User talk:Jmarchn

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jmarchn!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jmarchn!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FingerHandPosSPAOnlyLeft.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:PoNewEditIcon.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:PoNewEditCAT.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosSPA.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:UpdatePoFileIcon.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:PoeditIcon.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:PoNewEditSPA.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:MecanogENG.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:MecanogSPA.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:Mecanog.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:PoNewEditENG.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:MecanogCAT.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosSPAOnlyRight.gif was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosUSAOnlyRight.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:SingleFormsENG.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosBRAOnlyLeft.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosUSA.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosBRAOnlyRight.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:ATCalc SingleFormsPOR.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:MecanogPOR.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosUSAOnlyLeft.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:FingerHandPosBRA.gif was uncategorized on 20 August 2009.
Image:Human skull front simplified (bones) CAT.svg was uncategorized on 12 September 2009.
Image:Human body features-ca.svg was uncategorized on 12 September 2009.
Image:Human skull side simplified (bones) CAT.svg was uncategorized on 12 September 2009.
Image:Uterus Distortion1.svg was uncategorized on 21 September 2009.
Image:Organ of corti multilingual.svg was uncategorized on 30 October 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GoogleOCR cat 1.gif was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GoogleOCR cat 4.gif was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GoogleOCR cat 5.gif was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GoogleOCR cat 2.gif was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GoogleOCR cat 3.gif was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:LibreOffice startcentre CAT.png was uncategorized on 1 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schematic diagram of human eye no axes multilingual.svg

Please do not remova all categories from an image page, thats vandalism. You can of courese correct the categorization. If you want to have an image deleted you may nominate it for deletion. --Martin H. (talk) 16:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plantilla "User Catalan Countries"

S'ha creat la plantilla d'usuari {{User Catalan Countries}}. El motiu d'aquesta és mirar de fer visibles a Commons aquells usuaris que han nascut o viuen als Països Catalans. Si vols afegir-la a la teva pàgina d'usuari només cal que hi incloguis aquest codi: {{User Catalan Countries}}. Gràcies i disculpa la intrusió a la teva pàgina.--Peprovira (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Maps - CAT.png

File:Google Maps - CAT.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on my talkpage. --Martin H. (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:CERI Jacques Semelin.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CERI Jacques Semelin.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CERI Jacques Semelin.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Leyo 18:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural heritage monuments

Veig que estàs traient categories de "cultural heritage monuments" d'imatges que contenen fotografies d'edificis i conjunts protegits com a monuments. Si us plau, no treguis aquestes categories a menys que sigui per posar-n'hi d'altres que hi estiguin incloses.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I a més, perquè has tret l'interviqui d'una categoria de commons a la categoria corresponent de la Viquipèdia? [1]--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

El problema no és que hagis posat categories noves, sinó que has tret les categories que hi havia. Per exemple, si una foto que tenia la categoria d'esglésies d'Osona la poses a esglésies de Viladrau, has fet la mateixa categorització més concreta, perquè la categoria d'esglésies de Viladrau és dins de la categoria d'esglésies d'Osona, i el que has fet és una millora. Ara bé, si una foto que és a la categoria de monuments la treus d'aquesta categoria, estàs desmuntant una categoria que hi havia sense substituir-la per res equivalent.

I les categories són millorables, i a moltes fotos hi falten categories, però de moment té una certa lògica i anem repetint esquemes entre categories similars.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Els "cultural heritage monuments in Viladrau" són els que surten a la ca:llista de monuments de Viladrau, i que són els monuments oficialment inventariats o protegits, que actualment interpretem que són els elements inclosos a l'ca:Inventari del Patrimoni Arquitectònic de Catalunya.

No tinc massa clar si els monuments haurien d'anar dins de la categoria de cultura. Semblaria lògic, però en molts municipis la majoria de fotos que hi ha són de monuments, i si no estan en més categories acaba quedant una cosa poc manejable. Crec que cal evitar categories que només continguin una categoria si no es preveu omplir-les aviat i si no hi ha una molt bona raó. Algunes categories locals de religió que has creat i que només contenen la subcategoria d'esglésies són una mica rares, a menys que pensis pujar aviat més fotos de religió (capellans, processons...?).--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:13, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bon dia! Dius que Religious buildings in Calella està categoritzat com a Cultural heritage monuments in Calella, cosa que jo no havia mirat, perquè no ho hauria d'estar, són categories independents l'una de l'altra, ja que a Calella hi ha molts més edificis religiosos que no són considerats a la llista del patrimoni cultural local, i si en fem alguna foto llavors no podrien anar inclosos dins la categoria. Caldria treure la categoria de Patrimoni de dins els edificis religiosos i afegir-la al convent dels Agustins. --Enfo (talk) 08:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Torres d'aigua de Calella

Ja torno a ser aquí. Les torres d'aigua haurien de tenir una categoria conjunta, ja que formen un element protegit (cosa que no és obstacle perquè la torre del Mercat també estigui inclosa dins la pròpia categoria del Mercat, ja que n'és un element adjacent). Per si et pot servir de referència, fixat en Torres de la Mina Pública d'Aigües de Terrassa, que n'agrupa tres de diferents. L'únic és que a Terrassa cadascuna és un monument per ell sol, mentre que a Calella les han ajuntades totes dues en un sol element protegit, per tant en aquest cas caldria crear un element tipus Torres d'aigua de Calella, categoritzat com a Cultural heritage monuments in Calella i Water towers in Catalonia, i aquí dins ficar-hi la torre del Mercat i la de l'Escorxador. --Enfo (talk) 08:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Houses in Calella

