User talk:Zhuyifei1999/Archive 13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heads-up

Hi, as an active colleague on upload projects, I thought I'd drop you a personal heads-up for my request for adminship, today being the last day for views. RFA's tend to only have a small proportion of the community taking part, so it can be difficult to judge if this is representative. :-) -- (talk) 13:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Hey

Why the image failed? The image was perfectly licenced. What's the problem? Please tell.Krish! (talk) 06:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

There it is mentioned that "All sizes of this photo are available for download under a Creative Commons license" . See.Krish! (talk) 06:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
See COM:L: "Publication of derivative work must be allowed" & "Some examples of licensing statuses commonly found on the Internet, but forbidden on Commons, include: ... Creative Commons No-Derivatives (-ND) licenses" --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

PD images

As you may be aware, Flickr recently enabled images to be marked as being in the public domain. Most of the images I'm finding in Category:Flickr images needing human review are marked as PD, both on the Flickr source page and on the description page here. For an example, see File:Louis Moe - konvoluttenengra00gjel 0157 (21637845946).jpg; the bot correctly found the source page, and it correctly reflects the source's no-copyright-restrictions tag, but it apparently doesn't know what to do with it. Is there a chance that the bot could be reprogrammed to handle PD tags properly? Nyttend (talk) 01:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Expected behavior, see Commons:Requests_for_comment/Flickr_and_PD_images. In short: PD Mark does not explicitly state why the image is PD, and this is required by commons. Thus the handling logic is that if the image source page does not contain any PD templates, they will have to undergo a human review. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 01:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Oh btw, I'm not sure if Public Domain Dedication = Public Domain Mark --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
For the creation of upload tools from Gallica and the Google Art Project. Yann (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

gap - Invalid ID

Hi. I tried downloading an image from google culturalinstitute with gap, but it gives "Invalid ID! Please add a valid ID and klick -Go-!" [33] (I think its because of odd chars like '«'). --Sporti (talk) 13:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, that was the reason. In that case, try the hash-only id instead, since it is (kind of) a redirect to that url --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hash oly gives "Job did not seem to succeed. Please check your input or refresh this page to try again. If this still fail, please contact commons:User:Zhuyifei1999". --Sporti (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hmm. I just looked into it. This seems one of the images that's different, for most images I've seen a direct download of tile from ggpht.com will give weird results, but this one seems otherwise. I'll work on a fix tomorrow. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I tried to upload images using your program. One image was downloaded. I wanted to download a few pictures, but it is impossible. Not all works? And I want to express gratitude for a good idea.--IgorSokol (talk) 17:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Could you gave me the ids for those images that failed for you? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 22:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I am interested in these images:

Extended content

Raphael Portrait of the Young Cardinal Ippolito I d'Este 1503-1505 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-the-young-cardinal-ippolito-i-d-este/sAGc0AZndjyPsw

Titian Portrait of Marcantonio Trivisan, Doge of Venice https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-marcantonio-trevisan-doge-of-venice/VgEhlZEWSEOCdQ

Robert Lefevre Portrait of Joseph Bonaparte 1811 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-joséph-bonaparte/HwEHr8YJQVMRvA

portrait George II 1749-1755 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-george-ii/qwFzq5S4Blu9hg

Gerard Elisa Bonaparte https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/elisa-bonaparte-with-her-daughter-napoleona-baciocchi/OwEBXl6wZ35DUA?projectId=art-project

Kinson Pauline Bonaparte https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-paolina-bonaparte/DQEUxQLY23av3g?projectId=art-project

Iacoba of Baden https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/iacoba-of-baden/ygGXl4xy9RXtHA?projectId=art-project

Portrait Nicolas Fouquet 1661 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-de-nicolas-fouquet/zgEefsEQLhcfhw

Nicolas Fouquet 1653 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/nicolas-fouquet/LAHqGUGxY6UPPQ

Portrait of Doge Girolamo Priuli https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-girolamo-priuli/xQEhXVS3j4hGJw

Portrait of Doge Pietro Loredan https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-pietro-loredan/PgFf7Mj_QAVujA


Portrait of Doge Alvise IV Mocenigo 1779 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-alvise-iv-mocenigo/lgHetQytLKTwfw


Portrait of Doge Alvise I Mocenigo https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-alvise-i-mocenigo/6QE--n--rKb0HQ


Portrait of Doge Lorenzo Priuli https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-lorenzo-priuli/EwFlDHhJjMPipA


Portrait of Doge Carlo Ruzzini 1735 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-carlo-ruzzini/AwGY1ndgrICUeA

Portrait of Doge Marco Foscarini https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-marco-foscarini/QQHG_iZ2MkgkAw


Portrait of Doge Nicolò da Ponte https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-nicolò-da-ponte/hAHeyyV8Jd3aJQ


Portrait of Doge Francesco Loredan https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-francesco-loredan/GAFa_-Ot0zFzSg

Portrait of Doge Marcantonio Memmo 1616 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-marcantonio-memmo/QwEouwGyHypOOw


Portrait of Doge Giovanni Bembo https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-giovanni-bembo/zQHz8ZsSex4fIA


Portrait of Doge Antonio Priuli 1623 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-antonio-priuli/DgE5nRCbhVeQjA


Portrait of Doge Alvise III Mocenigo 1732 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-alvise-iii-mocenigo/XwGnhJpflAt_0Q


Portrait of Doge Silvestro Valiero 1700 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-silvestro-valier/3QFaKIoxqEI0AQ


Portrait of Doge Giovanni II Corner 1722 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-giovanni-ii-corner/mAFx-HdAr-4hPg


Portrait of Doge Francesco Morosini 1690 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-francesco-morosini/RgFBdzGvrDX4uA


