User talk:Brochon99

Discussion page

	Wikipédia (fr)		GLAM-Wiki
	Wikisource (fr)		META-Wiki
	Commons		Wikimedia Canada

Archives

Wiki Loves Monuments

Bonjour. Would you be interested in helping organize a potential Canadian component of the 2012 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments? Given your experience with "Wikipedia Takes Montreal", your expertise would be very valuable. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've responded to your emails, but your last email makes it seem like you did not get my reply. Just want to confirm you received my latest reply. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	I, SarahStierch, hereby award you, Antaya, with the Photographer's Barnstar for your wonderful photographs and speedy uploads during GLAMcamp DC! Your images really help to document the event and will surely be used in future documentation about it. Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

^^^ YES, what she said!!! Very nice collection! I am intrigued, by the way, but the .mov files you apparently tried to upload…do you have videos in a format that doesn't work here? Maybe you could send them to me offline…? -Pete F (talk) 03:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Techman224^Talk 23:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Activité Papillons en Liberté - Jardin botanique de Montréal.ogv

File:Activité Papillons en Liberté - Jardin botanique de Montréal.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pristurus (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Motd 2012-03-19

Hello Benoit, your video is now listed as Motd for the commons main page. I am hopeful to see more of your films on commons in future. Greetings from Germany, --Pristurus (talk) 22:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Merci pour organiser Wiki Love Monuments Canada! Il semble que beaucoup de travail! InverseHypercube 02:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please do not delete the photo

since the article in Spanish Wikipedia jessie need the truth is that there are items that do not have pictures.--CampRocks305 04:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry all the images on Commons are under free licence, like Licencias Creative Commons for instance. Jessie is copyrights of Disney. I'm sorry, but I had to delete couple of your images because of copy violation. Please read Sobre las licencias before uploading on Commons. Thank you, and sorry again. Benoit Rochon (talk) 04:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

why not upload them yourself and me an my deleted photos created by such securities and other deleted but not put anything here that are good for eliminating all but do not realize that such images are needed in Spanish Wikipedia

Fotos de Juan Martín Del Potro

Hola.

He visto que todas las fotos que subí me las marcaste como que viola los derechos de autor.

Me podrías enseñar a como subir fotos que no me las bloqueen. Porque la explicación que me da Commons.

Podrías, por favor?

Porque hay fotos de Del Potro pero hasta el 2010. Faltan en el 2011 y el 2012. Y yo quiero subir pero me las bloquean.

Saludos. Franco120199 (talk) 05:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named `license+` and `license-`

Hi Benoit Rochon, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!--Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tagging for speedy deletion

Hi Benoit,
thanks for detecting and tagging so many copyvios. However, the way you tag them, is somewhat suboptimal and produces additional work for the deletion admin. Per this diff I assume that you manually add "Copyvio|Notification of copyright violation|source=http://...". If that is correct, then please try to use the "copyvio" entry from the Toolbox (the third box in the left column on image pages). This way, the uploader is notified automatically and the copyvio-source-URL is put at such a place in the message template, that it is automatically pasted into the relevant field, when the deleting admin clicks on the waste-bin icon. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello!

Thanks for your work against copyright violations on Commons.

But please do not use the copyviotag like this {{Copyvio|Notification of copyright violation|source=xyz}} but use this one instead {{Copyvio|xyz}}. Thank you in advance. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 09:05, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since 2 days, I'm using the "Quick Delete" gadget. Benoit Rochon (talk) 11:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Hi Benoit. Okay? Could you help me? I published my picture in a frame that is in my house.

And he is on the list to be deleted. What happened?

thank you

Celso Novoselementos (talk) 23:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fait

Category:Image provenant de Wikipédia prend Québec. Fait. Letartean (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

English ∙ español ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ∙ Türkçe ∙ +/−

Hi Brochon99,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Hi Brochon99, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

-- RE rillke questions? 16:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Marin Soljacic.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marin Soljacic.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Marin Soljacic.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ju Ta 15:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

These pictures are of me.

1 File tagging File:Sudarat & Nadech Kugimiya.jpg 2 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 01.JPG 3 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 04.JPG 4 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 05.JPG 5 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 03.JPG 6 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 02.JPG

My E-mail in commons : [email protected] My Facebook : Noonlucky NY ([email protected]) Evidence : http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.247503225352295.37020.100002778596163&type=3 http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.201365626632722.29558.100002778596163&type=3]

I'm noonlucky. I apply this account to upload the pictures I take photoshoot. The article I wrote on Wikipedia. I will follow the rules of everything. But I can not use the old account is blocked. I want to open a new account. I develop my fault. It will certainly create problems in the past. I do not have malicious intent. I promise to take a picture of yourself only. And do not copy it.

Please add to my facebook for see my pictures. :)

200px

--Soluckypictures (talk) 07:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC) I am the owner of the copyright. I take a picture from my hand. [reply]

File:My Evidence.jpg ... I PrtSc SysRq in my computer .. I'don't copyright Do you understand me before. You are mistaken. Why don't answer me. I own the rights. I use the same account with my old account got blocked noonlucky. --Soluckypictures (talk) 13:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC) I know that serious with piracy, but I confirm that my picture is. I take a picture of yourself no need to license from photographer, because I was the photographer. You remove the banner go up, I deleted it as I am not of others, no one has these files unless I am alone. --Soluckypictures (talk) 13:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Benoit Rochon reason for remove banner because I am a photographer with my image. I need to request permission? I permission to myself? your banner it affects Wikimedia.

Martin H. said. "I not count them as non-free." The label is intended for obtaining permission from someone else, but I'm the owner of the image. I must be approve. Not ask permission from anyone else Because this image unless I'm nobody owns it.

