User talk:Gunnex/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

→

Grafitti na França

Oi Gunnex, tudo bem? Me tira uma dúvida? Grafitti são livres na França? Tirei esta foto em Nîmes e estou em dúvida se a imagem é livre ou não. Pode me ajudar? José Luiz ^disc 20:42, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oi. Você já consultou COM:FOP#France =

Not OK? FOP = en:Freedom of panorama, e na França é restrito também para obras 2D. Ver também Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Brest. Por cima, o grafitti parece uma obra derivada de uma fotografia com status de direitos autorais desconhecido. Portanto é muito provável que o ficheiro não seja permitido no Commons. Gunnex (talk) 21:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Que pena. Pode deletar a imagem pra mim (uploader request)? Não sei como marcar pra ER aqui. José Luiz ^disc 21:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Gunnex (talk) 21:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

German FOP question

Hi Gunnex. Can you take a look at File:Ewald Mataré - Pferd PM14.jpg? I've never really dealt with photos of sculptures on display in German museums. The uploader asked about this one because he's not sure it's ok. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 02:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I've never really dealt with photos of sculptures on display in German museums." --> Me too :-)). But let's see: en:Ewald Mataré, German artist, lived 1887—1965, Germany has 70 pma, from a general point of view, works of this artist are still copyrighted. The photo was taken in the interiors of Museum Kurhaus Kleve which is not covered by COM:FOP#Germany (see also de:Panoramafreiheit#Innenaufnahmen), so the photo can most likely not hosted at Commons. Additionally, the license supplement "Uploaded for educational use only - Please don't reuse this image outside of wikipedia." doesn't combine with COM:L. Btw, at the time I checked the photo, there was no license available, removed by the uploader. Considering all this, we have no license and no permission from the artist, the relative heirs and/or from the Museum Kurhaus Kleve and the file should be deleted per (the easiest way) uploaders request. Hope, this helps. Gunnex (talk) 05:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was thinking, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. I've deleted it. Your help is much appreciated, as always. INeverCry 06:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (Brazil 2009).jpg

File:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (Brazil 2009).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

silar (talk) 10:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bad faith, disruptive nomination of Silar (talk · contributions · Statistics) after surfing around Silar's contribuitions and nominating some files for deletion (details at User talk:Silar). This is a 5 year old file and it's quite normal that Agência Brasil has changed in this time his url/domain-structure = previously http://www.agenciabrasil.gov.br which now redirects to http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br. Gunnex (talk) 11:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angela Merkel (G8 2007).jpg

File:Angela Merkel (G8 2007).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

silar (talk) 10:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The next one... bad faith, disruptive nomination of Silar (talk · contributions · Statistics) after surfing around Silar's contribuitions and nominating some files for deletion (details at User talk:Silar). This is a 7 year old file and it's quite normal that Agência Brasil has changed in this time his url/domain-structure = previously http://www.agenciabrasil.gov.br which now redirects to http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br. Gunnex (talk) 11:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex is your name Marcello Casal Jr./ABr?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Silar (talk • contribs)

No. Why? Gunnex (talk) 11:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Uploader is most likely not the copyright holder of the images

Yours sincerely, Silar (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I requested a block of your account. Gunnex (talk) 14:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cancled the request per [1]. Gunnex (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Foto duvidosa

Veja esta foto File:Incêndio de grandes proporções atinge o Mercado Público de Porto Alegre.jpg. Não acho que o grupo RBS atribua licença livre para as fotos do seu site.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulo rsmenezes (talk • contribs)

Files: Fundinopi.jpg; UENP-REITORIA.jpg; DIREITOUENP.jpg.

Dispõe o artigo 48 da Lei Federal 9.610 de 1998, que "as obras situadas permanentemente em logradouros públicos podem ser representadas livremente, por meio de pinturas, desenhos, fotografias e procedimentos audiovisuais.". Tal dispositivo permite que prédios públicos, como os representados nos arquivos excluidos, por exemplo, sejam representados livremente. Das três imagens acusadas de quebra de copyright, a "Fundinopi.jpg" além do disposto pela lei, ainda citava o nome do autor como mencionado no art. 79 da mesma lei. Por sua vez, os outros dois arquivos, "UENP-REITORIA.jpg" e "DIREITOUENP.jpg", ainda que não citassem o nome civil dos autores, apresentava o nome de domínio das fontes, isto é, a autoria. Sendo assim, por que da exclusão? EXIJO EXPLICAÇÕES!— Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoINN (talk • contribs)

Não GRITE comigo, OKAY? Você obteve a permissão dos autores de licenciar estas fotos com uma licença livre? Não --> violação de direitos autorais. Aparentemente está confundindo COM:L com COM:FOP#Brazil (em português)... Gunnex (talk) 16:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

E isso aqui serve para que? COM:Marcas de direitos autorais! Faça-me o favor, todas as imagens são de órgãos públicos e tem o nome vinculado, seja o civil, seja o de domínio. Como se não bastasse, em consonância com o tópico Domínio > Brasil, do Marcas de direitos autorais, pode-se entender que o domínio nesses casos é PÚBLICO "para emblemas, bandeiras, escudos, armas, medalhas e MONUMENTOS oficiais, PÚBLICOS, nacionais, estrangeiros ou internacionais.". Isso, em associação com o quadro que distingue a gradação de licenças, permite concluir que NÃO é obrigatória a elucidação dos nomes dos autores. Então, mais uma vez, POR QUE DA EXCLUSÃO? LeoINN, 01:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Aparentemente está confundindo muitos coisas - e confesso que nem entendi completamente o que diz acima. A legislação sobre direitos autorais no Brasil é regulamentada pela LEI Nº 9.610, DE 19 DE FEVEREIRO DE 1998.. COM:Marcas de direitos autorais dá uma visão geral sobre os diferentes tipos de licenciamentos possíveis e apresenta também as restrições relacionadas. Leia Commons:Licenciamento para ver quais licenças Wikimedia Commons aceita.

