No More Mr Nice Guy

Okay, I was trying to assume good faith, but now it's quite obvious. You just reverted an edit I made to [[Moses Montefiore Windmill]] claiming there was no source for the name Jaffa Gate Mill, even though there was. This being after you showed up to [[Tawfiq Canaan]], [[Present absentee]] and [[List of native plants of Palestine (A-D)]] (all quite obscure articles), it's clear to me that you are following me. I'm asking you to stop. Right now. If I see you editing directly after me at another page again, I will report you to [[WP:AE]] for stalking. K? [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 17:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:Also, I'd like to ask you for the record, do you or have you ever had another account at Wikipedia? [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 17:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:I won't be reporting right now. I've given you what I consider a final warning. Do not follow me anymore. Okay? [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 21:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:::The fact that every single one of your edits over the last ten days have been to articles I edited either directly before you did or that I had been working on extensively previously is no coincidence No More Mr Nice Guy. I've given you two warnings now, and if you edit directly after me at an article you have not edited previously again, I will file the report. This is not a threat. It's a fair warning. Take it or leave it. There are thousands of I-P articles, thousands of which I have not touched. I'm sure it will be easy to find some. The ball is in your court. [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 23:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:::::I won't be bullied into filing a report No More Mr Nice Guy. They are time-consuming and a waste of energy (just like this discussion). I've said what I want to say and you do what you want to do, and we'll see what happens in the future. Happy editing. [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 23:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

that is your 3rd revert on [[Palestinian right of return]]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 15:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:Actually, no, your first edit on the page was a revert. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 15:13, 21 August 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:Yes it was, you removed anothers work, that is a revert. It doesnt matter if you use undo. (and Ill remove what I feel like) <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 15:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

Fair warning, continue edit warring and AN3 is my next stop. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

::and again at 3 reverts on the same page. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 14:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:and now 3 reverts on [[Arab Capital of Culture]]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

what brought you to that article to restore the edit of a banned user? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 01:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:since you have not answered let me give you some things to read. You can start [[Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users|here]] and while you have the time also take a look at [[WP:HOUND|this]]. Try not to do either of those things in the future. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:::I thought the links would make clear what it is I am accusing you of. Wikihounding and editing on behalf of a banned user. And if you continue with such behavior I will take the issue to arbitration enforcement. Bye. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</font>

:::::Deny all you like, but the reason I dont go to AE is that I dont feel one article is big enough an issue to go through the process. Just dont do it anymore. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:I do have a case, and combined with Tiamut's it is pretty strong. If on any future article that you have never edited before you show up right after me I will take that case to AE. That isnt a threat, it isnt a warning, just a fact. Edit as you see fit, but do not go through my contributions to further whatever arguments you think we have. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 18:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:Nope, because there is a pretty big difference. The 4th Geneva Convention article is a major topic that many, many people who edit in the topic are have watchlisted so it would be very difficult for you to say anybody followed you there. But ''Paradise Now'' is an article on a movie that people rarely edit. And you also went there to reinstate the edit of a banned user. I have many human rights articles on my watchlist even if I have not edited them. But I highly doubt you had ''Paradise Now'' on yours, I doubt you even saw the movie or read a single source about it, I doubt you have even read the article. You went there for the sole purpose of reverting my edit and reinstating the edit of a banned user. There is the difference. And like I said, 1 more time and I will go to the next step in solving the issue. The idea here is to get you to stop such behavior before it becomes necessary for an admin to stop you from continuing with such actions. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 19:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:No, I would tell AE that you edited an article for the first time to reinstate the edit of a banned user immediately after me and did so twice. I would then show them your history of following Tiamut around. But that isnt the point, I am just asking you not to follow me around. Ending up on obscure articles just to revert me give that impression. Please just stop doing so. Aint that complicated. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 19:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

::::::done. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 01:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:The Help Desk is in my watchlist, and I thought I was being helpful. Guess not. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 14:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:::I fixed the citation, what else was there to answer? Whether or not it was good enough to begin with? But yes, I fixed the cite because you asked a question at the help desk. Normally people say thank you when that happens. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 14:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)</font></small>

