Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Park Slunj 2010.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Park Slunj 2010.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 17:54:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by MarioCRO - uploaded by MarioCRO - nominated by MarioCRO -- MarioCRO (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Support -- MarioCRO (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Quickly glancing at it, there's a lot of noticeable overexposure, primarily looking at the sky and the sidewalk. The sides should also probably be sliced off and made straight. Not as major and more of a personal opinion, but I'm also not a huge fan of the large shadow caused by the tree in the foreground; it's kind of distracting and doesn't contrast well with the brighter parts of the image. Nice image, but not FP-worthy in my opinion, sorry. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 21:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)- Oppose too overexposed --Mr. Mario (talk) 03:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice but technical issues, mainly heavy chromatic aberration on both sides (large violet fringes). Sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 09:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment I tried to fix some issues raised above in File:Park_Slunj_2010_changed.jpg. Feel free to do whatever you want to do with. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)- Oppose yes it is a panorama but it's still a panorama made of individual touristy p&s snapshots.--Avala (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the composition is not too bad, but the pic is unsharp and has hard CA. The light was also very bad. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
