Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 25th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

잘못된 등록과 출처 기입으로 삭제를 요청드립니다. Mung choi (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deletion request for a deletion request?. --JuTa 11:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

zzz ffggfgfgf gfggfgf 70.82.91.37 04:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Tedious. Vandalism-DR. (NAC) Josve05a (talk) 06:28, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is ISIL? We should probably act per this and this. Mhhossein (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Christian Ferrer: for attention. --Mhhossein (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this discussion. It's at most a dubious file and needs to be deleted per COM:PRP. Mhhossein talk 06:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: now please stop nominating this file. --Jcb (talk) 14:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building looks too recent to be public domain. The architect shoud be dead for 70 years, since there is no FOP in France.

Coyau (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Rama (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cortes9882468 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+copyvios (speedy deleted). Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obviously advertising. --Achim (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Common is not Wikipedia. See COM:SCOPE. Wikicology (talk) 19:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious fake. --87.123.9.129 09:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep totally real --173.55.239.44 23:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean it is a real fake, then yes. What this image shows has neither been nor is the Google Earth logo. But feel free to try to present reputable sources which prove me wrong. --87.123.58.137 20:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bad plagiarism of the real logo. This rip-off is not even close to the original[1]. --87.123.58.137 20:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source to support US gov license - 'no source' tag was removed without fixing the problem Jcb (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. This was the very first hit outside Commons when searching for the ID in the title. LX (talk, contribs) 07:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: fixed by LX. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this are not sanam entertainment pvt ltd Aks843129 (talk) 02:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see File:Гоголевич ТТС.jpg DmitTrix (talk) 20:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image from the Russian book "Психотерапевтическая помощь людям сложного характера" by Гоголевич Т. Е. (see "Фото 3" here: http://www.medpsy.ru/climp/2014_1_3/article10.php) DmitTrix (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Juliameslener as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: I don't want my photos posted anymore


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? http://www.gettyimages.es/license/481281148 4lextintor (talk) 02:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be really useful. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be useful. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of authorship at site. Site header says "All rights reserved". No sign of listed Creative Commons license. czar 15:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the collection and provided sources.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 12:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Seems fixed Natuur12 (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one local source picture missing Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 09:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As per the discussion earlier, I have provided source for all the files similar to File:Collage Rome.jpg. The image which is missing is sourced from wikipedia for which link has been provided.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: issue resolved, all sources provided. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 2 images (File:Sungam-ukkadam bridge.jpg + File:PSG College of Technology Coimbatore.png, both recently tagged as copyvio) used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE jdx Re: 19:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT jdx Re: 19:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighte material. It is not clear how this is uploader's own work. Wikicology (talk) 19:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. See COM:SCOPE. Wikicology (talk) 19:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. The image was obtained from Streetjournal without permission from the original copyright holder. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 19:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS, such depictions of Minions are copyright infringements. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Basically an advert with no encyclopedic purpose CrowTalk 22:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope if not spam. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam. --INeverCry 00:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By request of uploader. Copyright owner told me that they had made it creative commons but, since it has not been approved, it is clear that is not the case. Pastures of Andalusia (talk) 00:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? http://www.elboyaldia.cl/noticia/sociedad/actriz-nacional-juanita-ringeling-deslumbro-en-la-red-con-esta-imagen 4lextintor (talk) 02:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no educational value, just a photo to make fun of people, and not even a good one at that. Kaldari (talk) 02:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EuroFeroe.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smthngnw (talk • contribs) 2016-08-17T12:27:48‎ (UTC)

I vote Delete. No advantage over the SVG version. — Andreyyshore (talk) 03:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sania jay

[edit]

out of project scope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Didym (talk • contribs) 2016-08-22T16:01:30‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work, please delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Clough (talk • contribs) 2016-08-19T10:15:08‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work, please delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Clough (talk • contribs) 2016-08-19T10:15:18‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work, please delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Clough (talk • contribs) 2016-08-19T10:15:22‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work, please delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Clough (talk • contribs) 2016-08-19T10:15:26‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure I see why this would be in scope. Jmabel ! talk 02:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France : File:Royan48.jpg already deleted Bloody-libu (talk) 04:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Widely above TOO, if in PD for some reasons, then a valid PD tag must be provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grozo20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Almost complex logo/insigna, if they are in PD for some reasons then valid PD tags must be provided

