The 2014 Michigan gubernatorial election took place on November 4, 2014, to elect the governor of Michigan, concurrently with the election of Michigan's Class II U.S. Senate seat, as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 41.6% 1.3 [1] | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Snyder: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Schauer: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Tie: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incumbent Republican governor Rick Snyder ran for re-election to a second term in office.[2] Primary elections took place on August 5, 2014, in which Snyder and former U.S. representative Mark Schauer were unopposed in the Republican and Democratic primaries, respectively.[3]
Snyder was considered vulnerable in his bid for a second term, as reflected in his low approval ratings.[4][5][6][7] The consensus among The Cook Political Report,[8] Governing,[9] The Rothenberg Political Report,[10] and Sabato's Crystal Ball[11] was that the contest was a "tossup". Snyder was saddled with a negative approval rating, while his Democratic opponent, former U.S. representative Mark Schauer, suffered from a lack of name recognition.[12][13] Despite having a more centrist voting record in the House of Representatives,[14] Schauer ran as more of a populist who put education, unions and taxes as his top priorities.[15]
Despite concerns about his approval rating hurting his chances at victory, Snyder was re-elected with 50.9% of the vote. As of 2024, this was the last time a Republican won the governorship of Michigan. This is also the last time the Republican candidate won the counties of Kalamazoo, Oakland, Clinton, Macomb, Kent, Leelanau, and Isabella, and the last time the Democratic candidate won the counties of Alger, Baraga, and Manistee. As of 2024, this is the last time that the winner of the Michigan gubernatorial election won a majority of Michigan's counties. This was the first election since 1990 that the winner was of a different party than the concurrent Senate election.
Republican primary
editPolling indicated significant opposition from Republican primary voters in Michigan towards Snyder's bid for re-election.[16][17][18][19] This came in the midst of discussions by the Tea Party network regarding whether incumbent lieutenant governor Brian Calley should be replaced as Snyder's running mate.[16][20] Snyder started running campaign ads in September 2013, immediately following the Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference[21] and formally declared that he is seeking re-election in January 2014.[2]
In August 2013, Tea Party leader Wes Nakagiri announced that he would challenge Calley for the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor.[22][23][24] At the Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference (September 20–22, 2013), speculation reported by the media also included Todd Courser as a potential challenger to Calley.[25] At the Michigan Republican Party state convention, which took take place on August 23, 2014, incumbent lieutenant governor Brian Calley won renomination.[26]
On January 3, 2014, Mark McFarlin (who had originally declared his intention to run as a Democrat the previous November), announced that he would be running for the Republican nomination.[27][28] He believed that his populist platform was too conservative for the Democratic ticket, and that he could get crossover support in the general election. However, he did not submit his filing petitions in time to qualify for the August primary ballot.[3]
Candidates
editDeclared
edit- Rick Snyder, incumbent governor of Michigan[2]
Failed to qualify
edit- Mark McFarlin, private investigator and Independent write-in candidate for governor in 2002 (had declared as a Democrat, then switched parties)[3][27][28]
Declined
edit- Mike Bishop, former Majority Leader of the Michigan Senate (running for Congress)[29]
