Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Thunderbird2 (talk | contribs) →"New evidence" presented by Locke: Ohconfucius: please withdraw misleading statement |
Thunderbird2 (talk | contribs) m →"New evidence" presented by Locke: It was Greg_L himself who invented this piece of fiction |
||
Line 209:
:Coming from someone who repeatedly points to my three year old block log (which is totally unrelated to this) you'll forgive me for not taking you seriously. —[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 02:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
::I'm not convinced it would have made a squat of difference. [[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 05:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
::: To Ohconfucius: No one approached me to supply evidence. Please withdraw the statement to the contrary, as well as the clear implication in your statement that my evidence is less valid than yours. The purpose of my post is to make editors aware that the behaviour to which I refer is not a new problem. I cannot be held responsible for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FDate_delinking%2FEvidence&diff=265233587&oldid=265230967 misleading assertions] of others. [[User:Thunderbird2|Thunderbird2]] ([[User talk:Thunderbird2|talk]]) 17:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
==Statement by Lightmouse==
| |||