Wikipedia

Codex Zacynthius

Codex Zacynthius (designated by siglum Ξ or 040 in the Gregory-Aland numbering; A1 in von Soden)[1] is a Greek New Testament codex, dated paleographically to the 6th century.[2] First thought to have been written in the 8th century,[3] it is a palimpsest—the original (lower) text was washed off its vellum pages and overwritten in the 12th or 13th century. The upper text of the palimpsest contains weekday Gospel lessons (ℓ299); the lower text contains portions of the Gospel of Luke, deciphered by biblical scholar and palaeographer Tregelles in 1861. The lower text is of most interest to scholars.

Uncial 040
New Testament manuscript
Facsimile from Tregelles edition
Facsimile from Tregelles edition
NameZacynthius
SignΞ
TextGospel of Luke †
Datec. 550
ScriptGreek
FoundColin Macaulay, 1820
Now atCambridge University Library
CiteTregelles, Codex Zacynthius. Greek Palimpsest Fragments of the Gospel of Saint Luke, (1861)
Size36 cm by 29 cm
TypeAlexandrian
CategoryIII
Notetextually close to codex B

The manuscript came from Zakynthos, a Greek island, and has survived in a fragmentary condition. It was brought to England in 1821 and transferred to Cambridge University in 1985 which later purchased it after an appeal in 2014. It is often cited in critical editions of the Greek New Testament.

Description

edit

The lower text of the manuscript contains fragments of the chapters 1:1-11:33 of the Gospel of Luke. The codex consists of 86 thick, coarse parchment leaves and three partial leaves;[2][4] (36 x 29 cm).[5] The text was written in a single column with well-formed uncial script. The letters are large, round and narrow, without spiritus asper, spiritus lenis, or accents.[5]: 91  The manuscript was written by two scribes.[6]

Abbreviations are rarely used in the codex. The handwriting is very close to that of the Rossano Gospels.[7]: 137  Some itacism errors occur. It uses grammatical forms typical of the ancient manuscripts (e.g. ειπαν, ηλθαν, ευραν), which are not used in later medieval manuscripts.[7]: 137 

The codex uses a peculiar system of chapter divisions, which it shares with Codex Vaticanus (B) and Minuscule 579. A more common system divides the chapters according to their titles.[5]: 91  The capital letters at the section beginnings stand out in the margin as in the Codices Alexandrinus and Ephraemi.[5]: 91 

The text is surrounded by a marginal commentary; it is the only codex that has both text and commentary in uncial script. The commentary is a catena of quotations of nine church fathers: Origen, Eusebius, Titus of Bostra, Basil, Isidore of Pelusium, Cyril of Alexandria, Sever from Antioch, Victor from Antioch, and Chrysostom.[8]: 333  The commentary surrounds the single-column text of Luke on three sides.[9] Patristic text is written in small uncial letters. Most of the quotations are those of Ciril of Alexandria (93 scholia); next comes Titus of Bostra (45 scholia).[10][11] The commentary was written in a different kind of uncial script than the biblical text.[8]: 335 

Contents

edit

The book contains the following chapters and verses of the Gospel of Luke: 1:1-9,19-23,27-28,30-32,36-60,77; 2:19,21-22,33-3; 3:5-8,11-20; 4:1-2,6-20,32-43; 5:17-36; 6:21; 7:6,11-37,39-47; 8:4-21,25-35,43-50; 9:1-28,32-33,35; 9:41; 10:18,21-40; 11:1-4,24-33.[4]

Notable Readings

edit

Luke 9:55b–56a

καὶ εἶπεν, Οὑκ οἴδατε οἵου πνεύματος ἑστε ὐμεῖς; ὀ γὰρ υἰὸς τοῦ ἁνθρώπου οὑκ ἦλθεν ψυχὰς ἁνθρώπων ἁπολέσαι ἁλλὰ σῶσαι (and He said: "You do not know what manner of spirit you are of; for the Son of man came not to destroy men's lives but to save them)
omit - Ξ א‎ B C L Θ 33 700 892 1241 sy bo
incl. - Majority of manuscripts [12]: 190 

Luke 4:17

καὶ ἀνοίξας τὸ βιβλίον (and opened the book) - Ξ A B L W 33 892 1195 1241 ℓ 547 sys, h, pal sa bo
καὶ ἀναπτύξας τὸ βιβλίον (and unrolled the book) - א‎ Dc K Δ Θ Π Ψ ƒ1 ƒ13 28 565 700 1009 1010[13][12]: 164 

Luke 9:10

εις πολιν καλουμενην Βηθσαιδα (to a city called Bethsaida) - Ξ 𝔓75 B L 33 2542 sa bo
εις τοπον ερημον πολεως καλουμενην Βηδσαιδα (into a deserted place belonging to the city called Bethsaida) - Ξmg Majority of manuscripts[12]: 185 

