James George Frazer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 4:
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2014}}
{{Infobox scientist
| honorific_prefix = [[Sir]]
| name = James George Frazer
| honorific_suffix = {{postnominals|country=GBR|OM|FRS|FRSE|FBA|size=100}}
| image = JamesGeorgeFrazer.jpg
| caption = Sir James George Frazer in 1933
| birth_date = {{Birth date|df=yes|1854|1|1}}
| birth_place = [[Glasgow]], Scotland
| death_date = {{death date and age|df=yes|1941|5|7|1854|1|1}}
| death_place = [[Cambridge]], England
| residence =
| field = [[Social anthropologist]]
| work_institutions = {{ubl | [[Trinity College, Cambridge]] | [[University of Liverpool]]}}
| alma_mater = {{ubl | [[University of Glasgow]] (MA 1874)| [[Trinity College, Cambridge]]}}
| doctoral_advisor =
| doctoral_students =
| known_for = Research in [[mythology]] and [[comparative religion]]
| author_abbrev_bot =
| author_abbrev_zoo =
| prizes = [[Order of Merit]]<br>[[Fellow of the Royal Society]]<ref name="frs">{{Cite journal | last1 = Fleure | first1 = H. J. | author-link = Herbert John Fleure| title = James George Frazer. 1854-1941 | doi = 10.1098/rsbm.1941.0041 | journal = [[Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society]] | volume = 3 | issue = 10 | pages = 896–914| year = 1941 | s2cid = 161719297 }}</ref>
|influences = {{hlist | [[Andrew Lang]] | [[Plato]] | [[Edward Burnett Tylor]] | [[Hermann Oldenberg]]}}
| signature =
|influenced = {{hlist | [[Sigmund Freud]]<ref>{{Cite book | last = Freud | first = Sigmund | title = Totem and Taboo | publisher = Routledge Classics | date = 2001 | isbn = 0-415-25387-X }}</ref> | [[Jack Goody]] | [[Ross Nichols]] | [[Bronisław Malinowski]] | [[Aleister Crowley]]<ref>{{Cite book | last = Josephson-Storm | first = Jason | title = The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences | publisher = University of Chicago Press | date = 2017 | chapter = Chapter 6: The Revival of Magick: Aleister Crowley|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=xZ5yDgAAQBAJ | isbn = 978-0-226-40336-6 }}</ref> | [[T. S. Eliot]]}}
|prizes = [[Order of Merit]]<br>[[Fellow of the Royal Society]]<ref name="frs">{{Cite journal | last1 = Fleure | first1 = H. J. | author-link = Herbert John Fleure| title = James George Frazer. 1854-1941 | doi = 10.1098/rsbm.1941.0041 | journal = [[Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society]] | volume = 3 | issue = 10 | pages = 896–914| year = 1941 | s2cid = 161719297 }}</ref>
|signature =
}}
{{Anthropology of religion}}
 
'''Sir James George Frazer''' {{post-nominals|country=GBR|OM|FRS|FRSE|FBA}}<ref name="frs"/> ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|f|r|eɪ|z|ər}}; 1 January 1854 – 7 May 1941) was a Scottish [[social anthropologist]] and [[folklore studies|folklorist]]<ref name="Josephson-Storm 2017, Chapter 5">Josephson-Storm (2017), Chapter 5.</ref> influential in the early stages of the modern studies of [[mythology]] and [[comparative religion]].<ref>Mary Beard, "Frazer, Leach, and Virgil: The Popularity (and Unpopularity) of the Golden Bough,", ''Comparative Studies in Society and History'', '''34'''.2 (April 1992:203–224).</ref>
 
==Personal life==
Frazer was born on 1 January 1854 in [[Glasgow]], Scotland, the son of Katherine Brown and Daniel F. Frazer, a chemist.<ref name="RSE">{{cite book|title=Biographical Index of Former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783–2002|date=July 2006|publisher=The Royal Society of Edinburgh|isbn=0-902-198-84-X|url=https://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|access-date=7 June 2016|archive-date=24 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130124115814/http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> He attended school at Springfield Academy and [[Larchfield Academy]] in [[Helensburgh]].<ref>Jaques Waardenburg. 1999. ''Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion. Aims, Methods and Theories of Research,'' Volume I: ''Introduction and Anthology'', p244. New York : Walter de Gruyter. {{ISBN|3-11-016328-4}}</ref> He studied at the [[University of Glasgow]] and [[Trinity College, Cambridge]], where he graduated with honours in [[classics]] (his dissertation was published years later as ''The Growth of [[Plato]]'s Ideal Theory'') and remained a Classics Fellow all his life.<ref>{{acad|id=FRSR874JG|name=Frazer, James George}}</ref> From Trinity, he went on to study law at the [[Middle Temple]], but never practised.
 