- Todd Courser, Tea Party activist, candidate for the Michigan Board of Education in 2012 and for chairman of the Michigan Republican Party in 2013[30][31]
Polling
editPoll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder |
Dave Agema |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harper Polling[32] | September 4, 2013 | 958 | ±3.17% | 64% | 16% | 20% |
iCaucus Michigan[33] | August 26–30, 2013 | 744 | ± 4.08% | 32.39% | 42.34% | 25.27% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder |
Mike Bishop |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iCaucus Michigan[33] | August 26–30, 2013 | 744 | ± 4.08% | 36.83% | 24.19% | 38.98% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder |
Keith Butler |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iCaucus Michigan[33] | August 26–30, 2013 | 744 | ± 4.08% | 38.98% | 11.29% | 49.73% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder |
Betsy DeVos |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iCaucus Michigan[33] | August 26–30, 2013 | 744 | ± 4.08% | 40.59% | 18.41% | 40.99% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder |
Gary Glenn |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iCaucus Michigan[33] | August 26–30, 2013 | 744 | ± 4.08% | 39.11% | 30.78% | 30.11% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder |
Pete Hoekstra |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iCaucus Michigan[33] | August 26–30, 2013 | 744 | ± 4.08% | 47.04% | 21.77% | 31.18% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder |
Bill Schuette |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iCaucus Michigan[33] | August 26–30, 2013 | 744 | ± 4.08% | 31.85% | 38.44% | 29.70% |
Results
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Rick Snyder (incumbent) | 617,720 | 100 | |
Total votes | 617,720 | 100 |
Democratic primary
editMichigan Democratic Party leadership rallied support behind former U.S. representative Mark Schauer, who ran unopposed in the Democratic Party primary. Party Chairman Lon Johnson encouraged all other potential challengers to stay out of the race so as to avoid a costly and potentially bitter primary campaign.[35] Conservative Democrat and "birther" Mark McFarlin had announced on November 29, 2013, that he was running for the Democratic nomination for governor,[27] but he switched parties on January 3, 2014,[28] leaving Schauer as the only candidate for the Democratic nomination.
Candidates
editDeclared
edit- Mark Schauer, former U.S. representative[36]
- Running mate: Lisa Brown, Oakland County Clerk & Register of Deeds and former state representative[37]
Withdrew
edit- Mark McFarlin, private investigator and Independent write-in candidate for governor in 2002 (ran as a Republican)[27][28]
Declined
edit- John C. Austin, president of the Michigan Board of Education[38]
- Vicki Barnett, Minority Whip of the Michigan House of Representatives[39]
- Jocelyn Benson, dean of Wayne State University Law School and nominee for Michigan Secretary of State in 2010[35][40]
- Virgil Bernero, Mayor of Lansing and nominee for governor in 2010[41]
- Mark Bernstein, attorney and Regent of the University of Michigan[35]
- Mike Duggan, Mayor-elect of Detroit and former Wayne County Prosecutor[42]
- Mark Hackel, Macomb County Executive[43]
- Dan Kildee, U.S. representative[44]
- Gary Peters, U.S. representative (running for the U.S. Senate)[45]
- Bart Stupak, former U.S. representative[46]
- Gretchen Whitmer, Minority Leader of the Michigan Senate[47]
Polling
editPoll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Mark Schauer |
Bob King |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research[48] | May 28, 2013 | 361 | ± 5.16% | 31% | 38% | 31% |
Results
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Mark Schauer | 513,263 | 100 | |
Total votes | 513,263 | 100 |
Minor parties
editCandidates
editLibertarian Party
edit- Mary Buzuma, nominee for Michigan's 2nd congressional district in 2012[49][50]
