Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7784.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2020 at 19:13:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Steam house at Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7803-5.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2020 at 19:09:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valves at the switch house east at Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sylvia ruppeli - Rüppel's warbler 04.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2020 at 08:16:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rüppel's warbler (male) in breeding season
✓ Done slightly cropped on the right side → @King of Hearts:
  •  Comment This photo seems a bit sharper than the other one when viewed at similar resolutions of the birds, but the other one has a nicer composition. This one needs some more space above the bird. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 QuestionCropping has been already done. This is my FP nomination after a couple of years. Maybe I missed the FP related evaluation rule: Is it usual to compare an FP candidate to another one created by the other users whether there is FP or not? If so I could delist my nonimation. → @Basotxerri: @Charlesjsharp:
 Comment We should promote the best, so if there is a better very similar image, it will be difficult to get positive votes for the second best. So annoying when there are so many different species to nab the same one as someone elseǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 03:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 22:08:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female Wandering crab spider (Philodromus aureolus) with her egg sac, Hartelholz forest, Munich, Germany.
  • Llez: I've removed those spots and what you called banding, among other improvements. It's brighter now too. Regarding the "severe unsharpness" I don't think that's a fair feedback. It isn't perfect, spiders are tricky subjects for focus stacking, but there is detail and I see no severe problem here, to be honest. Poco a poco (talk) 07:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had not realized, it is a miracle that this photo came out with so much exposure time --Wilfredor (talk) 12:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have you actually realised that this image is a FS image (as stated in the title and in the description page)? It is the merge of 36 images. Regarding sharpness, of course I can sharpen it a bit more but, hey! I offer here over 30 megapixel of image, next time will be only 20 Mpx and no sharpness issue... --Poco a poco (talk) 12:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Diego, I have to guess the original images were not sharp enough. I'm judging sharpness at monitor resolution 1920 x 1080. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record, I applied a bit of sharpening Charlesjsharp Poco a poco (talk) 22:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's better with the sharpening for what it's worth. But this is an FP either way to me. It may lack the pinpoint sharpness of some other focus-stacks (i.e. Ermell's) but it's still very good quality and really impressive for such a small creature. Cmao20 (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Order_:_Araneae_(Spiders)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 12:23:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Calopterygidae (Demoiselles)

File:Trollhattefallen.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2020 at 09:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waterfalls of Göta älv, west Sweden.
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Insufficient resolution. Images must be at least 2 MP, and preferably even more. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Hesperia comma, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-28, DD 113-140 FS.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2020 at 09:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of a Silver-spotted skipper (Hesperia comma), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany
  • Understood, but I think that argument deserved to be slammed. It might be different if Ivar were a new user who thought perfect sharpness at full size was a requirement for FP, but he isn't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • While I support Ikan's right to complain about a review on the grounds that it might "punish" anyone for uploading "a full-size photo", can we please avoid making personal attacks, Poco. And, "Make it better" is never ever an acceptable remark to make, because reviewers are not required to even be photographers, never mind expert macro photographers. Further, asking that comparable FPs be "preferentially from a Commoner" is also unacceptable. Commons FP is to review our finest images, no matter what their origin. -- Colin (talk) 12:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • A reviewer who knows, or better, has experience about a topic will always be able to make a more solid review. I don't review restorations because I didn't ever make one and so far I didn't review underwater photography because I had until last year no experience. I could review those images but then I only review the result without knowing the process to get there and how tricky or not it could have been for the restorator. I do indeed also review the difficulty to take a shot, but I'm fine if others just judge the result.
  • FPs don't have to be the work of a Commoner, that's clear, but wouldn't it be meaningful to encourage this kind of photography in the project to get more valuable stuff instead of being so harsh with those who give their best here? You show up again and manage that I give up to work further on macro photography (or at least to upload anything out of that to Commons) Poco a poco (talk) 08:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Slamming an argument and saying "Are you serious?" are not personal attacks where I come from, but apparently at least 1 person disagrees (not you). Your argument has a lot more substance behind it, though in comparing the compound eyes, I still disagree (for now) that this isn't one of the best. I went to your link, and I think it's clear that there aren't 4,495 similar, better photos there. Just look at the first page, and you can see that a lot of the photos there aren't closeups or aren't closeups showing the eyes. I opened one that is. Do you think that compound eye is superior to this one? There might be lots of similar photos in that category that are superior to this one; I grant you that. But we'd have to look through the category manually and find them - a worthy task, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ikan Kekek, just to be clear, my comment was indented to reply to Poco, and my remark about making a personal attack was directed at Poco, which I thought was clear with the "can we please avoid making personal attacks, Poco", but evidently not. Sorry that didn't come across. You commented on the vote, Poco commented on the voter, and my sentence was contrasting your approach (which I support) vs Poco's.
Wrt the set, there are an abundance of finer images, for example this scary green bee and plenty other bee-head close-ups. I reckon this entire tiny parasitic wasp is smaller than this butterfly's head, so it isn't really about whether we are comparing the compound eye of a bee or wasp with the compound eye of a butterfly, but that this is certainly includes photography on the same scale and subject matter. They even use the same lens, though they ignore the extender, which is fit only for a museum. It isn't surprising that the USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Laboratory are in a different class: their equipment may be no better, but they've taken thousands of these photos. -- Colin (talk) 22:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that bee photo is great! It was clear from a careful reading that your remark wasn't intended for me, and I guess my parenthetical "not you" wasn't clear enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Gnosis (talk) 03:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Wrt the "nothing is really sharp here" vote.... it is a totally accurate comment at 100% magnification. Whether that's a good reason to oppose is another matter (I don't think so). This already isn't a "full-size photo", which would be 50.6MP rather than 20MP -- this image is downsized about 60% already. If I look at a 2500px wide further downsized version (about 4.2MP) I'm not convinced this 20MP version has any extra detail, just noise. The camera sensor might be 50MP but the optics here are only rendering about 4MP of detail. Downsizing is harmful if there is actually a loss of information (real detail), which I don't really think is the case here.
So this "sharp 4MP image" might have been detailed enough to impress at FP 10 years ago, this is quite some way from being "among our finest" macro photos of insects in 2020. Obviously there's Ermell's excellent work recently. But for a closer comparison, see this POTY finalist from six years ago, for an example of a sharp 13MP compound-eye photograph, and there are 4,495 similar photos that pretty much all exceed this one in quality. -- Colin (talk) 12:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I went through that category and see good stuff but most of them are smaller and/or oversharpened. I didn't know though that category yet and is great to have it because you'll see no further macro shots of myself on the project anymore.
And I find it disrespectful and unfair to compare the images of laboratories with expensive equipment (do you know what is the price of those stepper motors??), unlimited time, specimens, space and so on with the shots I can take in my apartment and on my own. So, enjoy thos USGS images. Poco a poco (talk) 08:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info on macro lens magnification terminology and technical issues

When focused at the closest distance the lens can focus, a 1:1 macro lens reproduces an image of the plane-of-focus at exactly life-size on the sensor of the camera (here 36×24 mm full frame). This isn't life-size on your computer screen, however, which is likely to be much larger than 36mm wide (!) and have a much lower resolution than 8688 × 5792. You might have a 6" mobile phone or a 32" desktop, and the pixel size of the screen will affect the size of the image at 100% view. The Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1–5x Macro lens used here is unusual in that the magnification factor can be altered from 1x to 5x. Increasing the magnification causes a proportional reduction in both the effective aperture size (darker) and depth of field (extremely narrow). At 5x it is (5+1=6) times smaller effective aperture (f/5 becomes f/30). Using a 2x extender for 10x makes those problems a whole lot worse (f/55). The low light then requires a higher ISO (1250) and the tiny aperture causes diffraction softening, both of which rob an image of pixel-level detail.