Então, vamos começar a partir do zero (aqui só para fotografias, não para pinturas/desenhos/filmes/etc.).

Você é autor da obra (você tirou a foto)? --> Não

Você obteve permissão do autor da obra (da pessoa que tirou a foto)? --> Não

Se a resposta for "2x Não", mesmo assim, a foto pode livre desde que:

A foto foi ofercida pelo autor embaixo de uma licença livre e compatível com COM:L (exemplo)?

Esta foto é uma obra derivada de uma outra obra criada por um outro? --> Não (se for "Sim", é necessário esclarecer se a obra original está protegida por direitos autorais)
Esta foto mostra de maneira promimente detalhes de uma obra criada por um outro? --> Não (se for "Sim", é necessário esclarecer se a obra original está protegida por direitos autorais, COM:DM)

A foto foi criada por um Brasileiro antes de 1 de janeiro de 1937 ({{PD-BR-1937}}, exemplo)?
A foto (criada por um Brasileiro) foi publicada no Brasil antes de 1 de janeiro de 1944 {{PD-Brazil-media}}?
A foto foi publicado ou encomendado pelo governo brasileiro (federal, estadual ou municipal) antes de 1 de janeiro de 1983 {{PD-BrazilGov}}?

Se todas as respostas foram "Não", estas fotos mencionadas acima ainda estão protegidas por direitos autorais. Ver também COM:EVID.

COM:FOP#Brazil permite que no Brasil qualquer um pode tirar fotos de uma construção (por exemplo: um edifício) situada permanentemente em logradouros públicos sem permissão do arquiteto desta construção. Mesmo assim, esta foto é protegida por direitos autoriais do autor da foto. Note que COM:FOP#Brazil NÃO PERMITE que você entra numa galeria de arte no Brasil fazendo fotos de pinturas ali expostas. Estas obras são portegidas pelo artista até por setenta anos contados de 1 de janeiro do ano subsequente ao de seu falecimento. E note também que um alguns países nem é permitido tirar fotos de edifícios sem permissão do arquiteto = Commons:Freedom of panorama (todos os países com

Not OK)

Procure na internet por "Direito autoral no Brasil" para entender melhor os aspectos relacionados, já que o artigo pt:Direito autoral na ptwiki é meio fraco e de qualidade questionável.

Gunnex (talk) 09:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sala João Fahrion

Português: Paz e bem!

Os murais encontram-se em sala de acesso público, pertencente à Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, uma instituição pública; assim em parece que está cumprida a exigência legal do Artigo 48, da Lei 9.610 de 19 fev. 1998.

Além disto seia obra encomendada/executada pelo governo brasileiro (federal, estadual ou municipal) antes de 1 de janeiro de 1983 {{PD-BrazilGov}}

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 06:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Respondi em Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:João Fahrion. Gunnex (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Português: Paz e bem!

João Fahrion faleceu em 1970 (cf. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo%C3%A3o_Fahrion ) assim necessariamente produziu obras antes de 1983.

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 18:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Esculturas de Carybé

Olá Gunnex, quando tirei aquelas fotos Sculpture Carybé estavam no museu em Salvador, Bahia, era de acesso público, e era permitido tirar fotos, não sei o que fazer com isso Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sculpture Carybé. JMGM (talk) 06:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-379-0015-18, Flugzeuge Messerschmitt Me 109 auf Flugplatz.jpg

Hi Gunnex, Tm has asked about the closure of this DR, of which you were the nominator. Could you please weigh in here? Thanks, FASTILY 08:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship?

Hello, have you ever considered adminship? I think you'd be a good candidate, so I'd be happy to nominate you! Regards, --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steinsplitter! My work here is mainly focused on legal & organizational issues of ptwiki/eswiki-related uploads for which admin-status is not necessary. Additional, I prefer to work more in the background :-) and I already refused similar indications by other users in the past. Anyway, thank you for the thought. Gunnex (talk) 10:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Destaque na ptwiki

Oi Gunnex, tudo bem? O artigo pt:Administração Apostólica Pessoal São João Maria Vianney está pra ser eleito destacado na ptwiki e tenho algumas dúvidas sérias sobre os diretos de algumas imagens (algumas das quais eu ajudei a melhorar), pois são de baixíssima resolução e/ou não têm EXIFs ou, se têm, são "estranhos" (váriados tipos de câmeras, por ex.)... Pode ajudar? Minhas dúvidas são: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 e 6. José Luiz ^disc 01:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oi!

2. provávelmente okay (duvido "obra própria" mas a fonte é perto do uploader) + 1+5+6 okay

3. Interessante: Eventualmente COM:FOP#Brazil-fail = no meu ver crítico para fotografias tiradas dentro (no interior) de edifícios + óbviamente não "obra própria" já que o usuário não pintou o afresco + obra atual, considerando que a igreja foi construída em 1990. Ver também (p.ex) Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sculpture Carybé.

4. suspeito/deletion request.