Text-type

edit

The textual character of the codex is representative of the late Alexandrian text-type, and is similar to the Codex Regius.[4] Kurt and Barbara Aland gave the following textual profile of it: 21, 82, 21/2, 3s.[2] This means the text of the codex agrees with the Byzantine standard text 2 times, 8 times with the original text against the Byzantine, and with both the Byzantine and original text 2 times. There are 3 independent or distinctive readings. On the basis of this profile the Alands considered the quality of the text to suit his Category III.[2] According to the Claremont Profile Method, it represents the Alexandrian text in Luke 10 and mixed Byzantine text-type in Luke 1,[14] which probably indicates sporadic Byzantine corrections.[4]

Palimpsest

edit
 
The underwriting is 7th-century majuscule of Luke 3:7-8 with commentary; the upper writing is 13th-century minuscule of Matthew 26:39-51, part lection for Holy Thursday

The codex is a palimpsest, meaning that the original text was scraped off and overwritten and the parchment leaves folded in half. The upper text was written by a minuscule hand and contains lectionary 299 (ℓ 299) from the 12th or 13th century,[15] though the lectionary text is not complete; it is written on 176 leaves (28.7 cm by 18.2 cm), in one column per page, 33-36 lines per page.[16] Three folios are only the lower halves of leaves, one folio was supplied with paper (folio LXVIII).[17]: XII  The manuscript contains weekday Gospel lessons (Evangelistarium),[18] but is lacunose.[5]: 413  Tregelles did not collate its text because of its secondary value.[17]: XXIII Scrivener designated it by siglum 200,[19]: 341  Gregory by 299.[5]: 91 

The text of the lectionary is cited in some critical editions of the Greek New Testament (UBS3)[20]: XXVIII  in the following places: Matthew 10:4; 11:17; 12:47; 13:13; 14:22; 18:10; 22:30; 26:27; 28:9; Mark 1:27; 2:10.26; 4:16.20; 6:2.2.3.33.[20] It is not cited in UBS4.[21]

History

edit

Dating

edit

Tregelles dated the manuscript to the 8th century. Tregelles was aware that the handwriting is typical for the 6th century, but the handwriting of the commentary is much older. The letters Ε Θ Ο Σ are round, high, and narrow, and could not have been written before the 8th century. C. R. Gregory supported Tregelles's point of view. According to Nicholas Pocock, the manuscript could not have been written before the 6th century nor after the 8th century.[7]: 136–137 

William Hatch in 1937, on the basis of palaeographical data, suggested that the codex should be dated to the 6th century. It does not use breathings and accents and the text of the commentary is written in uncial script.[8]: 335–337  Aland supported Hatch's point of view.[n 1] This date is accepted by the majority of scholars.[2][4]

David C. Parker in 2004 argued that manuscript was written later than the 6th century, because it has a small number of square letters, and the handwriting is not typical for the 6th century. Some letters were compressed (Μ, Δ, Ε), the bar over the letter Τ is short and the letter Υ is written in several ways. According to Parker the manuscript should be dated to the 7th century.[22]

It is currently dated by the INTF to the 6th century.[16]

Discovery and further research

edit
 
Colin Macaulay, 1792, by John Smart, by permission of the Provost & Fellows of Kings College, Cambridge

The early history of the manuscript is unknown. In 1821 it was brought by General Colin Macaulay to England from the Greek island Zakynthos in the Ionian Sea, after being presented to him by Prince Comuto (Antonios Dimitriou Komoutos, 1748-1833) a former President of the Septinsular Republic. Comuto inscribed the Codex to Macaulay as a token of his esteem. On his return to England Macaulay presented the Codex to British and Foreign Bible Society[23] which then placed it in its library (Mss 24) in London.[5]: 91 

Scholz saw the manuscript in 1845, and Paul de Lagarde in 1853, but they did not decipher it.[5]: 91  The subtext of the Palimpest was partly deciphered, transcribed, and edited by the Rev. Tregelles in 1861.[15] Tregelles used types originally cast for printing the Codex Alexandrinus,[24] which only approximately represented the shape of the letters of the codex. The hand-written letters are smaller than the later letters. Tregelles included one page of typographical facsimile in this edition.[7]: 137  He did not decipher the small Patristic writing and doubted that it could be read without chemical restoration.[19]: 126 

Nicholas Pocock found errors in Tregelles' edition,[7]: 137  but William Hatch thought it satisfactory. J. Harold Greenlee corrected Tregelles' errors and edited the list of corrections in 1957,[25] which was examined by William Hatch. In 1959 Greenlee published a commentary.[9] The codex probably needs another examination with modern technology.[4]

 
Samuel Prideaux Tregelles

Tischendorf cited the codex in his Editio Octava Critica Maior in 564 places.[19]: 162  It is often cited in the critical editions of the Greek New Testament (UBS3,[20]: 11  NA26,[12] NA27[26]).

In 1985 it was loaned to the Cambridge University Library (BFBS Ms 213).[16] In December 2013, the Bible Society announced plans to sell some manuscripts, among them the Codex Zacynthius, to raise funds for a Visitors Centre in Wales. The University was given right of first refusal and had until February 2014 to raise the money to acquire the codex.[27]

The public appeal raised £1.1 million and the codex was purchased by the Cambridge University Library. A full spectrographic analysis was conducted and a definitive transcription of the Palimpest then published by Professor Hugh Houghton and Professor John Parker of the University of Birmingham.[28]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ UBS3 from 1983 dated the manuscript to the 8th century (UBS3, p. XVI.), but in the second edition of Der Text des Neues Testaments (1989) Aland dated it to the 6th century. NA26 from 1991 dated it to the 6th century (NA26, p. 693.).

