User talk:99of9/Promotions

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RanellidaeShell.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 13:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WestMacDonnellWaterTank.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job. Ok for me now. --Cayambe 06:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OchrePits.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- H005 19:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AboriginalOchrePitCentralAustralia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ViewFromKingsCanyon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RiverRedGum CentralAustralia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question The tree itself looks great, but there's a lot of CA in the stones. Any chance to fix that? -- H005 19:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Well spotted, I hadn't noticed that, I will have a go this weekend. --99of9 05:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Ok, I think the blue rocks are gone, but there were a lot to go through. See what you think. --99of9 13:20, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the effort, but frankly, I can't see much of a difference. I've made an image annotation to point you to a very visible example. Do you have the image in RAW format? Then I could try to fix it if you want. -- H005 08:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks for your patience! I must have uploaded an incomplete version before. I've uploaded again. --99of9 00:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Thanks, good enough for me now. -- H005 05:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HoldernessSchool1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LasseterHighway.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A tad overexposed IMHO, and visible vignetting. Can you do something about that? -- H005 20:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)  CommentHow does it look now? I'm learning so much this week about correcting aberrations! --99of9 03:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Great! -- H005 09:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camel Chewing.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liquid Nitrogen Tank.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Cayambe 09:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rockmelons.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Texture well shown, good photo -- George Chernilevsky 10:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PinkLadyApples.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems good enough. Juliancolton 22:06, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amesbury Ashfield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 18:10, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artichoke stack.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. --Cayambe 08:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxy-fuel cutting.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 03:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StPaulsAnglicanChurch Canterbury NewSouthWales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity OldSchoolLawns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I really like this panorama, but I think there are a couple of minor issues that should be brought to your attention... first of all, there are some dust spots in the sky. They are faint and would be easy to clone out. A little harder to fix is the halos around some of the people - but it's minor and no one would notice those unless they look really close. The last issue is a very minor stitching error in the upper right. I've marked what I found on the image... please feel free to remove my marks on the image once you've seen them. I didn't think any of them were major enough to detract from the image however. --J.smith 01:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Thankyou for your very careful review. I'm glad you liked it. I forgot to look for the dust spots in the sky - as you say, they will be easy to remove. I had trouble stitching the right hand side, but had concentrated more at the bottom than the top, so will look into that. Thanks for pointing out the halos, I will at least remove the CA colour from them.--99of9 02:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)  Done Thanks again for your constructive criticism. --99of9 07:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goulds Book Arcade BookStack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and valuable for illustrating articles. -- H005 08:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity InstituteBuilding DarlingtonCentre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StMatthews AnglicanChurch Ashbury.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful, with some acceptable chromatic aberration in the tree branches at top left. --Cayambe 08:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity MacLaurinHall-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good job, ok now IMO. --Cayambe 09:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:GlenHelenGorge NorthernTerritory Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GlenHelenGorge NorthernTerritory Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StStephanos GreekOrthodoxChurch HurlstonePark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 18:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity OldSchoolLawns2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose There are heavy artefacts in the sky (posterizing?) --Berthold Werner 18:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)  Question I've replaced it with the unprocessed version (except for perspective correction), how does this one look? --99of9 23:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)  Support --Berthold Werner 06:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HurlstonePark VietnameseBaptistChurch corner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 14:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhodonite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful. --Cayambe 16:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity FrontLawns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StAnnes AnglicanChurch Strathfield EndView.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:SydneyUniversity MainQuadrangle panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SydneyUniversity MainQuadrangle panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domestic Pigeon Flock Tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and good. At least the one below bears a ring :-). --Cayambe 15:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Central.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StDavids UnitingChurch Haberfield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 08:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Resurrection.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 08:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Gethsemane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments also this one --Berthold Werner 09:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass PeterDorcas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Berthold Werner 07:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Circumcision.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Berthold Werner 07:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Flag Flying animated.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and nice. --Cayambe 10:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BrushTailedPossum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good!--Mbz1 02:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dusky Moorhen Water Lilies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it a lot. --Korall 01:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PurpleSwamphen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me - Darius Baužys 17:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BrushtailPossum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cumulus humilis clouds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Yerpo 21:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Myna Fledgling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK--Mbz1 02:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

NB I did not create this image. --99of9 (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vitrail Notre-Dame de Paris 191208 04 Fuite en Egypte.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vitrail Notre-Dame de Paris 191208 04 Fuite en Egypte.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KataTjuta ValleyOfTheWinds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kata-Tjuta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Berthold Werner 07:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LiruShield Uluru Central Australia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Really nice colors and an artistic touch on composition. You seem to be using an EOS; I think running this through Canon's CA correction would make it even better. --MattiPaavola 21:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the review. Could you please mark where you see CA? --99of9 21:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC) There's red CA on the borders beetween the shadows and rock close to the top left corner. The borderline beetween the sky and rock seems to be fine. Anyway, I think I'm going to support this regardless whether you'll fix it or not since the tones and the composition are just great. --MattiPaavola 21:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for pointing them out. I have corrected them (and made a couple of other minor touch ups). --99of9 02:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallard Duck female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dusky Moorhen Water Lilies.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dusky Moorhen Water Lilies.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass JamesJohn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 09:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass FaithHope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 09:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass LightOfTheWorld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 09:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Baptism.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 09:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Crucifixion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 09:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass JohnTheBaptist Paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok -- Smial 01:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Nicodemus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 08:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Nathanael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also very good. --Cayambe 08:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass King.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Cayambe 21:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass JesusAndChildren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 21:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laughing Kookaburra Gravestone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great catch on the gravestone like that with good DOF --Herbythyme 13:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laughing Kookaburra Juvenile Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot and QI for me --Herbythyme 13:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 20:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Simeon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass YoungJesusAtTemple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Raven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Pelican Kioloa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

QI Promotion

Hi, for some reason this came to my talk page instead of yours. (I guess the reason was the lack of your signature.) Here it is anyway:

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NorthBeach WillingaPoint Bawley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Definitely a QI, but for an FP the crop may or may not be too tight towards the bottom. --MattiPaavola 10:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

And, congratulations of course!

BR, --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

OOoops! Thanks for passing it on. --99of9 (talk) 12:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StAndrews UnitingChurch Dapto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Don't really like the wires much but I'd prefer not to see cloning, not a big fan of the crop but I think it is qi. --Herbythyme 16:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Australian Pelican Kioloa.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Australian Pelican Kioloa.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass MaryJesus.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. If possible, please add (estimated) dimensions of the art work and the name of the artist to the file page. --MattiPaavola 10:52, 12 January 2010 (UTC) I'm working on finding out the artists, but yes, I can add dimensions, that's a good idea. --99of9 11:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:NorthBeach WillingaPoint Bawley.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NorthBeach WillingaPoint Bawley.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern Grey Kangaroo Feeding.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cute and good quality.--Korall 01:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eastern Grey Kangaroo Feeding.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eastern Grey Kangaroo Feeding.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass Flowers.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass CoatsOfArms.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thredbo River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerochrysum subundulatum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 14:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gastrimargus Musicus Barbed Wire.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gastrimargus Musicus Barbed Wire.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snow Gum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. I like the contrast between the green foliage and the white clouds. With some acceptable CA (bluegreen fringes on the tree branches at right. --Cayambe 21:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Kosciuszko Summit 360 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, interesting. --Cayambe 15:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis rubra (Blacklip abalone).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met. Interesting shellfish --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Slaunger (talk) 23:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rainbow Valley.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rainbow Valley.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thredbo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors, great resolution, interesting view. --MichaelBueker 12:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd Face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful. --Cayambe 09:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerochrysum subundulatum (Alpine everlasting).

review

•  Support Among the candidates, I have a slight preference for this one. --Slaunger (talk) 20:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Was the only showing flower, buds and leaves .... The background does not interfere with understanding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Scores:
1. Xerochrysum: +1
2. Xerochrysum subundulatum plant.jpg: +0
3. Xerochrysum subundulatum plants.jpg: +2
=>
File:Xerochrysum subundulatum.jpg: Declined.
File:Xerochrysum subundulatum plant.jpg: Declined.
File:Xerochrysum subundulatum plants.jpg: Promoted.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

--Slaunger (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Toby!
It is nomination by Slaunger, however result - yours! One more award for your nice job.
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Don't know if you noticed, George, but I used the role=creator parameter in the promotion template above such that the text is taylored towards a creator role. Of course, it would be nice if VICBot could automatically detect if the uploader, creator and nominator of a VI are different, such that notes could be placed on the talk pages of all relevant stakeholders. --Slaunger (talk) 13:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me through this one guys. --99of9 (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I think I can speak also on behalf of George also when saying that the pleasure is entirely on our side. You make great contributions of interesting subjects, you are easy to collaborate with and give very qualified input to our projects. Just thanks, generally, really. --Slaunger (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corvus mellori.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chacaltaya Pano MC.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chacaltaya Pano MC.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kniphofia uvaria (Red-hot poker).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Nice photo. I agree it is the best at showing the plant in its entirety (and natural environment). Nice composition too. However, for maximum value in online content, where it is typically not shown in large size, I would recommend making a cropped version in portrait format showing only the left plant in its entirety in an (admittedly more boring) composition. However, this is not FP, and for VI purposes I think it is better to fill the frame with the subject than to retain an optimal composition. --Slaunger (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment While I would prefer a photograph of the plant from within its native range of South Africa, I'm inclined to support this one or the cropped version that Slaunger suggests. Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Embarrassed to admit that I did not do my homework prior to writing my first comment, as it appeared so native in the photograph, that I did not even consider that it could be an introduced species in NSW, Australia. I thought, great, I have one of these in my garden, now I also know where it grows naturally! Anyway, now enlightened, I still think this is a good VI candidate, especially if cropped. --Slaunger (talk) 21:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks for the reviews. I will get a cropped version up. --99of9 (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment I just swapped it out for a cropped version, I hope that's procedurally ok. --99of9 (talk) 02:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes, I do not see any problem with that as noone has voted so far. And the reviewers, who have commented so far has both menioned the potential value of a cropped version. --Slaunger (talk) 04:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

•  Support cropped version. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Walter. --Slaunger (talk) 04:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Support - High quality image, well categorized, best for this scope IMO. If it only were geocoded, I would also support it... --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC) --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 18:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

•  Done Oh sorry, I failed to transfer the geocode when I made the crop. It's there now. --99of9 (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corvus mellori (Little Raven).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met, good nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 10:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eolophus roseicapilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eolophus roseicapilla takeoff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern Grey Kangaroo Hands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good for QI imo. --Cayambe 21:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Set promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Austroaeschna flavomaculata (male).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Austroaeschna flavomaculata (male).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--Eusebius (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Frontal lobe animation.gif, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frontal lobe animation.gif has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anhinga novaehollandiae drying.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment beautiful picture, but there is dust on this one too, could you correct it before i promot it --Croucrou 22:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for marking the spots, I can hardly even see them even with your help. I've uploaded a new version with cloning in all those areas, see if they're fixed. --99of9 02:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Comment you've done au great correction, it rest 3 dusts, but they are difficult to see, I've mark it if you want to correct it --Croucrou  Done thanks again. --99of9 10:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anhinga novaehollandiae extended.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment there is many dust on your sensor, could you delete them before promotion --Croucrou 16:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment The background is water, not sky, so it is expected to be patchy. Or are you seeing spots elsewhere? Could you mark an example you are worried about? --99of9 21:02, 3 April 2010 (UTC) *I've fixed dustspots.Good capturing.--PetarM 21:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment Thanks PetarM - it does look better with the floating debris spots removed. --99of9 21:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC) Comment good job there is one dust yet. i mark it --Jebulon 22:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)...WARNING: the last comment (just above) was NOT made by ME !!--Jebulon 23:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC) --Croucrou 23:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)  CommentThanks for that note Croucrou, I've removed what I think you were getting at, but you might want to check it. --99of9 02:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment great job, it rest some but now there are note realy visible, I have juste mark it if you want to be perfectionist --Croucrou 09:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)  Done thanks again. --99of9 10:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anhinga novaehollandiae snake necked.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

VIS promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Nephila edulis, female.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Nephila edulis, female.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hurlstone Park Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but no major flaws either. Interesting subject. Powerlines are no problem IMO: it's just part of the reality. Certainly acceptable for QI. -- MJJR 19:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd Portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd Portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cacatua sanguinea upright.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 15:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cacatua sanguinea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 15:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cacatua sanguinea seed pod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --AFBorchert 14:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dendropsophus microcephalus - calling male (Cope, 1886).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dendropsophus microcephalus - calling male (Cope, 1886).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Magpie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. (Long time nothing seen from you) --Berthold Werner 14:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)  Comment True. Meanwhile I've been learning to use the admin tools and contributing some diagrams, but they're not really complicated enough for QI. Thanks for the review. --99of9 10:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Atelopus certus calling male.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atelopus certus calling male.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:42, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megapodius reinwardt (Orange-footed Scrubfowl).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanellus miles miles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Cayambe 07:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acanthurus lineatus (Striped Surgeonfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support No competition really. Prefer this to the tighter crop too. Pitke (talk) 10:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nictitating membrane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very didactic work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support, but I found redundant and many red categories in the file and the category. Should be reworked. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment I think those red-linked categories are obviously going to be created eventually, and would all be clearly useful. So they seem like the perfect case to leave red-links in place. If you really don't like them, I think the best thing to do would be to make them blue. --99of9 (talk) 21:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment I've created the categories. --99of9 (talk) 02:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:42, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vanellus miles miles.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vanellus miles miles.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bronchial anatomy.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bronchial anatomy.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylocarpus granatum (Cannonball Mangrove).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:28, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pied Heron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magpie Lark female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity GreatHall SandstoneCrest 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 18:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity GreatHall SandstoneCrest 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good -- George Chernilevsky 18:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity GreatHall SandstoneCrest 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 18:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity GreatHall SandstoneCrest 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 18:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity GreatHall SandstoneCrest 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 18:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SydneyUniversity GreatHall SandstoneCrest 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Nice set. -- George Chernilevsky 18:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eastern Water Dragon Clontarf.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eastern Water Dragon Clontarf.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Congrats on your 10th! --Quartl (talk) 17:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! 99of9 (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-breasted Woodswallow chicks in nest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the composition. --Makele-90 20:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-breasted Woodswallow at nest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. Mattbuck 15:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bungendore Rail Loader.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe looks a little bit post-arranged, but I think I could have this as desktop wallpaper.--V-wolf 20:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eriophora transmarina front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is this picture made by a wikipedian? --Mbdortmund 13:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Criteria satisfied; made by User:99of9. --Wsiegmund 17:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masked Lapwing sand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is this picture made by a wikipedian? --Mbdortmund 13:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC) Criteria satisfied; made by User:99of9. --Wsiegmund 17:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leeds Castle, Kent, England 3 - May 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leeds Castle, Kent, England 3 - May 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Actinia tenebrosa (Waratah anenome).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:56, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tobacco Hornworm 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tobacco Hornworm 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leptophis ahaetulla Snake Eating a Frog (Craugastor gollmeri).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leptophis ahaetulla Snake Eating a Frog (Craugastor gollmeri).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spilosoma canescens caterpillar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:39, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Spilosoma canescens caterpillar.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spilosoma canescens caterpillar.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vespula vulgaris portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vespula vulgaris portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallabia bicolor Jenolan Caves portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 12:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallabia bicolor Jenolan Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --H005 21:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardhead male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is nice --Cesco77 19:17, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grey Butcherbird juvenile in tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work. Bright colours, good contrast, and sharp. --De728631 17:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardhead male drip.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanangra winter wonderland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To me, good composition and work in spite of a bit of color noise--Lmbuga 10:42, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera in Sydney 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardhead female 1 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Quartl 12:23, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anigozanthos Bush Pizzazz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 09:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthony Albanese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 06:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cockroach egglaying 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and useful -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 06:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spilosoma glatignyi caterpillar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spilosoma glatignyi caterpillar 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bee on Sydney wildflower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 06:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bee on Sydney wildflower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthony Albanese.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eumorphia prostrata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The image seem to me very good. It is advisable to put in the category Taxonavigation with the species name and author. A gallery would be even more appreciated.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

•  Done taxonavigation. Gallery would only contain one image? Personally, I'm not a big fan of galleries, they seem to get a long way out of date while the categories are always automatically updated. --99of9 (talk) 07:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I spent a long time neglected the gallery but I think now it will be increasingly useful in the future when the category will become overcrowded.
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spilosoma canescens (Dark-spotted Tiger Moth), larva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support are asked to put the Latin name in italics followed by the common name in English in brackets. I changed the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks. I'll update the others. --99of9 (talk) 06:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philotheca buxifolia (Box-leaf Waxflower).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spilosoma glatignyi (Black and White Tiger Moth), larva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eucalyptus camphora, (Broad-leaved Sally), foliage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 08:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Persoonia oxycoccoides.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 08:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Raven Sydney University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image. --Jakubhal 13:54, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Magpie closed eyes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Aye. --Airwolf 23:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Magpie feeding.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Magpie nearly closed eyes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australian Magpie open eyes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)