Can you see Category:Actors_from_Thailand and Previously, Martin H. he was examined the images I've uploaded. The rest was no problem at all. --Soluckypictures (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OMG I'm sorry I come from thailand the man is star in Thailand. And I am a woman. I'm not an actor.I did not excel in English. I have to translate the program google + bing. lol

Meaning may be something wrong with what I want to say, so I can undo the changes? I can remove banner okay? --Soluckypictures (talk) 11:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, because I am a Thai people I do not use English. I want translate from the Web site to communicate with you difficult. me too, Sorry for the confusion. But File:Nadech shooting for magazine.jpeg This file upload by Sry85. He is photographer for thai star, and administrator in Wikipedia Thai version. He is not my accounts. --Soluckypictures (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot at Barry Nadech Book Fair1.jpg, Barry Nadech Book Fair2.jpg and Nadech Kugimiya at Bangkok International Book Fair 2012.jpg too.

I uploaded from Noonlucky's account My old account, now blocked, Can you remove banner --Soluckypictures (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimania 2012 - 15 - Danny and Lisa.JPG

D. asked for deletion of that image. I hope you do not mind. --Jarekt (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Brochon99, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

Welcome aboard. --99of9 (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights 2

How can i ask a photography permission ???

WLMCA

Salut. I left a message over at the talk page for WLMCA. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You earned this

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Your tireless efforts towards the Wiki Loves Monuments has not gone unnoticed. Thank you for slogging through many photos to ensure accurate tagging. -Robthepiper (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Brochon99,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Help: `no-FoP Italy`

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

"Pas besoin de mettre {{HPC}} en doublon"

Salut, Benoit. I noticed you consolidated a couple of the recent HPC tags that Fralambert had recently added to some image descriptions. Multichill chnaged the HPC template in October so that it is now intended to be used "en doublon" (he also had a bot convert all instances of consolidated usage to multiple tags). If HPC is used in the old {{HPC|7642|10620}} format, the image or category is added to Category:Historic Places in Canada templates with deprecated parameters. I left two messages on Multichill's talk page in October asking him why he made the change, and he responded to neither. I never reverted it, however, because ultimately Multichill's change will make it easier to add the actual designations to the template, as per the old discussion on the talk page (which I never got around to acting on). Silver lining, I suppose. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Demande de suppression : File:Tino Rossi photo avant guerre.JPG - 13 janvier 2013

Bonjour à vous,

SVP, pourriez-vous supprimer de Wikimedia Commons l'image référencée dans le cadre ? Je l'ai remplacée par une autre, insérée dans le texte sur Tino Rossi. Merci de votre aide et bien cordialement. --Simonet63 (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Demande de déblocage

J’ai découvert avec une certaine stupéfaction, pour ne pas dire une stupéfaction certaine, que j’ai été bloqué un mois (pas moins !) et sans aucun avertissement par le dénommé Dereckson qui n’a pas supporté que je corrige récemment une faute stupide mais très répandue - « en Avignon » au lieu de « à Avignon » - faute tellement répandue qu’il se trouve même des gens pour croire que « en Avignon » est la seule tournure correcte.

Il justifie mon blocage par des reproches qui m’ont été adressés en 2010 sur Wikipédia en français. Sans doute faudrait-il lui rappeler que nous sommes en 2013. De plus, depuis 2010, j’ai tenu compte des critiques de l’époque, ce qui explique qu’il n’y en a plus eu depuis.

Il affirme que ma ma page de discussion sur Wikipedia en français comporte plusieurs plaintes à propos de ce en Avignon / à Avignon. Il lui aurait suffi de lire attentivement les « plaintes » pour constater que ce n’étaient pas des plaintes mais des interrogations sur le motif de la correction ; qu’après explication mes interlocuteurs avaient admis que j’avais raison ; que si effectivement, il y a eu un litige avec un autre utilisateur, c’est parce que j’avais corrigé plusieurs « en Avignon » corrects (car cette tournure n’est pas forcément incorrecte) et qu’après discussion, nous étions tombés d’accord.

Il me reproche mon pseudo : attaque ad hominem.

Je me serais engagé dans une guerre d’édition : ([e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Promo_008.jpg&action=history]). Si Dereckson avait lu l’historique de l’article, il aurait constaté qu’au contraire, quand je me suis rendu compte que cela tournait à la guerre d’édition, j’y ai mis fin en donnant des explications complètes, à la fois sur la page de discussion de l’article en cause, et sur la page de discussion de mon interlocuteur, explications qui ont fait que celui-ci a cessé de « corriger » mes corrections.

Sur ma manière de répondre, voir ci-dessus.

Je ne prendrais pas en compte les conseils qui me sont donnés. Dereckson peut-il citer les conseils qui m’ont été donnés ? Hormis le message d’accueil, le message de Dereckson, suite au blocage, est le premier que je reçois !

Enfin, j’inonderais les pages de discussion avec des arguments « sans aucun sens ». Je vous suggère donc de lire une seule d’entre elles (toutes les autres sont identiques) afin de vous faire votre propre idée sur ces « non-sense arguments ».

Pour toutes ces raison, et devant l’inanité des motifs de mon blocage, je demande mon déblocage. Mon adresse IP actuelle est 84.246.217.25 et mon identifiant de blocage est 117876. (La procédure veut que l’on précise ces indications dans toutes les requêtes de déblocage.) Je vous remercie par avance.

User:Orthomaniaque

Message adressé aux administrateurs dont la langue maternelle est le français.

PS : Sur la page d’explication qui s’ouvre lorsque l’on veut modifier un article, la procédure de demande de déblocage est indiquée : il faut s’adresser à un administrateur. Et là, surprise : un utilisateur bloqué ne pouvant modifier une page de discussion, il ne peut donc pas demander son déblocage ! C’est pourquoi j’adresse ma demande sous IP, depuis mon téléphone.

Pour le cas où Dereckson, piquerait une nouvelle crise en voyant une nouvelle correction de faute d’orthographe effectuée par moi, pouvez-vous m’indiquer comment il faut s’y prendre pour demander un déblocage ?