This is a lens from 1999, and while it was a technical marvel in its day, and still has its fans, it isn't going to resolve 100% sharp on a modern camera (24MP APS-C and 50MP FF have similar sensor pixel sizes). The 1.4 and 2x extenders are mostly a relic from the days of slide photography where you couldn't enlarge your slide and had to get the magnification done at capture time rather than later. Our modern cameras outresolve even many modern lenses, never mind 20-year-old ones, and once it is out-resolved then sticking an extender on just makes a bigger blurrier noiser image. See File:How to take Hi-Resolution Macro Studio Photographs of Insects and Plants - By Sam Droege at USGS BIML.webm and File:How to Take Macro Photographs of Insects USGS BIML Lab2.pdf for how the USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Laboratory took their photos. They used the same lens, without extension tube, and a 20MP camera and only 125 to 250 ISO. -- Colin (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who is the addresee of this comment. Apart from the video and the PDF there is nothing new to me here. And regarding the equipment, if you don't mind I'll decide con my own what equipment I use for which shot. I often play around with different variables and when I liked the result I uploaded it to Commons. And please, noun a similar lens of this century that I should use instead of the MP-E 65mm, because I don't know anyone of this type which is superior, even 20 years later. Poco a poco (talk) 08:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info on the compound eye

The compound eyes of an insect are composed of ommatidia, which are usually hexagonal in shape. You can see the hexagons in this macro shot. So why is the eye of this butterfly composed of many perfect circles? I think it is because it has been lit by a ring flash, which tends to produce a circle in any mirror-reflective surface (see human eye and patterned ring). The hundreds of circles here are not the shape of the eye facets, but hundreds of reflections of the ring flash. The actual shape of the eye facets is not visible. The flash rings are also visible in the eyes of this spider. Apart from the overall softness of the image, one reason the hexagonal eye facets don't stand out also caused by the flash. Fashion photographers use a (larger) ring flash to shoot some of their work because the direct light can be very flattering to their model. Unlike side (or top) lighting, front lighting like this will tend to hide surface details (a model's pores, spots or hairs). It also helps reduce the 3D of the face, making noses and chins less prominent. Cheekbones can be emphasized by makeup and some Photoshopping. But this is all exactly what we don't want for macro insect photography. We want side lighting to bring out all the horrid texture (eye facets, spiracles, hairs) and to give the subject a real 3D feel. If you look at the insects at USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Laboratory, you can see many have been photographed with a twin flash, lit from the sides or above. The abdomen of this bee and the iridescent eyes of a robber fly are all brought about by side-lighting. A ring flash is great for photographing banknotes, but not insects. -- Colin (talk) 08:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose I was swaying in favour, but I have to agree with Colin. The FP he references is much sharper. Perhaps Poco a poco can challenge Colin's techncail arguments? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry, but per Colin. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:42, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Regretful Oppose Per others. --StellarHalo (talk) 04:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Per my answer above. I already put my macro lens back in the bottom of a cupboard and already regret having uploaded anything. I may give it a try again in 8 years. Poco a poco (talk) 08:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Poco a poco, don't sulk. You've uploaded lots of educationally useful and interesting macro photos last month. I think you made some poor choices about equipment (the 2x extender and the ring flash), but no harm in experimenting and learning from mistakes. That lens is a difficult beast and I've never read anything to suggest that getting good results from it is going to be very hard work and always with a high failure:success ratio. The USGS bee folk show it is capable of producing good results. This kind of photography is challenging, and I'd expect a learning curve of months to a year, not four weeks. -- Colin (talk) 09:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escarabajo (Chrysolina sturmi), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-28, DD 546-573 FS.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 11:24:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Specimen of Chrysolina sturmi, Hartelholz, Munich, Germany.
  • Let's do it. I'll take over the nom if it's fine with everyone else. Poco, I'm not sure why the withdrawal. That's a remarkable shot whatever criticism we may have on other shots. - Benh (talk) 10:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • True, but if you renominate it, Poco has the right to withdraw that nomination too if he wants to. Just let it go, please. Following the rules is not a "waste of time" and there is no deadline on this project. --Cart (talk) 12:07, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info I've unstriked Benh's takeover of Poco's withdrawal of this nom since it's against the current rules of FPC. If you wish to change these rules, please start a discussion about this on the FPC talk page. For now, I think it's a good idea to let this now toxic nomination go to archive until all combatants have calmed down a bit. Feel free to try a new nom in a month or so with clearer minds. --Cart (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 21:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Presentation of the Polestar 1 Concept at Geneva International Motor Show 2018
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vibidia duodecimguttata - La Pairelle.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 15:12:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vibidia duodecimguttata
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Coccinellidae_(Ladybugs)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 21:58:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tinder sponge (Fomes fomentarius) in the Bruderwald in Bamberg. Focus stack of 23 images.
You take the page name and a # and then the section heading
In this case: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Polyporaceae
--Cart (talk) 12:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Polyporaceae

File:Fishmarket 01.jpg (delist), not delisted

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2020 at 20:17:11
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info Low resolution for a photograph, crop too tight, and bad composition, to name a few. Take a close look at this image and ask yourself: is this one of the finest images on Wikimedia Commons? (Original nomination)
  •  Delist We already have two much better FPs of fish markets. This image wouldn't even qualify as a QI let alone FP. I am honestly surprises it survives as FP for more than a decade. -- StellarHalo (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Sharp enough in the area of focus, so QI for me. I probably wouldn't vote to promote it today, but it doesn't meet the bar for delisting IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Isn't delisting made especially (as the guideline suggested) for images that are no longer "good enough" for FP due to changes in our standards? I mean, why keep it if you are not even sure you are not going to promote it if nominated today? --Alsakan (talk) 04:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Some of us think the lack of quality should be really obvious, or it's not worth the time or even appropriate. There are probably thousands of nominations we could relitigate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I have recently been going through the Featured Pictures galleries and there are actually very few images I want to delist. There is no reason to go through the old FP nomination logs and reconsider them all. However, this one in particular just stuck out to be as especially bad and lacking the quality that we would normally find in FP. To be blunt, it is just ugly, imo --Alsakan (talk) 06:13, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 6 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /--A.Savin 21:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:J.L. Gerome - The Wailing Wall - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 09:21:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jean-Léon Gérôme: The Wailing Wall
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Monuments

File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra (d.j.b) 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 12:28:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 09:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rojnik pajęczynowaty.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 17:35:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Cart (talk) 17:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bombus sp Villamontagna 03.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bombus sp Villamontagna
 Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal//2

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 07:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Aerial perspective of Fullerton Hotel, Singapore.jpg

description: The Fullerton Hotel Singapore is a five-star luxury hotel located near the mouth of the Singapore River, in the Downtown Core of the Central Area, Singapore. It was named after Robert Fullerton, the first Governor of the Straits Settlements (1826–1829). Commissioned in 1924 as part of the British colony's centennial celebrations.

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 12:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the lookout point Hindenburghöhe into the Rhine Gore
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 10:06:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 06:11:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jultomte illustration by Jenny Nyström
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Printed#Other
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 09:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Siegmund Breitbart
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Winston Churchill - 19086236948.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 08:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Colin has edited the page that I used as the basis of my oppose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Only just now did he do so. I totally agree with Colin and the others and I think your opposes should be stricken as you are trying to force an issue on "rules" that don't exist. Were you planning the many other photos that are on Commons, including FPs, that you felt fell into this category? Seven Pandas (talk) 22:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I interpreted the rules in good faith. Colin has edited the page I relied on. I apologise for annoying you Seven Pandas. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. I should have created a new nomination page instead of reusing this. The bot looks at the first revision in history, which is why it's attempting to close it prematurely. I will add the {{Bots}} template to make it stop. pandakekok9 05:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieja melanura - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 12:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Quetzal cichlid (Vieja melanura), Karlsruhe Zoo
  • I'd like to elaborate my comment, which goes in the same direction like Charles's. Some sort of shadow would be acceptable, but in this case it is too obvious. We have had some FPCs in the past of good quality that I also supported where the viewer could actually believe that the picture was taken from underwater. Thi is not the case here. Poco a poco (talk) 11:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Cichlidae (Cichlids)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 19:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African fish eagle (Haliaeetus vocifer)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Genus : Haliaeetus
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 16:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@King of Hearts: Thank you:) please review once again, weird sharpening artifacts are gone now. Best Regards Bijay chaurasia (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortuantely, at 9 MP this level of unsharpness is unforgivable IMO. Compare, for example, to File:Lago del Rey, Alemania, 2019-05-17, DD 25.jpg, which is worse at full res (46 MP), but much better at 4000px (10 MP). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 14:58:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peoples in Lake Tamblingan, Bali use traditional boats to cross. They left early in the morning to pray at the temple
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 17:16:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

