User contributions for 99.142.8.116

1 September 2009

• 17:3717:37, 1 September 2009 diff hist +36 Susan Roesgen adding proper tag according to WP:CITE (If we can't reference the Date, Title, Affiliation - not even the Award itself is Named or Linked - we do not have a citation. Tag is appropriate)
• 17:3017:30, 1 September 2009 diff hist −14 Susan Roesgen →2009 Chicago Tea Party: We do not make things up. "Others" do not exist unless cited and referenced.
• 17:2817:28, 1 September 2009 diff hist +481 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Notability: Abuse of power in furtherance of your displayed political bias is a violation of Wiki policy, and more importantly, principle.
• 16:2516:25, 1 September 2009 diff hist +536 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Notability: As you seem bent on discussing things other than content and have yet to support your vague accusations and implied malignment of your fellow editors good faith efforts to improve thi
• 16:1616:16, 1 September 2009 diff hist +408 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Appearance of POV and "the type of article it appears that" Gamaliel and Xenophrenic wish to write.: new section
• 14:5814:58, 1 September 2009 diff hist +9 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career
• 14:5514:55, 1 September 2009 diff hist +19 Talk:Susan Roesgen Undid revision 311284436 by Ipsoko (talk)removed specific attack
• 14:5014:50, 1 September 2009 diff hist +137 N User talk:Ipsoko ←Created page with 'Welcome to wikipedia. ~~~~'
• 14:4514:45, 1 September 2009 diff hist −48 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Notability: (Removed uncivil attack on good faith of fellow editor)
• 14:0114:01, 1 September 2009 diff hist +150 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Bush = Hitler-Satan / Obama ≠ Fascist
• 02:2402:24, 1 September 2009 diff hist +9 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?: (rephrased) uncivil personal attack removed
• 02:2202:22, 1 September 2009 diff hist −44 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?: (removed uncivil attack)
• 02:2102:21, 1 September 2009 diff hist +680 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Notability: hat the notability of a subject is derived from a prominent and widely remarked upon incident is more the rule than the exception for many articles. We do not fluff out and bury the n
• 02:1002:10, 1 September 2009 diff hist +373 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?: Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When
• 02:0102:01, 1 September 2009 diff hist +21 Talk:Susan Roesgen →CNN Frank Sesno Transcript critical of Roesgen "debating him, which is a problem"; supportive of her challenging him: Then let us restore it properly to the original
• 00:4900:49, 1 September 2009 diff hist +764 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Reference Clarification Request - Un-linked New Orleans Times-Picayune ref's not found in papers Archive: new section
• 00:3800:38, 1 September 2009 diff hist −69 Talk:Susan Roesgen →CNN Frank Sesno Transcript critical of Roesgen "debating him, which is a problem"; supportive of her challenging him
• 00:2800:28, 1 September 2009 diff hist +331 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?: We do not ignore unsupported claims. Nothing has been referenced to even support the existence of any such award.
• 00:2500:25, 1 September 2009 diff hist +17 Susan Roesgen If we can't cite the Date, Title, Affiliation - not even the award itself is named or linked - we do not have a citation. Tag is appropriate, Vague, unsupported claims need ref - no proper ref exists

31 August 2009

• 23:2923:29, 31 August 2009 diff hist +292 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?: On what basis do you claim that "''the award is clearly supported by the reference''"?
• 23:2523:25, 31 August 2009 diff hist +17 Susan Roesgen Undid revision 311172625 by Gamaliel (talk) I disagree - no proper ref exists yet and a cite is required. Need Date, Place, Title,
• 22:5222:52, 31 August 2009 diff hist +36 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: cite tag as per talk - need to support this with name of award, when award given, affiliation, title, etc...basic ref material
• 22:5022:50, 31 August 2009 diff hist +345 Talk:Susan Roesgen As you have no reliable citation as to, "Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?" and are requesting assistance I will leave the un-cited info in the article but return the cite tag to th
• 21:2921:29, 31 August 2009 diff hist +64 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Susan Roesgen won a Louisiana Associated Press Award for her reporting in Israel: Focused topic of discussion - Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?
• 21:2721:27, 31 August 2009 diff hist +456 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Susan Roesgen won a Louisiana Associated Press Award for her reporting in Israel
• 21:1321:13, 31 August 2009 diff hist −32 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: no source for announcer claim
• 21:1221:12, 31 August 2009 diff hist +2 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career
• 20:5920:59, 31 August 2009 diff hist +22 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: identified WWNO as a member of NPR.
• 20:5820:58, 31 August 2009 diff hist −72 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: Do not misinterprate NPR - employees of WWNO are not employees of NPR.
• 20:5320:53, 31 August 2009 diff hist +262 Talk:Susan Roesgen o the editor that removed the {{Citation needed|date=August 2009}} Tag. Where is this cited? Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?
• 19:5419:54, 31 August 2009 diff hist −49 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: removed NPR, ref (her station bio) makes no claim that she was employed as a reporter for NPR. NPR has no record of her. Timeline has no place where NPR could have been.
• 16:0916:09, 31 August 2009 diff hist +36 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: Added Citation Needed Tag. Which Award? What Story? Employer/Affiliation? When?
• 16:0816:08, 31 August 2009 diff hist +1,391 Susan Roesgen Undid revision 311099865 by Xenophrenic (talk)Excessive gutting of article content - wholly unacceptable
• 16:0216:02, 31 August 2009 diff hist −131 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: Removed plagiarized text. Tag: references removed
• 15:5915:59, 31 August 2009 diff hist −345 Susan Roesgen o→2009 Chicago Tea Party: Removed Cherry-picked quote as per Xeno Tag: references removed
• 15:5415:54, 31 August 2009 diff hist −2 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Bush = Hitler-Satan / Obama ≠ Fascist: Don't refactor the discussion.
• 14:1514:15, 31 August 2009 diff hist +184 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Bush = Hitler-Satan / Obama ≠ Fascist: Good edit. Well supported, logical, concise and eminently reasonable. ~~~~
• 14:0514:05, 31 August 2009 diff hist +246 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Notability
• 13:2413:24, 31 August 2009 diff hist +9 Susan Roesgen →CNN: corrected description of NYT's columnist
• 12:5012:50, 31 August 2009 diff hist +343 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Notability: It is ''un''-encyclopedic and absurd to list stories that a reporter has reported. It adds undue weight and infers an importance which does not exist.
• 12:4412:44, 31 August 2009 diff hist −148 Susan Roesgen Undid revision 311028894 by Xenophrenic (talk)Revert as discussion is taking place on talk page. Tag: references removed
• 03:1803:18, 31 August 2009 diff hist +867 Talk:Susan Roesgen →Notability: The article is largely a regurgitation, and at times outright plagiarized copy, of three nearly identical self-written bios.
• 02:3802:38, 31 August 2009 diff hist −34 Susan Roesgen →Early life and career: removed plagerized text. removed use of word "eventually" twice in same sentence.

30 August 2009

• 12:3512:35, 30 August 2009 diff hist −14 Susan Roesgen →2009 Chicago Tea Party: Removed unsupported remark "Others"