Demande de déblocage puis de suppression de compte

Bonjour,

Suite à une requête en suppression d'une image que je pense être une image de presse usurpée, j'ai été prise à parti puis, vu que je persistais à douter de la sincérité de cette image, j'ai été bloquée. Mon adresse IP, indiquée dans la procédure de déblocage est la suivante : 83.204.212.105 ; mon IP actuelle : 90.84.144.134 (non indiquée dans la procédure puisque si je me connecte avec, elle sera automatiquement bloquée) ; enfin, mon identifiant de blocage est 124381. J'écris actuellement depuis une connexion mobile. A défaut je ne pourrais vous adresser aucun message puisque tout m'est devenu interdit...

Je vous indique que mon petit ami (Holen-mor), se connectant donc forcément depuis le même ordinateur que moi, a aussi été bloqué au motif de faux-nez et vandalisme.

J'estime qu'il est inconcevable d'être traitée ainsi et muselée de la sorte au moindre désaccord. Je pense également qu'il est inadmissible que des fichiers douteux soient légitimés par l'opération de copineries, comme c'est ici le cas. Pour cette raison je ne peux ni ne veux continuer à cautionner des agissements délinquants, et il est hors de question que mes contributions continuent à demeurer sur un site qui méconnait autant les droits liés aux images.

Aussi je vous demande gracieusement :

1 - de débloquer mon compte afin que je puisse ouvrir les requêtes en suppression sur mes fichiers téléversés ; à défaut de procéder vous-mêmes et sans délais à ces suppressions.

2 - de supprimer définitivement mon compte tout en veillant à ce que celui-ci ne puisse être recréé ; ma volonté est de disparaite totalement de ce site qui enfreint sciemment les lois.

A titre subsidiaire, j'estime également être en mesure de solliciter des sanctions exemplaires à l'encontre des administrateurs m'ayant abusivement bloquée pour mieux me faire taire. Ceci d'autant que je ne me suis pas rendue coupable de vandalisme. Le vandalisme tenant plutôt dans l'obstination à défaire, clore et dénaturer systématiquement mes interventions, requêtes et arguments. Néanmoins cette demande demeure facultative, puisque subsidiaire... Au fond, la roue tourne toujours et la vérité finit forcément par éclater un jour. Donc je ne m'en fait pas trop pour l'avenir des concernés.

Merci.

AtomicGagou 12:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoit Rochon, you'll find some background information at COM:AN/U and COM:CU. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problème compte global sur Commons

Coucou, un nouveau m'a demandé ça au sujet de son compte global. Aurais-tu une réponse, parce que moi je reste sans voix. Merci beaucoup. --Mathieudu68 (talk) 14:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have mail

Hi Benoit; please check your @wikimedia.ca e-mail, there's an important and urgent message waiting for you there. odder (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Supprimer une photo

Coucou Benoit,

Un nouveau me demande sur WP comment supprimer une photo, et en particulier celle appelée Sylvestre.jpg, et qui ressemble à File:Sylvestre.jpg.

En fait, le chanteur resprésenté dessus avait donné son accord pour mettre la photo sur Commons, mais a finalement changé de décision. Comment dois-je m'y prendre ?

Mathieudu68 (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Jeunes musiciens du monde Kalkeri2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jeunes musiciens du monde Kalkeri2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jeunes musiciens du monde Kalkeri2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Debian.png

Hello Benoit, could you please delete this file page, I need it to move a file I rename a little too quickly. Thank you.--MainFrame (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already

Done by High Contrast.--MainFrame (talk) 15:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asterix.svg

Hello Benoit Rochon, why did you delete this logo? It's just the svg-version of File:LogoAsterix.jpg and very similar to File:AsterixDeutsch.svg. Or is this font copyrighted? Regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think "Astérix" logo this is copyrighted, that's why another user tagged has RfD. On WP-fr we can use logos, but I don't think this can stay on Commons. I'll ask someone and come back to you. Sincerely. Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Benoit Rochon, j'ai mis un bandeau de suppression sur File:LogoAsterix.jpg mais un autre contributeur m'a révoqué, avec comme résumé de modification ; « correct license », mais selon moi cette image de même que l'autre logo seraient à supprimer pour violation de copyright, le logo d'Astérix n'ai reproduisable par un logiciel de traitement de texte. Cordialement. FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AntonineMaillet.jpg

Hello!,

File:AntonineMaillet.jpg, which you uploaded from the collection of Library and Archives Canada, is tagged for speedy deletion. You can see Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, the letter from LAC and Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images for details. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Normalisation de {{HPC|xx|xx|xx}}

Salut, Benoit. Further to my note a few months ago, Multichill changed HPC several months ago so as to discourage people from using the template in the {{HPC|xx|xx|xx}} format. If you use that format, it places the image in Category:Historic Places in Canada templates with deprecated parameters. He then has his bot edit almost all of the images and categories using HPC to use the template "en doublon", so to speak. At the time, I asked him why he made the change, but he never had the courtesy to respond. In any event, it is a blessing in disguise, since it makes it much easier to amend the template to allow users to indicate the type of designation (as discussed last year at Template talk:Historic Places in Canada), which I plan to do this upcoming weekend. But first I needed to empty out the remaining 100 or so entries in Category:Historic Places in Canada templates with deprecated parameters, which I did this past weekend. Hope that helps. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cavalia Odysseo - Big Top Grand Chapiteau Blanc.jpg

File:Cavalia Odysseo - Big Top Grand Chapiteau Blanc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shatin City One Station Akira Yoshida Art cats

Bonjour Benoit, (desole, je n'ai pas d'accents sur mon clavier)
J'ai remarque hier que tu avais supprime les images suivantes:

Je ne comprends pas la raison de la suppression. J'ai pose la question sur la Village pump, ou l'on m'a oriente vers Commons:Undeletion requests, ou l'on me recommande de commencer par voir avec l'administrateur ayant effectue la suppression. Ce que je fais donc.
Ces photos montrent des statues d'un artiste japonais a priori encore en vie. Ces statues sont des oeuvres 3D situees de facon permanentes depuis mars 2011 dans une station de metro de Hong Kong. Elles sont decrites sur le site du MTR, l'operateur local du metro. Elles ont ete installees dans le cadre d'un programme demarre en 1998, et dans le cadre duquel 44 oeuvres d'art ont a ce jour ete installees de facon permanente dans des stations de metro. Je pense que ces statues sont couvertes par le freedom of panorama de Hong Kong (permanently displayed 3D artworks in public places in Hong Kong), et par consequent satisfont aux criteres d'inclusion dans Commons. Pourrais-tu me donner ton avis a ce sujet ? Y a-t-il un point qui m'echappe ? Merci ! Millevache (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re-bonjour Benoit,