:Hi No More Mr Nice Guy. I would like to work on two things regarding what has happened to Nableezy. On is to file an appeal of Sandstein's decision which I will begin in my user space shortly. The second, concurrent to this, would be opening a User RfC on Sandstein regading his abuse of his admin powers. I have asked Gatoclass for some advice on how to proceed. I hope he responds soon. When I have drafts up in my user space, I will be contacting you for feedback. I hope you will co-sign both the appeal and the User RfC. Also, check out Nableezy's talk page to see what has happened most recently and why these steps are absolutely necessary. Thanks. [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 19:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

:::You may not understand that in order to avoid being accused of canvassing, it is my responsibility to inform to all interested parties (all those who commented at Sandstein's page and Nableezy's of any intended initiative. I did not think you would support such an initiative, but you have the right to know about it, so that you can oppose, if that is what you wish to do. So thank you for your obscene commentary. And FYI, Nableezy has decided to file [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AE#Appeal_by_Nableezy an appeal at AE]. [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 21:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

:::::You responded to another editor's comments regarding Nableezy's ban on that page. If I misunderstood, and you do not want to be informed/involved in the discussions to follow, then you can simply disregard this message. Again, thank you for your commentary and have a nice day. [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 21:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 15:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

:I know you've received other reminders below already, but now that I see you've edited yesterday (or today, depending on time zone), I'd like to remind you once again that you're the last person we're waiting for on the mediation. Technically, the seven-day period expired Sunday, but it would obviously be much better for everyone if you explicitly stated your agreement or disagreement to the request. We don't want to keep waiting around guessing and, further, it would be a shame if the mediation were rejected because of your apparent disinterest when you really were interested in going forward with it (and it just slipped your mind, or you were busy, etc.). -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 03:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

:I should add as a final point that the proceedings of a request for mediation cannot be used against you in an ArbCom case or pretty much anywhere else. If necessary, the proceedings may be held off Wikipedia on a more private site. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 21:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

::Oh, I forgot to add that you can withdraw consent to mediation at any time. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 05:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

:Okay. I've told you all I needed to tell you. If you want to disagree with the mediation, you are well within your right to do so. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 19:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

:::Uh..... do what you want. This isn't a life-or-death decision. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 21:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

::::::My comments may be less welcome but I feel compelled to say this. If the mediation concludes, regardless of the conclusion, I will not mention the issue again. It is at least worth a try to get a discussion about this issue moderated by a disinterested party. Even if nothing is accomplished in terms of an agreement what have you lost? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 18:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)</font></small>

::::::::::::::::As far as I know nothing can be done to you for refusing mediation, you both can do what you want. Though I hope you would at least be willing to allow it to go through, even if you feel you want to withdraw at a later date. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 07:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)</font></small>

<small><div style="text-align:center; font-size:smaller;">This message delivered by [[User:MediationBot1|MediationBot]], an automated bot account [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|operated]] by the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please [[Wikipedia talk:Mediation Committee|contact the Mediation Committee directly]].</small></centerdiv>

[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Eden Natan-Zada]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''<fontspan facestyle="font-family:Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">Acroterion</fontspan>]] _{<small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">(talk)</fontspan>]]</small>}</fontspan>''' 12:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

:You violated 3RR, making four reverts in less than four hours. I've explained why my changes are necessary on the talk page. Please respect Wikipedia policies and guidelines (per [[MOS:IDENTITY]] and [[WP:3RR]]) and refrain from reverting again. [[User:Tiamut|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">T</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">i</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">a</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">m</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#B93B8F;">u</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#800000;">t</fontspan></b>]]^{[[User_talk:Tiamut|talk]]} 12:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

:::BRD does not trump 3RR. You are equally obligated to initiate a discussion, and you are in no way exempt from 3RR. '''<fontspan facestyle="font-family:Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">Acroterion</fontspan>]] _{<small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">(talk)</fontspan>]]</small>}</fontspan>''' 13:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

:::::One person's "tag-teaming" can be another person's consensus; it's easy to lose perspective. I've seen too many people who should know better find themselves on the wrong side of 3RR this way. I don't recall how I came across this, probably via noticing an edit summary in the recent edits page, which made me take a closer look. You'd be surprised at what comes up that way. '''<fontspan facestyle="font-family:Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">Acroterion</fontspan>]] _{<small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">(talk)</fontspan>]]</small>}</fontspan>''' 13:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