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Grozo20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

lacks of source for the background map to determine copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:Ryan Gosling - Cannes Film Festival - 02.jpg Kareyac (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Toy cars have been deleted recently. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 05:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taiwan Lantern Festival

[edit]

Lanterns and sculptures in Taiwan, where this is no freedom of panorama. See related cases Commons:Deletion requests/File:2008 taiwan lantern festival-1.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teemo.JPG. — ξxplicit 05:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

for File:2016台灣燈會副燈-夢幻奇緣.JPG File:2016台灣燈會副燈-祥猴獻桃.JPG File:2016台灣燈會副燈-舞動桃源.JPG File:2016台灣燈會副燈-鳥語花香.JPG ,{{Google}} !--111.250.10.73 15:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, image by Pat Oliphant. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work of copyrighted toy and packaging. MKFI (talk) 06:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.spicyelement.com/products/double-cooked-meat-sauce. MKFI (talk) 06:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B elena73 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations taken from different sources: http://vleontiev.ru/pressa/stati/302-lora-kvint, http://drobysh.com/nataliya-vlasova/valentin-gaft-i-nataliya-vlasova-v-spektakle-otdushina-prodolzhenie/, http://vlasova.ru/gallery/nataliya-vlasova-muzyikalnaya-drama-ya-edmon-dantes-2012/. User has been previously blocked for copyright violations.

MKFI (talk) 06:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted packaging. MKFI (talk) 06:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bartalomeo3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bartalomeo3 and 2 photos = per EXIF copyrighted works by "ALEX ZAKLETSKY", needing COM:OTRS-permission and File:Сергій Проскурня Майдан 2103.jpg (Facebook size, no exif), already published (embedded) for an event poster via https://www.facebook.com/freudhouse.ua/photos/pcb.814961845192276/814961555192305/?type=3&theater (2014). Uploaded in 03.2016.

Gunnex (talk) 06:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xaf1/t51.2885-15/s320x320/e35/11910000_1638454593101413_1649549195_n.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 04:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio via https://pslpdunesa.wordpress.com/ (gallery) https://pslpdunesa.wordpress.com/about/sejarah-singkat/img_7186/ (2015) = https://pslpdunesa.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/img_7186.jpg (exif available)

Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Batch error, tagged with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 08:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Jcb. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Adysetia1

Gunnex (talk) 08:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nommination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful own work. High-res but poor quality, possibly upscaled or scanned images. No EXIF.

MKFI (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 藤原弘武 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, probadly grabbed somewhere from social media. Uploaded on 08.03.2016 for ja:森崎アリス (a local Youtube phenomenon). Considering also File:森崎アリス フォトモデル.jpg versus (example) http://twicsy.com/i/PzZi2i (Twitter, 2015)

Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominating the file for deletion for several reasons:

  • EXIF data shows that the author is 'Brian Tannert'. Permission is needed to verify the uploader is the person himself.
  • Website screenshot. Unlikely to be own work. Possible copyright violation.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational value Berthold Werner (talk) 07:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image quality is so bad that it cannot be useful to anyone. The moth is probably not of the proposed species and cannot be identified. The database already contains tens of good pictures of the proposed species anyway. LamBoet (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SAMIULSR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, personal images

~ Nahid Talk 08:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahiduzzaman Shuvo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

group photograph; Out of scope

~ Nahid Talk 08:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahiduzzaman Shuvo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

photomontages : lacks of source to determine copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Shahiduzzaman Shuvo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded a new SVG version and design of this flag. This design is obsolete. Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://nazimdabbagh.com/new/index.php/akhbar/item/337-yaddasht-shargh2 MKFI (talk) 08:24, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://kurdipedia.org/imageviewer.aspx?id=1902&pid=200907241537221902&lng=1 MKFI (talk) 08:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work. Published previously: http://www.symptomscare.com/do-you-know-what-side-is-your-appendix-on/sma.html MKFI (talk) 08:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@27.255.17.28: please state your arguments. Do not just modify the comments from other people. The link in the deletion reason was originally http://www.medicineboxfc.com/sma.html; IP changed it to a new (which I have left above). The new link does not contain the image, but I don't know what the change was supposed to mean. MKFI (talk) 11:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by Brancusi (d. 1957), located in Romania (see en:Sculptural Ensemble of Constantin Brâncuși at Târgu Jiu) where there is no FOP.

