Message from @Warren H
Discord ID: 387738784520732672
Indeed
Guess what: you know about all those <1% African DNA results showing up on white guys’ tests? They’re fake.
👆
Probably also applies to Ashkenazi
@Deleted User. It probably wont be fake with me, as I am sicilian.
@Praetorian 😂 North African marauders and all that...
@Deleted User. Yup. And Muslims. Whatever mix I ended up with is pretty damn good though, I have to say.
@NCSC You cam see this represented in the job market here in Seattle. Im looking for work outside the city.
That sucks man.
This is a city counselor saying progress equals less white people.
Yup. It wasnt such a big deal even a year ago. Now its crazy. Nothing but asians, hispanics and black people serving you everywhere you go. And most of them are smug about it. They know whats really going on, and white people dont. I have the last laugh though, because as the economy improves whites will have the option to find work elsewhere. Once whites leave, they take their money with them. Then all these welfare parasites will go nanners as the welfare system implodes, and when the white people are gone, the blacks and browns and yellows will start killing each other. But none of them are smart enough to see the big picture, and their shortsightedness implores them to only focus on joining forces to move white people out of power.
I think the west coast may be a lost cause. I think the best we can do in places like seattle is to evacuate what few sane people remain.
Small western towns need to be hanled before the coastal towns are won
Hey lads, here’s an idea for cyber strike. Every time someone googles us, the very first thing they see is a hostile Wikipedia page about our group. I went to edit it, but new/unverified user edits have to be “approved”. If we could get a group of people to become approved users, we would have the ability to fix the page whenever we wanted. This would make us much more approachable to normies. What do y’all think?
I just signed up, but I’m not sure what constitutes an “approved user”.
actually the donald deleted our post after it got 300 votes, im remaking it though
new thread up, could use bumps
cowards
and @whiskeytangofoxtrot that is a great idea
I just read that once an account is 4 days old and has 10 edits, it’s considered Confirmed. But then there are higher clearances past that. I think Confirmed is all we need though. I’ll keep looking
@whiskeytangofoxtrot I wonder if a lower level user could simply mark “citation needed” whenever a negative opinion is expressed in the article
The problem is that people just cite the SPLC whenever they want to throw around different accusations. Excellent idea though where it’s not cited. @this_that5553
Maybe build up a reputation editing political pages
Yeah... the SPLC and ADL are counted as "credible sources". They determine what a hate group is
oops
I meant to say editing non-political pages
go write articles about kittens or something
then suddenly drop redpills
Haha, I’ll be sure to do that @Jacob
And apparently, the IE wiki page is a “Pending Changes Protection” article, so it’s only the 4 day/10 edit authorization. Let’s get to it!
We still have a great advantage, though. Unlike the alt-right, we have the opportunity to build our image before the fake news crafts that image for us.
Just as we we europeans are atomized as individuals, IE will be atomized as an organization unless we have allies. I say that it will be easier to make allies while we are still relatively unknown.
I think we should start reaching out to people who are sympathetic to our cause, who can give us positive promotions.
I have seen many well-platformed people stand up against the identity politics, and speak up in favor of white people. I think that would be a good place to start.
The America First crowd seems to have a good idea how to present themselves
I heard much about them.