Commons:Deletion requests/Category:SOHO data
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
It was made by the SOHO
Keep This is just incomprehensible. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
As stated by the Template:PD-USGov-NASA : "All materials created by the SOHO probe are copyrighted and require permission for commercial non-educational use.[1]" Is this enough to forbid them or can we upload SOHO images ? --The RedBurn (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- (ec) I am fully aware of the copyright notice on the SOHO website. However, these images and videos come from http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov, where it is simply asked to Please give credit for this item to NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio (example), and their copyright page clearly stipulates: Some SVS images produced in collaboration with other labs have distinct copyrights. For those instances, the copyright notices are noted on the page with the image. I'm pretty sure we can keep these. –Tryphon☂ 20:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- The template also states that "The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency, and other non-American space agencies. These are not necessarily in the public domain.". This note was added by User:Pharos. The RedBurn (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- For those instances, the copyright notices are noted on the page with the image. –Tryphon☂ 21:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This are images based on data gathered by the SOHO satellite. The images were created bu US government employees at the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio. (And it is the images that should be nominated, not the category.) /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept. You're misinterpreting the origin of these images, per Peter Kuiper. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)