BrightRaven (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images that represent a copyrighted sculpture in a non-FOP country.

Andrei S. Talk 08:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The gate was completed in 1938 by Constantin Brâncuși (1876–1957). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2028.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a part of a copyrighted sculptural group, located in a country with no C:FOP. —Andrei S. Talk 08:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material Klow (talk) 09:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution among copyright violations. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope KDS4444 (talk) 09:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. OTRS-permission from architect (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not very useful as an illustration; The description is a spam. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed, because the image surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 09:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and subject appear to be the same person, and then again the author in the file description and the author as given in the EXIF metadata do not match. Either way, this one looks like it should be deleted per the Precautionary Principle, or else the original author (whoever that is) should submit a permission statement via OTRS releasing the license to this image. KDS4444 (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, source and author are given as same, etc. KDS4444 (talk) 10:01, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload. En.wiki states: photographers are Vicki, Paco and Noah. OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Article project about depicted person was rejected 4 times, probably she is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another watermarked travel poster. All uploads by this uploader should probably be deleted and the account blocked. KDS4444 (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User : Yellfuls : OH, what!?!? It's my photography, what's wrong?

Please see your talk page. KDS4444 (talk) 12:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted travel poster KDS4444 (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User : Yellfuls : OH, what!?!? It's my photography, what's wrong?

Please see your talk page. KDS4444 (talk) 12:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted travel poster KDS4444 (talk) 10:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User : Yellfuls : OH, what!?!? It's my photography, what's wrong?

Looks like you've got a standardized response to this deletion request. Pls see your talk page. KDS4444 (talk) 12:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted travel poster KDS4444 (talk) 10:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User : Yellfuls : OH, what!?!? It's my photography, what's wrong?

User : Yellfuls: Did you take the photograph, is the image in the public domain, or do you somehow own the copyright to the image? Please explain further. Also, if you do own the copyright or are the original photographer, can you please remove the watermark from the image and re-upload it? The watermark serves no purpose, and the image cannot be used for promotional purposes. KDS4444 (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
One more time, pls see your talk page. KDS4444 (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship data, no publishing data, possible copyright violation. PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope advertising material. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mung choi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various scale duplicates of File:Line logo 1024x1024.png, unneeded as the size can be chosen at the use. Commons:Why we need high resolution media.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

잘못된 등록과 출처 기입으로 삭제를 요청드립니다. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mung choi (talk • contribs) 2016-08-25T10:45:08‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilourab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 10:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by La crisalida (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by La crisalida (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text docs, out of scope. And 2 photos with FB and transmission code in EXIF data, not own work.

