Minkowski space: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 October 2024

24 September 2024

23 September 2024

7 September 2024

4 September 2024

20 August 2024

12 July 2024

19 June 2024

11 June 2024

14 May 2024

9 May 2024

19 April 2024

6 March 2024

16 February 2024

28 January 2024

25 January 2024

19 January 2024

18 January 2024

6 January 2024

2 January 2024

31 December 2023

14 December 2023

12 December 2023

9 December 2023

6 December 2023

3 December 2023

2 December 2023

29 November 2023

27 November 2023

26 November 2023

24 November 2023

2 November 2023

1 November 2023

30 October 2023

24 October 2023

21 October 2023

19 October 2023

10 October 2023

4 October 2023

2 October 2023

26 September 2023

28 August 2023

20 August 2023

13 August 2023

11 August 2023

10 August 2023

7 August 2023

3 August 2023

22 July 2023

21 July 2023

7 July 2023

25 June 2023

14 June 2023

12 June 2023

9 June 2023

15 May 2023

24 April 2023

22 April 2023

15 April 2023

5 March 2023

12 February 2023

28 January 2023

18 January 2023

4 January 2023

26 December 2022

23 December 2022

4 December 2022

30 November 2022

  • curprev 22:4522:45, 30 November 2022 104.205.115.95 talk 79,046 bytes +258 you know how i know every "contributor" to this page is stupid by assuming it MUST be 'lorentzian' (minkowski's setup is MUCH more general, see pages 293-294)? because NO ONE has cited the carus translation, which is the BEST translation (and the one i used). adding cite (thanks to norm redington at MIT: https://web.mit.edu/redingtn/www/netadv/SP20130311.html) undo

28 November 2022

22 November 2022

5 November 2022

23 October 2022

19 October 2022

11 August 2022

23 July 2022

22 July 2022

18 July 2022

17 July 2022

16 July 2022

6 June 2022

4 June 2022

26 May 2022

18 May 2022

15 May 2022

14 May 2022

15 April 2022

30 March 2022

12 February 2022

1 February 2022

28 November 2021

13 October 2021

9 October 2021

5 October 2021

8 September 2021

25 August 2021

16 August 2021

7 July 2021

5 July 2021

3 June 2021

29 May 2021

25 May 2021

27 April 2021

8 April 2021

6 April 2021

24 March 2021

12 March 2021

24 February 2021

16 February 2021

13 February 2021

12 February 2021

  • curprev 10:5210:52, 12 February 2021 DVdm talk contribs 73,043 bytes +173 Undid revision 1006275876 by 99.239.158.18 (talk) nothing false about it, and well known and sourced - take it to the talk page if you don't like the source - source is footnote on page 4, not 5 undo Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 00:5400:54, 12 February 2021 99.239.158.18 talk 72,870 bytes −173 The claim "the mathematical structure of Minkowski spacetime was shown to be implied by the postulates of special relativity" (with reference to the Landau and Lifshitz book) is false. The "structure" of Minkowski spacetime is heavily defined and declared in that book, i.e. proclaimed, and not demonstrated "to be implied by the postulates of special relativity". undo Tags: references removed Visual edit

4 January 2021

3 January 2021

30 December 2020

28 December 2020

23 December 2020

20 December 2020

10 December 2020

4 December 2020

2 November 2020

21 October 2020

14 September 2020

13 August 2020

12 August 2020

15 July 2020

11 July 2020

11 May 2020

27 April 2020

22 April 2020

23 March 2020

29 February 2020

26 February 2020

25 February 2020

24 February 2020

23 February 2020

14 February 2020

13 February 2020

12 February 2020

11 February 2020

10 February 2020

7 February 2020

6 February 2020

5 February 2020

3 February 2020

2 February 2020

30 January 2020

29 January 2020

24 January 2020

22 January 2020

20 January 2020

16 January 2020

15 January 2020

12 January 2020

7 January 2020

6 January 2020

13 November 2019

9 November 2019

9 September 2019

11 August 2019

7 August 2019

1 August 2019

7 July 2019

30 June 2019

26 June 2019

21 June 2019

12 June 2019

1 June 2019

14 May 2019

10 May 2019

1 May 2019

24 April 2019

  • curprev 08:2308:23, 24 April 2019 Tmhajf talk contribs m 73,519 bytes +24 Reversed triangle inequality: Only ||v||^2 := v \dot v was defined. ||v|| was no-where defined. The sentence "Even the square root of the present interval occurs" seems to advise against ever defining ||v||. However, in "Reversed triangle inequality", suddenly ||v|| appears. Hence I propose to insert something like: "where (for a timelike vector) defining ||v|| := sqrt(||v||^2) makes sense,". BTW, should ||v|| be defined (for any vector v) as "||v|| := sqrt(abs(||v||^2))" ? undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 08:0208:02, 24 April 2019 Tmhajf talk contribs m 73,495 bytes +52 Only ||v||^2 := v \dot v was defined. ||v|| was no-where defined. The sentence "Even the square root of the present interval occurs" seems to advise against ever defining ||v||. However, in "Reversed triangle inequality", suddenly ||v|| appears. Hence I propose to insert something like: "where defining ||v|| := sqrt(||v||^2) makes sense," undo Tag: Visual edit

19 April 2019

21 February 2019

19 February 2019

16 February 2019

1 February 2019

30 January 2019

29 January 2019

27 January 2019

16 December 2018

12 December 2018

6 October 2018

29 September 2018

20 September 2018

19 September 2018

5 September 2018

19 August 2018

27 July 2018

8 June 2018

7 June 2018

9 May 2018

13 April 2018

7 April 2018

12 March 2018

11 March 2018

10 March 2018

25 February 2018

24 February 2018

12 February 2018

14 October 2017

4 October 2017

1 October 2017

25 September 2017

24 September 2017

5 September 2017

29 August 2017

28 August 2017

3 August 2017

1 August 2017

31 July 2017

24 July 2017

22 July 2017

14 July 2017

12 July 2017

6 July 2017

5 July 2017

24 June 2017

23 June 2017

19 June 2017

14 June 2017

12 June 2017

19 April 2017

18 April 2017

16 April 2017

15 April 2017

13 April 2017

26 March 2017

21 March 2017

20 March 2017

19 March 2017

17 March 2017

8 March 2017

2 March 2017

1 March 2017

24 February 2017

23 February 2017

19 February 2017

14 February 2017

13 February 2017

12 February 2017

10 February 2017

2 February 2017

16 January 2017

11 January 2017

  • curprev 11:0111:01, 11 January 2017 YohanN7 talk contribs 71,830 bytes −91 With that formulation spheres _aren't_ endowed with elliptic geometry (contrary to what the literature says). Confusing indeed. We should simply leave projective geometries out. (For the next edit, Lorentzian manifolds are covered earlier) undo

10 January 2017

8 January 2017

6 January 2017

22 December 2016

17 December 2016

16 December 2016

12 December 2016

11 December 2016

4 December 2016

1 December 2016

29 November 2016

15 November 2016

14 November 2016

3 November 2016

2 November 2016

1 November 2016

(newest | oldest) View (newer 500 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)