Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 443565454 by ResidentAnthropologist (talk) with drawn |
|||
Line 6:
ADD NEW DISCUSSIONS IMMEDIATELY BELOW THE STARRED LINE, AND INCLUDE THE DATE (example: 5 December 2010)
******************************************************************************************** -->
*[[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Comment_needed:_What_should_we_do_about_processes_.28such_as_XfD.29_created_in_violation_of_banning.2Fblocking_policy.2C_but_had_at_least_a_handful_of_other_valid_supporting_views_of_nom.3F|Discussion]] on how to deal with processes (such as XfDs) created in violation of block, topic-ban, or ban, but has had input from other (legitimate) editors supporting the processes <!-- 30 July 2011 -->
*[[Wikipedia talk:Did you know#RfC: DYK quality assurance and archiving|Proposal]] to improve policy compliance in DYKs and/or introduce articles from other forums into DYK.
|