*In relation to the above, you are informed that the [[Richard Goldstone]] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Teal"; face="font-family:Tahoma;">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</fontspan>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Navy"; face= "font-family:Times New Roman;">Penny for your thoughts? </fontspan>]] 21:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I see you're having a spot of bother. Any idea who the sockmaster is? Meanwhile, stick to 1RR if you can (obviously I'm not going to block you for reverting on genuine BLP concerns) and, if you need a quick, uncontroversial block for a breach, ping my talk page. I decided against full protection, because it was easier to block the only autoconfirmed agressor, but if there are more of them, I might reconsider. Anyway, just stopping by to make the offer (of course ANEW and AE are open as normal). [[User:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Teal"; face="font-family:Tahoma;">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</fontspan>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Navy"; face= "font-family:Times New Roman;">Penny for your thoughts? </fontspan>]] 04:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.<!-- Template:Reviewer granted --> [[User:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Teal"; face="font-family:Tahoma;">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</fontspan>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Navy"; face= "font-family:Times New Roman;">Penny for your thoughts? </fontspan>]] 01:02, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

[[User:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Teal"; face="font-family:Tahoma;">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</fontspan>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Navy"; face= "font-family:Times New Roman;">Penny for your thoughts? </fontspan>]] 01:02, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Since those socks look they're going to keep coming, I've put the article on level 2 pending changes. This means that any edit by anybody who doesn't have the reviewer permission will have to wait for a review by a reviewer or admin before their edit appears in the "stable version". Hence the above{{mdash}}I figured you might need them. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Teal"; face="font-family:Tahoma;">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</fontspan>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Navy"; face= "font-family:Times New Roman;">Penny for your thoughts? </fontspan>]] 01:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

:I've a feeling they might come back. I'll give it a day or two and if there's no sign of them returning, I'll unprotect it. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Teal"; face="font-family:Tahoma;">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</fontspan>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Navy"; face= "font-family:Times New Roman;">Penny for your thoughts? </fontspan>]] 01:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

It wasn't intentional... honestly! I discovered something strange and I don't recall anything else. Feel free to contest.--'''''^{[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:maroon;">The Master</fontspan>]]} _{[[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">of Mayhem</fontspan>]]}''''' 20:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

I didn't put "i wished hitler died" there. In fact, I was the one '''''reverting''''' the vandalism, not causing it. It was a false warning.--'''''^{[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:maroon;">The Master</fontspan>]]} _{[[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">of Mayhem</fontspan>]]}''''' 20:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Here's the story. I was reverting vandalism with Twinkle, but someone edited while rolling back meaning it had no power. Therefore, I removed some of the vandalism myself but I got caught up in an edit conflict. I still removed the "La Waffle" bit but didn't notice the "i wish hitler died". The "false" warning caused me to explode- my wikimood will display that. Sorry for bothering you.--'''''^{[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:maroon;">The Master</fontspan>]]} _{[[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">of Mayhem</fontspan>]]}''''' 06:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

OK- I have not done wrongdoing- slap the user who issued the warning with a trout.--'''''^{[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:maroon;">The Master</fontspan>]]} _{[[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">of Mayhem</fontspan>]]}''''' 09:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Can I do something about it- I'll retire indefinitely if you don't get this straight.--'''''^{[[User:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:maroon;">The Master</fontspan>]]} _{[[User talk:The Master of Mayhem|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">of Mayhem</fontspan>]]}''''' 10:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

This message is to inform you that I have initiated an administrator review of the recent editing at {{La|Old City (Jerusalem)}} and other problematic I/P articles. This review will result in any editors whose conduct is disruptive being sanctioned under the provision of [[WP:ARBPIA#Discretionary sanctions]]. You are welcome to participate in the review, which is located at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Israel/Palestine articles generally]]. Regards, [[User talk:AGK|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">'''AGK'''</fontspan>]]<small> <nowiki>[</nowikI>[[User:AGK|&bull;]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></small> 13:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adora,_Har_Hebron&diff=437579039&oldid=437577768 this] edit, you removed a line on the illegality of the settlement under international law. I assume that this was simply a mistake by you and as such I have come here instead of AE. I am sure you are aware that [[WT:Legality of Israeli settlements]] established a consensus for the inclusion of the line that you removed, and further that [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive74#Shuki|an editor was topic banned]] over the same disregard for that consensus. Kindly restore the material in a timely fashion. Thank you. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)</small>

