Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
7 votes
0 answers
185 views

Variation of (derandomized) Valiant-Vazirani

I am interested in the following "improvement" of the Valiant-Vazirani reduction. As pointed out here, under the right derandomization assumptions one can obtain a deterministic polynomial-...
Noel Arteche's user avatar
  • 1,049
1 vote
0 answers
34 views

On $PP$ and derandomization

$PP\subseteq P/poly\implies PP=\Sigma_2\cap\Pi_2$ and $EXP\subseteq P/Poly\implies EXP=PP$ $=CH=MA$. If $PP\subseteq P/poly$ then can $PP=\Sigma_2\cap\Pi_2=MA$ hold? Are there difficulties showing ...
Turbo's user avatar
  • 13.3k
3 votes
0 answers
121 views

On approximating problems in $\#P$

We know that for every counting problem $\#A$ in $\#P$, there is a probabilistic algorithm $\mathcal C$ that on input $x$, computes with high probability a value $v$ such that $$(1 − ε)\#A(x) ≤ v ≤ (1 ...
Turbo's user avatar
  • 13.3k
1 vote
0 answers
196 views

Consequences of VP = VNP on randomness

According to the answers in posting it is possible that $\mathsf{VP} = \mathsf{VNP}$ and $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$ are simultaneously correct. $\mathsf{VP} = \mathsf{VNP}$ implies $\mathsf{P/...
user avatar
65 votes
1 answer
3k views

More on PH in PP?

A recent question by Huck Bennett asking whether the class PH was contained in the class PP, received somewhat contradictory answers (all true, it seems). On one hand, several oracle results were ...
Noam's user avatar
  • 9,389