grapevine
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temporale in arrivo sulla campagna rignanese (Rignano sull'Arno - Fi).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 15:40:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thunderstorm approaching the Rignanese countryside (Rignano sull'Arno - Fi)
OK thanks for the advice, I agree and I will do it when I can. I thank you for the beautiful compliment, between the lines you told me that I have an eye for photos.PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you do, no question. It's a nice moody composition. Cmao20 (talk) 20:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 15:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ice crystals on a bud of acer pseudoplatanus
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 14:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 19:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
I agree in principle to the idea of featuring a scene in different light and have said so before, but not this particular photo, for the reasons stated above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2020 at 19:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:59, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Cyprus
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 15:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 16:23:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canyon of Khodz River in heavy clouds, Adygea, Western Caucasus
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fishermen preparing lobster traps in Norra Grundsund 1.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 13:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two fishermen preparing and baiting lobster traps while another is using a pressure washer to clean traps in Norra Grundsund, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.
  • @Daniel Case: That would be this shot. They were chatting, swapping stories while they were baiting the traps. I don't think that angle provided any FP-worthy shots though. Anyway thanks for your comment, but I think it's time to withdraw this and try another side of this fishing expedition. --Cart (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 03:27:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Frigga crocuta in Puerto Villamil, Ecuador
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 06:07:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harriet Jacobs
Source photo is here --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, you must have more info than I could find. How do you know original was carte-de-visite size, not the larger cabinet card? I thought the image came from a reproduction in a book, in which case the original size could not be determined. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Charlesjsharp: You are probably right that it's probably not the tiny size of the original carte-de-visites, but the term was used for cabinet cards as well, e.g. Brady's Imperial Carte-de-Visites. If you're asking for a file name change, I'm fine with that. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: I did try to be diligent here. I just mistook the nominaion redirect for a file redirect, didn't see the "global usage", and wanted to make sure everything had updated. Better to be diligent than break things, after all, and never hurts to doublecheck if it's your file. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks, I know and I understand. :-) I was mostly explaining why I put the delete on the page since I do this routine so often for renamed nomination. --Cart (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Sitting_people
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 08:28:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sulfur miners collecting frozen sulfur from the crater of Mount Ijen
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7780.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 04:15:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rusty pipe at the steam house at Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. ///Eatcha (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Germany
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 11:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Santa María de Eunate church is a very special church in the Camino de Santiago, because of it's octogonal shape and isollation. Here we can see it with a sunflower and wheat.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neukirchen-Vluyn, Schachtanlage Niederberg 1-2, 2018-08 CN-02.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 09:39:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 10:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atraksi Sembur Api Reog Ponorogo.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 05:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 09:34:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

one of iwans of Vakil mosque.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2020 at 17:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 19:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 08:26:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden monkey (Cercopithecus kandti) eating bamboo, Rwanda
  •  Info Ivar: There is nothing wrong with the voting period. Charles created this page at 08:27, 23 June 2020‎. Take a look in the page history. However, he didn't add it to this list until now, so the very short voting period is a result of that. Not sure why it was done in this manner. We could "reset" the nom by tweaking it using the {{Bots}} template from when Charles actually added it to the list and made it public. I think that would be better than going through all the mess of withdrawing and making a second nomination. What say you? --Cart (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Why is there sharp texture on the monkey's right hand? Shouldn't it be out-of-focus and blurred? Is this some AI Sharpening artifact? Can it be tweaked? The broken near end of the bamboo looks oddly crisp, like someone has cut it out of the image with scissors. Compare to the original upload which is soft. I can see how better software can improve the lighting of the first version, but bringing this degree of sharpness that wasn't there makes me a bit uncomfortable. Along the monkey's right cheek, you can see bits where the out-of-focus background has got weirdly sharpened. The overall improvement is very impressive and these glitches are only visible at 100%, but I am a bit worried if the AI is introducing texture and crisp hair that wasn't actually captured? What do you think? -- Colin (talk) 10:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment All sharpening introduces sharpness 'that wasn't there'. Topaz AI software can be aggressive and introduce artefacts. It's a balance which I try to manage by using layers, but of course a) I don't always get it right and b) voters have different opinions of sharpness, noise etc. I can reduce the artefacts on the hand. The end of the bamboo is just carelessness where I reduced exposure, but didn't do it very well. New version on its way. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 09:40:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a photo of railway station "Bielawa Zachodnia" in Bielawa (Poland)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2020 at 07:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Skyline of the Central Business District of Singapore with Esplanade Bridge in the evening.jpg

Downtown Core is the historical and downtown centre of the city-state of Singapore and the main commercial area in Singapore excluding reclaimed lands with many integrated resorts such as the Marina Bay Sands, one of the most expensive buildings in the world, with the most expensive standalone casino at Bayfront Avenue. There are many skyscrapers in Raffles Place, Tanjong Pagar and Marina Bay CBD with a height limit of 280m. It is one of the eleven planning areas located within the most urbanised Central Area,

If you think it has "Too much water" then you should see this featured picture of the same place and photographer, this proposed image is better in all aspects than another featured picture.--Editor-1 (talk) 03:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I specifically cited that as having a better composition above, so I disagree that this one is "better in all aspects". Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The other picture compensates it with a better crop on the left (too tight here) and the reflexions on the water, which don't stand out so good here --Poco a poco (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think commenting out was unnecessary, replacing the thumb image with a direct and bold link as you have suggested ("So please just give links (you can write them in bold) to photos you want to share with the voters in a non-Alt way.") is better and more useful.--Editor-1 (talk) 06:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's another way to do it and it works just fine. --Cart (talk) 12:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I think a dusk photo of this skyline from this angle goes well with a night photo; I'm not bothered by the crop since the reflections at dusk are inevitably shorter. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
❎ Alternative withdrawn by photographer

Alternative

[edit]

File:Skyline of the Central Business District of Singapore with Esplanade Bridge in the evening (cropped).jpg

@King of Hearts, Ikan Kekek, and Poco a poco: What is your opinion about this cropped version? I removed the far right/most right building whish is short/low-rise and unnecessary, this lossless crop made more space for the right side of the image. If another crop is needed please tell me.--Editor-1 (talk) 04:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

💡 @Editor-1: 3 things :

  1. Do not display another image in a standard nomination, otherwise the bot will get misled at the end of the voting period.
  2. For alternatives, especially with a cropped version, it's always better to ask / notify the photographer (when active, and this is the case here, I'm currently active on Commons). Photography is not only taking a subject, it's also about the choice of a framing. And I'm not sure to support your choice here.
  3. When doing such modification from a file, please mention your name in addition to the author. Say you're the author of the new crop. A framing is about the management of the space, this is an important thing, not a minor detail. A crop can either reveal or ruin a picture, thus this is an artistic choice. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also: please keep in mind the photographer can withdraw your nomination, if the candidature doesn't match the tastes. Concerning the oppose and neutral votes above (even if I don't share the ideas), they're perfectly legitimate. It's a matter of taste, and I find the arguments valid. In the other picture, I like the colors and the reflection. The large framing is wanted. In this one, the subtle light is interesting. Both pictures are different, and there is no "better" one in my opinion. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, if the cropped version were offered as an alternative, I'd say I like its composition better than this picture but not as much as the night picture. The problem is the little bit of curved light pole that's cut off by the right crop. I'd seriously consider voting for it if it were offered. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No major difference. The first one is fine. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Alternatives are for different crops or post-processing of the original image, if they are suggested by voters" and "The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot." please don't worry yourself.
The first one is not fine enough, the far right building is obviously redundant.--Editor-1 (talk) 07:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unless the photographer approves of this alternative being nominated, I don't think we should vote on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Editor-1, yes nominations can be closed manually, but it is a longstanding practice not to muddle up a nomination with other files than proper 'Alternatives'. Any file, even non-images like sound-files or small images in signatures that are not template or script based, will be read as 'Alts' and this will for example prevent fifth-day closings by the Bot. So please just give links (you can write them in bold) to photos you want to share with the voters in a non-Alt way. We are capable of following links. Displaying other files just because you can, is not the best strategy. --Cart (talk) 09:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: Are you really sure you don't want this alternative even if User:King of Hearts -- User:Ikan Kekek -- User:Poco a poco prefer this? @Ikan Kekek: Can you please at least strike your opposite vote? thanks.--Editor-1 (talk) 12:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Singapore
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 13:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brattåsberget cliff overlooking the mudflats in the inner part of Hanneviken, a part of Trommekilen, with migratory birds in Norrkila, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.
@W.carter: I wanted to mention that it reminds of my picture actually :) Good to see that inspiration is spreading across FPC. Thanks for removing the spot. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Sweden
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 15:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hidden Peak Fire Lookout
❎ Discussion about jpg compression level
  • I've seen this before if the 'restorer' use a better program than the 'uploader' originally had. It has happened to me too when I have helped some user who didn't have access to Photoshop and Lightroom. Small changes will increase the file in those programs. I don't think that small difference in file size is a big issue here since we are actually encouraged to upload as big files as possible.--Cart (talk) 17:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the restorer started from the source material, I would be fine, but I strongly suspect (s)he started from the the JPEG. And the changes are mainly details removal, so should reduce the amount of information the file carries, and hence its size. Yes it doesn't really matter here, and it would be even more stupid to add a new version on top since MediaWiki keeps all versions: the space is lost already. But maybe some people read me and agree with me that our planet has limited ressources ;) - Benh (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did a little experiment where I downloaded the original file and did only a mild NR on it in Photoshop, no dust spot removal, and just by doing that and save, the file jumped from 9.25 MB to 12.7 MB. Anyone can test this. --Cart (talk) 18:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You probably used different settings and lesser compression that's all ;) but the details was lost by the first compression so this would be useless outside an experiment. - Benh (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't quite understand what you mean. I didn't use any of Ivar's files, but went back in history to the original file, same as Ivar did unless Ivar had access to the original raw file. I assume you know that you can access the first (or any older) version of the file by clicking on the small thumbnail in the file's history. I think it also has to do with that when you do NR, you create better gradients between pixel areas. These areas that before the NR had more pixels of the same color, become several different colors and this will increase the file size. --Cart (talk) 18:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The filesize is partly determined by the settings on the software you use. See this analysis for Lightroom/Photoshop. I reckoned that Lightroom setting 90 (out of 100) and Photoshop 11 (out of 12) offered the best trade-off of file reduction vs retaining detail. I couldn't easily distinguish using the max setting from the "one stop down" setting but going another stop down did cause a small visible change at 100% pixel peeping. However, even then the change was "the noise shifted" rather than anything objectionable. I appreciate you can't get back what you lost, but you can stop it getting worse. This is particularly true if you have cropped the top or left, since those JPG 8x8 squares no longer line up.
This affects just storage size on Wikimedia's servers, and the odd few of us who ever look at the full size version. When someone looks at an image on Wikipedia or a reduced size version on Commons, the MediaWiki thumbnailer will have aggressively compressed that before sending it out. Benh, have a look at Special:NewFiles and you'll soon realised that a few extra MB in a high quality photo such as this is really not WikiMedia's problem. Plus, on the global scheme of things, a few milliseconds of Netflix blows this out the water, not to mention the x-rated portion of the internet. -- Colin (talk) 20:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe it's more serious a topic than I first thought. Cart, Charlesjsharp filesizes are determined by many things and mainly the information the files contains and the compression algorithm. Higher noise photo will yield larger size because of higher frequency information which are harder to compress. So usually, an NRed file will be smaller at equal compression algorithm. Keep in mind Jpeg is a lossy algorithm too, so it's a bit of vanity to think that by saving with a bigger size from a small size Jpeg, you'll get better results. It's as Colin said: at most, you'll stop making it worse. Charles, saying that topaze increases size whether you sharpen or NR misses a chunk of the story. You've got to tell on top how the original files were compressed and how topaze saves them too for a proper comparison. Colin, wrt size and space on Wikimedia servers, I can tell size doesn't seem to be a Wikimedia problem. I was just thinking about general use of ressource. Nothing is free, so let's use only what's necessary. That was my philosophy moment only. - Benh (talk) 07:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • However, I think that worrying about trying to make the file size smaller, in order to save a few MB on Wikimedia servers, is wasting another precious resource: one's life. And think of the likely other problem this worry may lead to: that someone uses too high a compression in order to save space, and ends up introducing JPG artefacts. Better to err on the side of too little compression. In the time it takes you to read this sentence, Netflix has streamed terrabytes of data across the internet. So, philosophically, as they say in the US, "don't sweat the small stuff". -- Colin (talk) 07:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Benh Files saved directly from RAW into Photoshop CS6 at maximum size jpg then put through by Topaz denoise AI on auto setting (includes sharpening) always increase in file size. Without exception. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I prefer to export RAW straight to JPG from Lightroom for this reason, but if I ever need to edit it in Photoshop I always save as 8-bit TIFF (compressed LZW) for small edits, and 16-bit TIFF (compressed ZIP) for major edits (for future proofing, because if I ever need a 16-bit version I don't want to redo all my local changes). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Colin I totally agree :) my example is a bit extreme. But think of it that way: millions of cigarette butts on the streets, so how is one more going to make it worse? I'd still avoid throwing them anywhere (OK I don't smoke so it helps) :D Sorry for the digression. - Benh (talk) 17:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United_States
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 15:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