::All material in articles must be cited to reliable sources. Any material that is not cited to a verifiable reliable source may be removed. My edit was in now way "illegitimate". Your edit did much more than revert the removal of material that was not cited. Your comment that you have never removed the line is simply astonishing, as the edit you made did 2 things; remove that line, and re-add the other line, though you added the source. But as you gave your consent for me to restore the line, I will do so. Bye. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 19:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC)</small>

::::I dont recognize any such history, and it is not "illegitimate" to remove, lets go with the favorite phrase of one of your friends, "contentious material" that is not cited to any source. That it remained uncited for months, or years, does not change the fact that it required a citation and could be removed absent one. That it is "easily verifiable" does not change the fact that it was not cited to a verifiable source, which is a requirement for material in an "encyclopedia". You could have re-added the material with a source, nobody would have said one word. Instead you chose to also remove material cited a reliable source that you know has consensus for. What is "illegitimate" is the removal of material that is both cited to a reliable source and has an actual explicit consensus for. Next time, if you would like me to take something like this to AE just say no when I ask you to restore material you should not have removed. Ill take you up on the offer then. Arrivederla. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 19:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)</small>

::::::Keep reading that policy, up to at least the point where it says ''You may remove any material lacking a reliable source that directly supports it.'' Yes, I may place a cn template prior to doing so, but I am under no obligation to do so. There are requirements for material in articles, citing a reliable source is one of them. But you are side-stepping the issue. You seem to be arguing that my removal of an unsourced sentence justifies your removal of a sourced sentence, a sentence for which you know there is consensus. If you want to make that argument at AE that is up to you. You will no doubt see my upcoming edits, where I will be implementing the consensus regarding the material on the illegality of these colonies into various articles. If I happen across similarly uncited statements I will likely remove them. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 22:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)</small>

::::::::Amusing it would be indeed, especially when contrasted with the argument that [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adora,_Har_Hebron&diff=437579039&oldid=437577768 this] edit did not revert what I added. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 22:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)</small>

::::::::::Why thank you. I understand what you meant, that isnt the problem. The problem is what you meant is absurd. You '''did''' remove a sourced line that you know has consensus. You then tried to shift the discussion as to whether or not I performed an "illegitimate" edit by removing an unsourced line, an accusation that you have yet to retract despite having been quoted, from a WP policy, that editors ''may remove any material lacking a reliable source that directly supports it'', and you further ask that I not remove such material despite a policy explicitly says that I may. So, no, I wont be complying with your request, and in the future, when you wish to restore something do not also remove other material that is sourced and has consensus. Bye. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 00:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)</small>

Do you use, or have you used, any other accounts on Wikipedia? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 16:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)</small>

::I dont honestly recall if I had asked you before. I cant see anything on this talk page though. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 16:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)</small>

For the Mediation Committee, [[User:AGK|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">'''AGK'''</fontspan>]]<small> <nowiki>[</nowikI>[[User talk:AGK|&bull;]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></small> 21:54, 25 September 2011 (UTC)<br>

I understand this is a contentious article and is under the [[WP:1RR]] rule, to which I assume you are also required to abide, but I am curious as to why you deleted the category which I added, [[:Category:Conspiracy theorists]]. That is an obvious one if you have read the last section of the article in question. You don't have to (and shouldn't necessarily) delete everything wholesale. Yours, [[User:[email protected]|<fontspan colorstyle="color:orange;">'''''Quis separabit?'''''</fontspan>]] 03:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

:: Yes, meet me there. Ciao. [[User:[email protected]|<fontspan colorstyle="color:orange;">'''''Quis separabit?'''''</fontspan>]] 04:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated [[meta:Research:Wikipedia Dispute Resolution|research page]]. <fontspan facestyle="font-family:Verdana;">[[User:Steven Zhang|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#078330;">Steven</fontspan>]] [[User talk:Steven Zhang|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#2875b0;">Zhang</fontspan>]] ^{[[WP:DRP|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#d67f0f;">DR goes to Wikimania!</fontspan>]]}</fontspan> 22:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)</small>

I noticed this at the time, but thought it may be a violation to tell you then. Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mandatory_Palestine&diff=prev&oldid=498240130 this], you can use <nowiki>{{lang-langx|he|פָּלֶשְׂתִּינָה (א"י)}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{lang-langx|he|פָּלֶשְׂתִּינָה (&lrm;א"י)}}</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>{{lang-langx|he|פָּלֶשְׂתִּינָה &#x28;א"י&#x29;}}</nowiki>. The three are, as far as I can tell, displayed exactly the same.

