Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 37:
Hi! I hate to tell you, but you made a bad revert [[Special:Diff/717998414|here]] when you reinstated unsourced or poorly sourced information about a living person, which is clearly forbidden per [[WP:BLPREMOVE]]. To make it worse, you [[Special:Diff/717998417|warned]] the user who removed the content (granted, they didn't provide any reason for deletion). [[User:Politrukki|Politrukki]] ([[User talk:Politrukki|talk]]) 08:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
:Thanks for your message, {{u|Politrukki}}. As you correctly stated, the user did not give an edit summary regarding the content removal. For this reason, I reverted the removal of what appeared to be content containing references. All I need is a reason from a user removing a fairly large block of text. <span style="color:gray;">--</span>[[User:Non-dropframe|<span style="color:Orange;">Non-Dropframe</span>]] [[User talk:Non-dropframe|<span style="color:gray;"><u><sub>talk</sub></u></span>]] 17:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
My concern is that you're allowing a criticism section manned by two people to remain but my HIGHLY-sourced praise section got deleted. Sounds like a wiki editor LuckyLouie, to be exact, is letting his personal bias interfere with fair wiki editing.
| |||