User talk:Rama/archive 10

Iran

http://www.flickr.com/photos/fhashemi/

File:M9_and_AN_PEQ-14.jpg M9_and_AN_PEQ-14_in_action.jpg

Could u plz proof any copyrightvialtion?--Sanandros (talk) 15:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are reversing the charge of the proof. It's not my place to prove anything at all, it is you who must provide a verifiable source for the images. They look very, very much like promotional photographs made by the maker, and in this case, even hosted on a US military site, they are not public domain. With the links dead, they are equivalent to images apparently snached from a random commercial site. Rama (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But it isn't a friendly way to delete these pics without any discussions.--Sanandros (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hippalectryon

Salut Rama, je passe aussi au Louvre aujourd'hui, on risque de se croiser :) En tout cas, j'avais prévu de passer aux figurines en terre cuites, donc n'hésite pas à te concentrer sur ce que tu voulais faire. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

En fait la section d'antiquités orientales est fermée, j'ai passé mon dépit sur la Grèce de l'Âge du Bronze. Mais je ne t'ai pas vue :p Rama (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Euh... moi aussi j'ai fait la Grèce de l'âge du Bronze... Bon tant pis, on uploade tout, ça fera du choix. Sinon non, les Antiquités orientales n'étaient pas fermées, tu voulais aller dans quelles salles ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J'aurais voulu refaire correctement les textes ougarites, ils sont à Sully, rez-de-chaussée Levant : Syrie côtière, Ougarit et Byblos Salle B [1]. J'ai eu l'impression que c'était fermé en regardant un plan, mais peut-être aurais-je dû vérifier par moi-même.

Dans la série des certitudes à remettre en doute, j'ai aussi vu plein de gens photographier au flash, y compris un type avec un gros flashgun orientable, et des gens qui se baladaient ouvertement avec un trépied. Peut-être que je ferais bien de prendre au moins un monopode la prochaine fois. Rama (talk) 23:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Les gardiens sont moins bornés qu'à Cluny, par exemple, donc ils te laissent photographier au flash ce qui ne craint rien, typiquement les statues. Pour les trépieds, j'ai vu aussi des gens se balader avec, mais se faire engueuler s'ils le déployaient. Pas vu, pas pris : un monopode discret dans une salle peu fréquentée, ça doit passer. Les vieux sortent bien des sièges pliants alors que c'est interdit...

Sinon, les salles dont tu parles étaient bien ouvertes, je suis moi-même passée par là pour sortir hier. Mais c'est vrai que c'est un peu confus, j'ai l'impression que l'ouverture ou la fermeture des salles varie pas mal en fonction des travaux.

J'ai vu ton SMS bien après l'heure. C'est con qu'on se soit loupés. La prochaine fois, on peut peut-être s'arranger à l'avance ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 06:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mes excuses pour le SMS. Je ne savais a priori que j'allais rester ainsi immobile, c'est pourquoi je n'ai pas tenté de te contacter plus tôt, et comme je n'ai pas de GSM, ça a été peu souple. C'était une bouteille à la mer ou cas où, j'espère que ça ne t'a pas mise mal à l'aise.

Bien volontier pour la prochaine fois. Bon développement de photos de terres cuites d'ici là ! Rama (talk) 09:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hipalectryon bis

Salut,

Très belle photo (ici), surtout pour du 0,2 s :) J'ai un peu réorganisé la page de description à la sauce musée habituelle, et j'ai demandé un renommage à la même sauce (File:Terracotta hippalektryon Louvre CA1792.jpg), j'espère que ça te convient. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parfait, je vais renommer les fichiers, alors. Bonne continuation! Rama (talk) 10:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Au poil ! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 11:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Au poil et à la plume. ^.^ Rama (talk) 11:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Achille mg 6916.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Amin pedia

Hello dear Rama i have unblocked the user since he promised not upload copyvios anymore , so if you have found any other copyvios from now please feel free to re-block. thanks --Mardetanha ^talk 09:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you very much. Goog continuation! Rama (talk) 21:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vaisseau-1er rang Morel-Fatio-2.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Schéma pour l'artillerie navale

Bonsoir, concernant l'article sur l'artillerie navale, pouvez traduire en français la description de la tourelle des cuirassés de la classe Iowa pour remplacer celui actuellement sur l'article : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iowa_16_inch_Gun.svg l'amateur d'aéroplanes

Plus ou moins fait, mais perfectible. Rama (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naked woman-Louvre-E27429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit of sharpening grain in background but otherwise good. Reduction to about 50% has helped sharpness :) --Iotatau 16:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Chenier2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Chenier2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Chenier2.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--malo (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main pouétique mg 6664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good idea and good quality -- H005 13:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images flous des Arts et Metiers

Bonjour,

Je pense mettre quelques images trop flous ou avec des reflets des vitres visibles à supprimer : Commons:Deletion_requests/CNAM-flou.

