User contributions for 185.51.8.40
Results for 185.51.8.40 talk block log logs global block log filter log
14 April 2019
- 20:5020:50, 14 April 2019 diff hist −1 User talk:Rusf10 →Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction: f
- 20:5020:50, 14 April 2019 diff hist +2 User talk:Rusf10 →Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction: f
- 20:4720:47, 14 April 2019 diff hist +2,032 User talk:Rusf10 →Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
15 March 2019
- 19:3619:36, 15 March 2019 diff hist −1,721 The Daily Caller So no talk page discussion, no evidence, just groups following each other and reverting until they get their way? If you actually took the time to review the TOS you'd see it says authors are SOLELY responsible for the content. That's textbook SPS Tags: Undo section blanking
- 19:0919:09, 15 March 2019 diff hist −1,721 The Daily Caller Undid revision 887912276 by Soibangla (talk) It says right on Reuter's site they don't have editorial control. Stop Tags: Undo section blanking
- 04:0104:01, 15 March 2019 diff hist −1,721 The Daily Caller Undid revision 887833485 by Soibangla (talk) Same junk sourcing you used on Tucker Carlson, a selfpublished BLOG is NOT RS Tags: Undo section blanking
- 03:1203:12, 15 March 2019 diff hist −1,675 Tucker Carlson Undid revision 887829328 by Comatmebro (talk) Calling someone a coke head with bad sourcing isn't "consistent with wp guidelines" Tags: Undo references removed
- 01:1801:18, 15 March 2019 diff hist −1,675 Tucker Carlson Need something better than a blog and a primary source Tag: references removed
14 March 2019
- 05:0405:04, 14 March 2019 diff hist −3,150 Steve Sailer Undid revision 887684960 by 74.103.152.134 (talk) yeah no this should stay out. Calling BLP exception to 3RR Tag: Undo
- 04:4504:45, 14 March 2019 diff hist −3,150 Steve Sailer Because it's BLP you should discuss vs revert. I agree the focus on VDARE in the lead is UNDUE. Lead is supposed to summarize the article proportionately. 2/3ds of the lead was VDARE but it's only a small part of the article. Also the two sources linking him were weak. BLP says the subject should be the FOCUS of the source especially for negative claims, here they only mentioned him in a sentence or two. Needs better sources and a big expansion of VDARE content to be DUE. Tag: Undo
- 04:3004:30, 14 March 2019 diff hist −3,150 Steve Sailer rollback with no edit summary. accident? Tag: Undo
- 04:1604:16, 14 March 2019 diff hist −3,150 Steve Sailer Lead should summarize the article per WEIGHT and VDARE is a small portion. Also BLP requires more than a passing mention which is all there is in the two sources. Tag: Undo