- Running mate: Scott Boman, activist, former chairman of the Libertarian Party of Michigan and perennial candidate
Green Party
edit- Paul Homeniuk[51]
- Running mate: Candace Caveny, nominee for the state senate in 2006, 2008 and 2010 and nominee for the State Board of Education in 2012
U.S. Taxpayers Party
editIndependents
editCandidates
editDeclared
edit- Robin Sanders, retired from the United States Navy and the Michigan Department of Corrections[52]
General election
editDebates
edit- Complete video of debate, October 12, 2014 - C-SPAN
Predictions
editSource | Ranking | As of |
---|---|---|
The Cook Political Report[53] | Tossup | November 3, 2014 |
Sabato's Crystal Ball[54] | Lean R | November 3, 2014 |
Rothenberg Political Report[55] | Tilt R | November 3, 2014 |
Real Clear Politics[56] | Tossup | November 3, 2014 |
Polling
editPoll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder (R) |
Mark Schauer (D) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mitchell Research[57] | November 3, 2014 | 1,310 | ± 2.7% | 48% | 47% | 3%[58] | 2% |
Mitchell Research[59] | November 2, 2014 | 1,224 | ± 2.8% | 47% | 47% | 4%[60] | 3% |
Clarity Campaign Labs[61] | November 1–2, 2014 | 1,003 | ± 3.08% | 45% | 45% | — | 10% |
Public Policy Polling[62] | November 1–2, 2014 | 914 | ± 3.2% | 46% | 45% | 4%[63] | 5% |
47% | 47% | — | 5% | ||||
EPIC-MRA[64] | October 26–28, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 43% | 3% | 9% |
Mitchell Research[65] | October 27, 2014 | 1,159 | ± 2.88% | 48% | 43% | 3%[66] | 5% |
Glengariff Group[67] | October 22–24, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 40% | 5% | 10% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov[68] | October 16–23, 2014 | 2,394 | ± 3% | 44% | 45% | 1% | 11% |
Rasmussen Reports[69] | October 20–22, 2014 | 1,000 | ± 3% | 49% | 46% | 2% | 3% |
Public Policy Polling[70] | October 20–21, 2014 | 723 | ± ? | 48% | 48% | — | 4% |
Clarity Campaign Labs[71] | October 19–20, 2014 | 1,032 | ± ? | 41% | 44% | — | 15% |
Mitchell Research[72] | October 19, 2014 | 919 | ± 3.23% | 48% | 46% | 3%[58] | 3% |
EPIC-MRA[73] | October 17–19, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 47% | 39% | 3% | 11% |
Clarity Campaign Labs[74] | October 12–14, 2014 | 967 | ± 3.16% | 44% | 42% | — | 13% |
Clarity Campaign Labs[71] | October 11–13, 2014 | 1,032 | ± ? | 44% | 43% | — | 13% |
Mitchell Research[75] | October 12, 2014 | 1,340 | ± 2.68% | 47% | 44% | 3%[58] | 6% |
Mitchell Research[76] | October 9, 2014 | 1,306 | ± 2.71% | 47% | 46% | 4%[77] | 3% |
Glengariff Group[78] | October 2–4, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 37% | 3%[79] | 15% |
Public Policy Polling[80] | October 2–3, 2014 | 654 | ± 3.8% | 47% | 46% | — | 7% |
Marketing Resource Group[81] | September 30–October 1, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 46% | 41% | 4% | 10% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov[82] | September 20–October 1, 2014 | 2,560 | ± 2% | 44% | 46% | 1% | 9% |
Lake Research Partners[83] | September 27–30, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 44% | 43% | — | 12% |
Mitchell Research[84] | September 29, 2014 | 1,178 | ± 2.86% | 46% | 42% | 5%[85] | 8% |
EPIC-MRA[86] | September 25–29, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 39% | 8% | 8% |
Target-Insyght[87] | September 22–24, 2014 | 616 | ± 4% | 44% | 45% | — | 11% |
Public Policy Polling[88] | September 18–19, 2014 | 852 | ± 3.4% | 46% | 44% | — | 10% |
We Ask America[89] | September 18–19, 2014 | 1,182 | ± 3% | 43% | 43% | 4%[79] | 10% |
Rasmussen Reports[69] | September 17–18, 2014 | 750 | ± 4% | 47% | 41% | 3% | 9% |
Denno Research[90] | September 11–13, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 43% | 40% | — | 17% |
Mitchell Research[91] | September 10, 2014 | 829 | ± 3.4% | 46% | 41% | 7%[92] | 6% |
Suffolk[93] | September 6–10, 2014 | 500 | ± 4.4% | 43% | 45% | 4%[79] | 8% |