En même temps j'ai marqué l'image File:CNAM-IMG_0567.jpg "corrompu", pouvez-vous y jeter un coup d'œil, est-ce le problème de mon poste, ou l'image ne s'affiche vraiment pas ?

Et merci pour les images, même s'il est très difficile de s'y retrouver, vu la manque de description des objets photographiés.

Green fr (talk) 16:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Il faudrait sans doute que j'y retourne. Les reflets peuvent dans certains cas se corriger -- le manque de profondeur de champs, par contre, évidemment pas. Quoi qu'il en soit, la demande que tu as faite est toujours utile, ne serait-ce que comme liste de photos à refaire. Rama (talk) 21:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: pour File:CNAM-IMG_0567.jpg, je n'ai pas de problème. Il y a eu quelques ennuis avec les serveurs d'images ces derniers temps, ce genre de contre-temps n'est donc pas surprenant. Rama (talk) 21:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pour 0567 - cela fait au moins 2 mois que j'arrive pas la visualiser. Même si c'est la configuration de mon poste, il y a qqch qui cloche avec cette photo.

Sinon, tu pourrais sinon faire les annotations aux photos, au moins photographier les pancartes des objets des musées ? Surtout quand il y a des volumes (encore une fois, merci pour les photos :-)), c'est super difficile de retrouver la "machine à tisser" qu'il faut parmi les dizaines exposées au CNAM.--Green fr (talk) 12:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Purge le cache de ton navigateur. (Ctrl shift R sous firefox ou alt F5 sous ie) Esby (talk) 10:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rapier Photos

In the English Wikpedia article on Rapiers, you are credited with four black and white photos of rapier hilts. Can you recall where these photos were taken? I would appreciate it if you could let me know.--Nimbus rutilus (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was taken during a weapon fair in Lausanne. Most of these rapiers are modern replicas used for fencing (there are genuine weapons but i di not remember which ones, sorry). Do let me know if I can be of further help. Cheers! Rama (talk) 21:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joan_Baez_TIME_23_November_1962.jpg

File:Joan_Baez_TIME_23_November_1962.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

feydey ^(talk) 09:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook

U know that they use pics on Facebook?--Sanandros (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am certain that they use lots of things on Facebook. Dear me, not the tastiest photograph I ever made, either. Cheers! Rama (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yea also wondered that they used this one.--Sanandros (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:D

		The Quality Image Barnstar
		Thanks for uploading such great images. Huib talk 11:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos de net marine

Bonjour, j'ai reçu votre message concernant les photos de netmarine. Je n'avais pas fait attention au "Template", plusieurs personnes qui m'ont envoyé des messages concernant de menues erreurs lors de ces premiers uploads, n'y ont vu que du feu. Vous aviez émis un certain nombre de messages concernant la possiblité d'utiliser ces photos qu'il faudrait préciser afin que personne d'autre ne tombe dans le panneau. J'ai trouvé l'autorisation sur une de vos pages (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Rama/NetMarine-licence) sans plus de commentaires sur la durée de validité, et d'autres infos sur la page de discussion de l'article french navy du wiki anglais. Sans ces infos, Je n'aurais rien chargé.

Bien amicalement Pontus AL

Bonjour, et merci beaucoup pour vos remarques. J'ai mis des avertissement j'espère immanquables à ces endroits. Si vous repérez d'autres endroits trompeurs, n'hésitez pas à me les signaler.

Merci aussi pour votre photo de la vedette côtière, qui prouve que nous pouvons faire nos propres photos quand nous en avons l'occasion.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions sur vos dessins

Voir Commons:Village pump#Possible copyright violation. Pourriez-vous expliquer là-bas comment vous avez crée ces dessins? Merci. Lupo 21:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harpist hands img 4997-b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

US PD Question

Hi Rama, I´ve uploaded this [2] based on the libary of congress. I´m not sure if there is anything, regarding copyright, I did forget to mention. Could you please take a quick look? Alexpl (talk) 10:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look absolutely perfect, thank you! Rama (talk) 13:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Insulfation2.jpg

This image is incorrect, in regards to correct hand position, and should deleted.

Source: American heart assiciation, European resuscitation consil.

Note: The hand position, was used 10 years ago in the netherlands, but is incorrect by current standarts!

