First whats not in dispute. They actively admit to shareing a computer, when asked why Bowsy's account was created 4 minutes after Henchman's, Bowsy responded with "We share a computer so we have to take turns." [1]
Henchman 2000 nominated WP:FANCRUFT for deletion here. Four minutes later Bowsy shows up to also reccomend the deletion [2] which then rolls onto a snowy keep.
User:Jenvidanes user page was nominated for deletion, due to it being just userspace version of a non notable band that was deleted so often the mainspace page was salted. Henchman voted first, followed 15 minutes later by Bowsy [3]. They were the first to !votes and the only ones to argue for keeping it, which seems to be somewhat of a pattern. It is important to note by the way, that this is one of the first times that the pair have used a borderline attack argument that everyone who wants to see any article they approve of deleted simply doesn't like it and that theres a conspiracy against them. Similar comments include:
*Abusive/incivil comments from Henchman 2000
"How did we not have strong arguments, the deletists didn't have strong arguments anyway, they were saying "I don't like this article, I don't want it here, I know, I'll use a lame excuse to try and make it seem like something is wrong with the article" second section edited
"An admin who fails to understand how AfD works and makes an opinionated closure and who fails to realise that the entire nomination was a WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument most certainly does NOT deserve points." [4],
"Therefore, that is not reason for deletion, as it is untrue, and it also proves Bowsy's point in saying that your closure of the AfD for List of Mario Party minigames was opinionated, if you wanted a say, you should've participated, but you didn't so it's your own tough luck" (to the closing admin) [5]
"This HAS went on WP:DRV and the deleteists have just flooded the review with endorses because they want it deleted. Something needs to be done about this and WP:DRV isn't going to do it." [6]
"If you look here you will find that an admin seems to think he has an overriding vote in the AfD. Out of all the almost identical votes on each side and ranting and raving, it was clearly a No Consensus closure. Also, Most of the delete votes and the nomination were WP:IDONTLIKEIT and wasn't a game guide and WP:FC and WP:LC are not policy and are just concepts forced upon people to get articles deleted. Can you please do something about it." (to Jimbo) [7].
*Abusive/incivil comments from Bowsy
"Vote is abuse of DRV, for it is not about content. This user has clearly voted in this manner because they also did so on the AfD, and for no other reason." [8],
"You may have been abusing the DRV process for List of Mario Party minigames. Please read this extract of WP:DRV#Purpose
This page is about process, not about content, although in some cases it may involve reviewing content.
As you can see, saying that the content was unacceptable doesn't fly during DRVs." [9][10][11][12]
Denigriating comments about others comments during AfDs [13]
Accusing the closer of ignoring the debate and instead basing it on a simple dislike [14].
XfD's (!votes in common bolded)
Henchman 2000 has participated in the following XfD's
