User talk:A.Savin

See also: User:A.Savin/Archive.

I respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.

---

Chicken Kyiv

Hello, Its a bad idea to redirect Chicken Kyiv to Chicken Kiev. Because Kyiv is the original name in ukrainian as Kiev is the russian name. And of course Kyiv is in Ukraine. Tangopaso (talk) 18:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I presume your request is not about the category redirect from "Chicken Kyiv" to "Chicken Kiev", but about the move itself. The reason is quite simple: "Chicken Kiev" is as such a proper noun and its name refers to the historical naming or translation of Kyiv/Kiev at time of first mention; it's pretty similar as for "Königsberger Klopse which never has been renamed to "Kaliningrader Klopse" despite the rename of the city; that means the move from "Chicken Kiev" to "Chicken Kyiv" a while ago, which was performed by a meanwhile indef-blocked account, was unconsensusal at the very least, and I don't see any preceding discussions either. In English WP, a rename of Chicken Kiev was already rejected, from what I see. --A.Savin 19:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality images

Я подумываю подать на это некоторые из своих фотографий. Как вы считаете, могут ли быть избраны следующие фото?

• File:Church of the Annunciation, Krasnoyarsk.jpg
• File:Krasnoyarsk Krai government building.jpg
• File:Russian surface-to-air missile system S-75 Dvina.JPG
• File:Center of space communications at Zheleznogorsk, Russia.JPG
• File:Krasnoyarsk Regional Philharmonic, the Grand Concert Hall.jpg
• File:Siberian State Aerospace University, Krasnoyarsk.jpg
• File:ISS Reshetnev antenna tower 3.JPG

MBH 13:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Для качественных архитектурных фото важно отсутствие перспективного искажения, а здесь оно есть, и немало. Вы можете попробовать номинировать третье изображение, хотя лично я не понимаю, зачем это нужно. --A.Savin 14:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Но как может не быть перспективного искажения (если я правильно понимаю, что это такое) при фото с земли? Что - только с вертолёта снимать? И где перспективные искажения у второго, четвёртого и предпоследнего фото? MBH 15:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Зависит от расстояния между вами и мотивом, от фокусного расстояния: с широкоугольным объективом больше возможности держать камеру прямо и не завалить вертикали. Исправить перспективу в фотошопе тоже можно, но когда здание едва влезает в кадр, как на номере два, этим вы с неизбежностью его обрежете и тогда ни о каком качественном изображении уж точно не может идти речь. --A.Savin 15:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Вероятное нарушение АП

Здравствуйте Александр. Имеются обоснованные подозрения на нарушения авторского права вот с этой фотографией File:Длимбетов Е.Т. -Ordamed 2024.jpg. Программа поиска не нашла в инете оригинального изображения, только обрезанное - [1], поэтому не уверен что можно действовать по обычной процедуре используя шаблон {{Copyvio}}. Факт нарушения авторского права подтверждён также загрузившей фото участницей. Оставляю на ваше усмотрение.--Valmin (talk) 10:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2024 - Deutschland - Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme

Teilnehmerbild von WLE 2020

Hallo A.Savin,

Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland ist beendet. Du hast mit deinen hochgeladenen Fotos zum Gelingen des Wettbewerbs beigetragen. Vielen Dank für deine Fotos, sie sind ein wertvoller Beitrag, das Thema Naturschutz in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Es wurden über 16.000 Fotos hochgeladen, du findest alle in der Kategorie Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Germany.

Bis zum 19. Juni 2024 kannst du die hochgeladenen Fotos im Vorjurytool bewerten. Vom 2. bis zum 4. August 2024 kürt dann die Jury die Siegerbilder, vielleicht ist eins deiner Bilder dabei.

Wir möchten den Wettbewerb besser machen, aus diesem Grund haben wir eine kleine anonyme Umfrage vorbereitet. Wir freuen uns, wenn du daran teilnimmst.

Vielen Dank im Namen des Organisationsteams und bis spätestens nächstes Jahr, wenn Wiki Loves Earth 2025 stattfindet. GPSLeo (talk) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Свобода панорамы в России для памятников

Месяц назад Конституционный суд РФ вынес вердикт по использованию изображений памятников после иска одного из екатеринбургских издательств. Нужно ли переделывать {{FoP-Russia}}? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

У меня эта ссылка не открывается. Если желаете, можете вкратце изложить суть вердикта, но об изменении правил Викисклада в любом случае решать не мне. --A.Savin 18:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

«при размещении в информационно-справочном материале о культурных, исторических и иных достопримечательностях территории (путеводителе) изображения произведения изобразительного искусства — скульптуры, которая расположена в открытом для свободного посещения месте на этой территории или видна из такого места, не требуется получения согласия автора или иного правообладателя скульптуры и выплаты ему вознаграждения, в том числе если соответствующий информационно-справочный материал распространяется в целях получения прибыли, а на данном изображении скульптура может рассматриваться как основной объект использования». У меня такой же вопрос по мемориальным доскам. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Ну, для "информационно-справочного материала" нам скорее всего недстаточно, но ещё раз: это не мне решать. --A.Savin 10:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Спейд на commons:Форум уже написал: по его мнению, это не свобода панорамы, которая нужна складу. MBH 21:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello, sorry for direct messaging you, can you block this specific IP, they've vandalized quite a lot pages by putting unnecessary deletion tag in the last 30 minutes. 140.213.126.5 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user Nyilvoskt (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Не надо придумывать неизвестные названия да ещё без года постройки

• Привет, in Vanasadam (неизвестное или мало кому известное выражение), вместо него надо употреблять современное название Ревеля, например, правильно in Reval, допустимо сейчас и in Tallinn, но Vanasadamas as in Vanasadam - буквально in Old Port, это довольно неприятный перебор от эстонского товарища Erko, начинающий юзер, и наверно не в курсе, что Wikimedia Commons задумана на английском языке. Он может держать для себя лично сайт Ships in Vanasadam с подкатегориями для всех судов, но не надо встраивать свою категорию в правильную категорию Category:Silja Europa (ship, 1993) in Tallinn, так как акватория порта очень мала, см. границу порта, а судно очень часто сфотографировано в Tallinn Bay, Port of Paljassaare, около Miiduranna на рейде. Определять точное местоположение судна он не будет, поэтому нет смысла затевать эту историю. Я снова убираю его ссылку в правильной категории в подкатегорию Silja Europa in Vanasadam. Парень даже не удосужился написать (ship, 1993). Это касается всех остальных судов. По-немецки это звучит как Шламперай (Schlamperei), так называлась немецким руководителем стройки работа советских 40 лет назад, типа тяп-ляп. Хорошего дня, thanks,