He was born on 1 January 1854 in [[Glasgow]], Scotland, the son of Katherine Brown and Daniel F. Frazer, a chemist.<ref name="RSE">{{cite book|title=Biographical Index of Former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783–2002|date=July 2006|publisher=The Royal Society of Edinburgh|isbn=0-902-198-84-X|url=https://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|access-date=7 June 2016|archive-date=24 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130124115814/http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
Frazer attended school at Springfield Academy and [[Larchfield Academy]] in [[Helensburgh]].<ref>Jaques Waardenburg. 1999. ''Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion. Aims, Methods and Theories of Research,'' Volume I: ''Introduction and Anthology'', p244. New York : Walter de Gruyter. {{ISBN|3-11-016328-4}}</ref> He studied at the [[University of Glasgow]] and [[Trinity College, Cambridge]], where he graduated with honours in [[classics]] (his dissertation was published years later as ''The Growth of [[Plato]]'s Ideal Theory'') and remained a Classics Fellow all his life.<ref>{{acad|id=FRSR874JG|name=Frazer, James George}}</ref> From Trinity, he went on to study law at the [[Middle Temple]], but never practised.
 
Four times elected to Trinity's Title Alpha Fellowship, he was associated with the college for most of his life, except for the year 1907–1908, spent at the [[University of Liverpool]]. He was knighted in 1914, and a [[Frazer Lecture|public lectureship]] in social anthropology at the universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Glasgow and Liverpool was established in his honour in 1921.<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/addresstosirjame00slsn#page/n1/mode/2up Address to Sir James George Frazer on the occasion of the foundation, in his honour, of the Frazer Lectureship in Social Anthropology in the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Glasgow and Liverpool (1920)].</ref> He was, if not blind, then severely visually impaired from 1930 on. He and his wife, Lilly, died in [[Cambridge]], England, within a few hours of each other.<ref name=lillyrb/> He died on 7 May 1941.<ref name="RSE"/> They are buried at the [[Ascension Parish Burial Ground, Cambridge|St Giles aka Ascension Parish Burial Ground]] in Cambridge.<ref name=lillyrb/>
 
Frazer is commonly interpreted as an atheist in light of his [[criticism of Christianity]] and especially [[Roman Catholicism]] in ''[[The Golden Bough]]''. However, his later writings and unpublished materials suggest an ambivalent relationship with [[Neoplatonism]] and [[Hermeticism]].<ref> name="Josephson-Storm (2017), Chapter 5.<"/ref>
His sister Isabella Katherine Frazer married the mathematician [[John Steggall]].<ref>{{cite book|title=Biographical Index of Former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783–2002|date=July 2006|publisher=The Royal Society of Edinburgh|isbn=0-902-198-84-X|url=https://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|access-date=7 June 2016|archive-date=24 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130124115814/http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
Frazer is commonly interpreted as an atheist in light of his [[criticism of Christianity]] and especially [[Roman Catholicism]] in ''[[The Golden Bough]]''. However, his later writings and unpublished materials suggest an ambivalent relationship with [[Neoplatonism]] and [[Hermeticism]].<ref>Josephson-Storm (2017), Chapter 5.</ref>
 