--93.167.210.222 08:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notify uploaders please

You should always notify uploaders when you delete their images. You seem to have forgotten this. See Commons:Undeletion requests#Afghanistan images for some recent examples. Multichill (talk) 13:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if this has anything to do with the deletion script being broken. -Nard the Bard 16:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight

Your thoughts and comments are welcome here: [3]. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 01:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Institutions_europeennes_IMG_4307.jpg

File:Institutions_europeennes_IMG_4307.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–Tryphon ^☂ 15:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your inages

Hi! Sorry to bother you. I made my bot mark some images with the text "Flickr" for a {{Flickrreview}}. Some of the images has you as author:

Maybe you would like to remove the Flickr-tag or what you prefer as a sort of proof of permission? Not a big deal I just thought it would look better that you had made an edit on the images :-) --MGA73 (talk) 10:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good thinking, thank you! Rama (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kunar-looting-body-1.OGG

Hello, You can't delete an image as you fancy. The decision of the DR was kept. If you have an objection, open another DR. Yann (talk) 20:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Файл: Ruine Berghof.JPG

Уважаемые Рама! Me при размещении Ruine Berghof.JPG, ошибка (в первой версии файла) Опубликованный фотография Mate, он не хотел бы иметь в вики. Вся другая информация, и последняя версия файла является правильным. Можно ли удалить фотографию моего друга с указанного файла? - Kolchak1923 ( Talk </ SPAN>) 20:10, 26 октября 2009 (UTC)

Сделано, я думаю. Позвольте мне знать, если вам нужно что-то другое, и хорошее продолжение! Рама ( Talk </ SPAN>) 20:17, 26 октября 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much!--Kolchak1923 (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Midshipman

One of your images was brought to my attention in my FAC review; File:Thomas Rowlandson-midship.jpg. The source is current listed as: scanned from Vaisseau de Ligne, Time Life, 1979, but I can't find that book via the title. Can you check the source and put a full citation with an author and ISBN#? Thank you very much! I found it, Vaisseaux de ligne. 140.182.208.54 15:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulation, thank you! Rama (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

# 16:07, 3 November 2009 Rama (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Taliban in southern Afghanistan 10-12-06.jpg" ‎ (No SERIOUS srouce)

# 16:07, 3 November 2009 Rama (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Taliban in southern Afghanistan 10-12-06.jpg" ‎ (No SERIOUS srouce)

I find this very disturbing as you were already chastised by a number of other administrators for unilaterally deleting images coming out of Afghanistan that you personally felt should not be included. Again, I notice you have not notified the uploader of your concerns, and you have not opened a request for deletion or sought others' input in any fashion. Regardless of the source of the image, you were wrong to have simply tried to make the file disappear.

As this is the third time I am having this identical issue with you, I regret to inform you that I am going to open a request to have your adminship revoked. Sherurcij (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deadminship request

Hi Rama, not sure if you've already been informed, but your use of the sysop tools is currently under scrutiny; see Commons:Administrators/Requests/Rama. Best regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–Tryphon ^☂ 14:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cher Ami!

C'est formidable! Du bist ja regelrecht polyglott!!!

"Wer bereit ist, seine Freiheit zugunsten der Sicherheit zeitweise einzuschränken, schützt keines und verliert beides!" - ist diese Übersetzung Deines Wahlspruches richtig? Und was bedeutet das Griechische?

Hergelotst hat mich übrigens Deine herrliche Verschwörungs-Graphik...

Herzliche Grüße --Skipper Michael (wikipedie.de) --82.113.121.24 22:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, die Übersetzung is gut. Das Griechische ist das Wahlspruch von Griechenland, "Freiheit oder Todt" ("Elefteria i tanatos"). Grüße ! Rama (talk) 08:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:FS_Redoutable.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FS_Redoutable.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eusebius (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question (oversight possible)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bistro#Suppresion_de_3_images

Est ce qu'on est bien dans les cas définis pour une action d'oversight? (Effacer un nom de l'historique des descriptions d'un fichier)

Esby (talk) 12:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dude

in the picture of the blokes wanking each other off, why does one of them have green hair? wtf?