panorama of mill in Świnoujście
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 15:33:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Melitaea cinxia
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cebuella pygmaea - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 19:54:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pygmy marmoset
  • I get your point, the flash lighting is a little harsh, probably without using flash the ISO needed would have been too high. To me though that would only be a serious problem if it badly misrepresented the colour of the fur, and looking at other images on Google it seems roughly what you'd expect. You are both right, it's just that to me this is mitigated by the high resolution (20mpx with the creature filling most of the frame), the nice angle, and the sharpness and lack of noise at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. The settings are just wrong here. At ISO 200 anf f/11 explains that dark backgroud and very unappealing flat and cold lighting. It is very common to shot animals at higher ISO and Charles shows that ISO 2500 give good results when processed skillfully. One can surely do better in a relatively controlled environnement. - Benh (talk) 08:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Thanks Cmao20 for the nomination. I agree with you. Zoo photography is a special theme. It is easy to photograph animals in well lit large enclosures. But you have other conditions in those who live in terraria, aquaria or smaller cages, which are completely in shadow. Here you have to use a flash. As many (e.g. fish, mammals) are moving very quickly, you have often not the time to arrange the light in an optimal way. And I think, it is better to make photos of living animals than of taxidermied museum specimens, although there you have the time you need to arrange an optimal lightning. --Llez (talk) 07:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Sorry Llez but it doesn't look like this is likely to win significant support to become an FP. It is still a very good photograph though and I think it's unlucky not to have done better. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wroclaw Most Mlynski w porannej mgle przed switem 2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 07:08:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mlynski bridges in Wroclaw
  •  Comment Since you asked what we opposers think is wrong with the composition, my answer would be probably what EV Raudtee said. Because the right side of the bridge is cropped, I find that it impedes eye movement in the entire right third or so of the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArT of opEN doors project - Rua de Santa Maria - Funchal 37.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 07:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

One of the doors of the "ArT of opEN doors" project, showing the preparation of Poncha, a traditional drink of Madeira, with a "caralhinho", a kind of a beater

File:Syrian hamster - mating.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 04:13:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Syrian hamster mating
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 09:22:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exemplar of Spiny red gurnard (Chelidonichthys spinosus), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal.
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 11:27:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Dhowa Temple
  • Yes, exactly, I was suggesting to "resize" (I know this word can be ambiguous), not to crop anything. So, applying an homothetic transformation, with the height remaining as it is, and the width reduced. Then, the proportions of the people will look more natural. In Photoshop (although I've got the menu in French): Edition > Transformation > homothetic transformation. In Lightroom: Corrections of the lens > Manual > Aspect. Hope this is clearer. Thanks, Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:40, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Sri Lanka
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2020 at 17:23:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Administrative Map of the German Empire as of January 1st, 1900
 Question Why the map is not in SVG? --Wilfredor (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilfredor: I am not the author so I am not sure but, I don't think this map was created using vector graphics to begin with. --StellarHalo (talk) 13:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your feedback, sorry I didn't remark that you're not the author --Wilfredor (talk) 13:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question @BevinKacon: Why does the map has to SVG? Some featured digital maps such as this, this, this, and this are PNG. Also, what is wrong with the German text? It is a historical map of Germany created by a German. Are you of the opinion that the map should be in English instead? I would really appreciate it if you could clarify your position and perhaps after that, I could add some more FPs to the my list of future delisting nomination. StellarHalo (talk) 09:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi I will expand on each point for you:
  • SVG - such files can be sized without loss of quality. I did not oppose for this reason alone.
  • German text - the map should be language neutral, native German names of places fine, but the sub-headings are German. They could just be deleted, or replaced with any universal sign or symbol if possible.
  • The files you gave as examples did not have full support in their review, and they passed review process many years ago when the standard was lower.--BevinKacon (talk) 09:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BevinKacon: I am not exactly sure what you mean by "language-neutral" in your second point.
  1. Do you believe those sub-headings, which serve to inform the readers about each separate section of the map, should be in English or have an English translation either on the map or in the file description?
  2. Do you think there should be a separate English version of the map?
  3. How do you think a multi-lingual administrative map would work in a practical manner especially for the ones that seek to have as much information of a complicated federal system of administrative divisions on one page like this one?
  4. Or do you believe that only the maps that effectively accommodate foreigners in addition to their respective intended audience are worthy of FP?
--StellarHalo (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The headings and words that are not names can be deleted. Any single language version can be uploaded on their own and linked to the language free version. This is inline with COM:MULTI. As it is a PNG file, it cannot be easily translated to any other languages, or any text changed. See File:Tanzania map-fr.svg for example.--BevinKacon (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lag Ba'Omer bonfire Tel Aviv Israel.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 18:54:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lag Ba'Omer bonfire in Shapira neighborhood in Tel Aviv,

File:Queen Emma Bridge and Handelskade, Willemstad, Curaçao - February 2020 - 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 10:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Queen Emma Bridge and Handelskade, Willemstad, Curaçao.