#{{lang-langx|he|פָּלֶשְׂתִּינָה (א"י)}}

#{{lang-langx|he|פָּלֶשְׂתִּינָה (&lrm;א"י)}}

#{{lang-langx|he|פָּלֶשְׂתִּינָה &#x28;א"י&#x29;}}

The trick is to type out whatever you want in a program that does right-to-left text correctly, then copy and paste while typing out the template on wiki. It wont look right in the code because rtl end parenthesis will be read as coming after the last word, and in left-to-right after is to the right. Otherwise you can play around with the lrm control character. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::For you actually typing something, yeah Word or any other program that has a rtl font available, Wordpad might also work. Or, and this is what I usually just do, use the translate box in translate.google.com. Select the language you are typing in as the translate from, then just type out what you want, with the parenthesis how you want, and copy from there. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 00:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

Great spot. How the hell did you find that?! <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:AnkhMorpork|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#990000;">Ankh</fontspan></b>]]'''.'''[[User talk:AnkhMorpork|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#000099;">Morpork</fontspan>]]'''</small> 20:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Thoughts on who? We could do this off-wiki if you really, really want. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 02:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::I'd rather not include those who have been involved with AE, but I'll ask around. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 13:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

:::Better the devil you know...A rfc conducted by admins that are trusted and whose neutrality will not be called into question is probably preferable. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:AnkhMorpork|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#990000;">Ankh</fontspan></b>]]'''.'''[[User talk:AnkhMorpork|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#000099;">Morpork</fontspan>]]'''</small> 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

I've asked Avraham if he is willing to moderate the RFC, and if he has suggestions on who would be a good choice to be among those who close. If you want to ask him to forward you that email chain, I dont mind. Among the names that I am open to are: NYBrad (not sure a sitting arb will want to touch this though), Moonriddengirl, Black Kite, and MastCell. Problem with any of those? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::Sure, feel free to move this there. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 21:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

:::::NYB recused. I seriously doubt there will be three names that will both have widespread support (I dont think unanmity qualifies for even a pipe dream) and will be willing and able. Im not even sure how to go about ascertaining the level of support and either later or concurrently seeing the willingness to participate. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 06:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::::If I get to choose, I choose option 2. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::I'll throw out a name, Dennis Brown. To my knowledge, he has had no I-P involvement at all and strikes me as a patient and reasonable admin. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:AnkhMorpork|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#990000;">Ankh</fontspan></b>]]'''.'''[[User talk:AnkhMorpork|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#000099;">Morpork</fontspan>]]'''</small> 13:07, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

:::::This thread is quite amusing, it's much like jury selection. NMMNG, you've just used up two of your peremptory challenges.<small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:AnkhMorpork|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#990000;">Ankh</fontspan></b>]]'''.'''[[User talk:AnkhMorpork|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#000099;">Morpork</fontspan>]]'''</small> 13:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

