User talk:Brühl

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Brühl!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

File:HallgarterZangeS.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

added license PD-self --Brühl (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Crane at File:Hkw-west-ffm011.jpg

Hallo Brühl, meinst du wirklich, dass der Kohlesauger in File:Hkw-west-ffm011.jpg als Kran zu bezeichnen ist? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 14:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Nun, die Bildbeschreibung enthält jedenfalls das Stichwort Kran. --Brühl (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Ach - tatsächlich. Danke! Wenn ich en:Crane (machine) (“generally equipped with a winder (also called a wire rope drum), wire ropes or chains and sheaves, that can be used both to lift and lower materials”) und de:Kran („In der Ausführung zum Umschlagen von Schüttgütern wird er meist als Bagger bezeichnet.“) lese, dann würde ich eher nicht sagen, dass man das Gerät als Kran bezeichnen kann. Dennoch könnte man ihn vielleicht als einen bulk-handling crane ansehen, der halt statt einer Schaufel eine Archimedische Schraube besitzt. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 18:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Self-propelled barges

I don't think it is a good idea to transfer barges to your new category, unless they are not to trace by name. Unless you have the intension to transfer about 1000 barges yourself to that category. First to find out wether or not old barges were self-propelled by the date of the image. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

In some respect you are surely right. But whenever I searched in Category:barges, I found it not being sufficiently structured. Especially this official types of vessels (page 4) not yet could be found by categories. Auf deutsch gibt es schon seit einiger Zeit den Artikel de:Gütermotorschiff (und de:Tankmotorschiff). Now it makes sense to connect the article Gütermotorschiff and Category:Self-propelled barges by commonscat. Of course, it is not always easy to recognize a barge as self-propelled. In doubt, you simply should avoid any transfer. I especially started to transfer only such vessels that are seen in movement. --Brühl (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Add {{subst:cfd}} on the category page Notify the creator of the category with {{subst:cdw|Brühl}}--~~~~ On the log, add: {{User talk:Brühl}}

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Self-propelled barges

It is usefull to extend the discussion of Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/03/Category:Riverboats with also this category. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

@Stunteltje: The discussion linked above was closed in September 2014. Does this one need further discussion or can it be closed? Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

For me it can be closed. In fact the majority of the categorised barges is self propelled, but not mentioned here. --Stunteltje (talk) 18:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

---

Closing with support of nominator. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

As this starts to be a discussion of general interest, I transfer the discussion to the discussion part of the category. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Correction: to the category discussion page. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Wappen Erbach.jpg

File:Wappen Erbach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Ships of the Rhine by home port

Moin Brühl, ich habe so meine Bedenken mit dieser von dir erstellten Kategorie: Sie sagt indirekt aus, dass diese Schiffe nur auf dem Rhein fahren und so ist es in Wirklichkeit nicht. Denke bitte mal darüber nach. Gruß von der Küste --Ein Dahmer (talk) 13:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Das ist mir klar. Die Kategorie soll die Gliederung der Heimathäfen nach Ländern gezielt ergänzen. Durch die vielen Kanäle können auch auf dem Rhein ganz andere Schiffe zu sehen sein, aus dem Donauraum, aus Belgien oder vielleicht Polen. Mir ging es darum, dass der Rhein ein grenzüberschreitender europäischer Fluss ist mit einem enormen Verkehrsaufkommen an Schiffen. Schiffe, die am Rhein ihren Heimathafen haben, waren im bisherigen Kategoriesystem nur mühsam zu finden. Ich hoffe, dass keine Einwände bestehen, den Benutzern von Wikimedia Commons durch die neue Kategorie eine zusätzliche Suchhilfe anzubieten. --Brühl (talk) 13:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Das Problem bleibt dennoch bestehen, diese Schiffe fahren eben auch auf anderen Binnenwasserstraßen. Darüber hinaus sind nur deutsche Häfen in der Kategorie (Stichwort “grenzüberschreitender europäischer Fluss”), wo sind die am Rhein gelegenen Heimathäfen der Schweiz, Frankreich und der Niederlande kategorisiert? --Ein Dahmer (talk) 14:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Was für ein Problem? Du kannst die Schiffe finden, die in einem Rheinhafen beheimatet sind. So wie Du bisher finden konntest, welchen Heimathafen ein Schiff hat, kannst Du jetzt zusätzlich sehen ob es sich um eine Stadt am Rhein handelt. Und in welchen Städte am Rhein Schiffe registriert sind. Von wegen Frankreich und Schweiz: vielleicht ist Deiner Aufmerksmkeit entgangen, dass ich Basel und Strasbourg eingepflegt habe. Bei den Niederlanden war ich vorsichtig. Strenggenommen liegt Rotterdam nicht am Rhein und außerdem wollte ich nicht durch einen Schnellschuss vielleicht Hochseeschiffe in diese Kategorie einschleusen. Mit Rotterdam kenne ich mich nicht genug aus. --Brühl (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Comment

Hi Brühl, where does the <!--{{ImageUpload|full}}--> comes from in the wikitext of your uploads? I am asking because this seems to be an depricated artifact from acient times and i want to remove it from all files. Regards, --Arnd (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I am sorry. Mostly, I just use the wikitext of my last uploads by „copy and paste“. Now I will update this. Thank you for your hint. --Brühl (talk) 09:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)