Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Jp7311 (talk | contribs)
Jp7311 (talk | contribs)
Line 398:
:*{{re|DBigXray}} I blocked {{noping|Jp7311}} for [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] earlier today. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 11:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 
Dear {{ping|Bbb23}}, {{ping|My_Lord}}, {{ping|Tamilmama}}, I would like to inform you that based on the above evidence, Admin {{u|El_C}} placed an indefinite block on Harshil169 from editing the Jaggi Vasudev page. Harshil169 then split this discussion and started a new one on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Partial_blocks/Noticeboard '''Partial blocks Noticeboard'''] where they canvassed their supporters to "build consensus" and the block has since been lifted. Yes all of this happened in a matter of less than 24-hours, while a block was on me for "personal attacks" for having accused Harshil169 of vandalism - despite presenting hard evidence. Anyways, what is more, they have misrepresented on the Partial Blocks Noticeboard the nature of what has been discussed on this page. And when I tried to contribute the facts there, deleted all my contributions! If any of you are inclined to "undo" their blanket deletion of my edits it would be good - as I am not blocked from editing there and perfectly within my rights as an editor to do so. It was their decision to split the decisiondiscussion. They are simply trying to confuse people and make this tedious for the Admins and 'prevail at all costs' that way. I personally have no skin in the game and am all for having this page be factual - if something was promotional it should of course be changed. But this kind of vandalism and libelous actions need to be checked, especially as there is an organized effort of several editors to keep it going. Thanks. - Jp7311
 
== Personal attacks and accusations of COI at [[Talk:WiTricity]], by [[User:Receptiondesk11]] ==