P 1 9 9   15:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless spam Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the copyright owner has released it free of copyright David Biddulph (talk) 10:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kongha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 10:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NFC website says "Copyrights © National Film Corporation Of Sri Lanka". No evidence that copyright has been waived. - David Biddulph (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)̈[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 10:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture has no purpose of usage. It may be available on Internet and copyright.  A l p h a m a  Talk 10:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture has no purpose of usage. It may be copyright.  A l p h a m a  Talk 10:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal meme with watermark, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gazr ayoubb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source is inaccurate, uploader seems to take Wikia's license, though it was created by the company and nog some Wikia user. Question is: is this logo complex enough to be protected by copyright Vera (talk) 11:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in India for 3-dimensional, but not for 2-dimensional art. OTRS-permission from author of drawings is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violates WP:USAGE Triplecaña (talk) 11:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violates WP:USAGE Triplecaña (talk) 11:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violates WP:USAGE Triplecaña (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violates WP:USAGE Triplecaña (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violates WP:USAGE Triplecaña (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violates WP:USAGE Triplecaña (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/bad quality, exists this better version not blurred. Unused. Teoamez (talk) 11:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aniceto José Jolela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Khilletzbal (talk) 19:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user User:Nemnastia uploads the same copyrighted photo again and again... Should we block the user? -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 04:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. — Nickel nitride (talk) 16:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. Uploader appears to have taken a snapshot of another photographer's own work. Wikicology (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The chemical structure of hafnium dioxide does not involve discrete HfO2 units. It is an extended solid that will look like this: File:Kristallstruktur_Zirconium(IV)-oxid.png ChemNerd (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File with no Exif data. Uploader have a history of copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 19:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The chemical structure of sodium oxide does not involve discrete Na2O units with covalent bonds. It is an extended ionic solid like this: File:Sodium-oxide-unit-cell-3D-balls-B.png. ChemNerd (talk) 19:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not clear how this is uploader's own work. This image appers to have been taken in the 1960s. uploader has an history of copyvio as well. Wikicology (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Kirill Moskvitin is needed.
Нужно получить OTRS-разрешение от автора Кирилла Москвитина. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work, no permission for original photo. According to the text and same file on de:Datei:Alexander Maria Scheirich.jpg: "selbst abfotographiertes Bild aus der privaten Photosammlung von Alexander Maria Scheirich aus dem Jahr 1988, Aufnahme mit BlackBerry 9700" Wdwd (talk) 19:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 19:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of championship belt. See User:Elcobbola/Awards#Championship_belts for full rationale and previous DRs (e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:WWE championship belts) Эlcobbola talk 20:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kishoresreenidhi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Kishoresreenidhi (serial copyright violator: photoshopper, file cropper, Panoramio etc.grabber, details at user talk). All files uploaded 04.2014.

Typical, living examples:

or

Nominating also some collages by this user where parts are affected by copyvios or by this nomination.

2 files by this user = false claim of authorship/license/etc....

2 files, like File:Stadium Center Guntur.png, mysteriously watermarked with photographer's credit "lyengar's photography" (may be also a fake/post-edit).

Gunnex (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright. fair use -and original poster- file: w:tr:Dosya:Friendship Games poster.jpg Lemon tart (talk) 22:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be useful; Could be a photo of copyrighted material (COM:PCP). Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution among copyright violations. I suspect here also copyvio. Taivo (talk) 07:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is screenshot of software with unknown copyright status. Evidence for free license is needed. BatchPurifier is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 10:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mention on the source website ("Использование материалов, размещенных на сайте, допускается только с согласия автора с обязательной ссылкой на источник."/"The use of materials posted on this site is permitted only with the consent of the author and link to the source.") does not seem to be a free licence (no permission to use for any purpose and to modify). BrightRaven (talk) 12:24, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1942 German aerial photograph. Without additionnal information about the source and the author it is impossible to check if the image is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Without additionnal information about the source and the author it is impossible to check if the image is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 12:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from the internet. Without additionnal information about the source and the author it is impossible to check if the image is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 12:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: 1940 map. Without additionnal information about the source and the author it is impossible to check if the image is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 12:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Siege of Leningrad, 1941-09-21.svg BrightRaven (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image de mauvaise qualité Fachimiar (talk) 12:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

+ 1 --B-noa (talk) 06:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible DW, no information about shown painting Krd 13:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KristianIvanco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freyhill (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs and anime/manga. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UrbanGroup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:World War II memorials in Republika Srpska Smooth_O (talk) 14:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ophaitoi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://viettan.org/IMG/jpg/image20.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement; no consent present. please contact [email protected] for further details Graefensteiner (talk) 14:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild verletzt keinerlei Urheberrecht. Das Bild wurde von mir auf dem Deutschen Comedypreis selbst angefertigt. Da ich nun von dem Vorwurf Kenntnis erlangt habe, werde ich juristisch gegen Gräfensteiner Management vorgehen, da deren Vorwurf a) nicht haltbar und b) für mich geschäftsschädigend ist. --Michael-schilling (talk) 09:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Eine Urheberrechtsverletzung kann ich hier nicht erkennen, da der Fotograf bekannt ist und das Foto selber gemacht hat. Sonstige Löschgründe kann ich ebenfalls nicht erkennen, da das Foto auf einer Veranstaltung mit Akkreditierung gemacht wurde. Raymond 12:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a previously published photo: https://topsport.bg/tennis/dimitar-kuzmanov-ne-sam-igral-s-zhoao-sousa-no-imam-golemi-shansove-za-pobeda.html Ytoyoda (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran means that this 1973 building is still under copyright czar 15:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio per COM:DW. At least one of them also lacks a licence from the photographer.