Ja torno a ser aquí. Veig que Houses in Calella l'has categoritzat com a Cultural heritage..., igual com els Religious buildings..., mentre que és una categoria més àmplia i que pot contenir cases que no siguin dins la llista de Patrimoni. Que ara les que hi hagin siguin totes dins la llista és perquè jo em vaig dedicar a penjar-ne només de les que entraven dins el concurs Wiki Loves Monuments, però en tinc d'altres que no estan protegides i que haurien d'anar també dins aquesta categoria genèrica, "Cases de Calella". Ho dic perquè si has creat més categories genèriques com aquestes cal separar una cosa i l'altra (seguint amb l'exemple terrassenc, veuràs que hi ha Buildings in Terrassa –i Factories in Terrassa, Churches in Terrassa, Schools in Terrassa, Masies in Terrassa, etc.– i Cultural heritage monuments in Terrassa, i malgrat que molts dels elements inclosos dins l'una i l'altra categoria es repeteixin són dues categories independents). --Enfo (talk) 08:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Venia pel mateix. A Commons:Categories#For_more_appropriate_categorization (lectura que et recomano) hi pots llegir que les categories es categoritzen pel seu tema i no pel seu contingut. Que ara mateix totes les fotos de cases de Calella que tenim siguin de monuments protegits, no vol dir que totes les cases de Calella siguin monuments protegits.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Les categories, com més específiques millor, però cal crear primer les genèriques de les quals depenguin. El que aniria bé és que tots els municipis tinguessin si fa no fa les mateixes, i ara hi ha una mica de desgavell, la veritat... Per exemple, ara a Terrassa no tenim houses sinó només buildings (i a dins hi ha churches en general –que inclou esglésies, convents, capelles, ermites–, factories, schools, chimneys, museums, masies i no sé si alguna més; el que en queda fora són majoritàriament houses); no dic que no es pugui crear també una categoria de cases, però al començament no hi vaig pensar i ara em fa mandra hehehe. També es pot diferenciar entre cases vulgars i cases amb un cert nivell de protecció, és clar, i filar prim tant com es vulgui, però el més important és tenir com a mínim les categories genèriques per saber on anar a buscar... Cal tenir present també que una foto pot tenir més d'una categoria coincident (per exemple, tot i que tot siguin edificis, una masia pot ser també museu, pot ser que hi hagi una fàbrica amb xemeneia, etc.). --Enfo (talk) 09:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Les categories de "houses" les veig poc definides i molt grans, però es podrien fer. Els francesos fan una cosa semblant al que proposes, que és categoritzar els monuments per tipus (castells, esglésies, etc.), però ho fan a per departament (Category:Monuments historiques in Pyrénées-Orientales (city walls)). Una categoria d'esglésies de Calella que siguin monument protegit no la veig gaire útil per si sola. Quan més útils són aquestes subdivisions és quan el mateix esquema s'aplica a més zones geogràfiques. Fer una categoria amb totes les esglésies de Catalunya que fossin protegides i fer-ne subdivisions per comarca i municipi potser sí que seria útil. En qualsevol cas, això no voldria dir treure els monuments de la categoria del municipi.

De fet, posats a categoritzar per tipus, crec que fa més falta categoritzar els "buildings" per tipus (i per estils) que no pas subdividir els monuments per tipus.

Ara bé, el que seria més útil ara mateix és agrupar les imatges per monument, perquè és molt més fàcil categoritzar per altres criteris les fotos d'edificis i monuments si tot l'element està junt en una categoria. Amb el WLM de l'any passat ens hi vam estar fins al maig. A veure si aquest any acabem abans tot i tenir més fotos. Si t'hi vols posar, endavant.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bona feina.

Si tens intenció de seguir treballant amb categories, et suggereixo que t'activis els ginys Hot-cat i Cat-a-lot, que trobaràs a les preferències.--Pere prlpz (talk) 00:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per al·lusions...

Em preguntes per què no vaig categoritzar les fotos de Calella si la majoria que hi ha ara són meves? Més que res perquè per al WLM vaig carregar més de 8.000 fotos al commons (aquí pots veure les estadístiques referents a les corresponents als Països Catalans), i vaig fent de mica en mica. De moment ja he creat totes les categories de monuments de Terrassa on hi ha més d'una fotografia, i només de Terrassa ja en vaig pujar més de mil. De mica en mica... --Enfo (talk) 09:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

El safari fotogràfic de Calella va ser un passeig. L'únic més fatigós va ser arribar fins a les Torretes, hehehe. --Enfo (talk) 23:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calella Les Torretes from Turó Capaspre.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:56, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Les Torretes i altres mandangues

Tens raó que pujar fins a les Torretes no és pas com escalar el K2, però si ho fas després d'estar tot el dia caminant per Calella amunt i avall ja té el seu què. La subcategorització dels museus per comarques (de museus, esglésies, castells, escoles o el que sigui) està molt bé. En alguns casos està començada o està feta per algunes comarques només (normalment gràcies a algú a qui se li ha acudit de fer-ho), i no estaria malament sistematitzar-ho (igual com en aquests casos els espanyols ho subcategoritzen per províncies, els francesos per departaments, etc.).

Ah, gràcies per la foto! Les que vaig fer jo eren totes in situ, no des del turó del davant, ens faltava aquesta perspectiva. Per cert, no sé quin problema hi ha hagut amb la foto, que he vist que t'han fet un avís que hi falten alguns permisos. Jo, com que no sé mai què s'hi ha de posar, sempre pujo les fotos amb el formulari que hi ha a les llistes de monuments, independentment de quin monument agafi. Si és d'un monument determinat vaig a aquell monument concret, però si no és cap monument o bé no està llistat, n'agafo un de qualsevol i l'únic que faig és treure-li el codi de monument i posar-li la descripció que em rota.

Això de les cases també està bé, perquè així es diferencia les que són monuments protegits de les que no ho són. Ara la majoria de municipis només tenen buildings genèrics, no houses, però una subcategoria més concreta no fa mai mal.

