Carbon capture and storage: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
"relatively pure" is a bit hard for laypeople to grasp in this context and can mean as little as 3% concentration. Replacing with words about separating the CO2 before it mixes with the atmosphere.
Updating with newer and higher-quality source
Line 5:
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2022}}
 
'''Carbon capture and storage''' ('''CCS''') is a process in which [[carbon dioxide]] (CO<sub>2</sub>) from industrial sources is separated before it mixes with the atmosphere, treated and transported to a long-term storage location.<ref name=":9">IPCC, 2021: [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_AnnexVII.pdf Annex VII: Glossary] [Matthews, J.B.R., V. Möller, R. van Diemen, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C.&nbsp; Méndez, S. Semenov, A. Reisinger (eds.)]. In [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 2215–2256, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.022.</ref>{{Rp|page=2221}} In CCS, the CO<sub>2</sub> is captured from a large [[point source pollution|point source]], such as a [[natural gas processing plant]] or coal power plant, and typically is stored in a deep [[geological formation]]. As of 20222024, around 7380% of the CO<sub>2</sub> captured annually is used for [[enhanced oil recovery]] (EOR), a process in which CO<sub>2</sub> is injected into partially-depleted oil reservoirs in order to extract more oil and then is left underground.<ref name=":13">{{Cite webjournal |last1last=RobertsonZhang |first1first=BruceYuting |last2=MousavianJackson |first2=MiladChristopher |datelast3=SeptemberKrevor 1,|first3=Samuel 2022|date=2024-08-28 |title=The carbonfeasibility captureof crux:reaching Lessonsgigatonne learnedscale CO2 storage by mid-century |url=https://ieefawww.orgnature.com/sitesarticles/default/files/2022s41467-09/The%20Carbon%20Capture%20Crux.pdf024-51226-8 |access-datejournal=2024-06-27Nature Communications |websitelanguage=Instituteen for|volume=15 Energy|issue=1 Economics|pages=6913 and|doi=10.1038/s41467-024-51226-8 Financial|issn=2041-1723 Analysis|pmc=PMC11358273 |pagepmid=1039198390}}</ref> Since EOR ''utilizes'' the CO<sub>2</sub> in addition to ''storing'' it, CCS is also known as '''carbon capture, utilization, and storage''' (CCUS).<ref name=":05">{{Cite journal |last1=Sekera |first1=June |last2=Lichtenberger |first2=Andreas |date=6 October 2020 |title=Assessing Carbon Capture: Public Policy, Science, and Societal Need: A Review of the Literature on Industrial Carbon Removal |journal=Biophysical Economics and Sustainability |volume=5 |issue=3 |pages=14 |bibcode=2020BpES....5...14S |doi=10.1007/s41247-020-00080-5 |issn= |doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
American oil and gas companies developed the processes involved in CCS in the mid 20th century. Originally, these technologies served to purify natural gas and to facilitate oil production. Subsequently, CCS was discussed as a strategy to reduce [[greenhouse gas emissions]].<ref name=":18">{{cite web |editor-last1=Metz|editor-first1=Bert|editor-last2=Davidson|editor-first2=Ogunlade|editor-last3=De Conink|editor-first3=Heleen|editor-last4=Loos|editor-first4=Manuela|editor-last5=Meyer|editor-first5=Leo|date=March 2018 |title=IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage |url=https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/srccs_wholereport.pdf |access-date=16 August 2023 |publisher= Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-1-4419-7991-9_37 |chapter=Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with CO2 Capture and Geological Storage |title=Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation |date=2012 |last1=Ketzer |first1=J. Marcelo |last2=Iglesias |first2=Rodrigo S. |last3=Einloft |first3=Sandra |pages=1405–1440 |isbn=978-1-4419-7990-2 }}</ref> Most announced CCS projects have not materialized. As of 2023, 40 commercial CCS facilities are operational and collectively capture about one thousdandth of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. CCS facilities typically require capital investments of up to several billion dollars, and CCS also increases operating costs.<ref name=":22" /> Power plants with CCS are expected to require around 15-25% more energy to operate,<ref name=":23" /> thus they typically burn additional fossil fuel and increase the pollution from extracting and transporting fuel. Almost all CCS projects operating today have benefited from government financial support, usually in the form of grants.<ref name=":16" />{{Rp|page=|pages=156-160}}
Line 52:
Storing CO<sub>2</sub> involves the injection of captured CO<sub>2</sub> into a deep underground geological reservoir of porous rock overlaid by an impermeable layer of rocks, which seals the reservoir and prevents the upward migration of CO<sub>2</sub> and escape into the atmosphere.<ref name=":12">{{Cite web |title=CO2 Capture and Utilisation - Energy System |url=https://www.iea.org/energy-system/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage/co2-capture-and-utilisation |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=IEA |language=en-GB}}[[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Text was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]]</ref>{{Rp|page=112}} The gas is usually compressed first into a [[supercritical fluid]]. When the compressed CO<sub>2</sub> is injected into a reservoir, it flows through it, filling the pore space. The reservoir must be at depths greater than 800 metres to retain the CO<sub>2</sub> in a dense liquid state.<ref name=":12" />{{Rp|page=112}}
 