Stefan4 (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the photographer of:

But, if I'm transgressing any license, please delete them. --Mingo edil (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may be the photographer, but you didn't make the belts. See COM:CB#Awards (inc. belts, medals, and trophies). --Stefan4 (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That specific section was created just a few days ago. Where was the consensus to add that section to the policy? Feedback (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't notice that the section only was added a few days ago. I saw it referenced somewhere else today. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Would COM:UA pertain? Do these have a function, or are they purely decorative? Rybec (talk) 03:32, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
the plain belts yes, but the decorative panels on them no. LGA talkedits 04:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's like saying a T-Shirt is utilitarian, but the images on it are not. Feedback (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But if I took a plain white t-shirt and made a one off artistic drawing on it I would still own the copyright to it even though I used a t-shirt as a a canvas. LGA talkedits 07:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe utilitarian in the United Kingdom, but hardly utilitarian in the United States. A US court found that a w:Stormtrooper (Star Wars) helmet isn't utilitarian whereas a UK court found that the same helmet is utilitarian. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why does US law take precedent over UK law on Commons? Feedback (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Because the servers are based in the US. LGA talkedits 07:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I added the section mentioned above. We did discuss it at commons/pump/copyright. I will remove it until we seek a broader consensus to include and/or word it better.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer all to the English Wikipedia under Fair Use. Per , there is obviously a precedent. We'll decide if they meet the Fair Use rationale over there. All other Wikipedias which desire the images should also reupload them. Feedback (talk) 02:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 04:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DW images of copyright belts.

LGA talkedits 08:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and previous discussions. --Krd 08:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of belts - see above deletions and/or User:Elcobbola/Awards#Championship_belts for full rationale.

Эlcobbola talk 16:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of belts - see above deletions and/or User:Elcobbola/Awards#Championship_belts for full rationale.

Эlcobbola talk 21:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files that are similar to those previously listed on this page and similarly are copyvio per COM:DW. Wanchan2020 (talk) 11:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent building - no FOP in France Litlok (talk) 16:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 16:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for free license. OTRS-permission from author WWE is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality picture, the butterfly is completely overexposed and thus not identifiable. LamBoet (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Logo" for a nonexistent radio show, uploaded to illustrate an article about a radio station which exists only inside the uploader's imagination. Article has been deleted at en as a hoax; no other potential reuse exists since neither the station nor the show really exists. Bearcat (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: missing informations about the copyright status: the image is probably a registered trademark and there's no confirmation that the uploader is the author too --Vale93b (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: invalid DR, use the 'nominate for deletion' link from the menu - also 'trademark' issues are not a deletion reason. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

-file in copyviol, licenza incompatibile con un marchio registrato. Danyele (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

-file in copyviol, licenza incompatibile con un marchio registrato. Danyele (talk) 17:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available as File:Roundel of the Bangladesh Army Aviation.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sock of Brook Sven. Same characteristics as copyvios here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Brook Sven Эlcobbola talk 17:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in wrong place for company infobox Keithmcguinness (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF and very small resolution Cap1000 (talk) 17:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF and very small resolution Cap1000 (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is just a photo of myself, I want to delete it please. Rantemario (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shishirpandey.28nov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duck copyios - professional quality images of notable person; no camera EXIF and appeared elsewhere prior to upload to Commons (e.g. File:HEPhoto04.jpg was here)