::::::No. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::The admins that are active in the actual administering of the topic area at AE would lose any claim to impartiality or uninvolvement if they were to make what is essentially a decision on article content. I don't think you can close this discussion, either way, and continue being active in enforcing ARBPIA, unless we get a "no consensus" repeat. There isnt going to be a "consensus" based on the numbers. One "side" is going to line up one way, and the other "side" will line up the other way. The only way this gets settled is if there is some group that is able to decide which argument best applies the policies that actually matter (the content ones). For that decision to have legitimacy, it needs to be made by people who are regarded as capable and impartial by those most vested in the issue. But it also needs admins who are actually willing to make a decision, which is why I think NMMNG objections above are ill-advised, but thats his prerogative. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 06:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::I dont know that there actually is a large pool available. We need people that will make a decision, and that subset of admins is pretty limited. I knew MC would be objected to by somebody (not you), but I think the basis for that objection is spurious so I threw it out there. The objection to BK surprised me though. He or she has always struck me as one of the better admins around. But whatever, moving on, we dont have anybody that has agreed, and we dont have a list of people that we agree to, though I think we have one admin that nobody has objected to, Moonriddengirl (who hasn't responded yet). Who else you got for suggestions? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 17:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::::Then move on to the ones you think I would object to but that you think are fair and would be a good choice. You never know, I might surprise you. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 19:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::::And what you think about Xavexgoem? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 19:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::::::No and no. Sandstein is a "by the numbers" type of admin. I can almost guarantee that he will say no consensus for any of these types of discussions. Even looking at AfDs where he made a keep/delete decision, the rationale is based on the numbers (eg [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian drive-by shooting]]). I think he is fair, but I dont think he will be willing to make a determination of strength of argument as applied to WP policies. I'd rather not get into why I'd rather not have AGK as one of three here. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 19:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::::::::Very. I would say no to GWH for other reasons. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::::::::::Go for it. Though nobody has actually asked X and MRG hasn't yet responded. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::::::::::::::All right, fine. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 21:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

:::::::::::::Nableezy, by your lack of enthusiasm, I assume you're not keen on Ed or HJ Mitchell? Thoughts on Malik Shabazz? If this impasse continues, I am prepared to nobly shoulder the responsibility and and humbly offer myself for this onerous task ;-) <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:AnkhMorpork|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#990000;">Ankh</fontspan></b>]]'''.'''[[User talk:AnkhMorpork|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#000099;">Morpork</fontspan>]]'''</small> 21:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

::::::::::::::I like Ed, I think he is one of the better admins around. That doesnt change my view that an admin enforcing ARBPIA shouldnt come near a content decision in the topic area. Malik is an involved editor, he cannot take any admin actions in the topic area (and I like Malik too, more than most). <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 21:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

It isnt going anywhere on the IPCOLL page, I dont think anybody actually cares about actually settling the issue, or at least nobody is saying they care. I havent heard back from MRG yet either, about to ask X if he is interested. Ill try to think of who else would be good. Have a problem with asking xeno (but again, not sure a sitting arb will want to, though Brad's recusal was unrelated to arbcom)? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&action=view&limit=1&username=Fifelfoo Not an admin] <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:31, 19 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

MRG said she would be willing. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 05:31, 26 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

::I thought I already told you, but I guess not. Avi didnt want to participate in closing the discussion. He asked MRG and NYB for me (they were his suggestions, along with a few others). I am still hoping he will be willing to moderate the discussion, even if he doesnt want to close it. But I havent pressed him on that. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 22:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)</small>

John Carter? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 22:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)</small>

::Will do. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 18:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)</small>

::I wrote above that Avi already declined. And as far as admins go, Id take Avi against nearly every other one here. Ill say that to either "side", and people that I respect a great deal (namely Nish) would no doubt say the same. So SD, calmly let that go. Avi did what he thought right, and I for one am not going to question his judgment on the topic. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 18:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)</small>

Tznkai? <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 18:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)</small>

"B. Did an editor just seriously say she thinks she knows what the subject of this article meant and that's a reason to keep information out of the article?" - very confused... are you referring to me? I'm inclined to think not, since Carol is a female name and nothing about me indicates my gender, but just want to check. --<small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:teal;">Activism</fontspan></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<fontspan colorstyle="color:darkred;">1234</fontspan>]]'''</small> 02:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

<small>An original barnstar</small> <small style="border: 1px dashed;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Activism1234|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:teal;">Activism</fontspan></b>]][[User talk:Activism1234|<fontspan colorstyle="color:darkred;">1234</fontspan>]]'''</small> 23:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

::Pictures dont need to come from reliable sources, in fact it is rare that we can use a picture from a reliable source due to the fair-use requirements Wikipedia sets for using copyrighted works. See [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images]], specifically ''Reliable sources, if any, may be listed on the image's description page. Generally, Wikipedia assumes in good faith that image creators are correctly identifying the contents of photographs they have taken. If such sources are available, it is helpful to provide them.'' <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 01:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)</small>