PjotrMahh1 (talk) 10:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

@PjotrMahh1: Правильным действием с вашей стороны было бы, выставить эту категорию на быстрое удаление или заменить её на {{Category redirect}}. Каких-то параллельных по смыслу категорий специально для "некоего парня" мы на Викискладе не допускаем. --A.Savin 12:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

• • Да, там проблема не только с этим парнем, который появился в 2017 и пропал тоже в 2017. Проблема возникла в 2014 году с категорией Category:Ships in Vanasadam, сделанной 2014-12-11 18:24:21‎ 2001:7d0:88c2:f401:2933:9a41:2adb:418. Я как-то обращался к нему Анонимус, ..., но он не желает или стесняется светиться. Я не стал сносить их личный контакт, (наверно для популяризации эстонского языка?). Туда же подключился и HenSti. А по идее сносить надо почти все категории, где используется слово Vanasadam не в качестве имени, а в качестве old port, то есть "суда в старом порту". По Фремантлю в Австралии иная проблема, там категория была в гавани Фреманля, хотя суда уже покинули гавань на фото, не знаю, приняли ли мою правку. Да, всё нормально: Category:Cruise ships in Fremantle, as PjotrMahh1 moved page Category:Cruise ships in Fremantle Harbour to Category:Cruise ships in Fremantle: port + area around. Очень много меняю категорий в Category:Cruise ships in Venice, те, в которых суда указаны без года постройки, например, Category:Aurora in Venice, это нарушение нормы оформления категории Category:Ships by name.--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 13:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Warsaw 07-13 img29 View from Palace of Culture and Science.jpg

Sorry, autofilling changed the category, I didn't notice. Artur Andrzej (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quedlinburg asv2018-10 img53 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2024 - Deutschland - Ergebnisse veröffentlicht

Hallo A.Savin,

die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland sind nun veröffentlicht. Vorjury und Jury haben aus 12.000 Fotos im Wettbewerb die besten 50 Einreichungen in den Kategorien Landschaft und Detail sowie drei Fotos mit Sonderpreisen ausgezeichnet. Wenn deine Fotos unter den ersten Plätzen sind und du einen Gutscheinpreis erhältst, hast du bereits eine Nachricht erhalten.

• Sieger WLE 2024 – Detail
• 
  Stephan Sprinz - Blühendes Strand-Milchkraut am Strand von Norderney
• 
  Peach-Boy11 - Eine parasitische Sichelwespe bei der Eiablage in eine Raupe
• 
  Oliver Knebel - Kupfer-Rosenkäfer im Naturschutzgebiet Dörscheider Heide

• Sieger WLE 2024 – Landschaft
• 
  T meltzer - Lilienstein im Elbsandsteingebirge
• 
  Thomas Hummel - Ahbach (Ahr) im Naturschutzgebiet am Wasserfall Dreimühlen
• 
  Roman Eisele - Trockenmauern der ehemaligen Weinberge im Naturschutzgebiet Hirschauer Berg

Hier findest du alle ausgezeichneten Fotos.

Wir haben dir bereits den Link zu unserer Umfrage geschickt. Wenn du sie noch nicht ausgefüllt hast, würden wir uns freuen, wenn du noch bis zum Sonntag den 18. August teilnimmst.

Falls du nicht bis 2025 auf den nächsten Fotowettbewerb warten willst, kannst du im September bei Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland oder einem anderen der teilnehmenden Länder deine Fotos zum Thema Kulturerbe hochladen.

Noch einmal vielen Dank im Namen des Organisationsteams und der Jury GPSLeo (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Categorization of churches as towers

Hello A., why are you systematically moving aerial photographs of churches to the category of church towers? Surely if the picture is about the whole church, such a category is misleading? Lieven Smits (talk) 20:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Sincerely I don't get your problem and why should a Category:Aerial photographs of church towers be misleading. --A.Savin 20:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

The name of the category is misleading for the following reason. Every church, apart from some ruins or rare architectural anomalies, has at least one tower. A normal aerial photograph of a church can hardly avoid including that tower. If the mere appearance of the tower in the photograph is taken as sufficient reason to categorize the photograph as "Aerial photographs of church towers", then the parent category "Aerial photographs of churches" loses its meaning. Since this is obvious to anyone reading the names of the categories, they would suppose that the child category is there specifically for high-magnification telephotos that focus on the tower only, without showing the entire rest of the church or showing it less prominently.

Apart from this confusion, it creates an unnecessary level of clicks.

In your opinion, what difference currently justifies that some churches are in the parent category, while some others are in the more detailed child category? Lieven Smits (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I just think, if an image is for example in the category "Aerial photographs of churches in Germany" and shows a church tower too, then it is of course okay to add it to both categories: "Aerial photographs of churches in Germany", "Aerial photographs of church towers". At least if the tower is prominently visible. --A.Savin 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Berlin JVA und Kriminalgericht Moabit Luftbild asv2024-07 img1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin JVA und Kriminalgericht Moabit Luftbild asv2024-07 img1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Что у тебя снова за проблемы с фото?

• Что у тебя снова за проблемы с фото? Ты видел, что круизные уже категоризуются по городам? Я тоже пару лет назад был против этого, ты новичок в этой схеме? А про timeline тоже не слышал? Верни всё как было, я от тебя уже начинаю уставать,

PjotrMahh1 (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

• • Если тебе нужно своё фото в главной категории судна, то сделай дубликат, то есть дополнительную категорию, я просто не знал, что тебе это нужно, чтобы на фото все сразу попадали,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 14:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
    • Я не понял, а зачем ты дериватив загнал в Category:Amera (ship, 1988) in Saint Petersburg, это не оригинальное фото, а производный дубликат. Зачем он тут. Я не против, что в описании просто год 2019 стоит, но это важно в правильном выстраивании фото судна на странице по времени, timeline, а не по алфавиту придуманного названия, некоторые начинают с цифр, чтобы их фото попали первыми на страницу. Но это и глупо и неправильно. Кроме того, надо полностью восстановить года и дни посещения судном Санкт-Петербурга в стиле https://fleetphoto.ru/vessel/801/, там фото Amera только два, но ставят правильно по timeline,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Постарайтесь сформулировать вопрос по новой, но только без хамства и так, чтобы было вообще понятно о чём собственно речь. --A.Savin 01:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