Quan t'hi vulguis tornar a posar, ja ho saps... Per cert, també vaig anar a pentinar Arenys (i allà sí que em vaig fer un tip de caminar, fins a la platja de Sant Pol i tot) i Sant Pol, la llàstima és que quan vaig ser a Sant Pol no duia la llista de monuments i vaig anar fent una mica a la babalà, seguint el mapa turístic imprès per l'Ajuntament... Això dels safaris fotogràfics és molt engrescador... Per fer Figueres m'hi vaig estar dos dies, per Terrassa no sé quants, per Tarragona un dia sencer (i no vaig donar l'abast a fer-ho tot). I tot això anant a peu, que déu n'hi do. Bé, ja n'hi ha prou de batalletes. Que tinguis un bon dia! --Enfo (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 18:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noms de les esglésies en angles o en català

Jordi, veig que estas canviant els noms de les esglésies de Barcelona, suprimint "Church of ...". En general crec que la política de commons és usar noms en anglès per a les categories. --Jordiferrer (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si fem una ullada a la politica actual llegim que "in general use the name most frequently used in English-language literature. For subjects of only local relevance, proper names in the original language are used generally". És a dir, s'ha d'usar el nom angles quan existeixi un traducció en angles d'us freqüent (com per exemple "Cathedral of Barcelona"), i es pot usar el nom en català quan es tracti d'esglésies locals sense traducció habitualment usada en anglès. Podem fer com els francesos, ara com ara.--Jordiferrer (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre els canvis veig que ja t'ha dit en Jordiferrer aproximadament el mateix que et diria jo. Ara bé, jo voldria afegir-hi que si vols buidar categories que no siguin clarament incorrectes (cosa que et pot portar conflictes amb la comunitat de Commons), suggereixo que facis servir {{Category redirect}} en comptes de demanar l'esborrat de la categoria buida.--Pere prlpz (talk) 20:24, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tu mateix. Ara bé:

Tens una mostra d'opinions que et trobaràs a Commons sobre el tema a Commons:Bots/Requests/PereBot. Que una categoria porti al davant del nom l'afegit de "església de" només té alguna utilitat per una part petita de la humanitat i dels usuaris de Commons. Sospito que per aquí et poden venir crítiques. Per això, jo he estat creant les categories evitant la part genèrica sempre que ha estat possible, mirant que sigui defensable que el nom en català és el nom propi del subjecte. De fet, el que et diran és que si hi ha una part genèrica ha de ser en anglès. A més, fixa't que aquests canvis no tenen consens ni a la Viquipèdia, on no hi ha el problema de l'idioma.
El cas francès es manté tot i la seva originalitat, però fixa't que no és el que fan a tot Commons, sinó bàsicament el que fan els francesos.
Compte que Commons està més ple de jacobins del que sembla.

O sigui, que tinguis sort.

I categoritzar per comarca i per municipi no em sembla malament, al contrari.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Me n'oblidava: Esborrar les categories en comptes de redirigir-les em sembla malament per dos motius:

Els noms que esborren no són incorrectes. Senzillament tu creus que n'hi ha un de millor. Si algú busca pel nom vell, val més ajudar-lo a trobar la categoria amb el nom nou. Diferent seria un nom amb una falta d'ortografia o un nom ambigu (que pogués significar una altra cosa).
Com més demanis als administradors que esborrin categories, més fàcil és que te'n trobis algun que no li agradi el canvi.

O sigui, com deia més amunt, tu mateix i que tinguis sort.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Museums in Solsonès by name (Categories potser innecessàries)

No li veig gaire utilitat a crear categories com "Museums in Solsonès by name". Afegeixen un nivell intermedi que alenteix la cerca. Quan vaig a Museums in Solsonès" ja hi podem trobar la llista de museus, que entenc que és una llista absolutament idèntica a la que podem trobar a "Museums in Solsonès by name". Respecte "Museums in Solsonès by city" pot tenir sentit si al Solsonès hi ha moltes ciutats amb museus i existeix categoria per cada ciutat. --Jordiferrer (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Church interiors in Igualada" està dintre de "Church interiors in Anoia", la qual ja està dintre de "Church interiors in the province of Barcelona" . Per tant, seria redundant afegir "Church interiors in the province of Barcelona" com estas fent. --Jordiferrer (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Sense entrar en el tema polític de l'existència de províncies, on puc estar totalment d'acord amb tu, el més correcte es que dintre de la província de Barcelona nomes hi tinguem les categories de les comarques d'aquesta província. Les categories dels municipis estaran dins de la seva comarca i no pas a la provincia. Així tot queda clar i simple.--Jordiferrer (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - El mateix podem fer amb les altres 3 provincies. L'unica comarca on hem d'anar amb compte és amb la Cerdanya, que té la meitat en una província, i l'altra meitat en l'altra.--Jordiferrer (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A veure si m'explico millor: No cal que "Church interiors Igualada" estigui directament dintre de "Church interiors in the province of Barcelona", perque ja hi està indirectament a través de "Church interiors in Anoia".--Jordiferrer (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pàgina d'ajuda

Bona feina. Si el que vols són comentaris per millorar-la i buscar la manera de donar-li visibilitat a la pàgina, et suggereixo que ho comentis a la taverna de Commons o a la taverna multimèdia de la Viquipèdia (o als dos llocs).--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SketchUp - Temple Expiatori de la Sagrada Família.png

File:SketchUp - Temple Expiatori de la Sagrada Família.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

heb [T C E] 07:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: SVG files

No hi ha cap funció administrativa per reanomenar automàticament categories. O bé són eines externes o bé amb bot. L'alternativa és marcar les categories amb {{Move}} on hi ha les instruccions per afegir-ho a les tasques d'un bot, però cal marcar-les una a una i veig que el bot té una llarga llista de categories pendents. --V.Riullop (talk) 08:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Via Catalana

Gràcies per afegir-la on no hi era :) Hi ha una discussió sobre com hauria de ser el mapa a l'article de la Viquipèdia en català, t'hi podries passar. --Joan301009 (talk) 08:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category moves

Hi Jordi,

1. You are moving a lot of files between categories and blanking some categories. Category:Computed tomography images of necrotizing fasciitis Category:HRCT_images_of_Systemic_Sclerosis Please do a discussion before doing category moves. Renaming Computed tomography in category name to CT is not helpfull practice. I named them so because many admins renamed categories named by abbreviations to full name. Abbreviations in medicine can lead to confusions. Although some abbreviations such as CT is well established there is no clear guideline to what is established and what is not, so it is better to avoid abbreviations in category names.

2. You have removed categories from some files which are left only with hidden categories EXAMPLE. Please review back your edits and add appropriate categories to files.