Surfando um pouco na periferia destes uploads sobre bispos/caredais brasileiros etc. = (até agora) copyvios (20 ficheiros), deletion request (8 ficheiros), sem permissão (8 ficheiros) de diversos usuários (ver também User talk:Gunnex#The permission of some of my imagens). Gunnex (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The permission of some of my imagens

How you realize, some of my images uplouds, before I put here, are on the site "Salvem a Liturgia", and were sent by Hernan Gouveia. Many of the images that are loaded undeniably mine. In fact I asked if I could use Hernan those pictures, and he left, just told me that "they were there and you could use." Understand? There is no reason to exclude them. We have to solve this? Amalário de Metz (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence from "Hernan Gouveia" and/or salvemaliturgia.com indicating that these files are indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host them on Commons. Please follow the steps decribed at COM:OTRS (especially the section "If you are not the copyright holder"), how to obtain a permission from "Hernan Gouveia" and/or salvemaliturgia.com and how to forward this permission to Commons. Please notify me when you have sent an e-mail to OTRS and I´ll tag the related files to prevent a deletion (and even if the files got deleted in the meantime, they can be restored later, if everything checks out). Gunnex (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not currently have more contact with Hernan Gouveia, and when I communicated with Savem a Liturgia, they told me to report to him. This being the situation, then I think these pictures liturgy Fields taken by him, shall be excluded. Thanks for your time.Amalário de Metz (talk) 12:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dúvida

Oi Gunnex, tudo bem? Estou aqui pra te encher de novo. Existe algum "Fast Buttons" aqui no Commons que me ajude com nomeações para deleção? Esta imagem foi carregada por um editor que já teve centenas de páginas apagadas e estou certo que não é de autoria dele (com 91 Kb e sem EXIF é provavelmente um thumbnail copiado da web). Pode me ajudar a fazer a nomeação corretamente? Gostaria de fazer uma para aprender (mesmo que seja negada). José Luiz ^disc 23:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Não está enchendo :-). Aparentemente está procurando por Help:VisualFileChange.js e Help:QuickDelete que adicionam diversos botões/links na sua caixa de ferramentas à esquerda na janela do seu navegador. Ambas ferramentas podem ser ativadas pelas preferências ("AjaxQuickDelete" + "Quick Delete"). Gunnex (talk) 00:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boa! Valeu! Vamos ver se acerto. José Luiz ^disc 01:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This Single Panoramio Page

Dear Gunnex,

Can you type in {{Panoramioreview}} tags just to images which were uploaded on this page by this user. User Maliepa did not request a panoramioreview to these images. I have ordered many panoramioreviews to his other panoramio images...but I avoided this single upload page.

I already ordered 70+ reviews for Maliepa's other panoramio images for Malieapa's images. For this and this image, its already too late to save them as the images have been deleted, so its better if the other images on this page be tagged with a panoramioreview template. There is now a panoramioreview bot. This unmarked image on this page can still be saved. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, around 40-50 files tagged with {{Panoramioreview}}. 8 files with Panoramio source (and user) unavailable, tagged with no-source. Gunnex (talk) 07:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help/ Maliepa did tell me that rausis75 deleted his panoramio account and created a new account with a new license such as this one But sadly, its not possible to save them now since no one marked these images. Best Regards and Goodnight from Metro Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/120746916

… so why didn't you tag is as No source yourself? FDMS 4 18:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually the file has a "source" (even beeing inactive) and instead of tagging the file with "no source" (which looks at first sight to be contradictory) I thought it would be more accurate to iniciate a license review (which - as I mentioned - would eventually fail). Four-eye principle :-). Do you think I am exaggerating? Btw, I speak Deutsch :-). Gunnex (talk) 19:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Considering the post right below to this one ("This Single Panoramio Page") where I checked multiple Panoramio files, I conclude that the no-source tag is indeed more practical for files from external sites with unknown (historical) license status (broken/404 links). And yes, maybe I am exaggerating :-) Gunnex (talk) 07:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I've kind of changed my mind. Anyways, thank you for your friendly answer and thank you for your contributions to Commons! FDMS 4 17:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

my pic

hi. i want say to u that i have 3 cameras and also i can get my frnds cameras, so the diffrence of camera is not reason taht i upload bad pics, but for lastly photos,: it was a mistake in upload,my pc folders is busy and it may i thinked that they are mine, u know,i upload eveynight, somestimes i dont even see the pics,i just want upload i my own pics, so dont block me,just delet them,and i promise to be more careful.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 21:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment transferred to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sonia Sevilla. Gunnex (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traçado mapa metrô salvador.png

Olá! Você iniciou a proposta Commons:Deletion requests/File:Projetos do sistema soteropolitano de transportes.png e as duas imagens acabaram sendo eliminadas. Entretanto, a imagem Traçado mapa metrô salvador.png foi feita baseada nelas duas. Qual deve ser o destino dela? Cumprs. Luan ^fala! 23:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Oi! Não vejo problemas. Se não for sua obra, adicione {{PD-ineligible}}. Gunnex (talk) 07:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eu juntei (dentro do possível das aproximações e diferentes escalas) os dois mapas para conseguir os contornos terrestre (a linha entre terra e mar) e viários (as linhas das vias metropolitanas e avenidas). E pronto. O resto é meu. Tenho até mesmo outros mapas/esquemas que seguiram a mesma lógica. O responderia como Fonte/Source para esse novos, uma vez que as imagens de base foram daqui retiradas for falta de licenciamento claro? Own? Por favor, pode responder em minha discussão, assim serei notificado. Luan ^fala! 20:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Como pode ser CC e domínio público ao mesmo tempo? Luan ^fala! 01:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Se quiser pode especificar/dividir o licenciamento:

"Eu juntei (dentro do possível das aproximações e diferentes escalas) os dois mapas para conseguir os contornos terrestre (a linha entre terra e mar) e viários (as linhas das vias metropolitanas e avenidas)." --> {{PD-ineligible}}
"O resto é meu" --> self-{{Cc-by-sa-3.0-br}}

Parecido com File:Screenshot of For the Commons Good (ptwiki).png. Gunnex (talk) 05:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Azad University of Isfahan

Dear Gunnex, I am Mehrnazar, The creator of Islamic Azad University of Isfahan WIKI. You had deleted the photos and left me a message:You have uploaded several files that are copyright violations... The owner of the pictures is the university itself and you can find them in the university gallery. also you can study the copywrite rulecreated by university Vice chancellor by which you can use the content freely in order to introduce the university. I would appreciate if you get back the pictures as I had spended a great time to upload and set them in the content. Thanks for your attention, MehrnazarMehrnazar (talk) 05:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mehrnazar! Sorry for the trouble but - as far as I remember - all those files uploaded by you were configured with "own work" although being previously published at the indicated links with a clear copyright notice "Copyright 2010-2011 khuisf.ac.ir, All rights reserved". Additional those files were not linked to the (quite hidden) "copyright rule" above and did not mention the real copyright owner. In other words: the deletion could have been avoided if the uploads had been better described. Anyway: I suggest that you write an e-mail to our COM:OTRS-team per [email protected] and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the files for you. Gunnex (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your reply and your guide lines. I will try the Email address you provided. Thanks for your time and kind attention.

