User talk:Valenzuela400

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Valenzuela400!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Philippine Circuit Show2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whpq (talk) 16:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roman Catholic Diocese Malolos Missal1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EnsureSupplement1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ireneo Villangca Mausoleum5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ireneo Villangca Mausoleum12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Charlotte Martinez Chiong6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malolos E E N T Hospital Charlotte Armando Chiong9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Crestmont Quezon City construction sign entry6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Crestmont Quezon City construction signage3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JCI San Fernando CabalenA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Belenghat Subanen SLT Zamboanga del Sur full body5.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Belenghat Subanen SLT Zamboanga del Sur full body5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I fogot to tag it, thanks very truly yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 09:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ifugao Ayangan Kalanguya Tuwali handwoven textile closeD.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ifugao Ayangan Kalanguya Tuwali handwoven textile closeD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I placed a license tag which I forgot earlier very truly yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 10:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Regarding copyrights of derivative works

[edit]

Hello po. Ang mga copyright po ay hindi lamang sa mga litratong kinuha ninyo, may ibang copyright din po kung may na-picture po kayo na bagay. Kung may larawan po kayo ng mga bagay na ginawa ng iba (halimbawa: painting, statue, building, etc.), may sariling copyright din po ang mga iyon. Hindi po kayo ang may-ari ng copyright ng bagay dahil lamang pinicturan ninyo ito (pero kayo pa rin po ang may-ari ng litrato). Pakibasa na lang po ang COM:Philippines upang malaman ninyo ang mga pwedeng i-upload dito.

Kung hindi na po naka-copyright ang bagay na pinicturan niyo po (Public Domain), pwede niyo po i-upload sa Wikimedia Commons gamit ang template {{PD-Philippines-FoP_work}} kasabay ng CC license niyo. Maraming salamat po. --Aristorkle (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, works that are on display by museums and galleries do not mean that photos of them can be published because the public can see them. R.A. 8293 does not have that exception. See COM:FOP Philippines. Kung kailangan niyo pa po kayo ng tulong tungkol sa copyright, maaaring mag-iwan ng message sa aking talk page. --Aristorkle (talk) 18:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aristorkle Thanks for your message and later I would like to ask some questions to you on FOP inter alia - specifically, my uploads of facade from Redemptorist station to Dr. Santos station and the Greenery Bulacan and others also - can I transfer all these photos to Commons and what tag should I use, very truly yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
By the way, I viewed you Guillrey Anthony Andal, oh memories, down the old lane, I could have met Joel Tabora at Arvisu house Katipunan ... the last time I lectured one on one 3 years ago at Jesuit Residence Ateneo QC on one of the greatest Jesuits ever Forbes Park millionaire Fr. Joey Jose de Leon SJ a mystic and time traveler I was about to take photo of Bernie Joaquin Bernas SJ and Catalino Arevalo, but he grabbed my camera, masungit daw yan ... never do that before me, Barasoain Church Fr. Domingo Mememg Salonga was a small boy at the San Jose Seminary then, and Romeo Archie Intengan was there with Roque Feriols in tsinelas Manny Dy, Leo Garcia, Mac Reyes, Eduardo Calasanz the Valedictorian .. they come and go; but since age 6 I went to extreme seclusion, no phone no communications, but I love photos my heart is first on horses, and third, Valenzuela, Bulacan then was not yet a city and we celebrated the end of the 1 year celebration last Nov 12, you notice that I only created 1 article Euwenn Mikaell Aleta whom I did prophecy to be the greatest ever Filipino actor, ahead of his times, hope you take more pictures Salamat Valenzuela400 (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
@Valenzuela400 Generally, architectural works under copyright protection require permissions from the architect. Looking at the pictures of different railway stations that you uploaded, most lack any artistic features to be copyrightable (i.e. generic), so you can export them to Commons as usual using a CC license tag. However, for your photos of The Greenery Bulacan, since the resort opened in 2001 according to their official website, most of the buildings and signages are protected by copyright. It would be best if you left an {{FoP-USonly}} tag under your CC tag on images you uploaded to the English Wikipedia to let others know not to export them to Commons. But if you took photos inside the resort, you must request permission from the resort to publish your photos since they were taken on private property. --Aristorkle (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aristorkle "But if you took photos inside the resort, you must request permission from the resort to publish your photos since they were taken on private property." I don't think so. What we need is CC licensing permission from the architect or whoever that designed the resort building. Permissions from the management or owner are not accepted as invalid. Building designer permission is what matters and not owner permission. Also, signages may be OK here if there are no artistic or creative properties in the signages' designs or content. {{PD-text}} in case of signages with no literary properties, for example only showing a list of persons, name of the establishment in plain fonts, or only address. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 15:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345 Yes, thanks for clarifying. Although, the signs in this case were designed to match the theme of the resort, so probably copyrightable.--Aristorkle (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Angel Datu Jovita Bundalian House markerA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 04:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Candelaria Quezon Coco deli coconut sugar granules7.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Candelaria Quezon Coco deli coconut sugar granules7.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeBot Thanks, Done, I edited and placed the license tag, which I forgot due to my inadvertence very truly yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 10:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]