User contributions for 207.229.183.131
Results for 207.229.183.131 talk block log logs global block log filter log
18 September 2007
- 03:3603:36, 18 September 2007 diff hist +59 Seleucid Empire Perspective: Seleucus attempted to capture territory east of the Indus after all, but failed.
17 September 2007
- 04:1704:17, 17 September 2007 diff hist +7 History of the Indo-Greek Kingdom →Eastern territories
- 04:1604:16, 17 September 2007 diff hist +7 Timeline of Indo-Greek kingdoms →Eastern territories
- 04:1304:13, 17 September 2007 diff hist +20 Taxila →History: chandragupta reference deserves its own bullet
- 04:1104:11, 17 September 2007 diff hist −248 Taxila →History: no references listed. unclear and unsupported statement removed.
- 02:1802:18, 17 September 2007 diff hist −700 Chalukya dynasty No, it's baseless speculation. phg is clogging up articles with eurocentric drivel. this "theory was rejected' because there is no scholarly basis for it. stop wasting people's time with your biases.
- 02:1202:12, 17 September 2007 diff hist −3,649 Indo-Greek Kingdom RV- PHG ignoring question. Why not have 3 separate maps to show different views? clearly some scholars believe indo greek territory was essentially restricted to pakistan. ur map doesn't show that.
16 September 2007
- 01:5301:53, 16 September 2007 diff hist +212 User talk:Windy City Dude No edit summary
- 01:5101:51, 16 September 2007 diff hist +853 Talk:Indo-Greek Kingdom →MAPS: THE RESURRECTION
- 01:4401:44, 16 September 2007 diff hist +327 Talk:Indo-Greek Kingdom →Genetic contribution
- 00:0400:04, 16 September 2007 diff hist −2 Kapu (caste) sp (agragarians)
15 September 2007
- 14:2214:22, 15 September 2007 diff hist −722 Indo-Greek Kingdom This is not vandalism. See discussion. User phg has illegally combined three maps (all questionable in their historicity). Wikipedia should not allow such an egregious flouting of the rules.
- 04:2904:29, 15 September 2007 diff hist −92 Kumaragupta I see previous
- 04:2804:28, 15 September 2007 diff hist −496 Kumaragupta I see previous
- 04:2604:26, 15 September 2007 diff hist −495 Kumaragupta I removed original research
- 04:2104:21, 15 September 2007 diff hist −511 Chandragupta II removed original research
- 04:1504:15, 15 September 2007 diff hist +159 Gupta Empire Although the Han period was certainly an important period in world history, it does not represent the cultural high point that the Tang does.
- 04:1104:11, 15 September 2007 diff hist −702 Gupta Empire →Chandragupta II: see previous
- 04:0904:09, 15 September 2007 diff hist −508 Gupta Empire →Kumaragupta I
6 September 2007
- 21:1421:14, 6 September 2007 diff hist −1,291 Yamuna →Ancient history: removed erroneous fanwank. seleucus did not campaign by the yamuna.
- 21:1321:13, 6 September 2007 diff hist −39 Kannauj →History: removed fanwank