As of 20222024, around 7380% of the CO<sub>2</sub> captured annually is used for [[enhanced oil recovery]] (EOR).<ref name=":13213">{{Cite web |last1=Robertson |first1=Bruce |last2=Mousavian |first2=Milad |date=September 1, 2022 |title=The carbon capture crux: Lessons learned |url=https://ieefa.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/The%20Carbon%20Capture%20Crux.pdf |access-date=2024-06-27 |website=Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis |page=10}}</ref> In EOR, CO<sub>2</sub> is injected into partially depleted [[oil fields]] to enhance production. This increases the overall reservoir pressure and improves the mobility of the oil, resulting in a higher flow of oil towards the production wells.<ref name=":43">IEA (2020), ''[https://www.iea.org/reports/ccus-in-clean-energy-transitions, CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions]'', IEA, Paris [[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Text was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]]</ref>{{Rp|page=117}}
 
Around 2220% of captured CO<sub>2</sub> is injected into dedicated geological storage,<ref name=":13213" /> usually deep saline [[Aquifer|aquifiers]]. These are layers of porous and permeable rocks saturated with salty water.<ref name=":17">{{Cite web |title=CO2 Capture and Utilisation - Energy System |url=https://www.iea.org/energy-system/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage/co2-capture-and-utilisation |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=IEA |language=en-GB}}[[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Text was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]]</ref>{{Rp|page=112}} Worldwide, saline formations have higher potential storage capacity than depleted oil wells.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ma |first1=Jinfeng |last2=Li |first2=Lin |last3=Wang |first3=Haofan |last4=Du |first4=Yi |last5=Ma |first5=Junjie |last6=Zhang |first6=Xiaoli |last7=Wang |first7=Zhenliang |date=July 2022 |title=Carbon Capture and Storage: History and the Road Ahead |journal=Engineering |volume=14 |pages=33–43 |bibcode=2022Engin..14...33M |doi=10.1016/j.eng.2021.11.024 |s2cid=247416947}}</ref> Dedicated geologic storage is generally less expensive than EOR because it does not require a high level of CO<sub>2</sub> purity and because suitable sites are more numerous, which means pipelines can be shorter.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ma |first1=Jinfeng |last2=Li |first2=Lin |last3=Wang |first3=Haofan |last4=Du |first4=Yi |last5=Ma |first5=Junjie |last6=Zhang |first6=Xiaoli |last7=Wang |first7=Zhenliang |date=July 2022 |title=Carbon Capture and Storage: History and the Road Ahead |journal=Engineering |volume=14 |pages=33–43 |bibcode=2022Engin..14...33M |doi=10.1016/j.eng.2021.11.024 |s2cid=247416947}}</ref>
 
Various other types of reservoirs for storing captured CO<sub>2</sub> are being researched or piloted as of 2021: CO<sub>2</sub> could be injected into coal beds for [[enhanced coal bed methane recovery]].<ref name=":07">{{Cite journal |last1=Dziejarski |first1=Bartosz |last2=Krzyżyńska |first2=Renata |last3=Andersson |first3=Klas |date=June 2023 |title=Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy: A survey of technical assessment |journal=Fuel |volume=342 |pages=127776 |doi=10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127776 |bibcode=2023Fuel..34227776D |issn=0016-2361 |doi-access=free }}[[File:CC-BY_icon.svg|50x50px]] Text was copied from this source, which is available under a [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]]</ref> ''Ex-situ mineral carbonation'' involves reacting CO<sub>2</sub> with [[Tailings|mine tailings]] or alkaline industrial waste to form stable minerals such as [[calcium carbonate]].<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal |last1=Snæbjörnsdóttir |first1=Sandra Ó |last2=Sigfússon |first2=Bergur |last3=Marieni |first3=Chiara |last4=Goldberg |first4=David |last5=Gislason |first5=Sigurður R. |last6=Oelkers |first6=Eric H. |date=February 2020 |title=Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-019-0011-8 |journal=Nature Reviews Earth & Environment |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=90–102 |doi=10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8 |bibcode=2020NRvEE...1...90S |issn=2662-138X |access-date=2024-06-21}}</ref> ''In-situ mineral carbonation'' involves injecting CO<sub>2</sub> and water into underground formations that are rich in highly-reactive rocks such as [[basalt]]. There, the CO<sub>2</sub> may react with the rock to form stable carbonate minerals relatively quickly.<ref name=":5" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kim |first1=Kyuhyun |last2=Kim |first2=Donghyun |last3=Na |first3=Yoonsu |last4=Song |first4=Youngsoo |last5=Wang |first5=Jihoon |date=December 2023 |title=A review of carbon mineralization mechanism during geological CO2 storage |journal=Heliyon |volume=9 |issue=12 |pages=e23135 |doi=10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23135 |doi-access=free |issn=2405-8440 |pmc=10750052 |pmid=38149201}}</ref> Once the mineral carbonation process is complete, there is no risk of CO<sub>2</sub> leakage.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Making Minerals-How Growing Rocks Can Help Reduce Carbon Emissions |url=https://www.usgs.gov/news/making-minerals-how-growing-rocks-can-help-reduce-carbon-emissions |access-date=31 October 2021 |website=www.usgs.gov}}</ref>