Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMD SD45T-2R

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TarnishedPath (talk | contribs) at 02:39, 17 November 2023 (→‎EMD SD45T-2R: add wikilink). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

EMD SD45T-2R (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be have been WP:REFBOMBed to make it appear more notable than it is. Review of the one source that is publicly accessible reveals that EMD SD45T-2R is not mentioned at all. Online searches for EMD SD45T-2R yield insufficient information to demonstrate notability, and mostly brings up results for EMD SD45T-2. I can not see how this passes WP:GNG. TarnishedPathtalk 07:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's another example of Rebuilt diesel locomotives besides its completely new y'know. 220.235.238.29 (talk) 07:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 220.235.238.29 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
There's proof here: EMD SD45T-2R: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
220.235.238.29 (talk) 08:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@220.235.238.29, that's not the proof you think it is. Please don't WP:GAME the system. TarnishedPathtalk 09:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am literally doing my best to try and spare this article and the GE U25BE article from deletion. 220.235.238.29 (talk) 09:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We need tons of sourcing for locomotive articles, the typical Kalmbach books generally aren't enough. We need extensive coverage from a museum study of the class, or a feature-length article in Trains or Railfan and Railroad... Oaktree b (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]