Deletion my files

Hi, My name is Hadi Karimi and I sue my own photos in Wikimedia which already uploaded at Panoramio. (2 galleries: 1 and 2. As copyright policy of Wikimedia I upload my photos as my own work and link to that image at Panoramio. But some of my photos has been deleted. Please undo deletion. One of images (File:Derak Mount Shiraz1 Hadi Karimi.jpg) had been select as featured picture. thanks --Alamarvdasht (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alamarvdasht! Did you read Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hava mount-Hadi Karimi.jpg? We need to clarify that you are Panoramio user(s) "Hadi Karimi" and "H-Karimi". In Commons this is done via COM:OTRS. I suggest that you write an e-mail to [email protected] and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the files for you. In the e-mail please link also to the above deletion request page. Gunnex (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I sent an e-mail to that address and linked to the deletion request page. Thanks --Alamarvdasht (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Egypt

Thank you,for your note I will send the permit directly by e-mail. but can I put any template show that we are waiting for the permission to protect it from removing.--Ahmed Mohi El din (talk) 12:12, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done --> [2], using {{subst:OP}} Gunnex (talk) 12:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Useful?

Uploading photos is a useful doing? some pics not seen even for years! the world is big and ppl is busy!--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 19:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cairo-Portal-in Arabic-(ORIGINAL).jpg

I'm the true creator of this file --Islam90 (talk) 09:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have taken all the 14 photos that are included in this collage? If not, we need for each file an author, license and source in order to verify if the images are freely licensed in compliance with Commons policy. See COM:Collages for details. Gunnex (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I'm little somethig in English and have a few information in Copyright also, But all 14 photos I had get from Wikimedia Commons --Islam90 (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay. You need to find all these related photos you got from Wikimedia Commons and list them in the source field. For this, you can use the "gallery" tag:

<gallery>
File:Example.jpg
File:Example.png
File:Example.svg
</gallery>

resulting in:

Gunnex (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok just a minute--Islam90 (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Well, I'd get all sources for photos, Can I remove the template of problem tag? --Islam90 (talk) 10:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kadıköy image

They are all mine, and I already said that this is my own work. I didn't understand where the problem is. --Ail Subway (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is: File:Kadıköy Yılbaşı.jpg (uploaded in 02.01.2014) versus https://www.flickr.com/photos/ardac/11654265385/ (30.12.2013, All rights reserved by "ardac"). Gunnex (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

that account is mine, if it is needed I can make them some rights reserved, but for a while, because they have higher resolution there. + if you have flickr account I can send you a message to verify it. --Ail Subway (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please write an e-mail to our COM:OTRS-team per [email protected] and explain your situation to them. OTRS stands for Open-source Ticket Request System. The main use of OTRS in relation to Commons is to verify and archive licensing permissions. I tagged the file accordingly to avoid deletion in the meantime. Gunnex (talk) 02:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks I sent an email. --Ail Subway (talk) 09:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A query about licence

Hello Gunnex, I used the safe search feature of Google images to find appropriate photographs needed for an article in Wikipedia. I used the "labeled for reuse with modification" filter and found few relevant photographs including this, this and this. However, I couldn't find explicit EXIF tags or notes regarding their licence in order to upload them in Wikimedia. Would you mind helping me with this issue? Thank you Msanta20 (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neither did I found any license infos at the indicated sites so uploading these photos would not be okay. But both photos at http://www.mannevesht73.blogfa.com/tag/%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B4%DB%8C%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86 has exif infos. You may contact the copyright holder directly and ask him if he would release these photos under a free license. Follow the steps described at Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder. Did you also check Commons:Free media resources/Photography, giving an overview of free sources? For what theme/subject you are looking for freely licensed images?

PS: If you ever upload a photo from an external site which appears to be freely licensed please tag the upload with {{LicenseReview}} to initiate a review process for verifying the copyright status of the photo, done by trusted users ("reviewers", details at Commons:License review). Gunnex (talk) 08:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content removed!

Hei Gunnex! :) You removed this file (File:Marco Iannitello1.jpg) due to copyright issue but the photo is owned by Marco himself that asked me to pubblish it on his wiki page. Can you restore it please? Thank you!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorenzo.muro (talk • contribs)

"(...) but the photo is owned by Marco himself (...)" --> "Owning" something decides nothing regarding copyrights as Marco obviously did not take this photo. Permission from direttanews.it needed. Please follow the steps described at Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder. If everything checks out, the OTRS-team will restore the file for you. Gunnex (talk) 11:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i'm going to verify once again but it is probable that Marco gave himself the photo to direttanews to promote his image on the article: Marco did not obviously take that photo but he's still the owner as he paid a photographer to buy a photo set. How have i to procede in this case? Thank for help!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorenzo.muro (talk • contribs)

Hi! I think you have to clarify this issue with Marco directly. If he can guarantee that beyond "owning" he is also holding the copyrights (because it was a work for hire) then (again) see Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder. PS: It would be nice you could signing your posts. Thx. Gunnex (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Восстановите файлы!

