Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466/Workshop: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→User:Cirt is desysopped: it's hard probelm |
|||
Line 401:
::I strongly oppose this too. It is simply not supported by the evidence. Overkill. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 17:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
::I have been debating this in my head for months on whether this is an appropriate measure. Cirt has never to my knowledge or even been accused of misusing the tools at all. The one problem is it keeps coming back to this:
:::a) The Admin core is entrusted by the community to uphold project polices ''especially BLP.''
:::b) There seems consensus early in this Workshop session to topic ban Cirt from ''at least'' Scientology related BLPs.
:::c) Does it make sense to have Admin who are charged with upholding BLP have in their ranks an Admin under BLP restrictions?
::I don't know what proper solution is here. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth to have that scenario I just outlined in place at the end of this. [[User:ResidentAnthropologist|The Resident Anthropologist]] <small>[[User_talk:ResidentAnthropologist|(talk)]]•([[Special:Contributions/ResidentAnthropologist|contribs]])</small> 20:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
====Further related violations====
| |||