User talk:Lo Scaligero

English: Welcome to the Commons, Lo Scaligero!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 14:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Quadrante Europa VR.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Quadrante Europa VR.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Motopark 15:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Porta Nuova Lotze.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 14:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Forte Dossobuono.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 14:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice regarding to your vote on 2010 POTY election

Hi Lo Scaligero, I am part of the Picture of the Year Organizing committee. I would like to inform you that the finalist you voted for - File:Fruitbowlwithmelons.jpg has been disqualified due to copyright issues. We have restored your voting quota so you might vote again for another image on the list. I regret any inconvenience in the mean time. Regards. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 12:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo Canossa

Hi, do you still have the original single photographs of this merged picture? I´d like to merge them again, to see, if it comes out a little better. --HarryCane (talk) 19:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statua ponte della Vittoria.jpg

File:Statua ponte della Vittoria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Trixt (talk) 10:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camera Commercio Verona.jpg

File:Camera Commercio Verona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 02:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uffici finanziari Verona.jpg

File:Uffici finanziari Verona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 02:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Zeno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta Palio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed. --Ermell 07:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review! --Lo Scaligero 12:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Fermo Maggiore - esterno (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The cranking in parts at the left and right should be cropped out. --Ermell 07:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review! --Lo Scaligero 12:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta Palio (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
No color space. --F. Riedelio 07:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain better? Thanks --Lo Scaligero 21:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please see Color space. --F. Riedelio 06:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fatto Adobe RGB > sRGB. Thanks! --Lo Scaligero 09:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 09:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Fermo Maggiore - esterno (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo seems a bit over-processed. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Fermo Maggiore - esterno (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di Santo Stefano - esterno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Uncalibrated color space (sRGB recommended). --F. Riedelio 07:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done thanks for the hint! --Lo Scaligero 13:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 10:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Maria in Organo - chiostro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jonadrews 17:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dogana di terra e d'acqua (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa degli Scalzi (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good light. The top crop is very tight, but IMHO OK. There are some minor traces of CAs, but not irritating. However the perspective correction was a bit too strong, the verticals are leaning out now; please make them vertical. (And maybe, if you are at it, denoise the sky a bit.) Thank you! --Aristeas 09:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done (I hope). Thanks for the hint! --Lo Scaligero 09:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa degli Scalzi (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Here the same things apply as to the first image (the verticals are leaning out, at least at the left, so please check and improve the perspective correction). In this photo also the CAs are IMHO irritating, so please reduce them. (If you are not used to that task, just drop me a note and I can give you some tips.) Thank you! --Aristeas 09:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Lo Scaligero 09:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Fermo Maggiore - esterno (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the dust spot and remove the noise in the sky. --Ermell 22:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Doing… work in progress. --Lo Scaligero 11:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks for the review! --Lo Scaligero 08:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di Santo Stefano - esterno (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:59, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica di San Zeno 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Beautiful and very good! Here IMHO some CAs are irritating: at the left and right edges of the church (bright wall against the shadow), at the doors and windows of the building at the left and at the tree branches, and maybe at the windows at the top of the campanile. And personally I would locally dial down the brightness of the church facade a little bit. No offence, I just want to help. --Aristeas 09:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Doing… I'm not offended :-) I'll try to fix --Lo Scaligero 08:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Lo Scaligero 11:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 07:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Zeno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santi Nazaro e Celso - esterni (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santi Nazaro e Celso - esterni (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arsenale (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit oversharpened + the sharpness of the left and right sides is not perfect, but still usable imo. --Nefronus 06:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Statua di Hachiko.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Nicolò - esterno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dogana Veneta (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento ai Caduti di Lazise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Nicolò - esterno (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quartiere Coppedé 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quartiere Coppedé 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giorgio in Braida AB1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MaedaAkihiko 12:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Pietra AB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Pietro in Archivolto 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona AB3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giorgio in Braida AB5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:18, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo del Capitanio AB6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo del Capitanio AB2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giorgio in Braida AB6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Disturbing luminance noise. --F. Riedelio 09:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the hint! --Lo Scaligero 09:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo del Capitanio AB5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo del Capitanio AB7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loggia del Consiglio AB2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:30, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giorgio in Braida AB2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Muselli AB2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona AB1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona AB4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giorgio in Braida AB3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Muselli AB1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too dark. Noise should be reduced as well. --Ermell 13:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the hint! --Lo Scaligero 14:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Bevilacqua (corso Santa Anastasia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Portalupi AB1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:59, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Signori AB (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Signori AB (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Signori AB (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Silvestro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Verona (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Guardia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. (Minor halos.) --XRay 09:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Guardia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better at the top.) --XRay 09:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Guardia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Guardia (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Signori AB (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The noise should be reduced a bit. --Ermell 08:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the hint! --Lo Scaligero 06:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Carlotti (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Carlotti (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Carlotti (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Silvestro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Silvestro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Signori AB (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo degli Honorij (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo degli Honorij (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo degli Honorij (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo degli Honorij (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Forti (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Forti (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Forti (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Guglienzi Brognoligo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Guglienzi Brognoligo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Fracasso Gianfilippi (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Ottolini in Bra (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Ottolini in Sant'Eufemia (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Ottolini in Sant'Eufemia (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Paletta Dai Pré (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Goodquality --Llez 05:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Paletta Dai Pré (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Fracasso Gianfilippi (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Good photo. On the right, there is a point in the sky (bird). --Knopik-som 07:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the hint! --Lo Scaligero 04:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Forti (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 20:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Verità Poeta (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. If you have them, it would be cool to also add GPS coordinates. --Domob 13:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Pienza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Pienza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista da Montepulciano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:46, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagno Vignoni (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit over sharpened, but good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagno Vignoni (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit over sharpened, but good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use of image for educational video

Dear Andrea Bertozzi,

I am so glad I came across your image of Can Grande della Scala. I am creating an educational video on Dante's Inferno and would love to include your image as part of my presentation. In my Power Point Slide, I will use your image, explain how this character pertains to Inferno Canto 1, and mention your name along the process.