Merci pour ton message. A dire vrai, je ne suis pas non plus un specialiste des licences. Je suis juste interesse par le sujet et ai appris essentiellement via Commons et des articles externes parlant de Wikipedia. Pour autant que je sache, le terme "freedom of panorama" est trompeur car il ne se limite pas au panorama, mais des photos "plein pot" d'oeuvres d'art sont acceptables, par exemple en Allemagne. Si le sujet t'interesse, tu peux lire la un post de blog interessant. Ce que je propose : je vais amener le sujet a Commons:Undeletion requests, cela devrait permettre a plusieurs personnes de s'exprimer, et pourra au passage eclairer ma comprehension de la FoP, en particulier sur les sujets lies a Hong Kong. Je vais aussi en informer User:Nightingale. Merci encore. Millevache (talk) 21:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BonnieBernsteinHeadshot.png

Hey there! I'm working on verifying authorization for the above linked work. Hoping you can restore the file in order to expedite the process. I appreciate your help. If you have questions, please feel free to drop me a line. Best regards, Cindamuse (talk) 11:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored by a colleague. Hope all is well! Cindamuse (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted files

Hello. You deleted some files uploaded by Qcumber: File:Eduard Stavytskyi.jpg, File:Kaletnik free.jpg, File:Oleksandr Kemenyash.jpg, File:Fagot.jpg, File:Prytula comm.jpg, File:Konkov.jpg, File:Ihor Yavorsky.jpg. I think all these files were OK because they are screenshots of Youtube video published under CC-BY licence. I had mentioned it in the talk page of these files. At first glance, these images looks like copyvio (I also thought so), but I think they can be accepted, since they are derivative works of CC-BY videos. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 08:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sur la page de la vidéo restaurée, quand je clique sur "Plus" dans l'onglet "À propos de". Je vois la mention "Licence : Licence de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée)" et en cliquant sur le lien j'arrive à cette page, ce qui me semble bien correspondre au cas décrit dans le modèle {{Youtube}}. Avant que tu les supprimes, j'avais fait cette vérification pour toutes les vidéos concernées. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour la restauration. "Fagot" est apparemment le surnom du chanteur du groupe ukrainien en:TNMK. Il n'y a donc apparemment rien d'offensant dans ce cas. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci également pour la restauration (j'étais un peu surpris de voir autant de fichier supprimés). Juste au cas où, Fagot est le surnom d'un chanteur ukrainien, mais ce mot signifie en ukrainien rien d'autre qu'un instrument musical (fr:Basson) — NickK (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2013 : Montreal Biosphère, monument?

See Talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2013_winners#Montreal Biosphère (nominated for Canada).--Sinuhe20 (talk) 11:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autorisation Photos

Bonjour, J'ai créer un article sur un artiste compositeur, et je voulais insérer des photos qu'il m'a gentiment données.J'ai demandé à cette personne d'envoyer un mail avec une license acceptable qui prouve qu'il est le propriétaire des photos. Cela fait plusieurs jours qu'une bannière est sous la photo indiquant : "un courriel contenant les détails de l'autorisation pour utiliser ce fichier a été envoyé sur OTRS ", mais la photo ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Document_autographe.jpg ) n'est toujours pas autoriser. Est ce normal ? D'autre part, d'autres photos ont été effacées, et pour les remettre à nouveau sur le site, Wikipedia demande d'envoyer une autorisation valide, et d'indiquer l'URL de la photo sur le mail. Problème, les photos ayant été supprimées, il n'y a plus d' URL ! Que faire ? Je vous remercie par avance de votre aide. Cordialement

Patrice SERRE

File:Zingmagazine Issue 23.jpg

Hello, curious why you deleted this file? I'd like to re-upload, please. Thanks.

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TimedText:GibraltarpediA introduction video.ogg.en.srt

Ciao, since I'm not English, I would need a helping hand to understand and write in English what people have said into this video (like made in TimedText:Monmouthpedia_video_revised.ogv.en.srt) as part of the project GibraltarpediA. In this way, it will translate into all the languages of the world. Now is a temporary transcription without synchronization. Grazie mille — Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Texte Parc Emilie-Gamelin.jpg

File:Texte Parc Emilie-Gamelin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image BAnQ

Salut Benoît,

Bravo pour la collaboration éventuelle avec BAnQ. Pour ce qui est de ta question, la réponse est simple: j'ai fait une capture d'écran de la zone de l'image que je voulais reproduire. J'ai croppé un peu et j'ai déposé sur Commons. Tout simplement! Bonne continuation. Bouchecl (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deux images

Bonsoir,

J'ai importé le mois dernier deux images (1 et 2) qui étaient présentes sur le site Digitaltmuseum. Je pensaient les images étaient libres et je les importés. Plus tard dans la soirée, j'ai eu des doutes et j'ai proposé leurs suppressions mais tout compte fait les images sont libres (CC-BY-SA 3.0 pour la première et dans le domaine public pour la seconde) du coup il est inutile de les supprimer. Désolé de te déranger pour mes bêtises. Cordialement--Shev123 (talk) 21:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pour la première image (le dossard), je m'étais rendu trop tard que la licence s'appliquait au texte en effet. Du coup, j'ai contacté le musée, un certain Sebatian Kuhn m'a répondu que c'était ok à condition de citer le musée (dois-je faire un autorisation OTRS, j'en ai jamais fait ou alors faire modifier les infos présentes sur le site Digitaltmuseum?). En fait pour la deuxième image, j'avais également confondu la licence du texte et celle de l'image mais vu que l'image est beaucoup plus ancienne, elle me semble également dans le domaine public. Merci pour tout. Cordialement--Shev123 (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