Эlcobbola talk 18:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacking adequate source data; also too low resolution to be educationally useful MPF (talk) 20:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, no FoP in Ukraine アンタナナ 21:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the used base map Jcb (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. 128.68.59.215 21:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. 128.68.59.215 22:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by w:de:Moses Solomonowitsch Nappelbaum [2] [3]. The photographer died in 1958 so it's not a PD-Old. 128.68.59.215 22:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 128.68.59.215 22:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image flickrlink goes to File:View of Florida's Historic Capitol with the modern Florida State Capitol in the background- Tallahassee, Florida (6992638776).jpg. Erroneous upload? Leoboudv (talk) 01:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above, rename in progress. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the high definition image already existing. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bernardo_Bellotto,_il_Canaletto_-_Dresden_vom_rechten_Elbufer_mit_der_Augustusbrücke_(National_Gallery_of_Ireland).jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uvo (talk • contribs) 2016-08-23T20:44:03‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - use duplicate!. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

잘못된 등록과 출처 기입으로 삭제 요청드립니다. Mung choi (talk) 10:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by INeverCry. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

잘못된 등록과 출처 기입으로 삭제 요청드립니다. Mung choi (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by INeverCry. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

잘못된 등록과 출처 기입으로 삭제 요청드립니다. Mung choi (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by INeverCry. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

잘못된 등록과 출처 기입으로 삭제 요청드립니다. Mung choi (talk) 10:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by INeverCry. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not good. Delete as this in the time loaded would not have been downloaded by anyone. I found other images here that are of better quality. T Heart 16:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not too bad. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as missing EXIF data and 'studio-like' format, Roland zh (talk) 01:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader Kalyan84 (talk · contribs) is serial copyright violator and I blocked him/her for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has been blocked as copyright violator. This is his/her last remaining upload. Small photo without metadata. I suspect here also copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the high definition image already existing. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canaletto_-_Dresden_seen_from_the_Right_Bank_of_the_Elbe,_beneath_the_Augusts_Bridge_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uvo (talk • contribs) 2016-08-23T20:16:39‎ (UTC)

 Keep colors and crop of two file look very different. --Jarekt (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jarekt. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the high definition image already existing. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canaletto_-_Dresden_seen_from_the_Right_Bank_of_the_Elbe,_beneath_the_Augusts_Bridge_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uvo (talk • contribs) 2016-08-23T20:31:43‎ (UTC)


Keep: Colour and quality are different. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the high definition image already existing. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canaletto_-_Dresden_seen_from_the_Right_Bank_of_the_Elbe,_beneath_the_Augusts_Bridge_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uvo (talk • contribs) 2016-08-23T20:14:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination, yes for this. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flickr user who uploaded this image is not the true author. Neil Boenzi and the New York Times own this photo. It was famously used for the cover of Vampire Weekend's first album. Much as I would like to use this image, it's not free and it's misattributed. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 04:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep license reviewed by admin as valid --173.55.239.44 16:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about the Flickr page. The admin who reviewed the license as described on the Flickr page was correct; despite the "All Rights Reserved" notice, the uploader claims in the comments that he has released the image into the public domain. As far as reviewing just the material on the Flickr page, the admin was correct in their review.
The problem is that this image is not the uploader's work. It was published in the New York Times by a different photographer, Neil Boenzi, and is in fact copyrighted. It can be found on New York Times website with a copyright notice, and as further evidence it was licensed and credited to Boenzi for use by Vampire Weekend for the cover of their album Modern Vampires of the City. —Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 17:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Has the uploader got permission beforehand? I am saying this because this image has unclear copyright status and authorization by the copyright holder is possibly needed for this image to get kept and avoid infringement. --173.55.239.44 04:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image has very clear copyright status. It is owned by the New York Times and was created by someone who is not that Twitter user. Multiple sources can be used to confirm that Neil Bonzi is the photographer and that it was created for and originally published in the New York Times.
The previous license review likely only used the Flickr page as a source. On Flickr the photo is labeled "All Rights Reserved," but the Flickr user who uploaded it there (and falsely claimed it as his own work) said in the photo's Flickr comments that he released the photo into the public domain. That is likely what the license review was requested for, to use the comment as a public domain license to overcome the generic labeling that claimed "All Rights Reserved". The problem is, again, that the Flickr user had no right to claim or release copyright because he is simply not the photo's author. To be actually released into the public domain or licensed any other way, the uploader would have to ask the real author and/or The New York Times.
Look again at the link above, to the NY Times store, crediting Boenzi for the image; look here for a relatively recent reuse of the image in the NY Times, credited again to Boenzi; read here that Vampire Weekend licensed and credited the image for the cover of their album Modern Vampires of the City in the liner notes: "The shot was taken by New York Times photographer Neal Boenzi looking south from the Empire State Building in November 1966."
There are more than enough sources contradicting the Flickr user's page to demonstrate that he is lying, did not have any right to license the image, and that the work is copyrighted (with no evidence and little likelihood that the NY Times released one of their images into the public domain—an image that they still sell prints of). --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 22:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the high definition image already existing. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bernardo_Bellotto,_il_Canaletto_-_Dresden_vom_rechten_Elbufer_unterhalb_der_Augustusbrücke_(National_Gallery_of_Ireland).jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uvo (talk • contribs) 2016-08-23T20:42:24‎ (UTC)