References

edit
  1. ^ Gregory, Caspar René (1908). Die griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testament. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs. p. 36.
  2. ^ a b c d e Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-8028-4098-1.
  3. ^ Gregory, Caspar René (1907). Canon and Text of the New Testament. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. p. 361.
  4. ^ a b c d e f R. Waltz, Codex Zacynthius Ξ (040) at the Encyclopedia of Textual Criticism
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Gregory, Caspar René (1900). Textkritik des Neuen Testaments. Vol. 1. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs.
  6. ^ Parker, David C. (2009). Manuscripts, texts, theology: collected papers 1977-2007. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 114. ISBN 978-3-11-021193-1. Archived from the original on 2010-12-19. Retrieved 2011-10-08.
  7. ^ a b c d e Pocock, Nicholas (1881). The Codex Zacynthius. London: The Academy.
  8. ^ a b c Hatch, William (1937). "A Redating of two Important Uncial Manuscripts of the Gospels - Codex Zacynthius and Codex Cyprius". Quantulacumque: Studies Presented to Kirsopp Lake.
  9. ^ a b Greenlee, J. H. (1959). "The Catena of Codex Zacynthius". Biblica. 40: 992–1001.
  10. ^ Reuss, J. (1976). "Bemerkungen zu den Lukas-Homilien des Titus von Bostra". Biblica. 57: 538–541.
  11. ^ DiTommaso, Lorenzo; Turcescu, Lucian (2008). The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity: Proceedings of the Montréal Colloquium in Honour of Charles Kannengiesser. Brill. p. 261. ISBN 978-9004167155.
  12. ^ a b c d Aland, Kurt; Black, Matthew; Martini, Carlo Maria; Metzger, Bruce M.; Wikgren, Allen, eds. (1981). Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece (26 ed.). Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelstiftung. ISBN 3-438-051001. (NA26)
  13. ^ Metzger, Bruce Manning (2001). A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. p. 114. ISBN 978-3-438-06010-5.
  14. ^ Wisse, Frederik (1982). The Profile Method for the Classification and Evaluation of Manuscript Evidence, as Applied to the Continuous Greek Text of the Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 52. ISBN 0-8028-1918-4.
  15. ^ a b Metzger, Bruce Manning; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 83. ISBN 0-19-516667-1.
  16. ^ a b c INTF. "Codex Ξ/040 (GA)". Liste Handschriften. Münster. Retrieved January 23, 2016.
  17. ^ a b Tregelles, Samuel P. (1861). Codex Zacynthius: Greek Palimpsest Fragments of the Gospel of Saint Luke. London: Samuel Bagster and Sons. ISBN 9780837013060.
  18. ^ "Liste Handschriften". Münster: Institute for New Testament Textual Research. Retrieved 16 March 2013.
  19. ^ a b c Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (1861). A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament (1st ed.). London: George Bell & Sons.
  20. ^ a b c Aland, Kurt; Black, Matthew; Martini, Carlo Maria; Metzger, Bruce Manning; Wikgren, Allen, eds. (1983). The Greek New Testament (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: United Bible Societies. ISBN 9783438051103. (UBS3)
  21. ^ Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara; Martini, Carlo Maria; Metzger, Bruce Manning; Karavidopoulos, Johannes, eds. (2001). The Greek New Testament (4 ed.). Stuttgart: United Bible Societies. p. 21. ISBN 978-3-438-05110-3. (UBS4)
  22. ^ Parker, David C. (2009). Manuscripts, texts, theology: collected papers 1977-2007. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. p. 115. ISBN 978-3-11-021193-1. Archived from the original on 2010-12-19. Retrieved 2011-10-08.
  23. ^ Smith, C.F. (2019). A Life of General Colin Macaulay. Unknown Publisher. pp. 53–54. ISBN 978-1-78972-649-7.
  24. ^ Alford, Henry (1863). The Greek New Testament. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green & Co. p. 113.
  25. ^ J. H. Greenlee (1957). "A Corrected Collation of Codex Zacynthius (Cod. Ξ)". Journal of Biblical Literature. LXXVI (3): 237–241. doi:10.2307/3261574. JSTOR 3261574.
  26. ^ Nestle, Eberhard et Erwin (2001). Novum Testamentum Graece. communiter ediderunt: B. et K. Aland, J. Karavidopoulos, C. M. Martini, B. M. Metzger (27 ed.). Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. p. 58. ISBN 978-3-438-05100-4.
  27. ^ Cambridge University Library bids to purchase early Gospel manuscript Archived 2017-11-07 at the Wayback Machine, see also UK: Bible Society to sell important bible manuscripts
  28. ^ "Recovering the text of the earliest Greek New Testament Commentary manuscript".

Further reading

edit
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Codex_Zacynthius&oldid=1195382552"