Добрый день! Я искренне не понимаю почему были удалены файлы File:Okorokova GP.jpg. При написании статьи я добавил данное изображение и указал, что файл распространяется свободно. То что данное изображение было использовано на http://op46.ru/13/80/ еще раз доказывает, что файл распространяется свободно. Если Вам интересно я могу привести как минимум 3 ссылки где использовано это изображение.

Приведите пожалуйста более веские доводы.

С уважением --Schumak27 (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Related: File:Okorokova GP.jpg = uploaded by you on 08.2013 versus (as indicated by me) "copyvio (cropped) via (example) http://op46.ru/13/80/ ( © Общество и власть) = http://op46.ru/upload/image/d91a6024b132e8319500791f57035158.jpg (last modified: 07.2013, exif available)" or http://www.ruslady.org/about/charter (Russian public organization "Business Women" © All rights reserved. 2006 - 2014) = http://www.ruslady.org/uploads/pvi/0dc/82/d6/32c9fcecb0778afbc7924494a6.png (last modified: 03.2013). Both sites are not freely licensed. You need a permission from the copyright owner. Please follow the steps described at Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder. If everything checks out, the OTRS-team will restore the file for you. Gunnex (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SL 12H 210

Was soll der Scheiss eigentlich hier "Gunnex". Wie kommst Du dazu legale Bilder als Kopie zu bezeichnen??? Und dann auch noch nach einem Tag zu löschen??? Ich habe die schriftliche Erlaubnis des Rechteinhaber bereits längst an '[email protected]' geschickt. Hier werden leagle Bilder gepostet um sinnvolle Artikel gut darzustellen und so ein Denunziant hat nichts bessers zu tun als Bilder zu löschen!!!! Aber selbst schreibst Du diesen Artikel nicht, weil Du offensichtlich davon keine Anhnung hast.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dermatte (talk • contribs)

[Ignoring personal bullshit] You got already an answer here. Forward the permission from the copyright owner to [email protected]. If everything checks out, the OTRS-team will restore the files for you. Details at Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder. In future please tag uploads awaiting permission from their respective copyright owners with {{subst:OP}}. Gunnex (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos borradas

Hola Gunex. Las fotos que has señalado para borrarse no tienen derechos de autor. Están sacadas de un vídeo del Ayuntamiento de Albacete y de la Diputación de Albacete, cuyo contenido es libre según la ley. Los vídeos a los que haces referencia son de medios de comunicación de la ciudad que, al igual que yo, se hacen eco de unas imágenes que pertenecen al dominio público según la legislación vigente. Pero esos vídeos no pertenecen a esos medios de comunicación, sino al Ayuntamiento de Albacete y a la Diputación, y tienen licencia libre según la ley española. Ruego que se eche marcha atrás al borrado de esas imágenes. Un saludo! JPOK (talk) 21:40, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use exclusively Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by JPOK for counter-arguing against deletion - and not my talk page. "según la ley" + "según la ley española" --> please indicate a tangible evidence that these files (in your opinion) are public domain. Btw, you declared all uploads as "own work" which is a lie. Read also COM:CRT#Spain. Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?

Hello,

Would you accept that I propose you as admin? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann! Thanks for the thought but I already declined adminship several times earlier due to personal reasons. Sorry. Gunnex (talk) 13:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nobu Tamura/Arthur Weasley images

Hi, all these images have been uploaded before by the creator, but this other user made compilations of them and uploaded earlier versions of them udner his own name. So they are still free, they just need proper attribution. FunkMonk (talk) 17:59, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thx for the advice. Please check also File:Estemmenosuchus.jpg (see the info below the tag) and File:Dromeosauridos.jpg (collage), both files uploaded by Levi bernardo (talk · contributions · Statistics) (btw, indefinitely blocked). Gunnex (talk) 18:08, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think I blocked him, actually. Those images should be free too, or well, any images by Nobu Tamura here, even those uploaded by the blocked user. FunkMonk (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the info below the no-permission tag at File:Estemmenosuchus.jpg (uploaded in 08.2013)? I did not find this particular image on http://spinops.blogspot.de/ but it is sourced with this site. And what I found is "All images on this site are copyrighted to Nobu Tamura under a Creative Commons 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license meaning that you are free to use them for non commercial purposes as long as you properly credit the author (© N. Tamura)."^{my bold} which fails COM:L (and also cc-by-3.0). It appears that (today - and possibly also on upload date in 08.2013) all files available at http://spinops.blogspot.de/ are not (more) compatible with COM:L. In other words: new uploads from this site are copyvios (if they were not uploaded by N. Tamura himself) unless it can be proven that the same image was earlier published by N. Tamura under a free license (allowing derivates/commercial use) because CC licenses are not revocable... upps... (in the meantime)... thanks for giving context to this file. Gunnex (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Most of those images where uploaded here under free licenses before he uploaded them to his blog. However, some of his older images only exist on Commons, and most of his recent ones only exist on his blog. FunkMonk (talk) 19:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How to recover the photos you've deleted.

Hello! You’ve deleted some of the photos I’ve uploaded. No doubt your intentions are good and commendable. But I am the owner of all those photos. They are photos of my ancestors, all dead long time ago. Yes I’ve also uploaded these same photos at a Portuguese genealogical site. But the fact that I’ve uploaded the photos in another site does not mean they own the photos. Please let me know what do I have to do to have those photos back in. Your help is appreciated.--Otripeiro (talk) 09:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Otripeiro! I suggest that you write an e-mail to [email protected] and explain your situation to Commons COM:OTRS-team. If everything checks out, they will restore the files for you. Gunnex (talk) 11:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brasão do municipio de Ajuricaba

Esta figura File:Brasão Ajuricaba.jpg esta incorreta. Este brasão é da câmara de vereadores do municipio. Já upei o brasão e a bandeira correta e consertei em todas as wikis, exceto a pt. Acho que ele deveria ser renomeado para evitar enganos.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 22:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estacion Villa Adelina al alba.jpg and File:Club Union Vecinal de Villa Adelina.jpg

Are you kidding me?