Public Policy Polling[94] | September 4–7, 2014 | 687 | ± 3.7% | 43% | 42% | 6%[95] | 9% |
46% | 44% | — | 10% | ||||
Glengariff Group[96] | September 3–5, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 44% | 42% | 3% | 12% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov[97] | August 18–September 2, 2014 | 2,897 | ± 3% | 44% | 43% | 1% | 12% |
Mitchell Research[98] | August 27, 2014 | 1,004 | ± 3.09% | 47% | 46% | — | 7% |
EPIC-MRA[99] | August 22–25, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 43% | 45% | — | 12% |
Lake Research Partners[83] | August 6–11, 2014 | 800 | ± 3.5% | 46% | 38% | — | 15% |
Mitchell Research[100] | August 5, 2014 | 626 | ± 5% | 47% | 42% | — | 11% |
Rasmussen Reports[69] | July 28–29, 2014 | 750 | ± 4% | 45% | 42% | 5% | 8% |
Marketing Resource Group[101] | July 26–30, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 44% | — | 11% |
CBS News/NYT/YouGov[102] | July 5–24, 2014 | 3,812 | ± 2.8% | 46% | 43% | 1% | 9% |
Mitchell Research[103] | July 7–17, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 43% | 39% | — | 17% |
EPIC-MRA[104] | July 12–15, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 46% | 43% | — | 11% |
Denno Research[105] | July 9–11, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 43% | 35% | — | 22% |
NBC News/Marist[106] | July 7–10, 2014 | 870 | ± 3.3% | 46% | 44% | 1% | 9% |
Public Policy Polling[107] | June 26–29, 2014 | 578 | ± 4.1% | 40% | 40% | — | 20% |
Mitchell Research[108] | June 6, 2014 | 961 | ± 3.16% | 46% | 41% | — | 13% |
Glengariff Group[109] | May 20–22, 2014 | 600 | ± 4.3% | 45% | 35% | — | 20% |
EPIC-MRA[110] | May 17–20, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 47% | 38% | — | 15% |
Hickman Analytics[111] | April 24–30, 2014 | 502 | ± 4.4% | 48% | 37% | — | 15% |
Magellan Strategies[112] | April 14–15, 2014 | 875 | ± 3.31% | 45% | 42% | 9% | 4% |
Mitchell Research[113] | April 9, 2014 | 1,460 | ± 2.56% | 49% | 37% | — | 15% |
Public Policy Polling[114] | April 3–6, 2014 | 825 | ± 3.4% | 43% | 39% | — | 18% |
Marketing Resource Group[115] | March 24–28, 2014 | 600 | ± 4.1% | 47% | 39% | — | 14% |
Denno Research[116] | March 9–10, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 42% | 39% | — | 20% |
Benenson Strategy Group[117] | March 4–7, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 42% | — | 9% |
Public Opinion Strategies[118] | March 2–4, 2014 | 500 | ± 4.4% | 45% | 36% | — | 19% |
Clarity Campaigns[119] | February 22–23, 2014 | 859 | ± 2.55 | 40% | 47% | — | 12% |
Target Insyght[120] | February 18–20, 2014 | 600 | ± ? | 47% | 38% | — | 15% |
EPIC-MRA[121] | February 5–11, 2014 | 600 | ± 4% | 47% | 39% | — | 14% |
Harper Polling[122] | January 7–8, 2014 | 1,004 | ± 3.09% | 47% | 35% | — | 18% |
Public Policy Polling[123] | December 5–8, 2013 | 1,034 | ± 3% | 44% | 40% | — | 16% |
Denno Research[124] | November 12–14, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 45% | 31% | — | 25% |
Inside Michigan Politics[125] | October 29, 2013 | 794 | ± 4% | 36% | 34% | — | 30% |
MRG/Mitchell Research[126] | October 6–10, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 50% | 36% | — | 14% |
EPIC-MRA[127] | September 7–10, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 44% | 36% | — | 20% |
Denno Research[128] | July 23–24, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 43% | 37% | — | 20% |
Public Policy Polling[129] | May 30–June 2, 2013 | 697 | ± 3.7% | 38% | 42% | — | 20% |
EPIC-MRA[130] | May 11–15, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 39% | 39% | — | 22% |
EPIC-MRA[131] | April 13–16, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 38% | 39% | — | 23% |
Public Policy Polling[132] | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 36% | 40% | — | 24% |
Public Policy Polling[133] | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 39% | 44% | — | 18% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder (R) |