 I withdraw my nomination --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 10:22:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bass rock
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 20:00:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue tiger butterfly

 I withdraw my nomination I agree with Charles. I'm not normally keen on withdrawing a nomination so fast, but the picture Charles has taken is considerably better than this one. Unfortunately Charles' picture is currently displaying a fault on Commons where recent changes fail to show up when viewing the photo at full-size, as documented here. Hopefully this problem will fix itself, so for now I will nominate another picture entirely, but I will nominate Charles' photo when I next have a slot available. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmao20: Since this is a cache issue, you should only run into this problem if you viewed the full-size page before the new version got uploaded. I have no problem seeing the latest version of Charles' picture at full-size. When viewing the photo at full size, refresh the page and the recent changes should immediately show up. StellarHalo (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@StellarHalo: I hear what you're saying, but I'm not sure that tells the full story. Before this morning I had never seen Charles' butterfly picture. I looked at the thumbnail, then went to view the full-res pic, and was greeted by his version as of 9th Jan 2018. I tried clearing my cache and visiting the page again, but no luck. Happily, though, I agree with you that I now have no problem viewing the pic at full size - the issue has somehow resolved itself. So Charles, you can expect to see your photo on FPC soon - hopefully tomorrow if this nom passes by five-day rule as currently seems likely. Cmao20 (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 21:47:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 05:03:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ranularia tripa (Lamarck, 1822), Tripus Triton; Length 8.3 cm; Originating from India
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Ranellidae

File:Sanderling auf Spiekeroog - Nationalpark niedersächsisches Wattenmeer.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2020 at 09:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sanderling at Spiekeroog in winter plumage
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 09:16:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Talamanca hummingbird (Eugenes spectabilis) male in Panama
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 18:28:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 17:52:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  CommentThe lamp post is not seriously affecting the picture and I wanted to keep the image natural without any manipulation, that's why I did not remove it King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠. If you think it is seriously affecting the object, I can give a try for removing it but honestly I don't want to do that || Mydreamsparrow (talk) 18:10, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 19:54:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Ceiling of Trinity Church - Left
    Ceiling of Trinity Church - Left
  • Ceiling of Trinity Church - Right
    Ceiling of Trinity Church - Right
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 03:17:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front view of a stream with a tree as vanishing point, mountains and mist in the countryside of Vang Vieng
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos

File:Münster, Hafen, ehem. Schüttvorrichtung -- 2020 -- 8064.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 04:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Former bulk bin (“Elephant”) in the port, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Germany
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 03:15:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water reflection of the mountains of Vang Vieng with crepuscular rays
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 11:32:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Third of May 1808
  • The "black line" is most likely the gap between the paining itself and the frame. Old paintings with the canvas stretched on a wooden frame, that might not have been perfectly straight and rectangular to begin with, get warped when the wood dries. In a lot of cases the painting and the frame don't match up perfectly and gaps appear. Some frames are made to cover a small portion of the paining's edges, some are not. In this case, it looks like the frame might not have been a perfect fit for the painting to begin with. --Cart (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1800-1850
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 10:46:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christening fly in a garden in Bamberg. Focus stack of 11 pictures
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family : Lauxaniidae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 10:46:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nazi wall newspaper, Wochenspruch der NSDAP, issue of 11 January 1943. These posters were widely displayed in wartime Germany.
  • Very nice, that's the kind of information I'd expect from a FP candidate file description page. Thank you, and apologies for my strong language. I might be able to translate this into German later if I find a quiet moment. --El Grafo (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question As a Jew who knows of dozens of relatives who were murdered by the Nazis in Poland, should I agree with you? For whatever reason, I don't, but I agree with the fruitful efforts to provide more context. I guess the question is whether by featuring this photo, we honor the man or his party. And I don't think saying that this is one of the best photos on the site and showing how propaganda in service of evil can be effective, we are thereby doing the equivalent of erecting an equestrian statue to Robert E. Lee in the public square. I had more trouble with a nomination of a photo of an equestrian statue of Khmelnitsky, because that is an existing heroic statue that is currently in the public square and honors a notorious Jew-killer. This would be a photo of a document by a party that is blessedly out of power in Germany and Austria. But I think the crux of the issue can be reduced to this: Is a photo of an immoral document itself inherently immoral? I don't think so, but I respect the argument that by featuring the photo, we risk promoting the contents of the document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've always believed that FP should be for any images that illustrate a subject particularly well, while POTD/POTY are for images that we are proud to display as a community. Certain types of FPs should not make it into the main page IMO, such as those depicting criminals, graphic violence, or sexual acts. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Khmelnitsky ended up being POTD for 2020-08-24. I do not want such kind of material to be given a platform here. This poster is already VI, on my opinion its more than enough. --Andrei (talk) 07:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I surely respect your opinion on this. I recused myself from voting on one of the nominations of a photo of that equestrian statue because it wasn't clear to me that on the basis of quality and composition, it should be opposed, but I couldn't support portraying a heroic statue of him neutrally while the image of the statue itself seemed to honor him. However, I feel like this is different in context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your concern, but I think that those wrong hands will probably get on it without our help, if they haven't already. Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I honestly think that the context of this - a cry to finish the job then, not leave it to the descendants, and how it can only be seen in a limited range of contexts that all help put a lie to the common myth that the general public was not aware of the Holocaust - I think the encyclopedic value outweighs any remaining propoganda value. I would suggest POTD is very careful with descriptions (Buidhe has said it should be pulled from POTY consideration above, so as long as the POTY organisers are informed of that, I think we can ignore this issue), but I think that, as long as a certain amount of care is taken, this sort of thing is valuable. Buidhe has been working hard to write, in an appropriate, academic, not-being-a-Nazi manner, about aspects of the history of Naziism over on en-Wiki, and this sort of visual evidence is helpful to such articles.
Obviously, there are reasons to be careful with such things. Our goal is to educate about, not accidentally promote. But I think this is about as good of an illustrative example as one can hope for, and - although perhaps I might be naive here - I don't see how it could be used to promote modern neo-Naziism, as it's very much of its time. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Amusing that Göring is made to look so leaderly and heroic here rather than the Jabba-esque figure he had become by then.

    Since everyone seems to be weighing in on the morality of featuring this, I will, in addition to seconding Peulle and Ikan, note that it makes us think about propaganda and how easily it can sway people, including us. The quote, outside of its historical context, is something almost any politician could say, and many have (including, I think, John F. Kennedy) and which in many other contexts many of us here would not disagree with (In fact, this is basically one of the arguments for addressing climate change now).

    It also shows (like the Pernkopf atlas, an article which I did a lot of work on) how artistic talent can be harnessed to execrable causes. Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support Have hesitated for a few days, but Ikan, Adam, and Daniel are right. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Alright, I've slept over this a couple of times and I think that this is now in a state where it can be featured. --El Grafo (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support For good articles, we need good images of both heroes and villains. I know, I was involved in getting a drawing of Kim Jong-un before we had a photo. Good illustrations are always a premium however distasteful the subject. --Cart (talk) 13:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 17:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Painted Dunes and Fantastic Lava Beds as seen from the edge of Cinder Cone’s crater.
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 11:43:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stacks of lobster traps and ropes in Norra Grundsund
  • The whole scene makes me think of a waterfall with swirls and vortexes down in the pond and people tend to find such things beautiful even though they are quite complex. --Cart (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Tools
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 20:33:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New Zealand#Waikato
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 02:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pine trees growing on the slope of Cinder Cone, a 700 foot high volcanic cone of loose scoria in Lassen Volcanic National Park
  • Related anecdote: In the back of my head is a painting of a similar motif, probably now in Tate, MoMA or some such place. I did a Google picture search to see if I could locate it. No such luck. The system identified this as "grass" and promptly redirected me to Günter Grass. Probably the most worthless search I've ever done. Still, it looks like a painting in a national art gallery. --Cart (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel: LOL! Great minds... I actually have a couple of dandelions in a parking lot about to get edited and uploaded. They won't make FPC though. --Cart (talk) 09:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 08:19:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Werdsteg in Adliswil, Switzerland, right before dawn
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 12:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Hendrapictures please, if you need help, let me know, this image is too good to be lost --Wilfredor (talk) 13:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 12:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 16:40:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bottom view of the iwan at one of the entrances of Fatima Masumeh Shrine
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks

File:Edelkastanie IMG 5671.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 16:45:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sweet chestnut blossom
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 13:23:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Man with prescribed protective mask at the Bamberg railway station
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 13:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pink-spotted hawk moth (Agrius cingulata) male in Panama
  • Might be better to move it to a horizontal or slanted stick for compo. Having it at the end of one like this, brings my mind to moth specimens stuck on pins. --Cart (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 22:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Looking up at The View From The Shard, Level 72
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 07:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#United_Kingdom

File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 13.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 09:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the "Old Keep" on the "Keep San Jordi", Château de Peyrepertuse
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 09:13:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exemplar of Spiny starfish (Marthasterias glacialis), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal.
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 09:00:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bill Rutherford
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 09:00:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Ganjali Khan Complex, is a Safavid-era building complex, located in the old center of city of Kerman, Iran. The complex is composed of a school, a square, a caravanserai, a bathhouse, an Ab Anbar (water reservoir), a mint, a mosque and a bazaar.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 10:01:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Eltz