You deleted photos taken by me???

I am Federico Russo, and you're saying me that I can't upload my own photos to Wikimedia because I had uploaded them to Panoramio too??

I quote YOU:

Answer me that, please.

Because I don't understand if All rights are reserved by ME, why can't I do whatever I want with my photos?

--Fedejr712 (talk) 17:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Are you also e.g. "melissa ybrahim" or " Juan Ullivarri" from Panoramio from where you also grabbed copyrighted photos? Who knows it, taken in consideration your questionable upload history? Concerning File:Club Union Vecinal de Villa Adelina.jpg + File:Estacion Villa Adelina al alba.jpg please write an e-mail to [email protected] and explain your situation to the COM:OTRS-team. OTRS stands for Open-source Ticket Request System. The main use of OTRS in relation to Commons is to verify and archive licensing permissions. If everything checks out, the OTRS-team will restore the files for you. Gunnex (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not Melissa Ybrahim, neither Juan Ulivarri. But they shared their photos in the web. If the copyright is not the correct one to be in Wikimedia, that's Ok, I've never complained about those two photos, you deleted them, end of the issue. I'm complaining about my own photos, taken by my own cellphone. I shared them in Panoramio, and I shared them in Wikimedia. Do I have to re-upload them now? Do I have to show you my DNI or something to prove it? The photos has their own Meta Data that corroborate that they were taken by my cellphone and here in Villa Adelina, where I live. What do I have to put in the mail that you put here? it has to be in english? where do I write to the OTRS? Saludos, --Fedejr712 (talk) 19:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For me doesn't exist an "end of the issue" if I catch an uploader like you, grabbing files from multiple copyrighted sources. IMHO, you are taken this too frivolously. Well, the easiest way would be (as an alternative to the above e-mail):

Change the licenses of the files available under http://www.panoramio.com/photo/39590101 + http://www.panoramio.com/photo/39587444 to a Commons compatible license, e.g. {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} (see COM:L#Acceptable licenses for details). After that, reupload the files under the same file name and I do the rest. If this procedure overstrain you (technically), provide all necessary details by e-mail (see above) for the COM:OTRS-team convincing them that you are indeed the copyright owner and/or the owner of the Panoramio-account. You can write in English or Spanish (will take more time). I leave it up to you how to do that but you certainly don't need to present any personal documents :-). Just write your story, as above. Gunnex (talk) 20:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think now I've changed the license in Panoramio, I'm not so sure, please check the photos in Panoramio now and tell me if I did it right. If it's ok I'll re-upload the photos with the same name, if it's not I'll send the e-mail. Thanks, --Fedejr712 (talk) 06:35, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You changed to CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 = a license which is NOT compatible with Commons. "NC" stands for "NonCommercial", "ND" stands for "NoDerivatives". You have to allow commercial use and derivated works, like CC BY-SA 3.0. Try again. Gunnex (talk) 07:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Check now. --Fedejr712 (talk) 03:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WTG :-) You got it. Gunnex (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't re-upload the photos. It failed and said: "Ya existía otro archivo en el sitio con el mismo contenido, pero fue eliminado." (translated: "There was already another file on the site with the same content, but was eliminated.") --Fedejr712 (talk) 22:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grr... appears to be a temporary protection to prevent reuploads of the same file. Use a different file name as you like. I'll check it later. Gunnex (talk) 23:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is not because of the name, I never got to where you can change the name, it just doesn't let me upload the photo.. --Fedejr712 (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done --> File:Estación de Villa Adelina (2010).jpg + File:Club Unión Vecinal de Villa Adelina (2010).jpg. Gunnex (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arenadabaixada2.jpg, uploaded by Tiago Volanick (Volanick2)

I am the author of that picture. Volanick received that picture from me by e-mail, in its original .rw2 format, full resolution. It was his innitiative. The file has no copyright, and Wikipedia can host it freely, if it so desires, as it may. Do not delete out of copyright issues, there are none. Gustavo Paolo, photographer, Curitiba-BR, 17/June, 2014 (22:20) e-mail:[email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.101.64.41 (talk • contribs)

Hi! See my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Volanick2. Gunnex (talk) 07:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pesquisa

Olá Gunnex, como vai?

Escrevo aqui porque abrimos uma consulta à comunidade sobre os rumos dos projetos Wikimedia e sobre os rumos do Catalisador. Houve algumas discussões na Wikipédia, no Meta e na lista, na terça-feira da semana passada fizemos uma conversa por IRC (veja o log). Queremos conhecer o que pensa e, para isso, criamos um formulário de pesquisa básica, que não deve tomar mais que 10 minutos e cujo objetivo é busca levantar informações sobre como as pessoas estão envolvidas, se não estão o que as fez parar de participar, o que elas conhecem da WMF, programa catalisador e Ação Educativa, e o que gostariam de ver acontecer.

Vamos realizar também um encontro aberto no dia 05 de julho, em SP, na Ação Educativa, para dialogar. Se tiver interesse em participar, por favor, coloque seu nome aqui. Se preferir dialogar de outra forma, diga-nos como e faremos contato.

Contamos com a sua colaboração. A pesquisa é anônima, mas poderemos compartilhar as respostas para conhecimento de toda a comunidade se assim desejarem.