Virg Bernero (D) |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling[132] | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 38% | 43% | 19% |
Public Policy Polling[133] | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 38% | 49% | 12% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder (R) |
Gary Peters (D) |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling[132] | March 2–4, 2013 | 702 | ± 3.7% | 37% | 44% | 19% |
Public Policy Polling[133] | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 39% | 47% | 14% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder (R) |
Bart Stupak (D) |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPIC-MRA[131] | April 13–16, 2013 | 600 | ± 4% | 39% | 38% | 23% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Rick Snyder (R) |
Gretchen Whitmer (D) |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling[133] | December 13–16, 2012 | 650 | ± 3.8% | 38% | 46% | 16% |
Results
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Rick Snyder (incumbent) | 1,607,399 | 50.92% | −7.19% | |
Democratic | Mark Schauer | 1,479,057 | 46.86% | +6.96% | |
Libertarian | Mary Buzuma | 35,723 | 1.13% | +0.44% | |
Constitution | Mark McFarlin | 19,368 | 0.61% | −0.04% | |
Green | Paul Homeniuk | 14,934 | 0.47% | −0.17% | |
n/a | Write-ins | 50 | 0.00% | N/A | |
Total votes | 3,156,531 | 100.0% | N/A | ||
Republican hold |
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic
edit- Alger (largest city: Munising)
- Baraga (Largest city: Baraga)
- Bay (largest city: Bay City)
- Eaton (largest city: Charlotte)
- Ingham (largest city: Lansing)
- Manistee (largest city: Manistee)
- Marquette (largest city: Marquette)
- Muskegon (largest city: Muskegon)
- Saginaw (largest city: Saginaw)
By congressional district
editSnyder won 9 of 14 congressional districts.[135]
District | Snyder | Schauer | Representative |
---|---|---|---|
1st | 54.0% | 43.28% | Dan Benishek |
2nd | 62.7% | 34.87% | Bill Huizenga |
3rd | 60.6% | 37.18% | Justin Amash |
4th | 55.1% | 42.05% | John Moolenaar |
5th | 39.95% | 57.59% | Dan Kildee |
6th | 55.91% | 41.21% | Fred Upton |
7th | 54.37% | 43.29% | Tim Walberg |
8th | 58.07% | 39.99% | Mike Bishop |
9th | 47.19% | 50.68% | Sander Levin |
10th | 59.08% | 38.42% | Candice Miller |
11th | 62.31% | 36.02% | David Trott |
12th | 41.27% | 56.53% | Debbie Dingell |
13th | 20.26% | 78.15% | John Conyers Jr. |
14th | 27.52% | 71.43% | Brenda Lawrence |
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "General Election Voter Registration/Turnout Statistics". Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- ^ a b c Oosting, Jonathan (January 30, 2014). "It's official: Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder launching re-election campaign with statewide tour". MLive Media Group. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
- ^ a b c "2014 Official Michigan Primary Candidate Listing". Miboecfr.nictusa.com. July 31, 2014. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
- ^ "Handicapping the 2013–2014 Governors Races: The Tossups". Governing. July 18, 2013. Archived from the original on August 5, 2013. Retrieved February 26, 2014.
- ^ "Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder raises $5M in 2013 for re-election bid". Daily Tribune. January 28, 2014. Archived from the original on March 4, 2014. Retrieved February 26, 2014.
- ^ "Which Governors Are Most Vulnerable in 2014?". Five Thirty Eight. April 8, 2013. Retrieved February 26, 2014.
- ^ Woods, Ashley (November 8, 2013). "Michigan Governor Poll Shows Close Race Between Rick Snyder, Mark Schauer". The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 12, 2013.
- ^ "Ratings". Archived from the original on March 5, 2013. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
- ^ Jacobson, Louis (July 18, 2013). "Handicapping the 2013–2014 Governors Races: The Tossups". Governing.com. Archived from the original on August 5, 2013. Retrieved July 25, 2013.