* Support} --Dr. Otztafan Kolibril (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." You have only done 16 edits. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --Cart (talk) 10:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 15:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Cistaceae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 18:33:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Purple sea urchin (Sphaerechinus granularis), Madeira, Portugal.
I didn't step on any urchins, but the one in this nom has soft spines, whereas this one doesn't :) Poco a poco (talk) 12:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch! I've met those black ones in the Red Sea. Not so nice... --Cart (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did know not to step on them. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:38, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Echinoidea
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 12:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lichenostomus flavicollis stealing hair from Thylogale billardierii for nest - Melaleuca.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 05:39:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yellow-throated Honeyeater
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)

File:Meyerbeer - Les Huguenots - Décor Acte II.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 06:44:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Les Huguenots Act II
IMHO, To correct this, a rotation without loss of proportion should be done and not only add a sharpness filter --Wilfredor (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera

File:American officer and French partisan crouch behind an auto during a street fight in a French city. - NARA - 531322 - restored by Buidhe.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 20:41:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NARA caption: "American officer and French partisan crouch behind an auto during a street fight in a French city."
A high proportion of combat photos from World War II were posed, but usually not as blatantly as this one. --Gnosis (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is not Wikipedia Featured Pictures but Commons Featured Pictures. Whether an image carries any EV or historical significance, or even accuracy, should quite frankly be irrelevant (unless it adds to the image's value ofc). Having said that I'd actually argue that this image carries significant historical value as it represents how the allies tried/wanted to portray this part of WWII. -- KennyOMG (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 13:26:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Graduates of the US Military Academy celebratring

* Oppose not good enough --Dr. Otztafan Kolibril (talk) 10:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." You have only done 16 edits. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --Cart (talk) 10:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I usually don't like to pile on oppose, but this kind of dramatic shot needs at least some editing to fix: the tilt, and possibly part of the horizontal distortion and keep the vertical distortion it's what makes the pictures wow! --PierreSelim (talk) 12:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose While this image is sort of close to home geographically, its composition is, as others have suggested, kind of random, and there are better ways to take this sort of picture. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 16:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 13:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hummingbird hawk moth (Macroglossum stellatarum) in flight
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 10:08:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Chile
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 17:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northern palm squirrel (Funambulus pennantii) in Agra
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 22:32:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue tiger (Tirumala limniace exoticus) male
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 16:36:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of a shabestan in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

File:Réfection de la peinture de la Tour Eiffel, 1924 - Gallica.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 15:40:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Repainting the Eiffel Tower in 1924.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 00:21:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiny house surrounded by trees, inhabited in the middle of green paddy fields in sunshine under a stormy sky at golden hour in Laos
  • Lol :-) It was last year, so to be honest I don't remember what happened next. I always walk with a waterproof bag. But one thing is sure, the sun might have disappeared in the minute after this shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 00:19:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water reflection of mountains, hut, green rice sheaves scattered in a paddy field and clouds with blue sky in Vang Vieng, Laos

* Support--Dr. Otztafan Kolibril (talk) 10:39, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." You have only done 16 edits. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --Cart (talk) 10:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos

File:Wide lens shot of railway on the side of a river cutting through deciduous forest in Banff National Park.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 23:17:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 09:37:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Czech Republic - Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wildsee - Kaltenbronn 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 06:06:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wildsee, Wildsee raised bog, Kaltenbronn, Northern Black Forest

File:Alphonse Mucha - Poster for Victorien Sardou's Gismonda starring Sarah Bernhardt.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 22:08:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gismonda poster by Alphonse Mucha
Here you go Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: That one's WAY too tightly cropped, but Gallica has options that just have fold line issues I can work around. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 05:00:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wooden mill in Kimzha
 Neutral until question over line in sky is resolved. Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Even if the line is removed, the clouds do not match the rest of the sky --Llez (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Llez. The photograph is also too hazy for me. I actually prefer this picture of the windmill. Buidhe (talk) 06:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I did not want to “kill” the nomination of this photo; I would still vote for it, but IMHO it is necessary to remove/smooth that line and make that clouds match the rest of the sky. I would guess that two or more photos were combined here, e.g. a lighter and a darker exposure (this is completely legitimate and OK!), but the photographer forgot to smooth the gradation between both photos properly. If this is the case, it should be possible to remove the line and to make the clouds match the rest of the sky better by working with layers and layer masks. Or, if the clouds where just copied in from another unrelated image, one should just get rid of them and show the sky as it was – i.e., more like on the right. --Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 18:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker der US Army -- 2020 -- 8388.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 13:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Door lock of Bunker 26 at the area of the US army at the special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 09:42:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from McQueen Pass towards Lyttelton Harbour, New Zealand
Confirmed results:
Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New_Zealand#Canterbury_(Waitaha)

File:Lake Lansing Park North Forest.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 15:05:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trees in Lake Lansing Park North Forest
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: The quality of the photo is too far below what is required for an FP. It is extremely difficult to get an FP from a phone camera. If you like to get some feedback on your photos before nominating them, please do so at COM:CRIT. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 15:20:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • OK, and what about the posterization, and all the strange spots in the bottom-right corner? Any chance to get a better background? New development maybe? --A.Savin 07:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To me it looks like some horrid maw of a fearsome sci-fi movie creature, à la the Sarlacc Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 11:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ostrich fern at Myrstigen trail
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Onocleaceae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 06:22:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset over Trommekilen, a part of Brofjorden, as seen from Norrkila, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. In the background is Preemraff oil refinery.
  • I think it's mostly due to that is was a very dark/shadow-y part of the photo and I had to raise the shadows there quite a bit. This camera does not handle really dark areas that well. It is a re-occurring comment on my photos. In this case, I'd rather have a not so sharp area than a dense black blob. (This was taken before a kind user here, I think it was Basotxerri, told me about a function to improve this. I'm using it these days.) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Sweden

File:Vietnamkrieg Bootsflüchtling 1980.jpg (delist), not delisted

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 12:19:50
SHORT DESCRIPTION 


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /--A.Savin 20:37, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 12:44:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of a shabestan in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Other ceilings

File:La chaleur à Paris, fillette prenant de l'eau à une borne-fontaine, 1921 - Gallica.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 08:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A little girl and a fountain, Paris, France.
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1910-1920

File:Catalan boats - Sète.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 16:17:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Catalan boats
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Sailboats

File:Georges Rochegrosse - Henry Février - Henri Cain and Louis Payen after Victorien Sardou - Gismonda.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 17:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gismonda
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 22:15:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of Queen Mother's Apartments in Topkapı Palace
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Domes

File:Wrocław - widok z Wyspy Slodowej - wyspa Tamka.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 16:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ostrów Tumski, Wroclaw
  • Maybe a slight sharpening halo, yes. Not a lot I can do about it without having access to the original RAW files though. IMO it's too minor a flaw to spoil my enjoyment of the picture. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland

File:Moon jellyfishes disturbing the top water layer of Gullmarn fjord 1.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2020 at 18:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moon jellyfishes disturbing the top water layer of Gullmarn fjord, Sämstad, Sweden.
  •  Comment I guess I don't understand the standard for underwater pics. These are small jellyfish, and the one on the right is sharp at full page on my 19-inch monitor, and mainly, I find the water beautiful. I think we've promoted less sharp underwater pics lately. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sharp on your 19-inch monitor? Well, clearly not sharp on my 4K screen :-) We might not have the same eyes, or the same photo in front of them :-) I think the water was a bit cloudy, the focus wrong, or the animal moving -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please note that this isn't a species photo, it's about the layer in the water. I've searched online for photos of thermoclines, but all I got was charts and texts. So I have nothing to compare with. --Cart (talk) 00:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I know, these small waves in the water are interesting and can document the phenomenon, perhaps as VI. But for FP they're interesting only with the animal. I don't think the quality is up to our current standards, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's ok if you don't like this photo, I have no problem with that. There are many better photos of moon jellies. But to exclude photos illustrating physics from FP, that sounds a bit strange to me. --Cart (talk) 01:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, it is difficult to capture, otherwise there would be other photos of it somewhere. I captured it by sheer luck and I only nominated the photo because I thought the "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. " was still in use. Guess it's not. --Cart (talk) 09:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ermell: I was quoting the rules of FPC (section "Symbolic meaning or relevance") in my comment above. So do you think should we remove that sentence from the rules, since it doesn't seems to be valid any more? The whole thing goes: Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph. --Cart (talk) 13:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mizrah - Israel Dov Rosenbaum.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 10:59:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Judaism
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 09:54:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seedeater (Sporophila sp.) female
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 11:10:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yad Vashem
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL COA Trzaska.svg (delist), delisted

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 02:02:29
SHORT DESCRIPTION 


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 21:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 16:33:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

