Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Death of Osama bin Laden merchandising: possibly not "an established troll" |
|||
Line 76:
When [[User:86.172.225.184]] posted his or her ideas to the "reactions to" article with his merchandising material[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reactions_to_the_death_of_Osama_bin_Laden&diff=next&oldid=427466023], [[User:Cambalachero]] immediately removed it for the same reasons I did. [[User:86.172.225.184]], in spite of several editors telling him or her "no" both politely and otherwise, responded with the dexterity of an experienced editor. At this point, I have no doubt that he or she is an established troll, long blocked from editing Wikipedia. If he or she persists, our best recourse will be to block him or her for disruptive editing and wasting our time. [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 13:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
:Since you have theatened to ban that ip personally, I am guessing that you are an Administrator. If so, then I think you are setting a pretty bad example - jumping to a wrong conclusion very rapidy, then being very rude and accusing that editor of all sorts of things without any kind of evidence. The topic was added to the "reactions to" article, in perfectly good faith, on the advice of another editor. Why do you persist in describing the links added for that topic as "his merchandising material"? Surely they are simply links selected ro demonstrate how offensive that material is. If the editor has added example links to on-line prescription medicines, would you accuse him or her of promoting those too? the occult? assisted suicide? Your conclusion that this editor is "an established troll" seems to just prove your very strong bias. You are being vey unfair. [[Special:Contributions/81.155.136.86|81.155.136.86]] ([[User talk:81.155.136.86|talk]]) 17:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#PDF_download_of_AfD_discussion]] ==
| |||