En fait, pour le dossard j'ai demandé au détenteur des droits de la téléverser avec son compte vu qu'il en un. Merci pour tes conseils concernant les demandes OTRS, j'ai pas mal d'institutions à contacter et mes mails actuels étaient assez confus.--Shev123 (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restauration d'une image

Bonjour,

J'ai téléversé une image sur Commons le mois dernier et cette image a été supprimée (j'ai probablement mis une mauvaise licence CC0 à la place de domaine public). En effet, cette image est dans le domaine public et du coup il n'y a d'autorisation ORTS à obtenir. Cordialement, Merci--Shev123 (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Shev123. C'est fait, l'image a été restaurée. Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Un grand merci!--Shev123 (talk) 11:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:BAnQ Projet Conrad poirier.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BAnQ Projet Conrad poirier.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Quebec-Canada.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Quebec-Canada.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Émission JAM

Salut,

Je ne vois aucune demande de republication sur la file permissions-commons-fr. Le courriel le plus ancien remonte au 25 juillet. Elfix 16:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giant iPhone Fido.jpg

File:Giant iPhone Fido.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 11:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Projet Poirier, bandeau de statut aux États-Unis

Bonjour, Répondu sur ma page. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mardi cest Wiki BAnQ.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mardi cest Wiki BAnQ.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 12:14, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mardi cest Wiki.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mardi cest Wiki.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 12:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maximus Johnity Ongkili World Economic Forum 2013.jpg

You deleted this file due to a non-commercial licence at Flickr, however this file was licensed cc-by-sa at the time it was uploaded to Commons, as confirmed by the licence review (the World Economic Forum changed their licences around March 2013, see Commons:Village pump/Archive/2013/03#Bad news). Please could this image be restored per {{Flickr-change-of-license}}, together with File:Maximus Johnity Ongkili World Economic Forum 2013 crop.jpg which was a derivative of this image. January (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The license is still CC-by-sa, this is not challenged. However, the license excludes commercial use which is against commons policiy. Is there any proof, that at the time of upload, the commercial use was not excluded? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The issue might be, that even the WEF has not considered the individual rights of the photographer Photo Moritz Hager and the swiss-image.ch agency. Or let's say: It is already doubtful, if the presentation in flickr was lawful. The terms of the agency under [1] are very clear on the matter, that they do not allow any alteration of the photos. Also the use of swiss-image.ch pictures is prohibited for any other purpose without written permission from swiss-image.ch or the copyright holder (SI partner, photographer). As far as I understand, we need an OTRS to publish it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The issue of whether the photo agency may have a copyright claim has been raised before at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Maria Bartiromo.jpg but the image was kept, and WEF images (almost all of which were taken by swiss-image.ch photographers) are widely accepted on Commons based on the CC-BY-SA licence at Flickr and {{WEF}}. January (talk) 15:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erm ... the fact that after receiving and removing the "no resale" in 2008 and now adding it again is more an indicatation, that there is indeed a copyright problem. So how about writing them a letter to get OTRS? Shouldn't this discussion be extended to a broader group of copvio experts? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I said at my talk page, if the licence was valid at the time of upload then it remains valid, the licence having been different before or having been changed since does not invalidate it. I have no objection to opening the discussion up to a wider audience, but I certainly don't think any WEF images with a valid licence review should be deleted through the speedy deletion process without discussion. Benoit Rochon, please could you confirm what your decision is on whether to restore the image? January (talk) 20:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Friends and Family. Canal Bridge BAnQ P48S1P00395.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Friends and Family. Canal Bridge BAnQ P48S1P00395.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ju Ta 19:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:City Views. Phillips Square. From the 17th floor - University Tower Building BAnQ P48S1P01215.jpg

File:City Views. Phillips Square. From the 17th floor - University Tower Building BAnQ P48S1P01215.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Louperivois Ψ @ 04:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friends and Family and Trips. Eaton's 5th Floor BAnQ P48S1P00802.jpg

File:Friends and Family and Trips. Eaton's 5th Floor BAnQ P48S1P00802.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Louperivois Ψ @ 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radio. Claire Martin BAnQ P48S1P23136.jpg

File:Radio. Claire Martin BAnQ P48S1P23136.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Louperivois Ψ @ 22:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Ukraine

hello there! I have sent you an email. could you please tell me if you can help us? thanks! --アンタナナ 18:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Antanana, before I answer you, I wanted to ask one of my friend on Commons who usually do judging for WLM Canada, but no answer yet. Foy myself, I'll have to decline sorry, I'm very busy with the launch of the French branch of The Wikipedia Library. Good luck guys, this is nice contest! Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 03:58, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boucher - Wikisource, le défi d'une bibliothèque virtuelle bénévole, 2015.djvu effacé

Salut Benoit... On dirait que mon OTRS a été ignoré ou n'a pas été terminé, ils viennent d'effacer l'article d'Argus... :( --Ernest-Mtl (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Ernest-Mtl, est-ce que tu as demandé à Argus d'envoyer le courriel ? Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 03:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Benoît... Tu devais me revenir là-dessus, je ne sais même pas à quelle adresse ils douvent l'envoyer... <censuré> d'OTRS... Arg! Vive les documents antérieurs à 1923! lol --Ernest-Mtl (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Ernest-Mtl. Pas de problème, tu vas voir, c'est assez simple. Le responsable chez Argus doit envoyer le texte de l'encadré Courriel à envoyer pour placer une image sous licence libre. Cette personne doit envoyer le courriel à partir de son adresse professionnelle, et ne pas modifier le texte, surtout pas le passage qui dis : "je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre, y compris dans un but commercial". De mon côté, je vais restaurer ton fichier avec le modèle OTRS pending, c'est bon pour 30 jours.

