User contributions for 71.126.152.253
Results for 71.126.152.253 talk block log logs global block log filter log
17 May 2014
12 May 2014
- 21:1421:14, 12 May 2014 diff hist +63 Dinesh Patel made it more detailed and extensive
13 November 2013
- 03:5403:54, 13 November 2013 diff hist +597 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: In order for this process to change, we need an extended period where no new admins are being promoted, so no candidates for a while is actually a good thing
11 November 2013
- 17:0517:05, 11 November 2013 diff hist +749 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: My 2 cents
- 15:0215:02, 11 November 2013 diff hist −2 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: move comment up
- 14:5514:55, 11 November 2013 diff hist +1,692 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: Reply
- 12:0912:09, 11 November 2013 diff hist +1,450 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: Reply
10 November 2013
- 18:0718:07, 10 November 2013 diff hist +163 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: Reply to Binksternet
- 15:0415:04, 10 November 2013 diff hist +568 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: Reply
- 01:3401:34, 10 November 2013 diff hist +1,416 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: Reply
9 November 2013
- 23:1723:17, 9 November 2013 diff hist +1,896 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: (ec) Reply
- 20:0720:07, 9 November 2013 diff hist +2,226 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: Reply
- 15:5715:57, 9 November 2013 diff hist +665 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: Reply
- 13:5413:54, 9 November 2013 diff hist +825 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: This discussion is just a waste of time like all the others in the past
8 November 2013
- 11:4511:45, 8 November 2013 diff hist +744 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Participation in reform: My 2cents
7 November 2013
- 12:0212:02, 7 November 2013 diff hist −99 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Experimental Re-runs: fix
- 12:0112:01, 7 November 2013 diff hist +2,617 Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship →Experimental Re-runs: Comment
27 October 2013
- 01:2101:21, 27 October 2013 diff hist +610 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Stupid that I have to post here re this bot...: Comment
26 October 2013
- 19:1319:13, 26 October 2013 diff hist +409 User talk:Jimbo Wales →It's high time Wikipedia governance was reformed: Might be some value in parts of the plan though
14 October 2013
- 02:1302:13, 14 October 2013 diff hist +769 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Why do the Collaboration areas of WikiProjects always fail?: Reply
13 October 2013
- 22:5122:51, 13 October 2013 diff hist +1,318 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Oversimplification misfires: Reply to Sphilbrick
- 18:0118:01, 13 October 2013 diff hist +1,352 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Why do the Collaboration areas of WikiProjects always fail?: Reply
12 October 2013
- 23:0123:01, 12 October 2013 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. counties inactive
- 22:5922:59, 12 October 2013 diff hist −3 Wikipedia:WikiProject Superfund inactive
- 18:4018:40, 12 October 2013 diff hist −3 Wikipedia:WikiProject KYOVA Region inactive
- 18:3918:39, 12 October 2013 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:WikiProject Franco-Americans inactive
- 18:3818:38, 12 October 2013 diff hist −3 Wikipedia:WikiProject FBI inactive
- 18:3718:37, 12 October 2013 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:WikiProject Asian Americans inactive
- 18:3718:37, 12 October 2013 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:WikiProject American music inactive
- 18:3218:32, 12 October 2013 diff hist +6 Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/New Orleans task force inactive
- 18:3118:31, 12 October 2013 diff hist +55 Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/Shreveport task force inactive
- 18:3018:30, 12 October 2013 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:WikiProject Kentucky/Eastern Mountain Coal Fields task force inactive
- 18:2818:28, 12 October 2013 diff hist +55 Wikipedia:WikiProject Texas/Austin task force Inactive
- 15:4915:49, 12 October 2013 diff hist +543 User talk:GoingBatty →Opting in to VisualEditor: Reply
- 14:1314:13, 12 October 2013 diff hist +651 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →Admin bot: My 2 cents
- 02:2402:24, 12 October 2013 diff hist +418 User talk:ChrisGualtieri →WikiProject United States: new section
11 October 2013
- 23:2923:29, 11 October 2013 diff hist +950 Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) →Why do the Collaboration areas of WikiProjects always fail?: My 2 cents
- 22:0322:03, 11 October 2013 diff hist +339 User talk:71.126.152.253 →Interesting comments: Reply
- 02:5802:58, 11 October 2013 diff hist +143 Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard →Desysopping: I feel the same way
10 October 2013
- 11:1411:14, 10 October 2013 diff hist +1 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Adminship table of yearly counts: Fix indent
- 11:1411:14, 10 October 2013 diff hist +795 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Adminship table of yearly counts: reply
- 00:4400:44, 10 October 2013 diff hist +1,146 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Adminship table of yearly counts: Reply to Kudpung
9 October 2013
- 23:4423:44, 9 October 2013 diff hist +600 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Adminship table of yearly counts: No I think your right, in general the community doesn't care
- 22:5622:56, 9 October 2013 diff hist +643 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Adminship table of yearly counts: Reply to Kudpung
- 13:1713:17, 9 October 2013 diff hist +97 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Adminship table of yearly counts: Also
- 13:0813:08, 9 October 2013 diff hist +188 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Adminship table of yearly counts: Because they wouldn't pass
- 01:3601:36, 9 October 2013 diff hist +314 User talk:Liz →Why don't you run for admin: new section
- 01:2601:26, 9 October 2013 diff hist +356 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Fixing broken 2013 RfA process: Reply to Liz
- 01:1301:13, 9 October 2013 diff hist +1,079 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Community engagement strategy: Reply
8 October 2013
- 22:0822:08, 8 October 2013 diff hist +711 Wikipedia talk:Flow →Community engagement strategy: Reply