- ^ "Ratings". Retrieved September 6, 2013.
- ^ "Ratings". Retrieved September 6, 2013.
- ^ Oosting, Jonathan (December 10, 2013). "Poll: Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, Democrat Mark Schauer in close race ahead of 2014". MLive Media Group. Retrieved December 29, 2013.
- ^ Dickerson, Brian (August 28, 2014). "Brian Dickerson: Can Schauer avoid the Tomb of the Unknown Front-Runner?". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved August 28, 2014.
- ^ "Rep. Mark Schauer Former Representative for Michigan's 7th District".
- ^ "Old-style populism lives on in Michigan race". October 28, 2014.
- ^ a b "Snyder's approval rating gets boost from bankruptcy, Medicaid decisions". July 31, 2013. Archived from the original on September 27, 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2013.
- ^ "Poll says Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder vulnerable in a Republican primary". September 3, 2013. Archived from the original on September 17, 2013. Retrieved September 3, 2013.
- ^ "Snyder losing GOP support since Medicaid expansion". September 4, 2013. Archived from the original on September 17, 2013. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
- ^ "With Medicaid win, did Gov. Rick Snyder lose some Republicans? Tea party talks potential primary". September 5, 2013. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
- ^ "Lt. Gov. Brian Calley on tea party challenger: 'We have a competition for ideas' in Republican Party". August 26, 2013.
- ^ "Snyder gets jump on 2014 election, launches TV, internet campaign ads". September 24, 2013.
- ^ "Tea party leader Wes Nakagiri wants to replace Republican Lt. Gov. Brian Calley in 2014". August 26, 2013.
- ^ "Tim Skubick: Tea Party could be 2014 election headache for Gov. Rick Snyder". August 27, 2013.
- ^ "GOP poll says Livingston County's Nakagiri has shot at state's No. 2 post in 2014". September 5, 2013. Archived from the original on September 9, 2013. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
- ^ "Snyder gets top billing, but Calley in spotlight at Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference". September 21, 2013.
- ^ Egan, Paul (August 23, 2014). "GOP chooses Calley over Nakagiri for lieutenant governor". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved August 23, 2014.
- ^ a b c d "Off the Record – November 29, 2013 – # 4323". Off the Record – WKAR-TV. November 29, 2013. Retrieved December 10, 2013.
- ^ a b c d Oosting, Jonathan (January 3, 2014). "Michigan Political Points: 'Birther' Democrat goes Republican for primary against Gov. Rick Snyder". MLive Media Group. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
- ^ "Former Michigan GOP Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop: 'I'm not running for governor'". June 24, 2013. Retrieved June 27, 2013.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ "Tea Party Looking For Its Gubernatorial Candidate". September 21, 2013. Retrieved September 22, 2013. (subscription required)
- ^ "Tea Party Looking For Its Gubernatorial Candidate" (PDF). September 21, 2013. Retrieved September 22, 2013. (transcribed from original source)
- ^ Harper Polling
- ^ a b c d e f g iCaucus Michigan
- ^ a b "Official Election Results Primary Election August 5, 2014". Michigan Department of State. Archived from the original on August 15, 2014. Retrieved August 25, 2014.
- ^ a b c "Tim Skubick: Mark Schauer's announcement for governor seals the Democratic field". May 28, 2013.
- ^ "Democrat Mark Schauer to challenge Gov. Rick Snyder in 2014". May 28, 2013.
- ^ "Mark Schauer to announce Oakland County Clerk Lisa Brown as running mate". April 2, 2014.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ "Michigan Democrats rallying behind Mark Schauer for governor, with John Austin offering support". May 8, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
- ^ Gray, Kathleen (March 10, 2013). "Democratic nomination for governor is now Mark Schauer's for the taking". Detroit Free Press.
- ^ "King Leads Schauer for Democratic Nomination". May 29, 2013. Retrieved June 4, 2013.
- ^ Wittrock, Angela (March 20, 2013). "Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero won't run for governor, Senate or Congress in 2014". mlive.com. Retrieved March 21, 2013.