Personnellement, quand je dois faire une procédure OTRS, j'utilise la technique du « tout cuit dans la bouche » : User:Benoit_Rochon/Mémoire#Déclaration de consentement. Je complète l'encadré pour la personne responsable, et je lui demande juste de transférer le courriel à [email protected]

Ça marche à tous les coups. N'hésite pas si tu as besoin d'aide. Benoit Rochon (talk) 03:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci patron! ;) mon sauveur! --Ernest-Mtl (talk) 03:52, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Ernest-Mtl. Et si tu veux faire encore plus simple, utilise le même courriel OTRS (Ticket#2015041310002269) sans changer le titre (il m'est assigné), fait la technique du tout cuit dans la bouche. Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 04:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de Tony Levin et Kevin Parent sur scène

J'ai ajouté cette photo sur la page de Tony Levin...peut-on avoir des détails...La date, l'endroit, le spectacle... Merci (belle photo en passant) !! - User:Poirier2000

Bonjour Poirier2000, la photo n'est pas de moi, mais de Victor Diaz Lamich. Ce photographe est l'officiel du festival de jazz, des FrancoFolies ainsi qu'au Montréal en Lumière, donc avec un peu de recherche, je pense qu'on peut trouver ces informations. Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci !! - User:Poirier2000

Translation issue

Hello

I am working on Commons:WLA and have an issue. I have moved the main page of WLAf2014 to Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2014. But the translations in various languages are still "attached" to the original page Commons:Wiki Loves Africa. How to "move" the translations so that they stay with the original page ? Anthere (talk)

After discussion with a translation Admin, the solution might be to start by deleting Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2014. Can you do that please ? Anthere (talk) 18:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is solved now. :-) Romaine (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?

Hi Benoit, you have deleted a file (Todos-contra-el-fuego.jpg) that I uploaded yesterday, claming that it is a copyvio. However, as I said in the Talk page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Todos-contra-el-fuego.jpg ), the image comes from a Spanish government website that states that its contents are free to use as long as the source is mentioned (http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/atencion-al-ciudadano/aviso-legal.aspx). --Savig (talk) 17:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:À faire - Capture d'écran page de discussion.jpg

File:À faire - Capture d'écran page de discussion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

signalement

Bonjour Benoit

une contributrice multiplie les demandes de relecture sur fr:wp. je me suis donc plongé dans son brouillon et je suis tombé sur les sources proposées. Cette contributrice nous les proposent sous la forme de photos de journaux, photos téléchargées dans commons.

Je crois que cela serait bien qu'un admin de commons se penche sur la question : c'est ici

A+

Matpib (talk) 10:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Matpib de l'avoir signalé, j'ai supprimé les fichiers. Ceci est parfois brutal pour un nouveau contributeur, qu'un méchant admin détruise son travail, est-ce que vous pourriez lui expliquer ? Merci à l'avance. Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

je m'en charge sur fr:wp. Matpib (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?

Hi, Benoit Rochon, on your UP, you mention ...Organiser of Wikipédia Takes Montreal instead of ...Organizer of Wikipedia Takes Montreal. Just wanted to let you know that catched my eye Lotje (talk) 05:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qrcode wikipedia fr.jpg

File:Qrcode wikipedia fr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dpla-fr (talk) 23:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

demandes de suppression

Bonjour

Je viens de demander la suppression de plusieurs images.

Ces images proviennent du blog (non-officiel) de Radio Courtoisie, où elles sont mises au statut "licence libre", sans indication du nom du photographe. Cela ne me semble pas garantir que ce blog respecte le droit des auteurs.

Pour information, cordialement

--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Historic Places in Canada

Je me posais une petite question en entrant des photos d'immeubles patrimoniaux de Joliette (Qui en a cité d'un cout 46 en 2016!) . Est-ce que ça serait possible de faire en sorte que le modèle {{Historic Places in Canada}} inclure le Répertoire du patrimoine culturel du Québec ou les ids des lieux historiques nationaux du Canada, où que tu pense que ça serait mieux de créer un nouveau modèle? Du moins j'aimerais bien ne plus être obliger de faire ce genre de Category:Église Sainte-Thérèse-de-l'Enfant-Jésus (Joliette, Quebec) truc en tête de catégorie. --Fralambert (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoit Rochon: Juste relancer parce que tu me réponds pas. --Fralambert (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Fralambert, désolé du délai, ça bouge pas mal dans ma vie ces temps-ci ! Je ne sais pas trop quoi penser. Peut-être est-ce mieux d'avoir un template à part ? Différent logo, différentes catégories, différent répertoire... qu'est-ce que tu en penses ? Benoit Rochon (talk) 15:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas de problème à ce qu'on aille un template à part. Possiblement pour les catégories de lié au modèle ça serait bien d'avoir des catégories, mais pour les catégories comme Category:Municipally designated cultural heritage monuments in Quebec n'ont pas à changer, à la limite on ajoute celle pour les objets. Pour le logo, je n'ai pas trop d'idée: le blason du Québec, une simple fleur de lys sur fond bleu, un logo maison? --Fralambert (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ 23:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ 23:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth photos

Hello. I've noticed you've put a number of my photos in the Category:Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2017 in Canada not for prejury after they had been marked as eligible by users Amqui and Fralambert. Would you mind explaining the reason for this, especially keeping in mind that most of these photos have been classified as Quality images? Thank you. СССР (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi СССР, I removed couple hundred of pictures in order to not flood pre-jury. If you don't agree, feel free to revert. Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Importer les photos sur Commons

Bonjour !
Dominique Delouche a joint à cette lettre :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Re_de_Dominique_Delouche_du_13-07-2017_%C3%89ric_Laborey.pdf 3 photos (les images du film).
Je veux importer ces photos sur Commons pour les utiliser dans l'article. Dominique Delouche écrit dans sa lettre : Je joins à ce texte les photos du film que j'ai conservées. Vous pouvez les utiliser. Est-ce que cette lettre est suffisante pour importer les photos sur Commons ? --V2016 (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Conference project