In 1896 Frazer married [[Lilly Frazer|Elizabeth "Lilly" Grove]], a writer whose father was from [[Alsace]].<ref name=lillyrb>{{Cite ODNB |title=The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography |date=2004-09-23 |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/66458 |pages=ref:odnb/66458 |editor-last=Matthew |editor-first=H. C. G. |place=Oxford |doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/66458 |access-date=2022-12-27 |editor2-last=Harrison |editor2-first=B.}}</ref> She would later adapt Frazer's ''Golden Bough'' as a book of children's stories, ''The Leaves from the Golden Bough''.<ref name="Ackerman1987">{{cite book|first=Robert|last=Ackerman|title=J G Frazer: His Life and Work|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s_k4AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA124|date=10 December 1987|publisher=CUP Archive|isbn=978-0-521-34093-9|page=124}}</ref><ref name="Kessler2013">{{cite book|first=Gary|last=Kessler|title=Fifty Key Thinkers on Religion|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=itOoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA54|date=March 2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-136-66241-6|page=54}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Leaves from the Golden Bough |journal=Nature |date=December 13, 1924 |volume=114 |issue=2876 |pages=854–855 |doi=10.1038/114854b0 |bibcode=1924Natur.114R.854. |s2cid=4110636 }}</ref> His sister Isabella Katherine Frazer married the mathematician [[John Steggall]].<ref>{{cite book|title=Biographical Index of Former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783–2002|date=July 2006|publisher=The Royal Society of Edinburgh|isbn=0-902-198-84-X|url=https://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|access-date=7 June 2016|archive-date=24 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130124115814/http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/fellows/biographical_index/fells_indexp1.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
==Work==
Line 48 ⟶ 42:
The [[mythology|study of myth]] and religion became his areas of expertise. Except for visits to [[Italy]] and [[Greece]], Frazer was not widely travelled. His prime sources of data were ancient histories and questionnaires mailed to missionaries and imperial officials all over the globe. Frazer's interest in social anthropology was aroused by reading [[E.&nbsp;B. Tylor]]'s ''Primitive Culture'' (1871) and was also encouraged by his friend, the biblical scholar [[William Robertson Smith]], who was comparing elements of the Old Testament with early Hebrew folklore.
 
Frazer was the first scholar to describe in detail the relations between [[myths and rituals]]. His vision of the annual sacrifice of the [[Year-King]] has not been borne out by field studies. Yet ''[[The Golden Bough]]'', his study of ancient cults, rites, and myths, including their parallels in early Christianity, continued for many decades to be studied by modern mythographers for its detailed information.<ref>D Daiches ed., ''Companion to Literature 1'' (1968) p. 194</ref>{{verification needed|date=February 2019}}
 
The first edition, in two volumes, was published in 1890; and a second, in three volumes, in 1900.<ref>R Fraser Intro, ''The Golden Bough'' (Oxford 2009) p. xl</ref> The third edition was finished in 1915 and ran to twelve volumes, with a supplemental thirteenth volume added in 1936. He published a single-volume abridged version, largely compiled by his wife Lady Frazer, in 1922, with some controversial material on Christianity excluded from the text.<ref>For the history of ''The Golden Bough'' see R. Fraser, ''The Making of The Golden Bough: The Origins and Growth of an Argument'' (London, 1990).</ref> The work's influence extended well beyond the conventional bounds of academia, inspiring the new work of psychologists and psychiatrists. [[Sigmund Freud]], the founder of [[psychoanalysis]], cited ''Totemism and Exogamy'' frequently in his own ''[[Totem and Taboo]]: Resemblances Between the Psychic Lives of Savages and Neurotics''.<ref>Sigmund Freud, ''Totem and Taboo: Resemblances Between the Psychic Life of Savages and Neurotics,'' trans., A.A. Brill (London: Routledge and Sons, 1919), p. 4</ref>
Line 54 ⟶ 48:
The symbolic cycle of life, death and rebirth which Frazer divined behind myths of many peoples captivated a generation of artists and poets. Perhaps the most notable product of this fascination is [[T.&nbsp;S. Eliot]]'s poem ''[[The Waste Land]]'' (1922).
 
Frazer's pioneering work<ref>"For those who see Frazer's work as the start of [[Social anthropology|anthropological study]] in its modern sense, the site and the cult of Nemi must hold a particular place: This<!--capitalised in original--> colourful but minor backwater of Roman religion marks the source of the discipline of [[Social anthropology]]", remarks Mary Beard, in noting the critical reassessment of Frazer's work following [[Edmund Leach]], "Frazer, Leach, and Virgil: The Popularity (and Unpopularity) of the Golden Bough,", ''Comparative Studies in Society and History'', 34.2 (April 1992:203–224), p. 204.</ref> has been criticised by late-20th-century scholars. For instance, in the 1980s the social anthropologist [[Edmund Leach]] wrote a series of critical articles, one of which was featured as the lead in ''[[Anthropology Today]]'', vol. 1 (1985).<ref>Leach, "Reflections on a visit to Nemi: did Frazer get it wrong?", ''Anthropology Today'' '''1''' (1985)</ref> Leach criticised ''The Golden Bough'' for the breadth of comparisons drawn from widely separated cultures, but often based his comments on the abridged edition, which omits the supportive archaeological details. In a positive review of a book narrowly focused on the ''[[Cult (religion)|cultus]]'' in the Hittite city of Nerik, J.&nbsp;D. Hawkins remarked approvingly in 1973, "The whole work is very methodical and sticks closely to the fully quoted documentary evidence in a way that would have been unfamiliar to the late Sir James Frazer."<ref>Hawkins, reviewing Volkert Haas, ''Der Kult von Nerik: ein Beitrag zur hethitischen Religionsgeschichte'', in ''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London''
'''36'''.1 (1973:128).</ref> More recently, ''The Golden Bough'' has been criticised for what are widely perceived as [[imperialism|imperialist]], [[anti-Catholic]], classist and racist elements, including Frazer's assumptions that European peasants, [[Aboriginal Australians]] and [[Africa|Africans]]ns represented fossilised, earlier stages of cultural evolution.<ref>Chidester (2014), pp. x–xi, 5, 8; and Chapter 6.</ref>
 