Portrait of Doge Pietro Grimani 1752 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-pietro-grimani/KgF7aEFqhl0HOw


Portrait of Doge Marino Grimani 1607 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-marino-grimani/YwEx9TSTNLgcMg


Portrait of Doge Alvise Pisani 1741 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-alvise-pisani/JwH3NVMKMgi_rA


Portrait of Doge Leonardo Dona 1611 https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-doge-leonardo-donà/JgF0fg52aWFONA

--IgorSokol (talk) 07:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

@IgorSokol: I looked into a few random ones from your list, they all work. Please list only the ones that do not work. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
@IgorSokol: Oh apparently the issue for you might be that you used eg. "portrait-of-the-young-cardinal-ippolito-i-d-este" of "portrait-of-the-young-cardinal-ippolito-i-d-este/sAGc0AZndjyPsw" of the url for the tool. This will not work, as the url will show "Item not found". You can use either "sAGc0AZndjyPsw" (as the url is a redirect), or simply "portrait-of-the-young-cardinal-ippolito-i-d-este/sAGc0AZndjyPsw" --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 12:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
@Sporti: ✓ Fixed https://tools.wmflabs.org/yifeibot/downloaders/gap.py?id=6wHBcokgxHBung&bouton=Go --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, uploaded. --Sporti (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Now I understand how the program works. I do not download these images: 1) Gerard Elisa Bonaparte https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/elisa-bonaparte-with-her-daughter-napoleona-baciocchi/OwEBXl6wZ35DUA?projectId=art-project 2) Iacoba of Baden https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/iacoba-of-baden/ygGXl4xy9RXtHA?projectId=art-project--IgorSokol (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

The gigapixels crashed the script. You can try again now --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Happened. Thank you so much.--IgorSokol (talk) 16:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Why?

[34] (there were multiple edits like this). Materialscientist (talk) 07:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

SQL query returned false positives. I do not yet know why, as it may be caused by many factors, and the issue is temporary. Similar problems have happened in the past. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I can't restore out of scope text awey because your edit are

Example [35] I must restore twice before I can hide out of scope text.--Motopark (talk) 09:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Just blank the section. If not, do you have any alternative suggestions on the operation of the bot? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I blanked next time--Motopark (talk) 11:43, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

16:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

YeFeiBot mistriggering

This is not a big deal, but thought I'd mention it. In a couple of specific cases, the bot has misdetected files as "Media without a license: needs history check". The specific files were File:X-2 with Collapsed Nose Wheel - GPN-2000-000398.jpg and File:D-558-2 Dropped from B-29 Mothership - GPN-2000-000251.jpg. In both cases, I was merging a 'newer' higher res upload of a "Great Images in NASA" image on top of the bot-scraped version, and the bot triggered on it. Since there was never a moment when the page was actually missing a license template, I'm not sure why it would have been detected, but it's obviously not a high-priority problem. Revent (talk) 00:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, you're right. When the SQL query returns false positives, it can rarely distinguish them. It used to be better, but the second check part is now broken for unknown reasons. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, it's obviously no big deal, just thought I'd mention it. Doesn't 'break anything'. Revent (talk) 01:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Nice to see this bot on Commons, but it's doing some strange things. Here it signs a MiszaBot/config I added to my talk. I'm pretty sure I saw it sign an addition of {{User talk}} or {{Busy}} on another user's talk yesterday or the day before. Jeff 20:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, false positive. I'll work on a fix when I have time. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Should be fixed. I added a note to the bot request --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

This image

The flickrbot seems to be marking several images continuously. The image above is one example. I don't know the reason. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

There's a lot. Probably related to phab:T116001 --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

hi, curently there are a lot of false positives in Category:New uploads without a license marked by your bot. Can you pls. check for the reason and perhaps stop your bot meanwhile. thx. --JuTa 12:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

It happened in the past, but there's no way AFAIK to find the exact reason. My guess is that it may be phab:T116001 for this run. Unfortunately, I can't even control my bot right now due to phab:T116148. You may block it if it continue to cause troubles --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 12:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
phab:T116148 fixed and job killed. Also removed from crontab til phab:T116001 gets fixed --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Thx a lot. --JuTa 17:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

flickrreview

Hi, likely because of the same bug User:FlickreviewR 2 is now reviewing the same files a lot of times messing up the version histories (example). Perhaps it should currently run only once a day or similar. thx. --JuTa 20:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done as twice a day. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 04:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

FlickreviewR confirmed license multiple times

Hi there! I noticed your useful bot did license confirm multiple times, this seems anomalous. Here. Just FYI. Palosirkka (talk) 04:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

See above *sigh* --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations! Bot was approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion for SignBot

Hello, I have a little suggestion to think about, it's great that SignBot signs user comments one minute after that comment, but there are some cases in which it would be better to wait a little more time, like this one where the user added a nonsense, and it was not possible to directly revert the edit because SignBot was in the middle; or cases like this one (both cases on October 24th) where the user makes two edits, in this case it was good that SignBot edited 3 minutes after the first comment, I don't know why it was that way here. Maybe it would be good to wait ¿5 minutes? after the comment, in order to allow rollbackers to revert, and to allow users to correct his/her own comment before the bot acts. Or you may suggest something else :) --UAwiki (talk) 01:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Hmm. I don't think time is enough for most rollbackers to see the messages, whether it is 1 minute or 5 minutes. Usually, I would recommend simply blanking the section. Besides, the bot currently cannot detect if any previous or subsequent messages by the same user is signed or not. It simply checks whether the to-sign line has been modified or not after the time. I don't see much sense too the the additional 4 minutes. As for 3-minute-unsigned edit you mentioned, well, the first was clearly signed, and the second was recognized as unsigned by the bot, thus the unsigned was only for the second edit. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)