Abraços,--Oona (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tickets of of FIFA World Cup 2014

Oi Gunnex. Para evitar problemas de copyright como aconteceu com as duas fotos que foram deletadas, eu gostaria te consultar se você acha que de minimis aplica para uma foto de uma pessoa segurando o ticket? Eu calculo que o ticket completo não ocupa mais de 10 a 15% da aerea da imagem. A preocupacao é com o design florido, que ocupa boa parte do ticket. O logo da FIFA fica bem pequenininho. Obrigado.--Mariordo (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relacionado: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tickets of of FIFA World Cup 2014 Oi Mariordo! Você já leu COM:DM? Se o ticket é a parte central da foto, a coisa fica complicada. Se você achar: não + a foto tem um certo valor educacional (ver COM:SCOPE), carregue :-). Mas use {{de minimis|reason=logos, symbols and ticket design copyrighted by FIFA}} embaixo da licença para sinalizar que derivações (como um recorte do ticket) possam configurar violações de direitos autorais. Gunnex (talk) 16:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado pela sua pronta resposta. Vou avaliar se é possivel considerando as restricoes. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More copyvio on World Cup pics

Hi Gunnex. I think within this cat there are a lot of blatant copyvio images, taken directly from mainstream media sources.--Mariordo (talk) 15:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mariordo! In this cat all files sourced with "Danilo Borges/Portal da Copa" are ok as http://www.copa2014.gov.br (= "Portal da Copa") is licensed under cc-by-3.0 (and it seems so, that "Danilo Borges/Portal da Copa" mostly took these photos). Nevertheless, copa2014.gov.br publishes sometimes unfree photos from (example) Getty or other photo (news) agencies, see http://www.copa2014.gov.br/pt-br/noticia/costa-rica-surpreende-e-derrota-o-uruguai-no-castelao ("Foto: Getty Images") = http://www.copa2014.gov.br/sites/default/files/450618800-820.jpg (see also exif), so a bit of attention is needed in checking these files. Gunnex (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens suspeitas

Olá Gunnex, não tenho muita experiência aqui no Commons, por isso gostaria de pedir sua opinião sobre as imagens carregadas pelo usuário Ônibus ABC, que me parecem bastante suspeitas. Inclusive nomeei uma delas para eliminação. sds Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oi Rodrigolopes! Nomeei File:Ônibus ABC.png por ser fora do âmbito. As outras imagens: não encontrei provas (e pela "qualidade" provávelmente "own works"). Os logotipos certamente não são obras próprias mas bem provável em domínio público por outras razões, considerando {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. Gunnex (talk) 08:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Esplanada

Opa, essa versão eu quem fizera em 2009/8, tava bem ruim e velha já. Sobre o índice, eu só segui o que estava lá, eu não tenho nenhuma opinião formada quanto à isso, posso seguir sua sugestão, ou você mesmo alterar :D, wikiway, não? Acho que a melhor opção para o campo de pesquisa seria colocar ao lado do botão para criação do tópico, eu tinha me programado pra fazer isso, e acabei esquecendo. O que acha? Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 22:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Related: [3]

Em relação ao campo de pesquisa: certamente também ficaria legal ao lado do botão. E o índice... bom... vou tentar entrar no código para experimentar :-). Gunnex (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eu ia deixar você fazer pra ver suas ideias, mas eu estava sem amigos (e cansado de ler e produzir piadas por causa do jogo do Brasil) e refiz a página, veja o que acha, abraços. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 00:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gostei da solução: ficou muito bom. Obrigado! Gunnex (talk) 06:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Santa Ana de Coro derivate 2013 000.jpg

Como ya lo he indicado muchas veces, ya acá en este sitio no colaboro me, es indiferente lo que hagan con las imágenes, lamentablemente me canse de hacer de tonta acá uno trabaja para mejorar los artículos y los recursos; para que otros estén todo el santo día haciéndole perder tiempo a uno; la quien borrar bien, la quieren usar bien, sin otro que comentar que la pases bien. --Veronidae (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry you got frustrated. However, I have nominated the file for deletion via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Santa Ana de Coro derivate 2013 000.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 16:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre borrado de todas las fotos y contribuciones personales

Buen día, acabo de ver que se ha maracado muchas fotos de las cuales en realidad tienen razón para ser borradas, pero otras no y simplemente se ha considerado por el hecho de que no fueron capturadas con el Sony Ericsson WT19i. Esto me parece mal porque no se toma en cuenta que se puede tener contribuciones de otras personas que aportan a Wikimedias Commons a través de mi. Otra cuestión es que escudos realizados con pequeñas herramientas se han marcado también para ser borradas. Por favor le solicito desmarque las fotos que menciono porque no considero válida su opinión de que por subir la mayoría de fotos con marca WT19i las demás no sean de mi propiedad, a menos que lo demuestre (cosa que dudo porque no encontrará ninguna foto igual subida anteriormente en ningún lugar). Saludos cordiales--Jhalvico (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jhalvico! Please do not use my talk page for counter-arguing. Instead, only use Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jhalvico. Gunnex (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Gunnex, gracias por tus respuestas, en verdad había contenido que me dieron otras personas pero no sabía que ya había fuentes con esos archivos, en fin, te escribo en esta sección para preguntarte como haces para subir contenido como este: File:Brazil 1953 Capistrano de Abreu 100 anos.jpg o como este: File:Associação Esportiva Araçatuba logo.svg, pues quisiera subir archivos como este: http://www.upec.edu.ec/nes/images/UpecContact.png en lugar del que se solicitó borrar: File:UPEC Escudo.png ¿Es posible eso? Saludos. --Jhalvico (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of copyright there is no difference between http://www.upec.edu.ec/nes/images/UpecContact.png (original) and File:UPEC Escudo.png (derivated work). The question here is: Does this coat of arms pass Commons:Threshold of originality or is it only composed by simple geometry ({{PD-shape}} (it may also be in public domain due to its age - Ecuador has 70 years after death of copyright owner - but es:Universidad Politécnica Estatal del Carchi was created in 2006 so this is unlikely). Considering especially - among others - the complex structure in the center of the coat of arms, I would say that indeed enough originality is available, failing {{PD-shape}}. But the borders are quite fluent so I recommend to wait until the deletion request is closed. You may also contact Commons:Café to get additional feedback regarding the copyright status of this file. Gunnex (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La cuestión es que no tengo claro si un escudo de una institución sea motivo de derechos de autor en mi país. Por ejemplo, File:Escudo Instituto Tecnológico Bolívar.png (dejando de lado el hecho de que sea borrado por haber sido sacado de otra página), es un escudo de un instituto con más de 100 años, y no se conoce autor intelectual del mismo, es decir se consideraría al mismo instituto como autor. En ese caso, si yo diseño un escudo basandome en los documentos del instituto, ¿incurriría en motivo para ser borrado?. Saludos y gracias por tu ayuda.--Jhalvico (talk) 21:23, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:EVID you have to prove that this logo was indeed created 100 years ago. But: usually, even old established organizations are updating/modifying or even completely redesigning their logos from time to time. Apart from this aspect and as an alternative licensing we can apply the same questions as File:UPEC Escudo.png = does this logo pass Commons:Threshold of originality or is it only composed by simple geometry ({{PD-shape}} which is not copyrightable? And in this case I would say: An open book and a hand holding a flame, some stars and decoration flowers floating around (= old symbols) are indeed ineligible for copyright. Nevertheless, you have to provide the details. A simple "own work" doesn't work here. So, try to make a workaround based on File:Associação Esportiva Araçatuba logo.svg. I'll do the rest. Gunnex (talk) 22:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beletti

