Content deleted Content added
→for the last time, Alex: new section |
|||
Line 224:
I'll humor you one last time. David Simon is an authority with no particular stake in how ''Pill City'' does. He is a neutral source. The ''publisher'' of the book is NOT a neutral source, unless they did something surprising like withdraw the book. This is equivalent to citing a crime suspect's lawyer as an authority on whether or not her client did the deed. No. Try again. Also read [[WP:DUEWEIGHT]]. [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 01:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
With all due respect, I createdthis page long before the controversy, and Wikipedia found Deutsch relevant renought to include wwithout any of the stuff that followed regarding his work. Why should i go away when i have as much right to be here as anyone. David Simon is not objective; he's a competitor with an interest in being the head honcho in BAL journalism. And St. Martin's not some mopey lawyer; they're the fifth largest publisher in the world. What they says matters. I'd be happy to bring this to a third party for a ruling. don't think you have much of a case/argument here.
| |||