Need help

Could you help us here, please? --Aboalbiss (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is an archive of a discussion of the English Wikipedia. Rama (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion

FYI, Commons:Undeletion_requests#Two_files.2C_both_American_Govt_files Sherurcij (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BurjDubaiHeight.svg

Your diagram File:BurjDubaiHeight.svg has been used in a slideshow by the UK newspaper the Daily Telegraph, without proper attribution

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/worldnews/6662675/A-first-look-inside-Burj-Dubai-the-tallest-skyscraper-in-the-world-as-it-nears-completion.html?image=13

request

Hello! I know you can't share deleted material, but do you think you could tell me what the source was for this image so I can obtain it myself? I can't read the page since it's deleted. Thanks!! 130.49.5.182 21:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original file that was on Commons was taken from the PDF here [4] and rasterised. A small example is on en at en:File:Minarets poster 1.jpg, as fair use. -- Rama (talk) 22:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!130.49.5.182 05:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FOP The Netherlands

Hello Rama, you deleted a few images from Henri Laurens, Fernand Leger etc. in The Netherlands and elsewhere. Perhaps you don't know or understand that, though the copyright from images is protected by French law, in countries with Freedom of Panorama those rules does not apply. I ask you, as this discussion is held a few times in the past, to undelete them immediately. You have absolutely no right to delete images taken in FOP countries. Read the rules on Wikimedia Commons. Gr. --Gerardus (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What files are you thinking about? Rama (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will look up the File names on nl. wikipedia: Rotterdam and The Hague and Venezuela/Caracas as well:

File:Henri Laurens 01.JPG
File:Denhaag kunstwerk grande fleur.jpg
File:Henri Laurens-L'Amphion-Leger-Bimural 1953.JPG
File:L'Amphion at UCV Caracas Venezuela.jpg

This are the ones on my list, but I don't know whether more images were deleted in the same action(?).--Gerardus (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restored File:Henri Laurens 01.JPG and File:Denhaag kunstwerk grande fleur.jpg. We do not have information about Venezuela, so I am assume the 70-year rule. Rama (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have the full info, well do not delete. If you are sure, delete. Venezuela and other South American countries were never a problem, like Spain and Portugal. Where can I find a complete list of your deletions?--Gerardus (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, no, that's the other way around: if you are pretty frigging certain that you have the right to take people's work, do it. Else, don't. You find the list of deletions at [5], of course. Rama (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You said no info, but Commons:Freedom of Panorama says: VENEZUELA: OK. You have to go to the end of the long list but Venezuela is on it. Please: undelete!--Gerardus (talk) 17:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, correct. I got mixed up between COM:L and COM:FOP. My bad. Restoring. Rama (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but what a problems we get by this thoughtless action. CommonsDeLinker removed all information and I have to reconstruct it all. What a shame! And, I still miss File:FernandLeger02.JPG, what happened to that image. Was that Venezuela as well? Oh boy, what a mess. --Gerardus (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FernandLeger02.JPG is a photographic reproduction of a promotional poster for an exhibit, taken in Switzerland. That surely can't fall under Freedom of Panorama. Rama (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right, but how could I control that? One question if you were so sure about Venezuela: why only delete French artists?? Are they so special to you that you did not bother the other artists? Strange action from an admin!!!! And not knowing where to find the FOP-regulations. Friendly greetings from,--Gerardus (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunsthalle Bielefeld.JPG

Hi Rama, in case you delete and (some time later, for whatever reason) undelete a file, could you please check CommonsDelinker's log then and see if you have to revert some of the bot's removals? If you don't do that, usually nobody else on the affected projects notices that a removed file is still/again there. In this case the file was used on Commons (in one gallery) and on de.wikipedia (on 8 pages, including FPC pages), and I only checked the file by accident (and reinstated the image). Thanks --:bdk: 18:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you. Glad we have this file, it is an interesting photograph. Cheers! Rama (talk) 19:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok :-) --:bdk: 19:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duchamp Fountaine.jpg

Hello. It was my impression that while almost everything by Duchamp remains under copyright until 70 years after his death, File:Duchamp Fountaine.jpg was a different case as the work was created, exibited, photographed, and the photo first published, all in the United States before 1923, and hence US copyright law was applicable. Is there something I missed which required it to be speedy deleted? Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In doubt, restored. Rama (talk) 19:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. If you think the licnese is questionable or the image may be a problem, I'd suggest listing for deletion discussion. I think this one is ok, but I might be wrong. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fichiers Bertrand Créac'h

1 décembre 2009 à 17:51 Rama (discuter | contributions) a supprimé « File:Bertrand Créac'h Lavis.jpg » ‎ (Copyright violation)
1 décembre 2009 à 17:51 Rama (discuter | contributions) a supprimé « File:Bertrand Créac'h Enlacement.jpg » ‎ (Copyright violation)

Pourquoi avoir effacé ces fichiers, sans prévenir en plus son créateur, c'est-à-dire moi-même ?... !!! Aucun "copyright violation" puisque et le sculpteur et le photographe (nous habitons à quelques kilomètres...), sont plus que d'accord ! Merci de répondre, et si possible, de remettre en ligne lesdits fichiers (les copyright sous wikimedia commons sont plus qu'obscurs à comprendre... : comment faire ? Plutôt que censurer il serait plus utile de poser les questions au préalable) Alalca (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Il ne s'agit pas de censure, mais de respect des droits d'auteurs -- qui sont définis par les lois nationales et non par Commons. Photographier une oeuvre protégée par le droit d'auteur n'en n'annule pas la protection; aussi, pour la publier sur Commons, l'autorisation de son auteur est-elle indispensable.

