Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-02-13-lac-2.jpg

File:2011-02-13-lac-2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2011 at 12:15:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2011-02-13-lac-2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-02-13-lac-2.jpg

•  Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very well captures the serenity and placidness of the place. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Murdockcrc (talk) 22:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support but I think that this image needs a more descriptive file name. Ggia (talk) 09:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ouch! Is this really the best that commons has to offer? Do you want this as an example of our prowess on the main page? Composition is trivial and DOF is low. W.S. 09:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
  • If you are not satisfied of my image, so, make a better picture. --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
    • Baah. I've got already a tough enough job trying to ensure no substandard images reach FP to get involved in picture taking, thank you. W.S. 14:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like this actually. It's a half-dead-looking winter scene but there's still beauty that can be captured. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor depth of field, not among the best landscape compositions we have to offer as a project. Steven Walling 21:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Muhammad (talk) 09:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition, no wow. --Karelj (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough, overexposed. Also, distortions and noise at the branches and trees to the far left.--Snaevar (talk) 01:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above.--Citron (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose - low educative value. --Спас Колев (talk) 09:02, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)