Érico
Title?
Hi, Can you please tell me how YOU came to determine that "one of [my] recent edits, such as the one [I] made to USS Jacana (AMS-193) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive". All of the information that I provided was from true life experience and though it may not seem to be constructive to you, it certainly would be useful for people who, like myself, had an interest in the USS Jacana and her service to the people of the United States of America. You are from Brazil??? What do you know about the history of the United States Navy and the ships that were in service a half century ago. Wikipedia is about information! That is what I was trying to provide before you decided that my information was inconsequential. I guess I won't be making any future financial contributions to an organization that allows such an abusive use of power by an individual who has no clue as to the value of a contribution of ACTUAL HISTORICAL events that occurred fifty years ago.
Thomas J Bembenek, USN Retired. Crewmember of the USS Jacana (AMS/MSC 193) from June of 1960 though September of 1962. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBembenek (talk • contribs) 23:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Pardon me!! I think that you may be a little confused!! I did not remove anything. YOU removed my contribution and in doing so removed the entire contents of the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBembenek (talk • contribs) 23:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
2.121.143.216
That was fast. I skipped over level 2 because he/she had vandalized again even after being reverted, before anyone had warned him/her.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- He/she vandalized the talk page, but that's not serious enough to report the person. I will watch the IP for the next hour.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- This person didn't do anything else. i didn't bother to make a report.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 15:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Revert
Hi, you reverted this edit probably assuming it as vandalism [1] and did not give a rationale. I previously removed it with a given explanation both in the editsummary and the talk page. The IPs started warring on it, but the article is semi protected now. I think you should self revert if it was just a procedural vandalism revert vide my rationale. Thanks. --lTopGunl (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks
Bem, eu acho que não preciso traduzir para o inglês aqui... Enfim, eu pretendo fazer pequenas edições aqui, mais em relação à alguns ajustes, já que na nossa wikipédia já tem bastante carências, ou seja, muito trabalho por lá. Thanks, Rafael Wiki (talk) 14:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)