Sobre esta imagem, após tê-la carregado aqui no Commons, fiquei na dúvida quanto a ser uma imagem livre e manifestei isto na minha página de discussão. Portanto, pode ser eliminada, sem problemas. --Olimor (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+sysop

Moin. Magst du wirklich nicht kandidieren? Würdest sicher veiel admins entlasten :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I´m very sad....

Hi, i´m mexican, I don´t know english, only a little, and I´ll try to write you this message.... I don´t understand why you erased my photos of commons..... this photos was of my propiety.... I taked a lot of the pictures that you delete me.... the rest of photos were of my friends.... I don´t want to make a bad use of this pictures, I donated to wikipedia because i believe in the proyect, I wish to take a best enciclopedy and you are a bad person.... I don´t understand why you delete my pictures and you give me a (amenaza in spanish).... You are a very bad people with me and my work and my country, my city.... you are bad ..... I´m crying.....--Isaacvp (talk) 21:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I am very sad for the people who believed in your licening, reusing "your" photos outside of Commons in this faith and are in danger to be confronted with legal/monetary objections by the real copyright holders. Always remember: If you did not take the photo yourself, you need a permission from the person who took the photo (even from a supposed "friend") for licensing the photo under a Creative Commons licensing. You grabbed all your uploads from multiple sources (see details at User talk:Isaacvp), declaring all the uploads with "own work" (which was a lie). My recommendation is: turn on your brain, buy a own digicam, take photos by yourself and upload them to Commons. But don't steal. Gunnex (talk) 22:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ave, grande deletador!

Fico lisonjeado pelo tempo que você dedica a minha humilde pessoa. Deve ser chato não ter uma maneira mais útil e criativa de ocupar seu tempo. Pena que em sua obstinação, você cometa injustiças como apagar a imagem de Rivaldo, que você erradamente comparou à imagem de Beletti, esta sim com copyright. Se você não tivesse com o raciocínio bloqueado teria visto que são situações diferentes. Mais absurdo, que só posso creditar a verdadeira vingança, é você querer apagar as imagens colhidas na Secretaria de Cultura RJ, sob o pretexto de que o uso comercial não é permitido. Se fosse uma licença não autorizada, o próprio site rejeitaria automaticamente. Você tem que melhorar sua pontaria.--Olimor (talk) 13:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"(...) você cometa injustiças como apagar a imagem de Rivaldo, que você erradamente comparou à imagem de Beletti, esta sim com copyright (...) --> related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beletti marcozero portaldacopa.jpg. You had 1 week for counter-arguing... Feel free to use Commons:Undeletion requests, providing an explanation.

"(...) apagar as imagens colhidas na Secretaria de Cultura RJ (...)" --> Read Commons:Esplanada#Status quo de certas imagens de Cultura.rj.gov.br and feel free to comment on Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cultura.rj.gov.br images to check, but NOT HERE. Thx.

"(...) creditar a verdadeira vingança (...) --> fact is that I still have NOT FINISHED checking some of your uploads (especially your supposed "own work") due to time issues. If you take this personally, I don't mind either way, because you are for me only a number as all the other uploaders whose uploads got deleted due to my requests (+/- 39.000).

Gunnex (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Você é um gênio!

Gunnex, você se supera. Por que CERTAS imagens de Cultura/RJ são de terceiros e logo não estão cobertas pela licença CC, você quer deletar TODAS as imagens oriundas daquele site. Quando são de terceiros, consta bem clara que elas são DIVULGAÇÃO. Eu sempre tive o cuidado de só carregar imagens criadas pelo próprio site. Note que os nomes dos fotógrafos - Vânia Laranjeira, Caru Ribeiro e Guga Melgar, principalmente - se repetem, deixando claro que eles são prestadores de serviço para Cultura/RJ. A mesma polêmica foi levantada com relação aos conteúdos da Revista Forum e ali se optou pela manutenção das imagens. Só para tua informação. Eu sei que é inútil, pois tu e teu coleguinha Yangas, de bronca comigo, vão apagar as imagens. Repito: você tem que melhorar sua pontaria, se entende o que estou te dizendo. --Olimor (talk) 16:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See above --> User talk:Gunnex#Ave, grande deletador!. Gunnex (talk) 17:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Come on!

O colaborador da wikimedia com o QI mais alto - The highest IQ in Wikimedia

E vocês querem ser tomados a sério! And you want to be taken seriously!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.176.49.77 (talk • contribs)