Another important work by Frazer is his six-volume commentary on the Greek traveller [[Pausanias (geographer)|Pausanias]]' description of Greece in the mid-2nd century AD. Since his time, archaeological excavations have added enormously to the knowledge of ancient Greece, but scholars still find much of value in his detailed historical and topographical discussions of different sites, and his eyewitness accounts of Greece at the end of the 19th century.{{citation needed|date =December 2012}}
Line 103 ⟶ 97:
Larsen also criticizes Frazer for applying western European Christian ideas, theology, and terminology to non-Christian cultures. This distorts those cultures to make them appear more Christian.{{sfn|Larsen|2014|pages=46–48}} Frazer routinely described non-Christian religious figures by equating them with Christian ones.{{sfn|Larsen|2014|page=47}} Frazer applied Christian terms to [[functionaries]], for instance calling the elders of the Njamus of [[East Africa]] "equivalent to the [[Levites]] of Israel"{{sfn|Larsen|2014|page=47}} and the [[Dalai Lama|Grand Lama]] of [[Lhasa]] "the Buddhist [[Pope]]... the [[God-man (Christianity)|man-god]] who bore his people's sorrows, the [[Good Shepherd]] who laid down his life for the sheep".{{sfn|Larsen|2014|page=47}} He routinely uses the specifically Christian theological terms "[[born again]]", "new birth", "[[baptism]]", "[[Infant baptism|christening]]", "[[sacrament]]", and "unclean" in reference to non-Christian cultures.{{sfn|Larsen|2014|page=47}}
 
When Frazer's Australian colleague [[Walter Baldwin Spencer]] requested to use native terminology to describe [[Aboriginal Australians|Aboriginal Australian]] cultures, arguing that doing so would be more accurate, since the Christian terms were loaded with Christian connotations that would be completely foreign to members of the cultures he was describing, Frazer insisted that he should use Judeo-ChristianAbrahamic terms instead, telling him that using native terms would be off-putting and would seem pedantic.{{sfn|Larsen|2014|page=47}} A year later, Frazer excoriated Spencer for refusing to equate the non-estrangement of Aboriginal Australian [[totem]]s with the Christian doctrine of [[reconciliation (theology)|reconciliation]].{{sfn|Larsen|2014|pages=47–48}} When Spencer, who had studied the aboriginals firsthand, objected that the ideas were not remotely similar, Frazer insisted that they were exactly equivalent.{{sfn|Larsen|2014|page=48}} Based on these exchanges, Larsen concludes that Frazer's deliberate use of Judeo-Christian terminology in the place of native terminology was not to make native cultures seem less strange, but rather to make Christianity seem more strange and barbaric.{{sfn|Larsen|2014|page=48}}
 
==Selected works==
* ''Creation and Evolution in Primitive CosmogeniesCosmogonies, and Other Pieces'' (1935)
* ''The Fear of the Dead in Primitive Religion'' (1933–36)
* ''Condorcet on the Progress of the Human Mind'' (1933)
Line 168 ⟶ 162:
 
* Resources related to research : [http://www.berose.fr/ BEROSE - International Encyclopaedia of the Histories of Anthropology]. "Frazer, James George (1854-1941)", Paris, 2015. (ISSN 2648-2770)
 
* {{Books and Writers |id=jfrazer |name=James George Frazer}}
*[http://www.bartleby.com/people/Frazer-S.html Sir James George Frazer Collection] at Bartleby.com
* {{Gutenberg author |id=Frazer,+James+George 1241| name=James George Frazer}}
* {{Internet Archive author |sname=James George Frazer}}
* {{Librivox author |id=4405}}