• Wikimedia по усмотрению расставляет суда на странице по алфавиту, ряд фотографов для фото уже используют timeline по номерам 01, 02, 03, или более сложные но краткие даты, однако лучше использовать полные даты с секундами, так как при развороте судна в одну минуту делается до десятка снимков, чтобы поймать точный нос, корму, левый или правый борт. Если оставить размещение фото по алфавиту, то посещение порта судном в зависимости от даты и года, а также поворот судна будут отражаться на странице нелогично или беспорядочно. Кроме того многие юзеры не указывают год и дату, часто и местоположение, в названии файла, в описании, приходится открывать файл, искать данные в описании, но и там обычно ничего нет. То есть юзеры просто закидывают страницу фотографиями, а что там изображено, знают только они сами. Далее, если файл подвергся обрезанию, то лучше оставить его на главной странице, очевидно делалось для показа в Википедии, его будет труднее смотреть в городской разбивке, да и зачем там нужен дубликат, если посещение судном города уже зафиксировано. То есть заход отменён не был, как почти весь круизный туризм в пандемию и ряд морей (Балтийское, Чёрное, Средиземное, Красное в ходе войны), а также ограничение захода в порты некоторых стран. Хотелось бы добавить, что некоторые юзеры из фото, в том числе моих, начали изготовлять фэйки, например, Angelgreat сводил в одно фото два судна, которые заходили в Таллин в разные дни: . Также он часто менял на борту название судна, чтобы получить якобы фото судно, которое оно имело в 70-е годы и под флагом, например, Норвегии, Royal Viking Sky или Royal Viking ..., название не помню. То есть удаляет современное название и пишет первоначальное, причём фото снято уже в 2000-е годы. Зачем? И такой фэйк переносится в Википедию. И это уже не остановить, идёт полная хаотизация. Просьба не отвечать на эти строки, так как я избегаю любого общения с юзерами (пользователями) и не хочу возвращать их действия через undo, после чего выскакивает красный колокол на странице talk. А общаться я не хочу. Лучше вручную внести изменения в категорию или в описание фото, thanks --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 04:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Категории существуют для того, чтобы собирать в них все медиафайлы, подходящие под это описание. Возможно, вы путаете категории с галереями, где вы действительно можете выбирать изображения произвольно. Так что заведомо нет ничего неверного во включении вот этой фотографии в вот эту категорию, раз уж вы зачем-то решили её (категорию) создать. Ну а если вы не хотите (ни с кем?) общаться, то честно говоря я не совсем понимаю, что вы вообще ищете в проектах Фонда Викимедиа и как себе представляете какую-либо работу в них. --A.Savin 12:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Tram line 1 (Frankfurt (Oder))

Hi, why did you revert the last modification? This line is a tram line in Germany, so it should be categorized there. Clic (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

See COM:OVERCAT. It's already categorized as route 1 in Germany, so no further categorization as roiute 1 please. --A.Savin 21:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Категории Новоржев

Здравствуйте. Категория Buildings in Novorzhev не входит в категорию Germana Street (Novorzhev), поэтому для моста она не будет отображаться. Wagon (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Вы желаете, чтобы я пояснил почему мосты не считаются за здания, или чем конкретно я могу быть полезен? --A.Savin 17:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for opening my eyes. Spending months for reading hundreds of scholarly works, in purpose of using thousands of references on Wikidata for towers and other buildings, wasting thousands of hours to organize cats here on Commons... and all can be destroyed by a single click. Goodbye and never again. --Orijentolog (talk) 09:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

As you wish. But I would use Common sense instead and ask to myself, whether towers really are buildings, and whether the ratio of height to width (or whatever it's named as in scholarly works) really is a shape. --A.Savin 09:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Please take a look around: "a tall narrow building or part of a building" (Oxford Dictionary), "a very tall, narrow building, or part of a building" (Cambridge Dictionary), "a tall, narrow building or structure" (Britannica Dictionary), "a tower is a tall, narrow building" (Collins Dictionary), etc. The definitions from these dictionaries are based on the traditional interpretation of towers, because they were built for millennia from elementary materials (brick, stone), so they almost always represent buildings i.e. structures with walls and a roof. Truss towers and similar came relatively recently and are just structures, not buildings. The English Wikipedia is not a good guide as it illustrates the tower article with modern examples of structures.

Of course, I don't claim all towers are buildings, nor am I asking that absolutely all types of towers be categorized under buildings, which is obviously wrong. We are a much more technically detailed project. What I am saying is that it is not wrong to categorize the general categories of towers under buildings, along with structures. We don't have categories named like Tower buildings. If you open Towers in Iran by function you'll notice that virtually all individual towers are indeed buildings. Non-building towers like electricity pylons and wind turbines have no individual example. When I said you were "destroying" the categorization tree, I meant this: there are 81 categories of towers by city and 31 categories by province, all categorized under buildings (Iran doesn't have structures by city/province). Now, after your subjective insisting on removal, everything has lost its meaning. Likewise in other countries. Italy, Germany and Iran were architecturally the best categorized countries, me and the others invested months in this work, and now you claim that these three should follow messy countries (your comment: please see other "Towers by country" categories). These three countries also have hundreds of architecture by city categories, while the majority of countries have none. And what now, the former should follow the latter flawed ones? As for shape, even Wikipedias keep towers under buildings and structures by shape, and here "shape" refers to the widest range of meanings: planar, vertical, 2D or 3D forms, even buildings with flat roofs‎.

Therefore, in the end, I will politely ask you to reconsider your behavior and edits like today, which make more than a hundred subcategories lose their sense. I don't see a future here if something that has been painstakingly organized for a long time is going to be destroyed with one click or overnight. If you asked me why I categorized like that, I would have answered you all this. --Orijentolog (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Well I'm not the one who started the discussion, so not sure why I'm the one who should reconsider my behaviour (and not sure what's wrong about it after all). However I think that a dictionary is less of a credible source of information for us, because we are basically a sister project of Wikipedia, which is not a dictionary, and a scientific explanation of a subject may of course be more complex rather than what is in a dictionary for a very basic level of understanding.

Your behaviour is wrong anyway, as at least two people obviously disagree with your approach and you had continued editwarring.

Regarding shapes, just take a simple example: this one and this one are both towers, but obviously different shapes. I hope this is enough to explain that at least there's something wrong with your approach. Thanks --A.Savin 23:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

You didn't get my point. I'm saying that all subcategories of Towers in Iran, some 122 of them (plus metacats), treat towers as buildings. By shape. There is no logical and practical alternative to that. Now, when your edit has removed the relevant parent category from the primary category, the whole categorization tree is messed up. Categorization should be consistent for primary and subcategories, but now it is not. I reverted to maintain consistency. A discussion like ours here is fine and any objections or questions are fine, but making radical changes before the discussion is not. That's my point.

The same thing is with Germany and other countries. I spent weeks for organizing historical towers in those major countries, like Towers in Germany, France and Spain by style, treating everything as buildings, and yesterday you went around removing buildings by shape from their primary category. Everything has lost its meaning. You may not be aware of the damage you're doing with such changes, but I am, and that's why I'm seriously considering abandoning the project forever. The same as others, like DenghiùComm.

Wikipedia itself treats towers as buildings and structures by shape, there is no separation on buildings and structures like here, so I don't understand what you mean. It does not explain that historical towers are mostly buildings (those with walls and roofs), nor does it provide an overview of historical towers in major European countries or Iran. Commons is actually a much more technically detailed project than Wikipedia.

See e.g. this discussion, users agreed that changes are needed and this will soon be done comprehensively, across hundreds of categories, and consistency will exist. So I'm fine with it. If I were to force something against the consensus, with "It's mine", "I opened it" or "It's our project", then my behavior would be problematic. Worth of block. Before the consensus was reached, I was also reverting edits, only for keeping consistency. Because 30 cases among 200 should not be ruined. Once we reached the solution, all 200 will be changed and that's fine. So, it's only keeping consistency, not forcing subjective ideas.

Regarding shapes, you didn't quite understand me. I wrote that shapes here includes "planar, vertical, 2D or 3D forms, even roofs". In terms of vertical shape, the two examples you give are towers, and they differ in planar shape. Please take a look at Shebeli Tower: it has three different categories (mausoleum towers, domed mausoleums, octagonal mausoleums) that fall under Mausoleums in Iran by shape. The first refers to the vertical shape, the second to the top, and the third to the floor plan. In the future, buildings by shape can be more precisely divided into buildings by planar shape, buildings by vertical shape, buildings by roof shape, buildings by 3D form, etc.

Finally, my referring to "scholarly works" is not related to the definitions of towers in general, but to the arrangement of individual examples. For that Shebeli Tower, it took me at least two hours to find strong sources, and reference the technical and chronological details on Wikidata. Once that's done, my editing of the Commons categories follows. The same was done with thousands of historical buildings. I don't know anyone else here who takes such a serious approach. --Orijentolog (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't understand whether you're actually retired or not.

Also, it's not my job to set a rule on tower-related categories. This should be done according to a consensus, which I fail to see at the moment.

Do I have to say something else here? Although you allegedly have retired, you are continuing pushing these "buildings by shape" categories. As I just see, there are already categories like Category:Towers in Spain by shape. Created by you! And now you are trying to push both categories in editwar modus into "Buildings in Spain by shape". "Towers in Spain" (and same for other countries) AND "Towers in Spain by shape". Never heard of COM:OVERCAT? Do I still have to explain why overcat is evil? I'm out here. Discuss elsewhere, or do retire. --A.Savin 10:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm trying not to get retired, but your behavior is forcing me to do so. Dear A.Savin, can you keep a rational discussion and act politely? Can you read the text above? I was reverting an IP edit, again to maintain consistency. I don't plan to revert yours, until we agree.

Looking superficially, it seems like Towers in Spain by shape falls under Buildings in Spain by shape by shape (twice shape), so you found it as strange and incorrect. BUT, buildings with particular vertical shape (like tower) have other shapes, so there's actually no COM:OVERCAT. There are similar examples: Windcatchers fall under Towers by function, but they are further subcategorized to Windcatchers by building function. Superficially it would imply something like Buildings by building function by function (twice function). Also, Industry buildings fall under Buildings by function, and again are further subcategorized to Industry buildings by function, implying Buildings by function by function (twice function). These cats are not wrong, they're fine. However, having meta categories with two identical criteria is not practical. If there was a more precise division of buildings by shape into planar, vertical and other shapes, as I discussed above, Towers in Spain would fall under Buildings in Spain by vertical shape, and Towers in Spain by shape would imply having something like Buildings in Spain by vertical shape by shape, similar to the case of windcatchers. Don't let that confuse you.

Once again, please read my arguments carefully and answer me after several days, when you be calm. Thanks. --Orijentolog (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Not to hijack the discussion but it seems like your way to far down in the weeds with this whole thing. There's absolutely zero reason to be that pedantic about categorizing images. Otherwise your seriously just missing the forest for the trees here. Things like COM:OVERCAT exist for a reason and that's clearly what your doing. It doesn't magically stop being overcategorizing just because you spent 2 hours researching towers and can write a 15 page research paper on why their shapes either. Regardless, from what I've seen so far you've been reverted by 3 admins, one of whom you got in an edit war with. Plus you edit wared me multiple times. You should really just be happy you haven't been blocked yet when your behavior is clearly inappropriate Honestly, this is an extremely minor that absolutely no difference what-so-ever in the grand scheme of things. It's certainly not worth editing waring people over. I know it sucks having something changed after spending a lot of time and research on it, but that's just the cost of contributing to a collaborative project. If you can't handle other people editing or changing your work go create a personal blog or something. Otherwise just drop the stick and follow the guidelines next time. Things like COM:OVERCAT are extremely easy to understand, follow, and there's absolutely no legitimate reason why someone who's been contributing to the project as long as you should be having issues over it. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

There's no any issue with OVERCAT there, as I explained. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

IDHT. Your clearly failing to get the point. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm calm. At least it's not me who's slamming the door but subsequently continuing to edit as if nothing happened. --A.Savin 18:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

I edited something related to the discussion here, changed by IP, nothing else. And I don't intend to continue editing only because of your behavior. In the end, I have to admit that you entertained me with your claims that you are some kind of "Westerner". You're not, you have no manners. Goodbye. --Orijentolog (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Just to let you know: the discussion about towers is over, so it's back to its original state. I do not intend to insert the same categories in all countries, except for those where I have comprehensively edited the subcategories (several major European countries). So please don't mind. Your comment that "shape of buildings is here commonly meant as 3D shape" was incorrect, as currently only 7-8 such categories exist, while tens of others stand for 2D shapes. Only polygonal have 22 different 2D shapes. You can see the current situation at Category talk:Buildings by shape, where I have put a division proposal for the future, and that can be recategorized later, in a year, two... no rush. If you have suggestions or criticism, feel free to leave a comment. Also, if you see something controversial or what seems to you controversial about the existing architectural categorization, feel free to ask me. If I made a mistake, I will take care of it comprehensively. All the best. --Orijentolog (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Zum meiner Datei...

Guten Abend @A.Savin! Du hattest mich wieder dran erinnert, mit dem Thema "(Fotos von den) Kunstwerken auf Commons". Dafür bedanke ich mich nochmals sehr! Ich wollte dir allerdings nur erinnern, dass auf dieser Foto NICHT auf einen Kunstwerk sich handelt, sondern um einige Kopftücher aus einem Live-Performance! Falls ich aber doch erneut einen Thema begangen habe, bitte ich um Entschuldigung! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 16:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Nun, wenn das einfach nur ein Haufen Kopftücher auf dem Boden ist, was soll dann der Nutzen eines solchen Fotos für das Projekt sein? --A.Savin 20:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Siehe hier: [2]. Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 20:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Oder, um es mal halbwegs nutzerfreundlich zu verlinken: Category:Performance mit der Künstlerin Farzane Vaziritabar in der Städtische Galerie Fruchthalle, anlässlich zum "175 Jahre Badische Revolution" in Rastatt am 20. Juli 2024. --A.Savin 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Опознание персоналий

Привет! У меня к Вам просьба помочь с опознанием персоналий в категориях Category:Unidentified politicians of Russia, Category:Unidentified people of Russia? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:Kommunarka (Moscow Metro)

Hello! I moved this category, because I wanted to move Category:Bachurinskaya (Moscow Metro) to Category:Kommunarka (Moscow Metro), since this is the current name of the station. Горизонт событий (talk) 07:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for moving! Горизонт событий (talk) 19:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Vyksa-lenin-i-tserkov.JPG

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Vaduz Castle

Good job on the photos for the Vaduz Castle on the wikipedia page for Vaduz Castle! GuyFromGaspésie2 (talk) 12:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Зоовыставки

Доброго времени суток, Александр!
Не все зоовыставки на гастролях бывают ужасными. Я уже давно не видел таких, в которых измученные животные сидят в тесных грязных клетках. Сейчас это, скорее, возможность энтузиастам экзотики продемонстрировать своих питомцев и свои успехи. В довоенные годы такие выставки были очень неплохими.
В 2009 я познакомился с коллекционером экзотики, у которого выставка и все питомцы были очень ухоженными и регулярно давали потомство. Это Евгений Буяновер из Днепра, основатель и владелец Трогательного зоопарка, человек с высшим биологическим образованием. В Интернете есть много публикаций о его деятельности. В коллекции Евгения много птицеедов, рептилий, скорпионов, есть разные многоножки и ракообразные.
Подобные коллекционеры есть и в других городах Украины, и в Виннице тоже.
Так что не стоит априори считать временную выставку животных злом.
С уважением, Георгий -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Здравствуйте, Георгий, спасибо за разъяснение.

Как я вижу, номинация и без меня прошла единогласно. Мне кажется, что в любом случае там нужна и категория по месту съёмки. --A.Savin 16:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Флаг ПФ

Приветствую ещё раз. Я не очень разобрался, какие здесь процедуры подачи заявок на мелкие флаги - можете выдать моей основной учётке флаг переименовывающего файлы? Он уже более 10 лет есть у меня на боте (я получил его одновременно с ботом для массовых переименований названий с кирлатом), но отдельные переименования просто плохо названных файлов неудобно делать с учётки бота. MBH 16:39, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

OK --A.Savin 18:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Спасибо. MBH 23:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Приветствую снова. Хотел бы попросить также о выдаче флага ipblock-exempt. Я гружу файлы в аплоад визарде большими наборами, такой набор заливается на склад час-два, и использую впн (бесплатный, без настройки исключений по доменам) для доступа к ютубу и дискорду. Для обычных правок в вики можно, хоть и неудобно, включать-выключать впн для правки, но на время заливки набора на склад он должен быть перманентно выключен, иначе заливка валится. MBH 14:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Бачуринская и Коммунарка

Здравствуйте! Не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, переименовать страницу Category:Construction of Bachurinskaya (Moscow Metro) в Category:Construction of Kommunarka (Moscow Metro)? Потому что название станции поменялось, она откроется под названием Коммунарка. Увы, сейчас во второй категории стоит редирект на строительство Новомосковской-Сокольнической. Кажется, вы можете удалять категории? Заранее спасибо. Горизонт событий (talk) 17:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Да, конечно --A.Savin 18:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Спасибо. Горизонт событий (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Ahrensfelde

Hallo Alex! Findest du hierfür eine elegantere Lösung? Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Lukas. Hmm, verstehe ich richtig dass Ahrensfelde ein Ortsteil von Ahrensfelde ist. Dann würde eventuell ein Name wie "Streets in Ahrensfelde (Ahrensfelde)" reichen, allerdings verstehe ich den Sinn des ganzen nicht, sieht man doch, dass es dort ganze zwei Einträge gibt und auch keine Kategorie für diesen Ortsteil in Category:Districts of Ahrensfelde (Brandenburg) soweit existiert. --A.Savin 21:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Naja, der Nutzer hat ja für jeden Ortsteil der Gemeinde Ahrensfelde die Straßenkategorie erstellt und wollte wohl Vollständigkeitshalber den Ortsteil Ahrensfelde nicht außen vor lassen. Aber wie du schon sagst, existiert dafür kein Kategorienbaum. Ich weiß auch nicht ob sich das lohnt? Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 04:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Nun, man könnte die Kategorie für OT Ahrensfelde anlegen mit einer Streets Unterkategorie eund es vorerst dabei belassen. Keine Ahnung, wieso Radler22 diese Kategorie ausgespart hat. --A.Savin 15:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Ist den die Abkürzung OT eine gängige und bekannte Abkürzung auf Commons? Lukas Beck (talk) 15:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Eigentlich nicht. Ich würde Ahrensfelde (Ahrensfelde) verwenden, auch wenn's doppelt gemoppelt rüberkommt... --A.Savin 15:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Danke. Ich habe das jetzt Mal entsprechend angepasst. Schönes Wochenende gewünscht Lukas Beck (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Hallö @L. Beck und @A.Savin Ot. ist eine eigentlich generell gebräuchliche Abkürzung für Ortsteil. Ich habe mich bei der Kategorie auch für die Verwendung entschieden, um es nicht nach doppelt gemoppeltem, oder Schreibfehler aussehen zu lassen, sondern auch für den Nichtwissenden klarzustellen, das es sich um einen Ortsteil mit dem gleichen Namen handelt. In der Kategorie Straßen Ahrensfelde ist ein Kauderwelch aus straßen der verschiedenen Ortsteile vorhanden, sodaß der Suchende es schwer hat, das richtige zu finden. Daher die Aufteilung, schließlich hat jeder andere Ortsteil ja auch seine eigene Unterkategorie. Die Hauptkategorie Ahrensfelde müsste ansich genauso aufgeteilt werden, denn dort weiß man auch nicht, was sich nun auf den alten Ort Ahrensfelde, seir 2003 Ortsteil Ahrensfelde und was auf den Gemeindezusammenschluß bezieht. Da ist die Namensgebung für die Sortierung recht ungünstig. Ich habe dies für die Hauptkategorie nicht auchnoch angelegt, wel dies eine stundenlange Arbeit, mit allem zurechtsortieren bedeuten würde. Die meisten Arbeiten arten so schon reichlich aus. Ich arbeite hier keine Auftragsliste ab, sondern lege da Hand an, wo es mich gerade drauf stößt und mein Hirn meint " ja komm los". Selbst bei den Straßen müsste man noch reichlich weitersortieren, L.Beck hat ja da schönerweise, gleich einiges noch erledigt. Radler22 (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Es dürfte für deutlich mehr Verwirrung sorgen, wenn du mit deiner Ortsteilabkürzung vom Standard abweichst. Daher halte ich die Idee von A.Savin für sinnvoller. Es mag "doppelt gemoppelt" aussehen, aber ist es das nicht auch? Der Ort heißt halt genau so, wie die Gemeinde. Als kann man das ruhig so umsetzten. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 15:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Hallö @L. Beck verzeiung bitte, aber ich wußte da leider nicht, das es hier extra Standards dafür gibt. Ich hatte extra nochmal nachgeschaut, und diese Abkürzung ist sogar nach DIN, nur das sie da wohl mit beiden Buchstaben großgechrieben wird. Ich kannte dies nur so wie ich es schrieb. Aber auch jetzt mit der Änderung ist es wohl besser als vorher.

Nun wäre es gut, wenn jemand die Zeit und Muße hätte, auch für den Ort Ahrensfelde selber eine Kategorie zu erstellen. Wie oben angemerkt, laut 'Districts of Ahrensfelde' gibt es diesen Ort nicht.

beste Grüße Marek Radler22 (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Памяти участника

Здравствуйте, добавьте, пожалуйста, в COM:RIP: SKas (talk · contribs) (ru:Википедия:Форум/Архив/Общий/2024/09#Памяти участника). --92.243.182.32 14:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

О метаданных

Приветствую. У меня есть такой вопрос - как у вас такое получается, когда изображение обрезано, а в исходных метаданных указаны его ширина и высота, как на примере Вашей фотографии Алексея Венедиктова? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Вы имеете в виду 7952x5304? Если так, то это размер каждого кадра-исходника от этой камеры, так что ничего странного --A.Savin 15:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Получается, вы используете специальную программу для обрезки что-то вроде Adobe Photoshop? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

SDC reverts

Hi A.Savin,

you have reverted a few of my SDC statements regarding the location of creation (e. g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=937142176) and now these files are once again lacking such statements (see Files with coordinates missing SDC location of creation). Can you please clarify your rationale for these reverts? Thank you --MB-one (talk) 18:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

It was "locality of creation (P1071)" which only applies for manufactured objects. Also, Saxony is not an appropriate value, too generic. --A.Savin 19:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello again,

There seems to be a misunderstanding as location of creation (P1071) is the designated property to indicate the location from where a photograph was taken (see {{Missing SDC location of creation}} for reference). Also, Saxony (Q1202) is a correct value according to the GPS coordinates of the camera. If you want to change it to a more specific value, that's obviously fine, but removing a valid statement doesn't make sense to me. MB-one (talk) 07:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

OK, P1071 you are right. Still, for mass-adding sth like Saxony I strongly  Oppose. Please apply for bot rights for such edits. I'd like to have a possibility to filter them out on my watchlist. Besides, it should be perfectly possible nowadays to add more generic values (based on cats, coords etc...) automatically. We don't need to create such a mess with adding "France" instead of "Eiffel Tower" to pictures of Eiffel Tower. So I will not restore these Saxony values on my pictures and if you add it again I will report you. Thanks --A.Savin 19:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi A.Savin,

Again, please feel free to add more specific value instead of removing a valid value alltogether. If you want to filter these edits on your watchlist, you can easily do so by filtering out edits with the tag AC/DC. Bots have a different purpose on Commons.

Please note, that reverting of useful edits can be seen as edit warring. So, I strongly advise against it. If you have further questions, feel free to ping me. Otherwise I see this discussion as completed.

Have a nice weekend, MB-one (talk) 06:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

No, I cannot filter it as AC/DC or whatever.

Your threats are of course irrelevant because if you re-install these meaningless SDC edits then you are the editwarrior for sure.

Yes, the discussion is completed indeed, as any discussion with you appears to be useless in the first place. --A.Savin 17:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TR Izmir asv2020-02 img17 Gündoğdu Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Gutspark Groß Glienicke

Du hast meine Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht. Auf dem Foto ist das Tor zu sehen, das 300 Meter von der Grenze entfernt in Berlin steht. Die Category:Gutspark Groß Glienicke beschreibt jedoch nur den Brandenburger Teil. Das Tor Gehört zu einem Baudenkmal in Berlin, das in der Denkmaldatenbank den Namen Category:Rittergut Groß Glienicke hat [3]. GPSLeo (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Bezieht sich denn der Name Gutspark auf das Rittergut? --A.Savin 16:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Die gehören historisch wohl schon zusammen, sind aber durch die Landesgrenze zwei getrennte Denkmäler. Habe gerade auch bemerkt, dass sie selbst in Wikipedia getrennt werden. de:Gutspark Groß Glienicke und de:Rittergut Groß Glienicke. GPSLeo (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Somit ist die Gutspark-Kategorie als Unterkategorie des Ritterguts einzusortieren, was du versäumt hast, wie so oft. --A.Savin 17:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Damit ist jetzt aber der Park in Brandenburg als Unterkategorie eines Baudenkmals in Berlin kategorisiert. Eigentlich versuche ich so etwas eher über {{See also}} oder eine Überkategorie die weder in Berlin noch in Brandenburg sondern direkt in der Bundeskategorie einsortiert ist zu lösen. GPSLeo (talk) 18:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Meines Erachtens nicht schlimm. Es geht ja um ein und dasselbe Rittergut, und dass dort die Stadtgrenze verläuft macht daraus keine zwei voneinander unabhängige Objekte mit zwei nicht verbundenen Kategorien. --A.Savin 18:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Фотография с показа в Берлине

Добрый день, вы могли бы пожалйста убрать или использовать другую фотографию М. Локшин из Берлина с показа Мастер и Маргарита? 185.104.139.72 20:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Добрый день. На каком основании? --A.Savin 04:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Crucifixes, ... in Wartburgkreis

Hallo - would you please respect the data I just completed in my district. The change will make categories empty again and can soon be deleted - that's annoying. I live here and process the data according to available documents. I took most of the photos myself. There are 400 districts in Germany where there is still a lot to do. Please choose another area. I'll watch your activities for the next few days. EACC80 (talk) 09:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

No clue what is your problem. Please add the "crucifixes" category only to files where a crucifix is clearly visible. Not every cross is a crucifix. A crucifix is a sculpture of Jesus on the cross. MfG --A.Savin 11:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Pleace have a look at this brand new examble of Vandalism in Wartburgkreis. [4] The Crosses are a christian symbol and is praxis do remove the Jesus figures after a catholic event as a precautionary measure - you understand, that the examples in this field are seldom. OK? EACC80 (talk) 11:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm still not sure what is your problem with me. If you want to report vandalism on crosses, go to the police. --A.Savin 11:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

You should read the last message from them on their talk page. It's totally incompressible. Or maybe their trying to use Commons as a way to track crime? I can't really tell, but somethings going on here. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Toilette

Wäre es für dich in Ordnung, wenn wir das Foto wieder in den Artikel einarbeiten. Ich habe noch einmal mit allen Beteiligten gesprochen und es bestehen keine Bedenken, außerdem veranschaulicht es das Lemma adäquat. Mitumial (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Es geht um dieses Bild. Ich bin eigentlich dagegen, dies zu verwenden, denn ich halte es nicht für repräsentativ für den Artikel (es ist gestellt und überhaupt, welche Frau geht denn schon *so* auf die Toilette, wage ich mal zu vermuten). Mir gefällt auch deine Praxis nicht, Fotos in möglichst prominente Themenartikel gezielt zu platzieren, um sich selbst zu bewerben und ohne wirklich zu schauen, ob sie dort jeweils auch nötig sind. Allerdings habe ich bei diesem Thema im Moment nicht vor, Widerstand zu leisten, und stelle es dir anheim, das Bild wieder einzufügen. --A.Savin 22:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Marburg asv2022-02 img06 Reitgasse.jpg

Hallo, ich hatte dein obiges Foto entdeckt und in die von mir neu erstellte Kategorie Buchhandlung N.G. Elwert mit aufgenommen, nachdem ich ein Bildnis des Buchhändlers Noa Gottfried Elwert entdeckt hatte. Jetzt sehe ich, dass du diese Änderung zurückgenommen hast. Darf ich fragen, was für dich als Urheber des Bildes der Buchhandlung in Marburg dagegen spricht, dein Foto mit in die eigens für diese traditionsreiche Buchhandlung erstellte Kategorie mit aufzunehmen? Danke für deine Antwort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haendelfan (talk • contribs)

Bitte signiere deine Beiträge zukünftig, sonst antworte ich nicht. Zur Frage: Ich habe nichts gegen eine separate Kategorie, das Problem ist nur, dass du diese Kategorie dauernd versuchst anzulegen, obwohl sie verwaist ist. Unter der Hilfeseite COM:Categories kannst du nachlesen, wie man Kategorien korrekt anlegt. So wie du das tust, nützt sie nichts und niemandem und ist daher schnellzulöschen. MfG --A.Savin 17:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Hennickendorf Gartenstadt lub 2024-06-23.jpg

Hallo Alex. Mein Bild hat irgendwie einen komischen Rotlink einer eigentlich gelöschten und leeren Seite. Weißt du, warum dieser dort steht und was er bedeutet? Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 11:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Lukas, also ich sehe dort Stand jetzt keinen solchen Rotlink. LG --A.Savin 22:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich habe dir zu dem Thema eine E-Mail geschickt. Viele Grüße Lukas Beck (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Belle foto

Ciao 192.167.110.12 09:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Mal so als Idee

Category:Dorfkirche (Rüdersdorf bei Berlin) Lukas Beck (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Oberbaumbrücke 3.jpg

Hallo Alex, könnte das nach deiner Einschätzung nach ein urheberrechtlich schützenswertes Kunstwerk sein? Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 19:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Ja, das könnte es... --A.Savin 23:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Russian Embassy

Not the main facade, but it is the same building built at the same time by the same architects. You could create a sub-category inside Category:Building of the Russian Embassy, Berlin (1953–) for the specific facade if you like, but please keep them inside the category.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tula asv2019-09 img06 Kremlin aerial view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tula asv2019-09 img05 Uspensky Convent aerial view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata Objekte löschen

Guten Morgen Alex, weißt du etwas darüber, wie Wikidata Objekte gelöscht werden können, wenn diese zum Beispiel doppelt angelegt wurden. Konkret würde ich gerne diese, bereits von mir geleerte Seite löschen: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31559436. Sie war doppelt zu diesem Objekt: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q20479143. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Ja, habe manchmal auch so ein Problem. Ich mache das dann über Zusammenführungen (Merge with-Knopf), wobei von der alten ID ein Redirect verbleibt. Löschen können nur die dortigen Admins, weiß aber nicht ob sie das auch machen auf Anfrage. LG --A.Savin 13:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Könntest du es mal mit dem Zusammenführen probieren und kennst du einen Admin, der dort gerne helfen könnte? Lukas Beck (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Das scheint ja bereits durch einen Bot erledigt zu sein... --A.Savin 16:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Oh klasse, danke dir trotzdem. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img41 National Opera.jpg

File:Tallinn asv2022-04 img41 National Opera.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wkentaur (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Bogdan Stoyanov (Jõhvi FC Phoenix)

Добрый день. Проверьте, пожалуйста, мой тикет на эту фотографию File:Bogdan Stoyanov (Jõhvi FC Phoenix).jpg. И у меня удалили одну фотографию, так как за месяц никто не рассмотрел мой тикет File:Pioneers in Juvenile Inspektor.jpg --Kodru (talk) 07:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

У меня нет доступа к тикетам, а вот здесь список тех, у кого он есть. --A.Savin 15:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Понял, спасибо большое! Kodru (talk) 17:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathenow Schleusenhaus asv2024-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Peter Zhikharev 2024.jpg и 16 других файлов

Добрый день. Некто User talk:Komarof (в списке администраторов Викимедии его нет) без разбора скопом удалил 17 загруженных мною файлов в разные годы. Я обратился к нему на его странице и на своей странице: по какой причине это сделано? Если есть сомнения в моём авторстве, то персоны, представленные на фото, могут прислать вам своё личное письменное подтверждение, что снимал их именно я в своей фотостудии. - Ответа пока не последовало. - Прошу вас как администратора вмешаться и исправить этот произвол.--Floridorus (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

OK --A.Savin 17:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Вижу ваши вопросы к Komarof'у. То, что он отвечает, это не аргумент. В метадланных указаны разные фотокамеры. Ну, да. И что? Как это сказывается на авторстве? Никак. У фотографов обычное дело в разных случаях использовать разные камеры в зависимости от освещения, контрастности и т.п. Мало ли чего. - Вы для начала восстановите удаленные файлы. А потом будем разбираться с каждым файлом отдельно.

Floridorus (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Итак, восстановленные файлы висят на удалении. Что делать теперь? Насколько понимаю, теперь бремя доказательства висит на том, кто предлагает эти файлы к удалению. Верно ли понимаю? - Мне что-то доказывать, объяснять нужно? Floridorus (talk) 12:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Сложно сказать. Лично я ничего доказывать не обязан, так как я вообще тут не при чём. Я бы посоветовал, если файлы действительно вашего авторства, выложить их в версиях максимально близких к оригиналу, т.е. в высоком разрешении и с метаданными, чтобы изначально меньше вопросов было. --A.Savin 13:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Т.е. загрузить эти файлы заново? Правильно понимаю? Floridorus (talk) 13:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Можно и так. А можно просто новые версии поверх существующих. --A.Savin 16:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch Kapelle in Bangs asv2022-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:21, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img15 Marienkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frechen Alte Kirche Buschbell asv2024-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goslar asv2022-06 img04 Stephanikirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goslar asv2022-06 img30 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Spreewald

Hallo Alex, ich habe mir gerade einige deiner Bilder aus dem Spreewald von 2016 angesehen. Dabei ist mir bei diesem Bild aufgefallen, dass der abgebildete "Kanal" laut Daten von Open Street Map die Spree selbst ist. Schau dir das gerne selber noch mal an, ggf. können deine Bilder noch Mal überarbeitet werden. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Paestum

@Poco a poco: Hello there! The way he writes in Italian is quite different (it can be faked of course). I agree that the style and the quality image requests point towards another sock. But I noticed that in the same period, Livio's socks were using a different camera. I did a CU on it.wiki, and the ususal IP range is different (but a second check on Commons can help). What do you reckon ? --Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Just forget about the camera. The EXIF data are very easy to fake, which was extensively practiced by many confirmed Livio/Commonists' socks. --A.Savin 10:22, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Scusate se scrivo in italiano ma il mio inglese non è perfetto e non vorrei essere frainteso. Qui mi sembra che si vada molto a sensazione, non ho fatto assolutamente niente che avesse fatto l'utente che mi contestate. L'unica "prova" sarebbe il tipo di foto, che comunque non vedo questa somiglianza.....ne nei soggetti ne sul modo. Non ho messo le mie foto ovunque e non ho mai litigato con nessuno, venivo qui 1 volta a settimana quando le lezioni me lo permettevano. Mi sembra una decisione senza prove e senxa possilita di appello. Scusate lo sfogo. 78.209.81.184 12:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

I looked into pictures and EXIF data. The EXIF data is definitely modified and erased, but still there are similarities. I cannot cnfirm with certainty that it's Livio but I cannot confirm either that it isn't. Could a IP check by a checkuser cast some light here? Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

@Poco a poco I performed a CU on it.wiki, and it might be him. Data are too vague to be certain. Ruthven (msg) 12:34, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt (Dosse) Gaswerk asv2024-03 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Category:Users in Berlin

Hallo Alex, beim Bearbeiten meiner Benutzerseite ist mir folgendes aufgefallen. Verwende ich zum Beispiel {{User Germany}} auf meiner Nutzerseite, landet mein Name automatisch in dieser Kategorie. Lässt sich das auch für die einzelnen Bundesländer einrichten, exemplarisch für {{User Berlin}}? Oder wäre das ein Thema für COM:Forum? Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Gute Idee, war eben so frei und habe es einfach hinzugefügt. --A.Savin 16:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Danke. Sieht gut aus :-). Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Копивио

Александр, здравствуйте. Прошу небольшой (я надеюсь) помощи вот в такой ситуации. Участница GAlexandrova то ли по наивности, то ли в силу непонимания загрузила несколько фотографий, которые по сути являются пересъемкой чужих фотографий с фотовыставки в Летнем саду, в чем на голубом глазу и призналась вот тут. Надо их, видимо, удалять, тем более что загружены они вообще как собственные работы. Но я затрудняюсь объяснить админам, не владеющим русским, почему загрузки юзера GAlexandrova я обсуждаю на СО юзера(ов) Александровы АГ (в предыдущей теме там же на СО они объясняют Алексею, в чем причина), ну и вообще растолковывать всю эту коллизию с переснятыми фото. Вы не могли бы сами грамотно и по правилам выставить эти фото на удаление? Если надо найти оригиналы, то это я могу сделать сама и скинуть вам ссылки. То есть я понятия не имею, откуда именно организаторы выставки эти фото надергали, но они довольно легко ищутся в интернете. Заранее благодарна за ответ. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 02:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Спасибо большое! Но если от меня понадобятся какие-то действия, сообщайте, сделаю. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göttingen asv2022-06 img18 Uni Reitstallportal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göttingen asv2022-06 img26 Odilienmühle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ibiza City Dalt Vila asv2023-04 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marburg asv2022-02 img12 StMarien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Tzim78 15:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PK Karachi asv2020-02 img32 National Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:02, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathenow Bismarckturm asv2024-03 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)