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Message not accessible

Hi, I can see in my alerts that you sent me an email 11 hours ago but I have problems accessing that account because I haven't used it for a long time. Please write to me at [email protected] ---Thank you. Xufanc (talk) 13:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WLM Canada winners

Hello Benoit, you published this year's Canada WLM finalists in this page. Are this pictures following an order they way there are or do they have no ranking? If the first applies (that would be great from my point of view :) ) using a number for each of them would be convenient, if the later applies then a note like "Pictures are presented in no particular order since there was no local WLM contest" (see Austrians) would be good to state the outcome clearly. Regards, Poc o² 16:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Poco for mentionning this. It's done. Best. Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scan Athon

Bonjour Benoit, Voilà une photo Document_BAnQ_,_Cartable_2007-03-006_-1_,_pic_tes que je viens de téléverser dans le cadre du Scan-a-thon d'archives de BAnQ durant Wikimania Montréal, est-ce que le modèle est bon s'il te plait? Merci Cordialement. --Great11 (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Bonjour pourriez vous supprimer mes 3 fichier que j'ai importé ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Julien_Auroux&ilshowall=1 ) mais que je n'arrive pas à supprimer . Je vous en serais très reconnaissant et beaucoup plus vigilant pour la suite. Cordialement . Julien Auroux Julien Auroux (talk) 13:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression de mes fichiers importé par erreur

Bonjour Monsieur Benoit Rochon, comme vous êtes un administrateur, pourriez vous supprimer mes trois fichier ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Julien_Auroux&ilshowall=1 ) que j'ai importé, car je n'arrive pas à les supprimé. Une erreur de novice .

En vous remerciant de cette suppression .

Julien Auroux — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julien Auroux (talk • contribs) 13:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Leury - Histoire de Rouyn-Noranda.djvu

Copyright status: File:Leury - Histoire de Rouyn-Noranda.djvu

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Leury - Histoire de Rouyn-Noranda.djvu. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:27, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shweta Tiwari.jpg

Hi, are you sure this was copyright violation? I removed the nomination because the metadata went back to january 2008 (more than 10 years ago). It sometimes happens that other sites use files from here and that years later someone (this was an IP-user with only one edit (if I remember it well) reports it as "this is on Google". I don't know if the IP-user put the nomination back, but I wanna be sure this is really copyvio.. Regards, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you answer me? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Richardkiwi, I'm busy with Wiki Loves Earth. I restored it. Best, Benoit Rochon (talk) 12:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thnx, but an IP-user already nominated for speedy because he/she doesn't know how to start talk about a deletion. So I reverted it. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

audio

rèj :

Bonsoir Monsieur Rochon, ça, c'est une mauvaise qualité d'enregistrement, pouvez-vous enregistrer une nouvelle version du mot « rêve » s'il vous plaît? 104.244.64.173 22:43, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Print from 1877 a copyvio?

Hi! You seem to have deleted File:Lord Dorchester Vanity Fair Print 1877.jpg as a copyright violation. Perhaps I'm missing something, but I thought that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional works of art more than 100 years old were treated as public domain here? The artist died in 1922. I've absolutely no interest in this particular file, but if this was a mistake there may be other similar images uploaded by the same user that have also been nominated and deleted in error. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I put the right date and the right licence banner. Benoit Rochon (talk) 21:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I think there may be other similar images uploaded by the same user that have also been nominated and deleted in error, possibly not by you (I can't see the deleted contributions of the uploader, of course). File:George Payne Vanity Fair Print 25th September 1875.jpg seems to be one such. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:39, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:Page d'accueil GLAM BAnQ - Exemple de tuile de premier niveau.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hi Benoit, how are you doing? I am reaching out to you on behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments international team. We see that you have signed up on the interested countries page for this year. I would like to know if you are still interested, and we would be happy to provide any support that you may require in organizing the contest. Best, KCVelaga (talk · mail) 14:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, KCVelaga. I might have a question; in Canada, we have lists on Wikipedia English and French. Sometimes there are differences between both languages. I heard that WLM lists could be on Wikidata. Would you be able to tell me more about it? Using Wikidata would be an improvement for countries with more than one language. Thank you in advance for your help. Best. Benoit Rochon (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoit Rochon: We are working migrating the lists to Wikidata, but I will only be ready by next year. So for this year, it will we will only follow the lists on Wikipedias. Pinging Lokal Profil if he has anything more to add. KCVelaga (talk · mail) 08:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KCVelaga: Hum, there is already more that 8000 heritage places already in Canada in Wikidata (Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Quebec and Alberta are complete). And, in case you don't know there is more thar 50 different types of heritage designation in Canada. When you talk of migration, I am a little sacered of it, since the Canadian Register of Historic Places don't seem to have been updated since 7 years. --Fralambert (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not seeing this before. The migration would focus on the contents currently in the monuments database (the dataset in French to start with). d:Wikidata:WikiProject_WLM/Mapping_tables/ca_(fr) started looking at mapping the values but was never completed.

As for Wikidata powered lists that can be done even if the migration is not complete (albeit with less items). The main issue tends to be different wikis not allowing Wikidata powered lists in the main namespace. /Lokal _Profil 20:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer Lokal. And just for my knowledge, what would be the main argument for not allowing Wikidata feeding lists in the encyclopedic space? Best. Benoit Rochon (talk) 06:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Various concerns such as quality, citations etc. have been raised in the past. I think the true reason is often simply that local editors feel that they loose control over the content. With Listeria even more so since any local changes they do get nuked with the next update. /Lokal _Profil 13:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Fonds famille Dujay-Nogentel – Accord du 19 février 1573 BAnQ 04T P51 002 (crop comparison).jpg

Copyright status: File:Fonds famille Dujay-Nogentel – Accord du 19 février 1573 BAnQ 04T P51 002 (crop comparison).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fonds famille Dujay-Nogentel – Accord du 19 février 1573 BAnQ 04T P51 002 (crop comparison).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments Canada questions

Hi Benoit, bonjour

I am very new to Wikipedia/Wikimedia other than for research so bear with me.