::::I'm not sure whether situations are analogous. My concern in the case I think you are referring to was with unsourced contentious narratives being used in captions. I think it's [[Talk:Gaza_War/Archive_62#Refs_for_image_captions_and_caption_neutrality]]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#000000000;">Sean.hoyland</fontspan>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 05:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

::Can you please respond to the request for mediation already? The deadline to do so is fast approaching. Some of the participants listed there could be omitted due to their low involvement in the dispute, but you're not one of them. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 20:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:2px;">[[User:KoshVorlon|<fontspan style="color:blue;">&nbsp;'''K'''osh'''V'''orlon</fontspan>]].<fontspan style="color:white;background:blue;">&nbsp;'''W'''e '''a'''re '''a'''ll '''K'''osh ...&nbsp;</fontspan></span> 17:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">tariq</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">abjotu</fontspan>]]''' 20:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

:Hey guys. As an outside observer, there is no need for all this anger. I don't know what you are angry about, but just stop. Wikipedia is about making articles, and indexing human knowledge. It is ''not'' about getting into fights. Thanks. — '''[[User:Rosscoolguy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#088A08;">Ross</font color=#088A08span>]][[User_Talk:Rosscoolguy|<fontspan style="color=:#0489B1;">coolguy</font color=#0489B1span>]]''' 02:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeal]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal. If you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- This message generated from Template:AE_sanction.--> <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<fontspan style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]]</span></small> 22:27, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

<div class="center"><big><big><big>'''''[[Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/October2013|Books and Bytes]]'''''</big></big></big>

<p>Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013</p>

<p>[[File:Eurasian_Eagle-Owl_Maurice_van_Bruggen.JPG|100px]]

<p>by {{user|The Interior}}, {{user|Ocaasi}}</centerp></div>

<p>'''New positions:''' Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian</p>

<p>'''Wikipedia Loves Libraries:''' Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.</p>

<p>'''New subscription donations:''' Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??</p>

<p>'''New ideas:''' OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges</p>

<p>'''News from the library world:''' Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY</p>

<p>'''Announcing WikiProject Open:''' WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions</p>

<p>'''New ways to get involved:''' Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration<br/p>

<p><big>[[Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/October2013|Read the full newsletter]]</big><br/p><br>

<big><div style="text-align:center; font-size:larger;">[[Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Coordinators/Signup|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-progressive">Sign up now</span>]]</center></bigdiv>

For the Mediation Committee, [[User:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:blue; font-variant:small-caps;">'''TransporterMan'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|<fontspan facestyle="font-family:Trebuchet MS"; font-size="1:x-small;">TALK</fontspan>]]) 22:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)<br>

[[WP:AE#No More Mr Nice Guy]] <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#C11B17;">nableezy</fontspan>]]''' - 20:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)</small>

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision&nbsp;and for [[WP:ARBPIA]] 1RR violation as set out at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=780559447 AE], you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] (specifically [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|this section]]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the &#91;&#91;WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard&#93;&#93; or &#91;&#91;WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard&#93;&#93;. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me ([[Special:EmailUser/Sandstein|by email]]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.&nbsp;<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<fontspan style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]]</span></small> 21:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC) <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Standard provision: appeals and modifications|procedure instructing administrators]] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->

*I would decline the appeal. The argument that a revert is not a revert if it provides a requested source is mistaken, because no Wikipedia definition of "revert" exempts such reverts. Because Wikipedia does not have a "[[stare decisis]]" rule, any prior opinion by an admin to the contrary is not binding. Also, No More Mr Nice Guy could have made this argument in their defense at AE, but did not do so. The status of the consensus rule is not relevant here because 1RR was violated independently of it. If this appeal is to be considered further, it would need to be made at AE using the {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}} template. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<fontspan style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]]</span></small> 07:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

::::At the time of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=779873644#No_More_Mr_Nice_Guy your first statement], the complaint made it sufficiently clear that 1RR was the issue that you were able to make any self-reverts or arguments regarding it. The complaint was open for several days, enough time for you to make self-reverts or raise the arguments you do here. <p>You cannot edit AE while blocked, but an admin reviewing your unblock request can copy your appeal there if they think the appeal has merit. (But they are less likely to do so if the appeal is not in the format set out in {{tl|Arbitration enforcement appeal}} ). <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<fontspan style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]]</span></small> 15:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)