Good luck to you and all your endeavors. I am so thrilled to know that you allowed the public access to your image.

Best, Santonyo Bangali 69.127.183.237 03:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad I was able to help with the image ;-) Have a nice day! Lo Scaligero (talk) 07:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using the Image for a free app

Ciao Andrea,

volevo utilizzare la tua immagine per un articolo su un app di Roma gratuita che porta i turisti un pò fuori dalle solite gite di rito. L'app si chiama Spotted by Locals. Ti ringrazio in anticipo, ovviamente ti ho menzionato nella foto! 93.42.66.111 12:54, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using the image for an academic volume

Dear Andrea, I would like to use your images of Chiesa di San Bernardino - Cappella Pellegrini 07 and Chiesa di San Paolo - cappella del Veronese (3) for an academic volume written about Paolo Veronese. It is wonderful that you have shared these images for people wanting to learn more about Italian art and architecture. Thebelli (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Thebelli! Thanks for alerting me to your intentions. Of course, you are free to use my images under the cc-by-sa-4.0 license. Bye!! Lo Scaligero (talk) 08:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Is "Andrea Bertozzi / Wikimedia Commons / Cropped / CC BY-SA 4.0" your preferred credit line for the images? Thebelli (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebelli it's great :-) Lo Scaligero (talk) 09:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

**2022 Picture of the Year**: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiesa di San Nicolò - interno (1).jpg

Hello Andrea, I would like to ask you to confirm that I may use your photo (your name, of course) for my photo presentation "Autumn on Lake Garda". Kind regards, Renate 2A02:8109:8B80:73E5:D132:DF68:E5DF:B7DF 10:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course Renate, you can freely use the image following the cc-by-sa-4.0 terms 😉 Thank you!! Lo Scaligero (talk) 12:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:BPV Verona 1.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Casa di Giulietta (4).jpg

Yours sincerely,--Wdwd (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Wdwd (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo de Podestà Verona

Ciao Andrea, Sto cercando una foto in alta risoluzione del Palazzo de Podestá a Verona. Mi potete aiutare? Sentitevi liberi di inviarmi un'e-mail a [email protected] Ciao, Susanne Islandshästen (talk) 15:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao @Islandshästen, prova a controllare in questa categoria, troverai numerose fotografie! A presto, Lo Scaligero (talk) 07:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie mille! I migliori saluti, Susanne Islandshästen (talk) 13:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chiesa dei Santi Nazaro e Celso - Verona

Buona sera Andrea Bertozzi

Sono Donato Benedini e sto scrivendo un libro sulle chiese di Santi Nazaro e Celso, San Benedetto al Monte e San Giorgio in Braida. A corredo di quanto scritto mi piacerebbe inserire delle foto dei quadri. Per tale motivo le chiederei se posso utilizzare le sue.

Grazie

Benedini Donato email: [email protected] 84.221.193.252 16:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gentilissimo (wikipedia e commons sono ambienti informali per cui ti darò del tu, ovviamente vale anche il contrario :-)

puoi liberamente utilizzare le fotografie sia mie che di altri autori, ovviamente nei limiti della licenza che si trova nella pagina della singola fotografia, che solitamente richiede di fornire i crediti appropriati e di indicare la licenza originale. Per qualsiasi dubbio scrivimi pure! ;-)

A presto, Lo Scaligero (talk) 08:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Foto della Cupola della Cappella Pellegrini nella Chiesa di San Bernardino in Verona

Buona sera Sig. Andrea. Sono d. Massimo Boarotto, cancelliere della curia di Verona. Stiamo preparando l'aggiornamento dell'annuario della diocesi di Verona, una pubblicazione ad uso interno, gratuita, che sarà distribuita a tutti parroci della Diocesi. Come copertina vorremmo inserire una sua foto della Cupola della Cappella Pellegrini della Chiesa di San Bernardino in Verona. All'interno, in seconda pagina, nella descrizione della foto, metteremo la dicitura: [© foto di Andrea Bertozzi]. Grazie. 93.62.163.106 16:16, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buongiorno, sono onorato che vogliate utilizzare una mia fotografia per la vostra pubblicazione. Vi chiederei solamente di modificare leggermente la dicitura, secondo la licenza adottata, in questo modo: [Foto di Andrea Bertozzi, da Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA-4.0] o, in forma più ridotta, va bene anche [Foto di Andrea Bertozzi, CC BY-SA-4.0]. La ringrazio! Un cordiale saluto, Lo Scaligero (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Lo Scaligero

Image:Quadrante Europa VR.jpg

Image:Porta Nuova Lotze.jpg

Image:Forte Dossobuono.jpg

Notice regarding to your vote on 2010 POTY election

Palazzo Canossa

File:Statua ponte della Vittoria.jpg

File:Camera Commercio Verona.jpg

File:Uffici finanziari Verona.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Use of image for educational video

Using the Image for a free app

Using the image for an academic volume

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

File:Chiesa di San Nicolò - interno (1).jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Palazzo de Podestà Verona

Chiesa dei Santi Nazaro e Celso - Verona

Foto della Cupola della Cappella Pellegrini nella Chiesa di San Bernardino in Verona

Navigation menu

Search