I would like to begin to contribute to the Wiki Loves Monuments media in the form of photos I intend to take around Winnipeg, Manitoba. I have some questions / observations that I hope you can address.

1. The FAQ states, "On maps of historic sites, there are red marks and green marks. When an image is added to one of the lines of the lists, the mark turns red." and "A red mark does not mean Wikimedia Commons will not take more photos of this historic site, a photo in the repository can be improved, whether it is a better picture quality or better weather. The green mark does not mean that there is no picture in the repertory, it simply means that no user has added an image in one of the lists." I think that you have reversed the colours. The red marks don't have pictures yet, the green marks do have pictures. I was tempted to edit it myself but I wanted to contact you because it is your words and I don't want to mess things up.

2. The text in the pop-up balloons on the map of Manitoba are in French for the majority of the marks. I noticed that this applies specifically to Manitoba and not, for instance, Saskatchewan or Alberta. Unfortunately the French language has not been dominant in Manitoba for a long time so it would be easier for the 90% of Manitobans who don't speak French if the balloon text were to be in English instead. Is that a change that I can make for myself?

3. The big red label on the map reads, "Wiki Loves Monuments 2018" when I think it should be 2019. I don't know if you are able to make changes to the map but I couldn't figure out who else to contact.

4. What would be required of a person to fulfill the role of "English lists maintenance"? Thank you for your attention to these matters and correct me if I am out of line with my queries.

Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shockeymoe (talk • contribs) 19:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

ATTRIBUTING THE AUTHR FOR GAGET PREFERENCE

Lepluspre'cieux (talk) 05:59, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Benoit Rochon. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2020 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you--A1Cafel (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Double Check Copyright

Hi, you marked the file (180601 (3) One-The World in Seoul.jpg) as a possible copyright violation but the tag (CC BY) is still present at the very bottom right of that page. You can see other photos from that same page in the category (Kang Daniel in 2018) and they have been reviewed and confirmed as okay to use by other editors. So, please double check and remove the copyright template when you get the chance.---HrToss (talk) 06:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HrToss, maybe I miss something, but the photo is coming from tistory.com so it's a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons is accepting only photo that are free licence and this photo is not under free licence. Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey !

Lingua_Libre Atikamekw at Wikimania 2017 Montreal.jpg

I bumped into this photo today ! Miss you all, the Quebecois & Atikamekw ! Salutation à toi Benoit. <3 Yug (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	vandalis Pongjay (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WHY ARE YOU DELETING MY IMAGE radhastirling2 ???

WHY ARE YOU DELETING MY IMAGE radhastirling2 ??? I own the image. I ticked the box to show I won the image? Why the hell are you removing it from Wikicommons???

PLEASE STOP IT!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.0.92.242 (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:36, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Unibroue - La fin du monde.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discostu (talk) 22:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont couvert de Powerscourt 02.JPG

File:Pont couvert de Powerscourt 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Asclepias (talk) 13:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont couvert de Powerscourt 05.JPG

File:Pont couvert de Powerscourt 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Asclepias (talk) 13:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tout va bien?

Prends-tu toujours tes messages ici? Tu as disparu. -Michel 2001:18C0:7DD:6800:D057:742C:D6BE:6263 03:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brochon99. Check your email—you've got mail!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Saqib (talk) 08:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User WPQC

Template:User WPQC is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

10 years since event happened

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Anohthterwikipedian (talk) 23:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User WPQC

Template:User WPQC has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Brochon99

Wiki Loves Monuments

A barnstar for you!

Autopatrol given

Motd 2012-03-19

A barnstar for you!

please do not delete the photo

Fotos de Juan Martín Del Potro

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

tagging for speedy deletion

Copyright violations

A barnstar for you!

Fait

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

File tagging File:Marin Soljacic.jpg

Evidence

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

Copyrights 2

WLMCA

You earned this

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Help: no-FoP Italy

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

"Pas besoin de mettre {{HPC}} en doublon"

Demande de suppression : File:Tino Rossi photo avant guerre.JPG - 13 janvier 2013

Demande de déblocage

Demande de déblocage puis de suppression de compte

Problème compte global sur Commons

You have mail

Supprimer une photo

File tagging File:Jeunes musiciens du monde Kalkeri2.jpg

File:AntonineMaillet.jpg

Normalisation de {{HPC|xx|xx|xx}}

Shatin City One Station Akira Yoshida Art cats

Deleted files

WLM 2013 : Montreal Biosphère, monument?

Autorisation Photos

File:Zingmagazine Issue 23.jpg

Editor @ ar.wiki

Image BAnQ

Deux images

Restauration d'une image

Copyright status: File:BAnQ Projet Conrad poirier.jpg

File tagging File:Quebec-Canada.png

Photos Émission JAM

Projet Poirier, bandeau de statut aux États-Unis

Copyright status: File:Mardi cest Wiki BAnQ.png

Copyright status: File:Mardi cest Wiki.png

File tagging File:Friends and Family. Canal Bridge BAnQ P48S1P00395.jpg

File:Boucher - Wikisource, le défi d'une bibliothèque virtuelle bénévole, 2015.djvu effacé

Photo de Tony Levin et Kevin Parent sur scène

Translation issue

Copyright violation?

signalement

Typo?

demandes de suppression

Template:Historic Places in Canada

Wiki Loves Earth photos

Importer les photos sur Commons

Message not accessible

WLM Canada winners

Scan Athon

A barnstar for you!

Suppression de mes fichiers importé par erreur

Copyright status: File:Leury - Histoire de Rouyn-Noranda.djvu

audio

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships

Print from 1877 a copyvio?

Image without license

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Copyright status: File:Fonds famille Dujay-Nogentel – Accord du 19 février 1573 BAnQ 04T P51 002 (crop comparison).jpg

Wiki Loves Monuments Canada questions

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

A kitten for you!

De-adminship warning

Double Check Copyright

Hey !

A barnstar for you!

WHY ARE YOU DELETING MY IMAGE radhastirling2 ???

Help: `no-FoP Italy`