Content deleted Content added
ce |
Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2024-10-04. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger |
||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|italic title=yes}}
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
|action1date=9 February 2019
|action1result=listed
{{WikiProject Spaceflight|class=GA|importance=Top}}▼
|action1oldid=889635655
{{WikiProject Soviet Union|class=GA|importance=top}}▼
{{WikiProject Russia|class=GA|importance=Top|tech=yes|hist=yes|sci=yes}}▼
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=natsci
|otd16date=2023-10-04|otd16oldid=1178490249
|otd17date=2024-10-04|otd17oldid=1249338774
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Weather|importance=Low |space-weather-task-force=yes}}
}}
▲{{OnThisDay|date1=2004-10-04|oldid1=6373608|date2=2005-10-04|oldid2=24760000|date3=2006-10-04|oldid3=79453550|date4=2007-10-04|oldid4=162230492|date5=2008-10-04|oldid5=242713200|date6=2009-10-04|oldid6=317900182|date7=2010-10-04|oldid7=388782525|date8=2011-10-04|oldid8=453750421|date9=2013-10-04|oldid9=575789288|date10=2015-10-04|oldid10=683764771|date11=2017-10-04|oldid11=803724944|date12=2018-10-04|oldid12=862496757|date13=2019-10-04|oldid13=919598348}}
▲{{DYK talk|21 July|2019|entry= ... that the 1957 launch of '''[[Sputnik 1]]''', the first artificial satellite, led to [[Sputnik crisis|a period of public anxiety]] in the United States and accelerated the [[Space Race]]?<!--Special occasion hook for July 21-->|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Sputnik 1}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 125K
Line 20 ⟶ 29:
}}
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-01-25">25 January 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-05-07">7 May 2021</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Oklahoma/Cold_War_Science_(Spring_2021)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Hunterafortune|Hunterafortune]].
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 10:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
== Citation style ==▼
{{ping|Coffeeandcrumbs}} I find the current citation style really hard to work with; would you be amenable to changing it to either sfn, harvnb, or similar? I think sfn is the simplest of those types personally, but I am sure not all agree. '''<span style="background:#B1810B; padding:2px; border-style:solid; border-width:1px">[[User:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;">Kees08</span>]][[User talk:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;"> (Talk)</span>]]</span>''' 07:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)▼
:Agreed. Choose which ever you like. --- [[User talk:Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#CC2200">Coffee</span>]]<nowiki/>and[[Special:Contributions/Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#663366">crumbs</span>]] 09:34, 14 July 2019 (UTC)▼
== Harvard designator ==
I think there's room in this article to explain objects 1957 Alpha 1, 1957 Alpha 2, and 1957 Alpha 3, and why they were named that, since it was the first designation for an artificial satellite. Sources:
*[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1957IrAJ....4..252O Comments on Satellites]
*NYT<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1957/11/25/archives/alpha-is-sciences-tag-for-first-of-satellites.html|title=Alpha Is Science's Tag For First of Satellites|newspaper=The New York Times|date=November 25, 1957|page=12}}</ref>
== Propaganda ==
I made a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sputnik_1&type=revision&diff=1029453371&oldid=1028184594|change], and this change has a copy/paste mistake. But in the second part of this change, I believe, it was constructive change. My change was reverted (and I agree, because of copy/paste mistake). In order to avoid [[WP:EW]] I am not tried to implement my changes again (in their right part). Let's discuss here. I'll send a message in your page. What do you think about my change overall (not in the part of copy/paste mistake)? [[User:SHaggY caT|SHaggY caT]] ([[User talk:SHaggY caT|talk]]) 02:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
I suggest to add:
[[Sputnik_V_COVID-19_vaccine|Sputnik-V]] - Russian vaccine against [[covid-19]], which is named after the fist mankind's satellite in the [[LEO]] in order to improve efficiency of the [[Cyberwarfare_by_Russia|modern Russia's propaganda]]<ref>https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210313-sputnik-v-in-eastern-europe-propaganda-tool-or-godsend</ref>. Russian propaganda claimed that Sputnik-V is the first vaccine<ref>https://sputnikvaccine.com/about-vaccine/</ref> against Covid, like Sputnik satellite was the first artificial [[satellite]] in the [[LEO]]<ref>https://sputnikvaccine.com/sputnik-moment</ref>.
[[User:SHaggY caT|SHaggY caT]] ([[User talk:SHaggY caT|talk]]) 17:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
:The new vaccine name Sputnick V is clearly intended to remind people of Sputnick 1, but how important is this vaccine to the actual topic of Sputnick 1? To me, it looks peripheral. It doesn't change how people think of Sputnick 1. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 18:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
▲{{ping|Ethanpet113}} The article is a bit far from GA as it is; the cleanup tag notwithstanding, there are a lot of paragraphs that are uncited. I recommend you try to get them cited before someone picks up the review, or else it might fail a little quickly. '''<span style="background:#B1810B; padding:2px; border-style:solid; border-width:1px">[[User:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;">Kees08</span>]][[User talk:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;"> (Talk)</span>]]</span>''' 08:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
== Name transcription ==
▲{{Talk:Sputnik 1/GA1}}
What is the source for [ˈspʌtnɪk] transcription? [ˈspʊtnɪk] is how it sounds in its origin language. Should the other one be removed, or is it commonly used and therefore included? [[User:Eerienempty|Eerienempty]] ([[User talk:Eerienempty|talk]]) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
▲== Citation style ==
▲{{ping|Coffeeandcrumbs}} I find the current citation style really hard to work with; would you be amenable to changing it to either sfn, harvnb, or similar? I think sfn is the simplest of those types personally, but I am sure not all agree. '''<span style="background:#B1810B; padding:2px; border-style:solid; border-width:1px">[[User:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;">Kees08</span>]][[User talk:Kees08|<span style=color:#FFFFFF;"> (Talk)</span>]]</span>''' 07:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
▲:Agreed. Choose which ever you like. --- [[User talk:Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#CC2200">Coffee</span>]]<nowiki/>and[[Special:Contributions/Coffeeandcrumbs|<span style="color:#663366">crumbs</span>]] 09:34, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||