Best regards, --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 08:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ICD 10 -Cats

Hi Jordi! Thank You for starting with the category-tree according to the ICD 10 system. I think this is a very good idea! Greeting from munich! --Hellerhoff (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Map

The map showing ratification statuses of the European Charter of Minority or Regional Languages cannot be changed following the ovte in the French national Assembly. Nothing is ratified yet. The French Constitution ahs to undergo a full-fledged change first.

Attention, le vote de l'Assemblée nationale ne vaut pas encore ratification de la charte européenne des langues régionales et minoritaires. Témoin ce cexte: "Lors des manifestations des Bonnets rouges en fin d'année dernière, une revendication est revenue en force, celle de la ratification de la Charte européenne des langues régionales et minoritaires. C'était l'une des promesses du candidat Hollande à la présidentielle de 2012. Aujourd'hui pour répondre en partie à la grogne bretonne, le gouvernement a relancé le débat autour de ce serpent de mer. Hier Mardi les députés ont donné par 361 voix contre 149 leur feu vert à la ratification de la Charte. Mais celle-ci doit aussi franchir le cap d'une modification de la Constitution et ce n'est pas gagné ! en effet dans la celle-ci l'article deux précise que "la langue de la République est le français". Un changement constitutionnel qui jusqu'à alors a toujours été repoussé depuis 1999 date de la signature par la France de la Charte, par les différents gouvernements français." Voir : http://picardie.france3.fr/2014/01/29/les-deputes-ont-vote-hier-pour-la-ratification-de-la-charte-europeenne-des-langues-regionales-ou-minoritaires-une-victoire-pour-le-parler-picard-404821.html

Votre modification de la carte était donc prématurée.

cordialement,

Pensées de Pascal (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FestImatge

Gràcies per l'avís, Jordi! De fet, vaig visitar l'exposició de la fàbrica Llobet-Guri ara fa dos anys durant el certamen. Aquest cap de setmana m'és impossible, però el que ve no et dic que no em vagui de pujar... Per cert, la xerrada que dius, al programa diu que és dissabte, no divendres (de fet, el dia 19 és dissabte). Si fos un divendres al vespre no podria pas venir, ja que depenc estrictament del transport públic i a més plego tard de la feina, tampoc no hi seria a temps. En dissabte, cap problema. Però aquest és el dissabte de setmana santa i seré fora! Espero que vagi molt bé la xerrada. Una abraçada. --Enfo (talk) 08:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:EmbryonicBrain CAT.svg

File:EmbryonicBrain CAT.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick87 (talk) 21:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:NuclearNoGràcies.svg

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wellcome Images Barnstar

		Wellcome Images volunteer barnstar
		Thank you for helping to categorise the Wellcome Image library uploads. You are in our project hall of fame for your work! --Fæ (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:DoingSpirometry.JPG

File:DoingSpirometry.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

188.153.250.100 12:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wiki-Sexuality_images,_male_masturbation

Wiki-Sexuality images, male masturbation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Leyo 20:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Digestive system diagram hu.svg

I have translated the missing titles. Many thanks for the redrawn and the message. Nl74 (talk) 22:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:1397263 1007466215935757 1545314437200385607 o Dr. Miguel Saucedo Lopez Olivera.jpg

File:1397263 1007466215935757 1545314437200385607 o Dr. Miguel Saucedo Lopez Olivera.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:PColldecarrera01.jpg

File:PColldecarrera01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

WQUlrich (talk) 19:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kinesiography

Category:Kinesiography has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Partynia (talk) 09:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dentistry_procedures

Dentistry procedures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Partynia (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. --Partynia (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dentistry

Hi Jmarchn, please don´t remove all files from the Category:dentistry. I put there 21 (special) files not to empty completely the category. Thank you. --Partynia (talk) 17:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Partynia:

Hello!. I only:

Created Category:Periodontal diseases and disorders and filled it.
Category:Oral and maxillofacial surgery is now only a subcategory of Category:Surgery. Therefore, Category:Surgical dentistry is now a subcategory of Category:Dentistry procedures. Perhaps, Category:Surgical dentistry should not be a subcategory of Category:Oral and maxillofacial surgery, if no then add a message to look for Category:Oral and maxillofacial surgery (with {{Cat see also}}).

--Jmarchn (talk) 06:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your categories are OK. Thanks for that. I spoke about the files (not the categories) in the Category:Dentistry. We should leave some (good) files (thumbs) in the main category dentistry. They are all also categorized in the specific category.--Partynia (talk) 07:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply:File:Girl practicing exercises.jpg

The Image about a girl overcome the disease.The Image associated with this disease.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image about the disease and its patients.No problem in its presence in this category.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lichen sclerosus

You asked: "... are referred to lichen sclerosus of vulva?"

Lichen sclerosus (LS) can occur on the penis, as these references demonstrate.[2][3][4] Based on the micrographs one can not tell whether it is from a penis or vulva; thus, I think it should be left as it is. Apologies that it took me a while to get back to you. Nephron T|C 02:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SVG categories

Hola Miguel,

may you please add the categories Category:SVG diagrams in Catalan or Category:SVG charts in Catalan to all of your SVG files? This would be very helpful.

Medical diagram
chart

Yours sincerely, --Loverslime (talk) 12:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Gluten ataxia eng.1.ogg y Ataxia por gluten.ogv

Estimado Jmarchn:

No lo he duplicado porque sí. Uno es la versión en español y otro es la versión en inglés. ¿Hay algún problema con ello? Debería haberlo especificado, ¿no?

Respecto a las categorías, muchas gracias, ando muy perdido, no conocía esa que me apuntas.

Saludos cordiales. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 21:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos_of_skin_neoplasms

Videos of skin neoplasms has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

105.232.100.226 14:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_gay_couples

Nude gay couples has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

170.0.179.42 16:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted as obvious vandalism. --Fæ (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Two_nude_men

Two nude men has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

200.89.85.41 03:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New pictures

Ok. Grazie. Mi dispiace, ma non sono molto capace. --ALEISF (talk) 06:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rename declined

Hi I have recently declined your request for rename on 3 files as they fall into filerename Criteria to decline #2 Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized. Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages Please take a note of it. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ}

I have made necessary changes to the Template:Other versions/Osmotic pressure on blood cells diagram. If have further queries do contact on my talk page. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 10:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SVG_pharmacologic_agents

Category:SVG_pharmacologic_agents has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Wostr (talk) 21:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

thanks!!