- ^ AlHajal, Khalil (June 25, 2013). "Tim Skubick: Mike Duggan's next step? Probably not a gubernatorial race". MLive.com. Retrieved January 8, 2014.
- ^ Selweski, Chad (January 17, 2013). "Mark Hackel preparing for marriage, not a run for governor". The Macomb Daily. Archived from the original on May 30, 2015. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
- ^ "?".
- ^ Bell, Dawson (November 10, 2012). "Several Democrats may challenge Snyder in 2014". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved November 17, 2012.
- ^ Skubick, Tim (April 15, 2013). "Tim Skubick: Bart Stupak's out... for now". Fox 2 News.
- ^ "Gretchen Whitmer says she won't run for governor in 2014". Detroit Free Press. January 30, 2013.
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ "Michigan Committee Statement of Organization". Michigan Secretary of State. May 17, 2014. Archived from the original on July 18, 2014.
- ^ "Libertarians hold party convention in Howell". Lansing State Journal. May 17, 2014. Archived from the original on May 27, 2024. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
- ^ a b "2014 Unofficial Michigan General Candidate Listing". Miboecfr.nictusa.com. July 22, 2014. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
- ^ "Third party gubernatorial candidate Robin Sanders focuses on public safety". Current State on WKAR-FM. June 17, 2013. Retrieved November 1, 2013.
- ^ "2014 Governor Race Ratings for November 3, 2014". The Cook Political Report. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
- ^ "The Crystal Ball's Final 2014 Picks". Sabato's Crystal Ball. November 3, 2014. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
- ^ "2014 Gubernatorial Ratings". Senate Ratings. The Rothenberg Political Report. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
- ^ "2014 Elections Map - 2014 Governors Races". Real Clear Politics. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ a b c Mary Buzuma (L) 1%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 1%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 1%
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Mary Buzuma (L) 1%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 1%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 2%
- ^ Clarity Campaign Labs
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ Mary Buzuma (L) 3%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 1%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 0%
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Mary Buzuma (L) 2%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 0%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 1%
- ^ Glengariff Group
- ^ CBS News/NYT/YouGov
- ^ a b c Rasmussen Reports
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ a b Clarity Campaign Labs
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Clarity Campaign Labs
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Mary Buzuma (L) 1%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 2%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 1%
- ^ Glengariff Group
- ^ a b c Mary Buzuma (L) 2%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 1%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 1%
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ Marketing Resource Group [permanent dead link ]
- ^ CBS News/NYT/YouGov
- ^ a b Lake Research Partners
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Mary Buzuma (L) 2%, Paul Homeniuk (G) <1%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 2%
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Target-Insyght
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ We Ask America
- ^ Denno Research
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Mary Buzuma (L) 4%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 1%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 2%
- ^ Suffolk Archived September 24, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ Mary Buzuma (L) 3%, Paul Homeniuk (G) 1%, Mark McFarlin (TP) 2%
- ^ Glengariff Group Archived September 10, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ CBS News/NYT/YouGov
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Marketing Resource Group
- ^ CBS News/NYT/YouGov
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Denno Research
- ^ NBC News/Marist
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Glengariff Group
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Hickman Analytics
- ^ Magellan Strategies
- ^ Mitchell Research
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ Marketing Resource Group
- ^ Denno Research Archived March 17, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Benenson Strategy Group
- ^ Public Opinion Strategies
- ^ Clarity Campaigns
- ^ Target Insyght
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Harper Polling
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ Denno Research Archived November 21, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Inside Michigan Politics
- ^ MRG/Mitchell Research
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ Denno Research Archived September 27, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Public Policy Polling
- ^ EPIC-MRA
- ^ a b EPIC-MRA
- ^ a b c Public Policy Polling
- ^ a b c d Public Policy Polling
- ^ "2014 Michigan Official General Election Results - 11/04/2014".
- ^ "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index". The Cook Political Report.
External links
editOfficial campaign websites (Archived)