Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Opp2
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 03:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Opp2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Username of the puppet (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: D, E, F,
Replace this text with your explanation of your request for checkuser and examples of policy violations. Wikimachine 03:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Clerk note: Please provide a reason for a checkuser. Miranda 04:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- As per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Liancourt_Rocks/Evidence, there has been much evidence that there are sock puppetry going on to push POVish edits & to override consensus (violating 3RR). These same people did not limit their edits to Liancourt Rocks but several other articles interesting their nationalistic bias. Some of these sock puppets & masters have been participating in polls, and when their anon IP addresses or sock puppet accounts have been blocked they go onto a nearby public place to continue their disruption. Although users of both conflicting POVs seem to have committed SOCK, I have only enough time to get RFCU on only one side. (Wikimachine 20:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC))
Disputes between these editors are presently in arbitration. See, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks. Under the arbitration policy, this request should probably be deferred to the arbitrators. Newyorkbrad 15:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)