Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 212:
::: As per, Apsad inscription of aditya sinha , Susthivarman defeated by Gupta King. Habung was colony of Brahmins. Upper Assam was Aryanised before lower Assam. Latest stone inscription of 5th century AD found in Upper Assam. Kamrup is related to Kamakhya. And Human Sacrifice was performed in Kamakhya just like Tamreswari temple in Sadiya. As per inscription, Tamreswari Temple was named as eastern Kamakhya. Used for same purpose. And Kamrup , Mymensing, Dinaspur , Dispur etc are proved as Bodo origin term. And Sanskrit origin of Kamarupa is contradictory with Birth of Pradyumna = Kamadeva. So, Sanskrit origin is denied by modern researchers. Harruppeswar is proved as sanskritization of Ha-rubu-Apha by modern researchers. And Aryavat boundary don't have kamrup. North Indian never claimed Kamrup as part of Aryavart. Anyway, It's wastage of time to counter who assume good faith. [[User:PerfectingNEI|PerfectingNEI]] ([[User talk:PerfectingNEI|talk]]) 05:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
:::: MM Sharma have given illogical conclusion. Oxygen is part of Air. According to MM Sharma's logic , AIR word is used so it can't be oxygen. He is saying Subset isn't part of the Set. Which is mathematically illogical [[User:PerfectingNEI|PerfectingNEI]] ([[User talk:PerfectingNEI|talk]]) 06:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
:::::Oldest references of "Brahmaputra valley" was of Kamrup region ("Suvarnakundya", "Hangsakonchi" etc) by [[Kautilya]], [[Gopatha Brahmana]], other Brahmanas. The inscriptions of Nilachal was oldest, Prayag ([[Prayagraj]]) stone pillar refers to Kamrup alongwith Davaka of central Assam. The Kingdoms of "Pragjyotisha" and "Kamarupa" were in Western Assam, first century Davaka was in central Assam, which later acquired by Kamrup. Kamrup is used indiscrimantely in Hindu scriptures and in other sources. History of Eastern Assam before second century is not known. Central Assam do had Davaka kingdom and capital of Mleccha dynasty. Yuan Chwang not taken Eatern Assam route to return due to its inhospitable nature and dangers present there, so no foreign traveller visited Eastern Assam. Eastern Assam cannot Aryanised before Kamarupa, because migration of Aryans was happened from west to east not vice versa. Even today Eastern Assam has large number of tribes, in contrast to Western Assam, which has only Koch, Bodo and Rabha tribes. Di prefix maybe associated with tribal languages, but "Pur" (city), "Kamrup" are Sanskrit words. With Aryanisation of Western Assam, it became part of Aryan speaking India, which proved by number of epigraphical references.The fast checking of sources is not considered appropriate here (such as Sharma 1978), if you want to remove Sharma 1978, remove him completely from Wikipedia (consult RSN).[[User:Bhaskarbhagawati|<span style="color: gold">भास्कर् </span><span style="color: red">Bhagawati</span>]] [[User talk:Bhaskarbhagawati|<span style="color: ">Speak</span>]] 00:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
===Wrong Attributions===
I have removed two M M Sharma citations purported to be supporting Varmans were Indo-Aryan. They were actually making some other arguments on the Mlecha dynasty, so removed on WP:OR. There is another citation with no author name but a journal name. I have kept it for now, with the assumption being it will be updated with the proper reference. If not, I shall remove it on the basis of WP:V. [[User:Chaipau|Chaipau]] ([[User talk:Chaipau|talk]]) 10:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||