TRA R189 across Shuangxi Station
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, X neutral → not featured. /--Kulawik.pl (talk) 08:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 09:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

photo of Sempervivum arachnoideum
  • It's certainly better, and the light is perfect now, but I'm still not sure the sharpness is quite there. Not sure what camera you used as there seems to be no EXIF data but I don't think it's resolved the details too well. Nevertheless, I've removed the oppose. I've seen considerably worse than this pass FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Kulawik.pl (talk) 08:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates//2 Commons:Featured picture candidates//2 Commons:Featured picture candidates//2

File:Paços do Concelho, Cascais.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 01:03:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paços do concelho, Cascais
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Overexposed building, very noisy sky. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

 I withdraw my nomination

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 22:25:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bombing of the Concordia Vega oil refinery in Ploești, Romania by B-24s of the United States Fifteenth Air Force on 31 May 1944
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 01:45:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chimney Rock headlands, Point Reyes
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 00:00:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colorful clouds and blue sky with water reflection of an island hosting trees at sunrise in Si Phan Don, Laos
Totally agree. This nom was inserted in the list at 5:01, more than 5 days after, but I should have waited for the bot. Apologies. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question I love the sky and water, but I'm trying to figure out why the trees look the way they do. Is that just because of the light, or did you sharpen them somewhat, such that maybe it would be worth looking at them with somewhat less sharpening? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, Ikan Kekek, for your question. There is no special sharpening here, but certainly denoising. To get the colors of this sky without blown highlights, I had to shoot in lower exposure. But of course, due to the high contrasts, the trees were almost all black. I had just a silhouette. Not bad, but I made the choice to recover some details in these darker parts by lowering the shadows in Lightroom, and this naturally resulted in heavy noise. Although it is taken at 100 ISO, this noise was visible, at least at full size especially in the sides. Note there was also wind. This is a single image, and you can see the sky is fine at full resolution (a lot of details captured in the yellow & orange area). The weak part is certainly the trees, but the aim was to get some volume for this island. This is what my eyes could see in reality without special glasses! A solution I see now to get less noise would have been to take two pictures for tone mapping HDR, however, it was so windy, at slower speed the leaves would probably have been blurry. The image looks better at lower resolution. But the subject is more the sky over the water, with these gradients, pink and white clouds -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 15:11:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Yes I know, this house was restored in 1943 --Wilfredor (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Personally I find value in maintaining a consistent naming convention for a single photo shoot, as it makes it easy to explore the entire set. I generally only deviate from my general convention for that set if there's a very recognizable subject in there. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is another way of looking at it. There is no rush to do a re-name. Let's hear what Agnes and the other editors think about this. Dat is een andere manier om ernaar te kijken. Er is geen haast om een nieuwe naam te geven. Laten we horen wat Agnes en de andere redacteuren hierover vinden. --Cart (talk) 17:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 07:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 00:08:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Illuminated facade of a restaurant serving traditional food with fresh vegetables in Chiyoda, Tokyo
  •  Comment Actually, you don't have anywhere near enough edits to vote. You have to have at least 50 edits to be able to vote on FPC nominees other than if you nominate a photo (then you can vote for it). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 08:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Japan
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 11:36:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 07:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 14:06:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Delicious enchiladas made with sprouted corn tortillas, chili powder, cumin, onions, mexican cheese, and tomato sauce.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 07:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vincent van Gogh - Zonnebloemen - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 04:05:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunflowers
  •  Comment @Gnosis: O_O... Hmm, I may have been a bit too hasty in choosing the version to nominate. Let me decide if I want to let this one be promoted and then nominate it for delist and replace later or ping everyone else who has voted to support and ask them if they would prefer your version. --StellarHalo (talk) 19:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

[edit]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 07:56, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Interiors

File:Baby Hamster - 2 Weeks Old.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 10:16:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A two weeks old baby hamster
  • Actually the background is half door and half wall Cart, the dark shade is of the design on the door. To remove it, the dark portion has to be cloned and I never wanted to do that coz a simple try may spoil the natural beauty of the picture and it may also effect the subject (the cutie hamster :-)Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I still think the photo would look better without the dark spot regardless of its origin. It's "bugging" the image. You don't clone such a thing, you apply a weak and diffused gradient in Lightroom or something similar, to counter it. Also, if it's something in the design of the door, how come it spills over to the pink wall too? --Cart (talk) 16:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks nice on my two side-by-side 27-inch HD monitors too. :-) When you look at a photo at a certain magnification (30/50/100/whatever %) the size of your monitor doesn't matter. You just scroll it around if your monitor is small. --Cart (talk) 11:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do, but full size at 19 inches is a lot bigger than full size at 13 inches. Of course I could look at it at 200% of full size on the smaller monitor, but in fact, the larger monitor can't get as bright, though I've set it to the max. It's very old. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Cricetidae (Cricetids)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 09:50:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Padded-silk panel with many figures depicted in relief with silk and paper on the painted ground. High-resolution scan using the Google Art camera, shared by the Khalili Collections as part of its GLAM partnership.
invalid vote, per the guidelines, users need at least 50 edits before voting. Here only 3 currently -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Textiles
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 10:21:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lilac-breasted roller (Coracias caudatus caudatus) Botswana
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Coraciidae (Rollers)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 21:16:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of a shabestan in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 23:08:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainbow emerging from a recent rainstorm in a valley.
  • Sahagunethan removed it from the list. That is the way many new nominator do since they don't know about the {{Withdraw}} template. I marked it with that template and archived it, otherwise is would be floating out there with a Bot message prompting it to be closed. If the nominator change their mind, I can revert that edit. --Cart (talk) 09:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thanks, Cart. I was confused because when I looked for it in the log, I didn't find it at the time I posted before. I thought they might have just removed it, but as you say, that's irregular. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:55, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose First of all the resolution is absolutely immense, so thanks for providing such high-res photos. That said, the composition of this one does not rise to FP for me. I'd like to see more of the landscape at the bottom rather than so much featureless grey cloud, and the bits of trees sticking up from the bottom of the frame are a bit random and don't make for a harmonious photo. Cmao20 (talk) 14:30, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The composition for one thing, and the unsharpness of so much of the image as another. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral It's just a baby rainbow -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 21:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Daphnia giving birth
  • The images were uploaded during Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2019, a photo competition that is widely advertised in the science community. But the simple thing here would be to just e-mail the photographer and ask him if he uploaded the photos himself or if they were "stolen" by someone else since we've had problems with this before. I'm sure he would like this to be treated in a proper way too. Perhaps Charles could do this since he is a known photographer (with website and all) in a field adjacent to this biologist? --Cart (talk) 09:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, everyone! As a main coordinator of WSC contest in Poland I can confirm, that Mr Miś uploaded this photo :) We are in touch with him of course and we are very proud. Check his other photos on WC, too :) Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL) (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL). We have recently had high quality stolen photos here at FPC, so we just wanted to make sure. Very impressive work! We are fortunate to be able to host his photos. --Cart (talk) 17:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae

File:Парк-пам'ятка садово-паркового мистецтва Молодіжний - казкове світло.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2020 at 18:17:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Molodizhnyi Park

 I withdraw my nomination Looks like folk are not as enthusiastic about this as me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 18:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Big Sandy Bay beach
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker -- 2020 -- 8365.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2020 at 08:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bunker 23 in the special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Pygocentrus nattereri - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2020 at 09:52:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-bellied piranha; Karlsruhe Zoo
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Characidae

File:Edouard Manet - Olympia - Google Art ProjectFXD.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 22:16:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Manet's Olympia
  •  Comment I realize this would be a typo, but Monet and Manet are very different painters. (Monet is one of my favorites, as Debussy is one of my favorite composers, but I find that Manet's paintings only occasionally have fully realized forms [for example, the Philadelphia Museum of Art has a couple of big Manets that I liked the last time I saw them]. I'm quite aware that my views on this are uncommon.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think auto type did this to me hahaha. Thanks Ikan for brining it to my attention. --Gnosis (talk) 01:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 10:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wroclaw Wieza Cisnien Na Grobli.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 17:41:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wrocław, Na Grobli Water Tower
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 18:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exemplar of Giant clam (Tridacna gigas), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal.
  •  Neutral I'm glad folks finally realize how hard it is to get underwater photos that are technically great. This is a really nice quality, and there is nothing wrong with the camera settings. However, I would prefer some better consideration regarding composition for an FP. It is harder than on land, but even so. I don't expect anyone to get it right on their first attempts (it took me some three years to get good shots into the water), but some wow-factor would be nice. IMO; you got it with the purple sea urchin, not so much with this or the green starfish. Just keep at it, it will get better. :-) --Cart (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Cart you don't have to tell me how hard it's to get nice picture underwater, now I feel more comfortable about reviewing them after gathering some experience. This is even more tricky than 5x-10x macro shots :) I thought though that your marine pictures were taken from above the sea. If not, what equipment are you using to get under the water? --Poco a poco (talk) 10:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hey Poco a poco, of course I realize that you have found out the difficulties of shooting stuff under water! I was talking about voters in general here. Previously, underwater shots were unfortunately assessed the same way as photos taken on land. So progress. :-) I don't have any underwater equipment (wish I had!) so I shoot from the shore, which presents other difficulties since I have to make the surface "invisible". --Cart (talk) 11:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You should not stay with a nomination Poco a poco if the species is incorrectly identified. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Charlesjsharp if Llez cannot help with that I eventually will, don't worry, this nom will not be successful without a proper ID. I have indeed invested a couple of hours to look for it and so far no success. I will otherwise ask the portuguese marine authorities Poco a poco (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2020 at 15:45:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