Андрюша Романов (talk) 14:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos_of_retina

Category:Videos_of_retina has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kidira (talk) 11:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes en castellano en la wikipedia gallega

Hola, Jmarchn. Acabo de ver que has cambiado unas imágenes en png por otras en svg en algunas páginas (que casualmente había hecho yo) de la Galipedia, lo cual supone, sin duda, una mejora del formato. Pero ese cambio llevaba asociado otro: la imagen original estaba en inglés y la nueva estaba en castellano, es decir, no estaba en el idioma de nuestra wikipedia, el gallego. Yo personalmente no tengo muy claro si es mejor dejar la imagen que estaba, que no estaba en gallego, pero si en inglés, que es un idioma muy internacional en ciencia y los términos que contenía eran facilmente entendibles sin necesidad de saber mucho inglés (bastaba con saber ciencia para inmediatamente entenderlos, ya que son muy similares a los terminos gallegos), o si es mejor ponerla en castellano. El castellano lo entendemos perfectamente en Galicia, pero ten en cuenta que por la misma razón la propia existencia de la Galipedia (o de la Viquipèdia) sería superflua, ya que los gallegos (o catalanes) siempre podríamos consultar directamente la wikipedia castellana para todo. Se podría añadir que en la práctica hay una cierta competencia entre las wikipedias en castellano y en gallego a la hora de decidir cuál se consulta. En consecuencia, en las páginas que hago yo siempre traduzco (siempre que me es posible) todas las imágenes en castellano al gallego, si bien dejo algunas en inglés (que también trato de traducirlas, naturalmente, pero no doy abasto). La mejor solución es traducir también esa imagen ahora al gallego. Intenté hacerlo, y si no está ya hecho es porque no pude abrirla en Inskape, que es el programa que uso, aunque no domino totalmente, ni mucho menos. Lo que ocurrió es que no conseguí bajarla y abrila en el Inkscape por mi desconocimiento. No sé si tengo que clicar en Copiar imagen o en Guardar imagen como o en dónde. Acabo preguntándote una cosa: ¿Cambiarías una imagen en inglés por otra en castellano en la wikipedia francesa, por ejemplo? Bien, puede ser también que todo sea un prejuicio mío y nada más y seguramente tu intención era buena, lo que he de agradecer. Por otra parte, hay imágenes mías en gallego que las encontré casualmente (así en gallego) en la wikipedia croata y vasca (eso que me enterara, que igual hay más, ya que he hecho docenas de imágenes para la wikipedia commons, generalmente traducciones), pero esa imagen la subieron ellos (los usuarios croatas y vascos), ya que no tenían imagen en el idioma propio de su wikipedia. --Miguelferig (talk) 22:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por tus indicaciones. Me fueron muy útiles y ya conseguí realizar la traducción. Utilicé de inicio la versión inglesa porque se podían escribir las etiquetas como texto sin tener que usar text to path. Lo que me pasaba antes es que no conseguía bajar con éxito la imagen de wikipedia a mi PC. Gracias otra vez.--Miguelferig (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello, my friend? Are you a doctor! great, what specialty? Thanks for the tips, I will change the category and change the image! EricNeuro

Copyright status: File:Shoulder joint-ar.svg

Copyright status: File:Shoulder joint-ar.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Shoulder joint-ar.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Shoulder joint-es.svg

Copyright status: File:Shoulder joint-es.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Shoulder joint-es.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Other_diseases_of_the_digestive_system

Category:Other_diseases_of_the_digestive_system has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kersti (talk) 07:39, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly named category

L = Lens of the eye of a burgundy snail (*Helix pomatia*)

Category:Watching in human is very awkward English. Would you mind if I renamed it as Category:People watching? - Jmabel ! talk 23:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lens (anatomy) is not subcategory of Category:Anatomy of the human eye as even the eyes of spiders and Snails have lenses in their eyes. --Kersti (talk) 09:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People eating

Hello, Jmarchn. Sorry for my error. I do not understand why it happened. Thanks for noticing it. Greetings. --Allforrous (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re File:Person-female-young-biology-care-professional-730733.jpg

lo de la categorización no se me da bien... --Rafandalucia (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Human anatomy categories versus general anatomy categories

Please never move a file from the general anatomy category to the human anatomy category without reading the description and the file name. You moved many files relating to animals froum Category:Inner ear to Category:Human inner ear. Also: please never move a category with a general name like Category:Cochlea to the human anatomy category as almost all of these anatomical structures are present in many animals too. --Kersti (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help improve for [5]. Thanks you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.214.51.98 (talk) 09:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Labia_minora_hypertrophy

Labia minora hypertrophy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

64.5.66.21 18:23, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Labia_minora_hypertrophy

Labia minora hypertrophy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

64.5.66.21 18:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear fi.svg

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear fi.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cherkash (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How to create a multilanuguage SVG

I think you should take a look at File:SystemLanguage.svg.

Xml code

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="320" height="140" style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:30px">
    <text x="30" y="50">systemLanguage:</text>
    <g transform="translate(30,110)" fill="red">
        <switch allowReorder="yes">
            <text systemLanguage="de">de</text>
            <text systemLanguage="en">en</text>
            <text systemLanguage="es">es</text>
            <text systemLanguage="fr">fr</text>
            <text systemLanguage="it">it</text>
            <text systemLanguage="cs">cs</text>
            <text systemLanguage="tl">tl</text>
            <text systemLanguage="to">to</text>
            <text systemLanguage="zh">zh</text>
            <text>other</text>
        </switch>
    </g>
</svg>

switch and systemlanguage is explained here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Element/switch

If you want that an element is only viewed in one language add systemLanguage="...".

