User talk:Tzafrir
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
I'm not frequently here. If you want to leave me a message, try the page on the Hebrew Wikipedia or email me. Tzafrir (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Nvi gitconfig.png was uncategorized on 6 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Thessaloniki view-banner.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Thessaloniki view-banner.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Nice of you to add that scary-looking templated warning before actually reading what I wrote in the file's page. I clarified further in the talk page. Tzafrir (talk) 11:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry for "scary-looking templated warning" and I do not read file's pages or talk page before adding them, since I process many hundreds of files at the time. All I do is to look for recently uploaded files missing licenses and tag them so they can be fixed or deleted, since all our images need a clear copyright statements. I did not designed the {{No license}} and {{Image license}} template, I just use them, but if you think they can be improved please suggest how, we often need a fresh perspective. In case of this image I just copied the license from the source file, so it is fine now. Regards. --Jarekt (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Just to clarify: I wrote the talk page after getting this message. I wrote it in the page itself. Maybe I should have written it in the talk page. I have just wasted more than an hour on uploading it until I realized that the derivativeFX was broken, and I had to upload it manually. Thanks for fixing the license. Tzafrir (talk) 13:00, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry for "scary-looking templated warning" and I do not read file's pages or talk page before adding them, since I process many hundreds of files at the time. All I do is to look for recently uploaded files missing licenses and tag them so they can be fixed or deleted, since all our images need a clear copyright statements. I did not designed the {{No license}} and {{Image license}} template, I just use them, but if you think they can be improved please suggest how, we often need a fresh perspective. In case of this image I just copied the license from the source file, so it is fine now. Regards. --Jarekt (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Hod Hasharon COA he.svg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hod Hasharon COA he.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |