Support Low resolution, but very educational. All criteria met. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC) I follow the recommendations on the size. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
*strong Support. Many thanks for this very interesting and unusual nomination. It' a very good idea, and the animated demo is very relevant. One regret : the size is too small.--Jebulon (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too, primarily because it isn't a time sequence of events, so I don't see why it's presented as animation. The photos should be viewable side by side. (And for the quality problem - if it's really the best example we have yet, there will soon appear a better one.) --Ikar.us (talk) 08:42, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose now, because of the size, and because of very interesting arguments of Ikar.us. I agree with. Maybe a Valued Images Set could be more appropriate. Nevertheless, it is a very good idea, which one have to go further into --Jebulon (talk) 08:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