You said your question was not answered anyhere, but I don't know, what you need.

If you want to test a file you can use File:test.svg, maybe start by removing lanugages, then you will also know how to add them.

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear de.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cherkash (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medalla Creu de Sant Jordi.jpg

File:Medalla Creu de Sant Jordi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: taken from https://www.capdevilajoiers.com/es/coleccion/ (you have to move the items in the gallery) from https://www.capdevilajoiers.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/47-o21u2f7w18qst6iw83ruaunbnb7qt6lavdg81p85kw.jpg

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Triplecaña (talk) 08:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi, please check the results of your edits. Recently, a lot of corrections like this had to be done. Jcb (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SVG_sterols

Category:SVG_sterols has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Wostr (talk) 17:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Acerca de medicina

Hola. Un gran gusto en conocerte. En mi caso también estoy retirado. Conozco poco de Medicina, mucho de software, y mucho más de Ciencias Exactas. Con mi "agradecer", significo que dejo de seguir esa categoría, y me dedico a las otras 6.000 que sigo. Un fuerte abrazo. --Allforrous (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mouths_(open)

Mouths (open) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Roy17 (talk) 11:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People_related_to_health,_to_categorize

Category:People_related_to_health,_to_categorize has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ies (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sertoli cells

Hola. Necesitaría que revise Category:Sertoli cells. Si considera que Category:Sertoli cell nodule y Category:Sertoli cell tumor, son duplicados me avise. Gracias.--Allforrous (talk) 14:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jmarchn,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Diseases_and_related_health_problems

Diseases and related health problems has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jmarchn,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dermatitis papulosa nigra.jpg

File:Dermatitis papulosa nigra.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Masum Reza^📞 19:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jmarchn,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discusión amistosa

Hola. ¿Podemos ser amigos y hablar aquí? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadafras (talk • contribs) 23:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. @Sadafras: No entiendo a que te refieres....--Jmarchn (talk) 12:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johanna Budwig.jpg

File:Johanna Budwig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Zeitungsente0815 (talk) 18:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--22:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for people in health professions by country

Categories like Category:People of Zambia in health professions are not meta categories. I removed the metacat template from a !ot of these, but I see you've created some new ones that you put the template on. Please remove it. Category:People in health professions by country, the parent category, is a metacat (because its subcategories are grouped by country, the criterion named in the category name), so I added the template there. Thanks, and if you have any questions, feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos_of_microscopic_images

Category:Videos_of_microscopic_images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Events about healthcare"

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:UIATF_Pow_Wow_2007_-_SIHB_01A.jpg&curid=2442359&diff=390755635&oldid=118999747 : how is this an "event about healthcare"? If the Baptists set up a booth at a street fair, does it become an "event about Baptist Christianity"? - Jmabel ! talk 17:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Jmabel: Solved. Moved to Category:Healthcare in Washington (state). You were right, on another occasion change it yourself. Thanks. --Jmarchn (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think of Category:Healthcare in Washington (state), just that the new category seemed less right than the one it replaced. If I'd thought of that, of course I would have done that. - Jmabel ! talk 00:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phylogenetic tree-ca.svg

File:Phylogenetic tree-ca.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cherkash (talk) 03:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SVG_people_associated_with_medicine

SVG people associated with medicine has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 17:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gray309-es.svg

Hola Jmarchn, he visto que en el archivo File:Gray309-es.svg que creaste los apofisis coronoides y condilar no están correctos, están intercambiados. En la versión anterior del archivo sí estaban bien. Salutacions, Alevántate (talk) 18:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Renan_García_Tamayo

Renan García Tamayo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Human thumbs

Hi!

This category is a sub category of:

Both of these are a subcategory of:

Category:Fingers

And "Fingers" is a sub category of:

Category:Human digits

So since "Fingers" are a part of Human digits then only human fingers can be in the category. And "Thumbs" are a part of "Fingers" and therefore only human thumbs can be in "Thumbs".

I think a lot of changes are needed if the category tree is going to be right.

I get the point of doing it. So I hope you get it right (thumbs up) :-) --MGA73 (talk) 12:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SVG subcategories of <other topics>

Hi, I see you're taking topic XYZ and creating a subcategory SVG XYZ. This means that, say, biology readers need to switch out of thinking "biology subtopic of camouflage, of reproduction, of behaviour" and switch into thinking "SVG, what is that, oh, graphics" and then search in TWO directions, both bio and not. I'd say that makes searching MORE difficult. I suppose I see your thought that it's more organized - sure, it is - but there would be a huge number of such cats to create, and all at a price of convenience to the user. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Chiswick Chap: !

Undoubtedly, the existence of SVG categories entails the inconvenience you have cited. And there is another drawback: the work in creating, recategorizing files, and maintaining these categories.

Any action has advantages and disadvantages. And you have emphasized the disadvantages.

Obviously I wasn’t the first person to think that SVG categories would be useful. Many people have believed in the convenience of the existence of Category:SVG files and many subcategories of these "special" categories.

There is a clear advantage in research: the ability to find easily editable and translatable drawings.

Needless to say, whenever possible any editor should opt for SVG drawings towards others (PNG, JPG).

You must be a person who think and write in English, but those of us who have other languages as natives or who edit in other languages, it is very convenient for us to find those files that can be translated easily into our language and for our (localized) Wikipedia, then having SVG categories is very handy. I myself have translated many drawings into my language (Catalan) but also into other languages.

I am fully aware of the inconvenience you mentioned, to solve it I created some (specific) templates to facilitate navigation (i.e. {{DiseasesNav}}, used in thousands of category pages).

I understand that having large containers (i.e. Category:SVG physics) of uncategorized drawings is not a good experience for anyone looking for something specific.

Other currently unused possibilities and other small changes should be used to improve the results of the search in Commons, but this is not the topic of our conversation.

Out of respect for your opinion I abandon the creation of these types of categories in the field of biology, as that is not exactly what I know. But please don’t destroy the work I’ve done.

--Jmarchn (talk) 10:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the thoughtful approach. On the biology SVG cats, if they're only fractionally populated they'd be better merged, but I expect you did that already. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Morphine photo

Dear Jmarchm,

You removed several categories from the photo, and obviously im not complaining or anything -- on the contrary! I'm relatively new, and was wondering if you have a few seconds to explain -- fine, teach -- me why, so i dont make that error & give you extra work again. Thank you! DanielTahar (talk) 15:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DanielTahar:

Hi, Daniel. You have made an overcategorization error.

I deleted from your photo (File:Morphine Ampoule For Veterinary Use.jpg):

Category:Medicine. At beginning of this page, exists the message: "This is a main category requiring frequent diffusion and maybe maintenance. As many pictures and media files as possible should be moved into appropriate subcategories.". The categories are designed to quickly locate something by navigating through subcategories (proof it). In this case if all photos related to medicine were in this category (towards a more precise category) this category would contain hundreds of thousands of photos. An example of misuse of categories can be found in Category:ECG graphs.
Category:Analgesics. It is unnecessary for your photo to be here as all morphine is analgesic, and you already have the photo in Category:Morphine
Category:Opiates. The same reasoning above: morphine is an opiate.

I hope I have told you well. I am a physician and I have altruistically categorized thousands of files related to medicine, it is hard and endless job.

Jmarchn (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-- Dear @Jmarchn, I didnt even know theres a page for the category, which tells you what to use it for. Im going to read more into it. Im writing short like a WWII telegram because i was so amazed by your detailed reply, and figured if you reply in so much detail to a moron beginner like me...

Thank you thank you thank you. Im sure its a full time job, but nevertheless -- if i had to see a physician id choose you, based on the effort to teach and not criticize. Wish there were more as half as nice as you. All the best from Israel.

@DanielTahar:

OK. I and my wife lived next to the Jewish neighborhood in Girona (Category:Call (Girona)). All the best from Catalonia. Jmarchn (talk) 07:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please provide me a text-free version of File:RNA vaccine-en.svg

Hello Jmarchn, thank you for your kind notification on my talking page on zh-wikipedia. I am working on the translation of this picture, if you can kindly provide me a text-free version, I think I can finish the translation much faster. --Kuon.Haku (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, You can modify the file with Inkscape. Within this file you can find a list of all used words in this draw. Before to modify this draw with Inkscape (and to make easy the translation) read User:Jmarchn/Edition of Inkscape draw with layers. If it is more difficult for you (?), tell me and I send the word list to return me with the Chinese translation. Jmarchn (talk) 13:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Psychological_trauma

Psychological trauma has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

37.238.47.10 09:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine (cropped).jpg

File:AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martino Gian (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear es.svg

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear es.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cherkash (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Famiglia Mapelli Mozzi, Paginas 68-69.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Famiglia Mapelli Mozzi, Paginas 68-69.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 10:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong tag usage

Buenos días/buenas tardes, Jmarchn. Sorry, I cannot use català, so I try to use simple English. ¡Thank you for conributing with fine pictures! At your last uploads, e.g. RNA vaccine-ca.svg I saw that you used the Igen tag in a wrong way. Moreover, with your instruction in Edit JMN Inkscape you are recommending a wrong procedure, as

Add {{inkscape}}

¡Please, do not just add the Inkscape or Igen templates! The correct way is to validate the file, and tag it with the number of the W3C errors. This can be done very easy by using the script.

Another idea: it might be better than many drawings in different languages to have only one, with all translations using the <switch> option. When you are interested in that better way, you may get help how to do it. Atentamente, -- sarang♥사랑 10:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang:

Thanks for the script for Igen; I have already installed it. Although I do not understand why these errors occur. We hope that new versions of Inkscape do not produce these errors.

You say it might be better than many drawings in different languages to have only one, with all translations using the <switch> option. I do not agree, it is in a few cases if the priority is the good presentation and ease of reading the drawing. I already knew the <switch> system and currently I consider it is not a good system: Better tools are needed to embed text in other languages and the Wikimedia svg file viewer needs to be improved (it not have the effect of smoothing the outline of the characters).

Jmarchn (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; of course it is your autonome decision how you insert text. Yes, a lot of improvements are needed depending everything with SVG text; may be sometime we will get them? In the meantime let us work on improvements we can contribute. Stay in health! -- sarang♥사랑 06:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hematopoiesis (human) diagram es.svg

Bon dia, hace unos días un usuario anónimo escribió el siguiente informe de error en la Wikipedia en español:

La imagen que representa la hematopoyesis presenta el siguiente error:
El Promielocito no presenta granulación secundaria, por lo tanto, en la representación visual deberian ser los tres iguales, no de diferente coloración (que es la granulación secundaria que recien aparece en los Mielocitos). Si bien es cierto que se les puede llamar de esa forma, porque darán origen a cálulas maduras diferentes, eso no significa que manifiesten estos gránulos. Los unicos gránulos presentes en este tipo de célula son gránulos de tipo Azurófilo, es decir, granulación primaria.
Enviado por: TM YAG 186.67.71.41 (discusión) 17:36 16 mar 2021 (UTC)

Consulté un par de libros de histología y tiene razón, todos los promielocitos tienen la misma granulación. ¿Tienes alguna objeción para que proceda a cambiarlo? Un saludo. -sasha- (talk) 14:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disculpa, pensé que eras el autor de la imagen y acabo de ver que solo la tradujiste. Ya lo corregí yo mismo, quizá te interese hacer lo mismo en la versión en catalán. Perdona las molestias. -sasha- (talk) 14:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consulté más fuentes y a veces ponen tres promielocitos y otras, uno. Supongo que da igual... lo voy a cambiar de la forma que sugieres. No es el único error de la imagen de todas formas, creo que el monoblasto también está mal puesto. Saludos. -sasha- (talk) 13:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SBAR

Category:SBAR has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Cristiano Tomás (talk) 01:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Substance_dependence_in_Turkey

Substance dependence in Turkey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_standing_women_with_shaved_genitalia

Nude standing women with shaved genitalia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

181.90.244.91 20:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circle (transparent).svg

File:Circle (transparent).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

65.246.71.66 00:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People_watching

People watching has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Brianjd (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vaping

Vaping has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Lord Belbury (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Hi again Jmarchn. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 05:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category removals

Why have you been mass removing Category:Female human breasts, such as from File:Brianna Beach 04.jpg? I don't see any subcategory of Female human breasts is already has or had. Helper201 (talk) 04:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Helper201 The reason is very simple: to categorize File:Brianna Beach 04.jpg in Category:Female human breasts is an over-categorization, as all photos contained in Category:Front views of nude standing women show their breasts. Note that Category:Female human breasts only contains a photo of the female breasts and not of the entire women. Jmarchn (talk) 06:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But Category:Front views of nude standing women is not a subcategory of Category:Female human breasts or vice versa. Also there is no rule that the category Category:Female human breasts must only show breasts and not the entire woman. That is not how other categories work. If it appears in the image, we add the category. Helper201 (talk) 19:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pimple

Pimple has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

191.125.152.130 01:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Solved! Jmarchn (talk) 12:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diagram of the human heart (cropped) bs.svg

Hello. Could you just fix a typo? It says "Plućne arETrije", but it should be "...arTErije". Thanks in advance. (I never worked with pictures at all.) – KWiki (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KWiki: I hope to correct it on Monday. Jmarchn (talk) 09:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delphi XE2.png

File:Delphi XE2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teetrition (talk) 03:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Behavioural_and_emotional_disorders_with_onset_usually_occurring_in_childhood_and_adolescence

Behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

2A00:23C5:E9A3:7301:2D33:2F79:E3C:2F7C 05:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circulatory System en.svg

Hello re the circulatory system file and others relating to the Veins and Arteries - these files were changed by you, renaming the Femoral vein to Subsartorial or superficial femoral vein - the accepted and recognised use is of just the Femoral vein see page for example. On other pages the accepted term of Superficial femoral artery has been changed to Subsartorial or superficial - the recognised usage is of Superficial femoral artery. The use of the term Subsartorial is hardly recognised. Could you please change these details back.--Iztwoz (talk) 09:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Iztwoz: Thank you very much for your contribution. I have already changed the three drawings Jmarchn (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks --Iztwoz (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file history says subsartorial was renamed as Femoral but image does not show this.? --Iztwoz (talk) 10:40, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Iztwoz: Actually:

Show "Femoral".

In articles containing these drawings, there is sometimes a delay in updating the old image to the new one. I've even found this problem after purging the article or saving it again. Jmarchn (talk) 14:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response Jmarchn and for the hopefully soon to appear updates!--Iztwoz (talk) 17:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mikhail_Alexandrovich_Yasinovsky

Mikhail Alexandrovich Yasinovsky has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Всевидяче Око (talk) 11:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cosmetics-related_logos

Cosmetics-related logos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male_anogenital_area_images

Male anogenital area images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female_anogenital_area_images

Female anogenital area images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lifestyles

Lifestyles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

186.172.233.204 12:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sedentary_lifestyle

Category:Sedentary_lifestyle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

186.172.233.204 12:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_heterosexual_couples

Nude heterosexual couples has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 15:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Benjamin Bocio

Category:Benjamin Bocio is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ ^{🩺 • 💉} 07:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos_of_homosexual_cunnilingus

Videos of homosexual cunnilingus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

103.75.21.254 12:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Psychological resilience

Category:Psychological resilience is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 04:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Precordial Leads 2.svg

Hello Jordi, I took your great depiction of the ecg leads and changed some details. Lead V5 and V6 should be on the same height as V4, independent of intercostal spaces. I uploaded it as File:Precordial Leads 3.svg.

Thank you for all your images! J.Ammon (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wallace scale of burns

Hello! I thought you might like to know that I have made a version of the Wallace scale image with text marked for translation by the SVG Translate tool.

Thanks for creating all these diagrams! Marnanel (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

Hi, You must inform the uploader when you tag a file for deletion. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Human_sadness

Human sadness has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

186.172.58.159 23:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:FundiPau logo.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FundiPau logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FundiPau logo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 14:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos_of_human_sexual_intercourse

Videos of human sexual intercourse has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

49.197.167.237 11:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Videos_of_urination_in_animals

Videos of urination in animals has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jarble (talk) 18:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jmarchn

Tip: Categorizing images

Plantilla "User Catalan Countries"

File tagging File:CERI Jacques Semelin.png

Cultural heritage monuments

Torres d'aigua de Calella

Houses in Calella

Per al·lusions...

Les Torretes i altres mandangues

Autopatrol given

Noms de les esglésies en angles o en català

Museums in Solsonès by name (Categories potser innecessàries)

Pàgina d'ajuda

Re: SVG files

Re:Via Catalana

Category moves

ICD 10 -Cats

Map

FestImatge

Notification about possible deletion

Wellcome Images Barnstar

File:Digestive system diagram hu.svg

Category:Dentistry

Reply:File:Girl practicing exercises.jpg

Lichen sclerosus

SVG categories

Re: Gluten ataxia eng.1.ogg y Ataxia por gluten.ogv

New pictures

Rename declined

Categories

Categories

A kitten for you!

Imágenes en castellano en la wikipedia gallega

Copyright status: File:Shoulder joint-ar.svg

Copyright status: File:Shoulder joint-es.svg

Poorly named category

Re File:Person-female-young-biology-care-professional-730733.jpg

Human anatomy categories versus general anatomy categories

Wish

How to create a multilanuguage SVG

Xml code

Your edits

Re:Acerca de medicina

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Discusión amistosa

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Categories for people in health professions by country

"Events about healthcare"

SVG subcategories of <other topics>

Morphine photo

Could you please provide me a text-free version of File:RNA vaccine-en.svg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Famiglia Mapelli Mozzi, Paginas 68-69.jpg

Wrong tag usage

Categories

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Reminder

Category removals

File:Diagram of the human heart (cropped) bs.svg

Archive

File:Circulatory System en.svg

Wiki Science Competition 2023

File:Precordial Leads 2.svg

Wallace scale of burns

Deletion requests

File tagging File:FundiPau logo.png

Navigation menu

Search