L'ayant droit de l'oeuvre originale (i.e. l'auteur ou ses descendants) devrait envoyer un mail à [email protected] , confirmant son accord. De plus amples informations sont disponibles sur Commons:OTRS/fr, mais je reste à votre disposition le cas échéant.

Bonne continuation. Rama (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama in Guernsey

Bouônjour! I notice from this edit that an image of a statue of Victor Hugo in Guernsey was deleted by you on the grounds that there is no freedom of panorama in Guernsey. However, COM:FOP#Guernsey clearly shows that Guernsey legislation provides for freedom of panorama. Could you explain, please? Man vyi (talk) 22:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The explanation is simple, I goofed. Restored, sorry. Rama (talk) 10:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for prompt action. Man vyi (talk) 11:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@Rama: Sorry for insisting on a side issue, but this is what had to be checked after undeletion in this case. I only noted Man vyi doing some of the needed reverts, e.g. here. I later reverted the rest, e.g. there. Well, … especially because you deleted the file ad hoc without any deletion request or so (you decided on your own), it would be very nice if you could take care of required reverts yourself the next time, see also my little request above. --:bdk: 19:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chicago spire.svg

File:Chicago spire.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DR04 (talk) 01:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ménage à Chartres

Salut. Je suis en train de faire un plan des vitraux de la cathédrale de Chartres, et du coup je fais de la catégorisation dans la région, je classe les photos pour repérer la meilleure vue de chaque fenêtre, etc. Comme tu le sais, il y en a un paquet (et de photos, et de vitraux). Est-ce que ça te choquerait beaucoup si je proposais à la suppression des photos du style de celle-ci, toujours bien sûr en proposant en remplacement une autre vue plus présentable des mêmes vitraux ? D'autre part, j'ai fait des retouches sur plusieurs de tes photos que je compte réutiliser. Dis-moi si ça ne te convient pas et je les réuploaderai comme DW. Cordialement, --Eusebius (talk) 15:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non non, pas de problème. Le but c'est d'arriver à quelque chose de bien, pas de se brosser l'égo. Merci pour le ménage et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, à plus ! --Eusebius (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chartres_cathedral_2866.jpg

File:Chartres_cathedral_2866.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bussigny mock minaret mg 9570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MattiPaavola 21:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osiris E3751 mp3h8829-d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Nice DOF. How about cropping a little from left, top and bottom to improve the composition? --MattiPaavola 16:53, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
* Like this? -- Rama 17:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Put that one on here and I would promote it :) --Herbythyme 17:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
* OK, done ^^. -- Rama 17:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the d version is much better. I would even crop the snake away from the hat, but I think it's a matter of taste. Definitely QI anyway and well done! --MattiPaavola 17:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chartres cathedral 2857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I'd prefer if the four lights were cloned out. This time I agree with the black borders, but would prefer if they were even. --99of9 01:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perspective correction would be nice, too. --MattiPaavola 17:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info Lights cloned out, perspective corrected, centred. --Eusebius 20:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good now. --99of9 20:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Your opinion on a nomination for deletion would be appreciated here, thanks, DR04 (talk) 19:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Rama/archive 10

Iran

Hippalectryon

Hipalectryon bis

Schéma pour l'artillerie navale

Quality Image Promotion

File source is not properly indicated: File:Chenier2.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Images flous des Arts et Metiers

Rapier Photos

Facebook

:D

Photos de net marine

Questions sur vos dessins

Quality Image Promotion

US PD Question

Image:Insulfation2.jpg

Notify uploaders please

Oversight

Some of your inages

Image:Kunar-looting-body-1.OGG

# 16:07, 3 November 2009 Rama (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Taliban in southern Afghanistan 10-12-06.jpg" ‎ (No SERIOUS srouce)

Deadminship request

Notification about possible deletion

Cher Ami!

File tagging File:FS_Redoutable.jpg

question (oversight possible)

dude

Need help

Undeletion

File:BurjDubaiHeight.svg

request

FOP The Netherlands

File:Duchamp Fountaine.jpg

Fichiers Bertrand Créac'h

Freedom of panorama in Guernsey

Ménage à Chartres

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Deletion

Navigation menu

Search