User talk:Seewolf
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Orgullomoore 05:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --
Image Tagging Image:Seewolf.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Seewolf.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Oxam Hartog 22:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- This image was licensed correctly, only the information that was there from the beginning has been removed by an IP. – Restored and protected after the image was deleted mistakely and further vandalism appeared on that page. (See also [1]). --:Bdk: 16:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Copyright violations
Hello,
I think there was a misunderstanding regarding this image. Sorry for this annoying message. Regards, Yann 16:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Image:KIKU brak-ontree.JPG is uncategorized since 6 July 2009.
- Image:RBMK reactor from Ignalina.png was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Moderne olivenernte.JPG was uncategorized on 16 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Brockhaus Blackout.jpg was uncategorized on 18 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Kryptolog Sperrprüfung
Hallo Seewolf, dürfte ich Dich darauf hinweisen, dass Du gar kein Recht hast den Account Kryptolog Sperrprüfung zu sperren. Er wird, wie der Name schon sagt, für die Sperrprüfung verwendet. Also, bitte entsperren. The Kryptolog write me 22:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Löschenanträge für Bilder
Laut S1 taugen meine Bilder nichts, du hättest sie ruhig löschen können. Dann häte er sie noch einmal neu machen können, so dass sie seinen Ansprüchen genügen. --Noebse (talk) 16:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
Dear Seewolf,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Was soll der Quatsch?
Mit welchem Recht löscht Du einen Beitrag wiederholt heraus, in dem ich dem Benutzer auf etwas aufmerksam mache, was nicht in Ordnung an seinem Bild ist? Soweit ich sehe, ist Ppb-gera nur bei de.wikipedia gesperrt und nicht hier und selbst wenn, ist das kein Grund meine Beiträge zu löschen und sie für nicht beachtenswürdig zu erklären. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Du musst schon etwas genauer hinschauen, der ist global gesperrt. Es ist nicht sinnvoll, wenn du etwas schreibst, die Trollbeiträge wieder einzufügen. Gruß, Seewolf (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Habe nicht gesehen, dass der Typ generell gesperrt ist und ganz knusper scheint er auch nicht zu sein. Ging von der irrigen Annahme aus, er würde einfach nur falsch argumentieren. Nichts für ungut. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Knusper wäre hier wirklich der falsche Ausdruck. Aber danke, dass du dir den ans Bein gebunden hast. Gruß, Seewolf (talk) 09:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Habe nicht gesehen, dass der Typ generell gesperrt ist und ganz knusper scheint er auch nicht zu sein. Ging von der irrigen Annahme aus, er würde einfach nur falsch argumentieren. Nichts für ungut. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File tagging File:Helmut Zerlett.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Helmut Zerlett.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Leyo 20:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Phänotypen
Hallo Seewolf, bezüglich der Genehmigung meines Bildes "File:Phänotypen.jpg":
Es handelt sich um eine Zusammenstellung von Photos aus dem Schulbuch Lange Strauß Dobers: "Biologie Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch" (copyright 1971, 2. Auflage von 1977), ISBN 3-7005-8041-X, S. 264f. Der Punkt dabei ist, daß die Photos selbst - wie man auch klar sieht - sehr alt sind, weshalb kein Copyright mehr bestand (und daher im Buch auch keine Quellen angegeben sind). Benutzer:Schlesinger schrieb, daß sie sich bereits im Bertelsmann Volkslexikon von 1956 finden.
Logischerweise kann somit auch kein Copyright bei den Autoren des Schulbuches liegen. Aus dem Buch selbst habe ich sonst nichts kopiert, sondern lediglich die dortigen Bildunterschriften in meinem Bild eingefügt. Wenn Du Dich selbst überzeugen möchtest, sende ich Dir gern per Mail die beiden Originalscans der fraglichen Buchseiten zu. Beste Grüße! --Avstriakos (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo Seewolf, wenn auch weiter kein Einspruch kommt, geh' ich davon aus, daß die Sache OK geht und hau' das Bapperl wieder raus. Beste Grüße, --Avstriakos (talk) 15:20, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Gut gemacht, Bravo:
Kaum kümmert man sich einmal nicht drum, wird fröhlich gelöscht ... und nicht einmal die Versionsgeschichte ist einsehbar (wer das wann warum entfernte).
Vielen herzlichen Dank auch Dir, Seewolf, für Dein umfassendes Schweigen und das ned-amal-Ignorieren meiner Anmerkungen und Vorschläge! Das ist wahre Kommunikation - meine Glückwünsche zu solch konstruktiver Zusammenarbeit. Der WP/WM gehen Mitarbeiter verloren? Na sowas, und keiner weiß, warum ...