One of the iwan ceilings of Fatima Masumeh Shrine in atabki sahn, Qom, Iran
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Leo belgicus.png

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2020 at 10:03:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leo Belgicus
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 03:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wilton Paes de Almeida Building was a high-rise building in Brazil. It was listed as a historic building in 1992. It caught fire and collapsed on 1 May 2018, causing at least 7 fatalities.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 21:07:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • And indeed, Cart, I always do. If you look at any of my previous FPs, they all have a detail description (at least as much description as hier in the FPC, where I usually add background information) in English and Spanish (ok, apart from the last 10 FPs or so, I've a bit of backlog). Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 23:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Houseboats on Nigeen Lake on a stormy day
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 11:41:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 19:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 14:20:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) female after chase
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)

File:Wroclaw- Kosciol sw. Elzbiety.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 17:43:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Elisabeth of Hungary church in Wrocław, 1486
✓ Done Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 23:11:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marbled white butterfly
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 22:20:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hanger sponge with fly. Focus stack of 9 pictures.
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Strophariaceae

File:Evstafiev-bosnia-cello.jpg (delist), delisted

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 06:52:18
SHORT DESCRIPTION 


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 13:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:France cities.png (delist), delisted

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 09:07:47
SHORT DESCRIPTION 


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 13:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 - Urania am Abend am Donaukanal.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 18:41:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Observatory Urania and Danube Canal
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Austria

File:Chapel of Saint Sebastian in Mikulov - west side 2020.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 20:14:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chapel of Saint Sebastian on hill Svatý kopeček in Mikulov, Czechia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leptobrachium smithi - Smith's litter frog (23903607194).jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2020 at 18:51:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leptobrachium smithi
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 01:10:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A rare breed of sheep, the Manx Loaghtan, in photographed Yorkshire
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Pierre-René Maignan - Jules Massenet - Ariane.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 06:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for Jules Massenet's Ariane
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 09:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sri Nam National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 09:58:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mine Lazy in Orlová-Lazy, Karviná District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2020 at 18:23:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waves crashing into a quay in Kyrkevik, Lysekil, during Storm Dennis.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2020 at 00:01:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hawdon River, Arthur's Pass National Park, New Zealand
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 23:59:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tortuous dirt road in wet paddy fields and green hills in Vang Vieng, Laos
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2020 at 03:35:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Unique Moment with the Moon and Christ the Redeemer
    Unique Moment with the Moon and Christ the Redeemer
  • Unique Moment with the Sun and Christ the Redeemer
    Unique Moment with the Sun and Christ the Redeemer
  • Well I would say between 300 and 600mm on FF (a 100-400mm on APS-C should be great). But to make a really informed choice, consider that the size of the moon is mostly dependent on the focal length alone (and same goes for the sun and any very far object). Then to get the element on the foreground (here the statue of the Chris) the right size is the tricky part which requires u finding the right spot at the right distance. So, just check on Flickr or other how the moon renders for given focal lengths, and you'll know. - Benh (talk) 21:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Benh --Wilfredor (talk) 16:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors

File:Flower of Spathodea campanulata at Muzhappilangad .jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2020 at 16:16:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spathodea is a monotypic genus in the flowering plant family Bignoniaceae.
 Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Cart (talk) 16:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2020 at 05:38:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An iwan of Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran
  • It is part of the mosque, but your image is 100% symmetrical with a plain blue sky, how can we avoid seeing something inharmonious in that isolated corner? There's nothing on the left! If you had moved slightly your camera, this intrusive part would not have been visible. Otherwise, you could also cut it (or delete it). So tiny, this doesn't seem to be part of your composition. Your image will be promoted soon, because there are enough supporters, but I wanted to express my subjective view. It's not horrible enough to oppose, but a bit unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2020 at 14:39:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral of Santa María, Sigüenza, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:48, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Spain

{{{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pulpo (Octopus vulgaris), isla de Mouro, Santander, España, 2019-08-14, DD 35.jpg}}}}

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2020 at 21:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coprinopsis variegata - Point Pelee.jpg, not featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 05:09:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coprinopsis variegata
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2020 at 11:51:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Suspension bridge in Sochi National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 09:28:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

photo of Lybia tessellata
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Xanthidae_(Mud_Crabs)
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 10:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A west view of the Horseshoe Falls, shown as Maid of the Mist VII is approaching
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United_States#New_York
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 23:23:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paradise shelducks
  • The background doesn’t seem dark to me...are you 100% sure your monitor is bright enough? As for the sharpness of the heads, I do think you have a point, the head of the left duck is perhaps a tiny bit OOF. I still think this is overall a great capture though. Cmao20 (talk) 01:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination. I think this is a great photo and I wonder how it would do at FP in English Wikipedia - lots of encyclopedic value in displaying male and female ducks together in one frame. But it looks like it's not setting anyone's heart alight here. Cmao20 (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2020 at 18:31:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

'Thira' is a hindu festival in Kerala.
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2020 at 23:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bearded fireworm (Hermodice carunculata), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal.
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Polychaeta
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 03:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for Meyerbeer's Le pardon Dr Ploërmel (later renamed Dinorah':
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2020 at 21:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Suzdal Kremlin
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 10:22:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Nepal
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 11:28:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunflowers in the Reggello countryside (Florence)
-Thanks, it is the first favorable vote, albeit slightly, that I receive Featured picture. You all know the limits of my means, but I could not help sharing this sunflower bloom with you. It is the most photographed field in the whole of the Valdarno Fiorentino in these weeks! Thank you so much. PROPOLI87 (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Lovely colors, great idea with the sunflowers leading towards the building. Two things, however, prevent me from supporting: 1) low resolution; 2) a little more room on the right would help, because currently the image is too right-heavy. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
-OK thanks. For the space on the right I would have done better to nominate this? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Girasoli_nella_campagna_di_Reggello_(Firenze).jpg PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
-Hello! I am overjoyed because this time the photo has also obtained favorable votes and even if it will not be accepted it is okay! And then I'm happy to have shown this beautiful sunflower bloom that fills the eyes and the heart, because photography is also an emotional fact. Thanks to all of you for not excluding it right away!And then finally in Italy we were able to leave the house after the quarantine and be able to admire all this!PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 06:20:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hotel Negresco by night in Nizza in France
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2020 at 05:19:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@Ikan Kekek: But would you have looked for him in it without having read my !vote? Daniel Case (talk) 01:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you didn't read my remarks above when I voted for this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 07:44:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shah Mosque (Imam mosque) in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Sitting Leo Belgicus - Visscher.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sitting Leo Belgicus
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 15:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Labyrinth spider (Agelena labyrinthica) female in web funnel
  •  Comment I think the context is important as this species makes its tunnel in long grass. I feel the grass stems are like a portalː Come into my parlour, said the spider to the fly... Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monte Palace Tropical Garden - Azulejo 02.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2020 at 09:58:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Azulejo panel "Pulchra ut luna", Monte Palace Tropical Garden, Monte, Funchal
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Others

File:Scribe- Menahem - The Birds' Head Haggadah - Google Art Project.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2020 at 08:25:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Birds' Head Haggadah
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Judaism
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 07:43:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Altaysky Nature Reserve. View of the Chulyshman River Valley
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:30, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2020 at 08:12:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Manpupuner rock formation
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2020 at 15:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 16:35:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunflowers
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2020 at 03:27:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial View of Flamengo
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2020 at 23:58:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flooded building and tree trunk in the muddy water of the Mekong in Si Phan Don, Laos, September 2019
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Floods

File:Tatry - panorama z Polskiego Spiszu.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2020 at 07:46:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tatra National Park, Poland
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Poland
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2020 at 13:31:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ruskeala Falls
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2020 at 15:15:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Answer: the mushroom is on the west side of the birch. The sun was shining through the leaves of the trees on the east side. I think that this created the stains. I can remove some stains. But not all of them.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Fomitopsidaceae
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2020 at 11:14:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Karst peaks and green paddy fields under a stormy sky, South view from Mount Nam Xay, Vang Vieng, Laos
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Log/July_2020&oldid=576996528"