In diesem Sinne: Ich wünsch Euch was (Stichwort "kreuzweise, desgleichen"). --Avstriakos (talk) 20:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- Gut gemacht, Bravo:
TFF Rudolstadt
Hallo Harald,
sehe egrade, dass du Bilder von TFF hochgeladen hast - eine Kategorie existiert bereits unter Category:TFF.Rudolstadt 2013 (gut gefüllt, auch Kategorien der letzten Jahre). Gruß, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Detmold Bild
Hallo Seewolf,
Herzlichen Dank für ihren Bericht über meinem Bild "Detmold_01.jpg". Ich habe den Architekt in Detmold abgemahnt die Lizenz in Ordnung zu bringen. Mit freundlichem Gruß, Marc (MJJR (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)).
File source is not properly indicated: File:Rarr.svg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rarr.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze
Hallo Seewolf,
in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.
Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.
In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.
Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.
Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.
( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)
File:Emin Sükrü Senkal-4647.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Emin Sükrü Senkal-4650.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen
Hallo Seewolf,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland
Hallo,
hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.
Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Gern kannst Du Dich hier auch weiterhin beteiligen! Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichte Dein nebenstehendes tolles Foto einen Platz unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.
Als Preis erhältst Du einen Foto- oder Buchgutschein im Wert von 20 Euro. Daher bitten wir Dich, eine E-Mail an communitywikimedia.de zu schicken, in der Du Deinen Benutzernamen und Deinen Klarnamen angibst. Gibt dort bitte auch an, ob du lieber einen Foto- oder lieber einen Buchgutschein per E-Mail zugeschickt bekommen möchtest.
Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.
Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!
i. A. --Nicola (talk) 08:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Harald und Grüße aus der "alten Heimat" --Pelz (talk) 00:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Auch herzliche Glückwünsche aus dem Sauerland. --Asio 12:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC) und --Bubo 容 15:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Seewolf,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Seewolf,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 18:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Code issues in User:Seewolf/common.js
Hi Seewolf, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.
Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:
- You edited User:Seewolf/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
- Though, that change appears to introduce 12 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
- To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
- ISSUE:
line 39 character 19
: Use '===' to compare with ''. - Evidence:if ( html == '' ) html = '<div style="margin:2px;"><i>No results found on Wikidata</i></div>' ;
- ISSUE:
line 52 character 6
: Missing semicolon. - Evidence:}
- ISSUE:
line 81 character 23
: Use '===' to compare with ''. - Evidence:if ( query=='' || query==me.last_query ) return ;
- ISSUE:
line 127 character 38
: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence:if ( $('a.image').length == 0 ) return ; // No possible thumbnails
- ISSUE:
line 140 character 77
: Use '===' to compare with ''. - Evidence:if ( typeof wgWikibaseItemId == 'undefined' || wgWikibaseItemId == '' ) return ;
- ISSUE:
line 167 character 53
: Missing semicolon. - Evidence:$('#sdc_main').css({bottom:bottom+'px'})
- ISSUE:
line 179 character 61
: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence:if ( $('input.sdc_checkbox:checked').length == 0 ) {
- ISSUE:
line 209 character 29
: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence:if ( cbs.length == 0 ) return me.show_action_button(); // All done
- ISSUE:
line 342 character 59
: Missing semicolon. - Evidence:html += "<div style='margin:0.2em;'>Property "
- ISSUE:
line 434 character 30
: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence:if ( mids.length == 0 ) return ;
- ISSUE:
line 462 character 33
: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence:if ( to_load.length == 0 ) return ;
- ISSUE:
line 510 character 29
: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence:if ( out.length == 0 ) {
Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 15:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC).
You seem to be the only OTRS agent who had some dealings with this image and is still an agent. Perhaps you remember this Commons:Deletion requests/File:Simon Michel.jpg. Well it has raised it ugly head again with this OTRS Ticket:2019111810008261 I am dealing with, though it was a different Ticket:2014011110003537 that originally verified the image back in 2014. I'm not really sure what to do with this, so perhaps you would review and advise, preferably by dropping a note in the ticket. The email used now is different from the one used in 2014, but it was Swiss email and there was an release attached to that ticket, though not signed. Thanks in advance.
File tagging File:ABT Logo 4C.svg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:ABT Logo 4C.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Die Komödie Frankfurt Foyer by panolocal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stepro (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Die Komödie Frankfurt Eingang by panolocal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stepro (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Die Komödie Frankfurt Saal by panolocal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stepro (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Andreas Borcherding-11.png
Copyright status: File:Andreas Borcherding-11.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Andreas Borcherding-11.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
please dont remove DR tags
please dont remove DR tags before it is over. please revert your edits until DR is over. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- ok then, im gonna revert them all myself! ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Seems like a lot of work, would have been easier to just withdraw your now baseless nomination. --Seewolf (talk) 08:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Please fix the permission with the ad-hoc template. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)