Kept: not duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For me, it's hard to understand how this can be below TOO Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I've always wondered the same, especially since en:File:National Defence Force Syria Logo.jpg is treated as non-free content on Wikipedia and this is basically the same imagery without the English text. Not sure how the Commons version being in svg justifies a free license for what appears to be a copyrighted logo. Anyway, if this is unacceptable for Commons, then File:Flag of the National Defense Force.svg probably needs to be discussed as well since it appears identical except for flag color. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I posted this on village pump, but I feel I should post there here too. I think a user has been changing a lot of these images from a cc license to a "below TOO" license, which I agree doesn't work with things like the linked NDF flags. These were all uploaded several years back, but I think the reasoning for uploading the NDF logo as fair use was because I had merely found it (as opposed to creating an svg) and therefore didn't feel comfortable uploading it under a cc license. I wouldn't lump the NDF in with the various non-state groups in Syria however - the NDF is an irregular government run force; perhaps more akin to a Syrian equivalent of the US National Guard than a private army. If it's felt that a cc license can't cover the NDF flags, and that there's no allowance for it due to its nature as a government creation, then what we could perhaps do is replace the wikicommons flags with a small, low-res image image (like what's been done here for Hezbollah). I suggest this because I'd venture the bulk of NDF flag usage is in small, infobox form. A fair-use version could then in turn be uploaded to Wikipedia. In these circumstances all other Syrian government emblems etc (e.g. the various Coat of arms) would have to be removed too and something similar done. MrPenguin20 (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikiano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If the files are in public domain for some reasons, then a valid tag must be provided

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Copied from the DR talk page:
    "Ne estas kaŭzo por forigi ilin ĉar la fontoj, de kie mi prenis ilin, estas ĝuste menciitaj. Mi asertis dekomence, ke ili ne estas mia propra verko. Dankon! Vikiano (talk) 05:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)"
    Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Un des personnages de la photo est mort en 1873. La photo vu son âge est manifestement dans le domaine public. Évitons les excès de zêle. --Pino~eowiki (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - One of the depicted persons in the first picture apparently died 1873, and it may have been taken many years before that. It's quite a safe bet that the photographer didn't live on for more than 73 years after taking it, so the picture is quite clearly {{PD-Old-70}}. --Latebird (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Auta de Souza herself died in 1901, so the second photograph has most likely been taken in the 1890ties. This being before 1923, it's clearly PD in the USA. To be PD in Brazil, the Photographer would need to have died before 1946 ({{PD-Old-70}}). While there is quite a strong chance for this to be the case, it would be better to have evidence in this case. Is there any chance to figure out who the photographer is? In either case, the descriptions (author info etc.) need to be fixed. --Latebird (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: but information still needs to be fixed. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

잘못된 등록과 출처 기입으로 삭제 요청드립니다. Mung choi (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. http://line.me/en/logo
  2. en:File:Line (application) logo.svg move to commons , it is a good idead ! --111.250.25.117 02:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Mung choi: Why did you request for deletion?
@111.250.25.117: I'm agree with you. I do not understand why Mung choi requests for deletion.
--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@111.250.25.117: The SVG should have been uploaded here, not the pixelated 1024x1024 version. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See File talk:Line logo 1024x1024.png --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 isn't CC-BY-SA 2.0. Copyright violation. C messier (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:C messier Thank you for your attention. This image was uploaded with licence CC-BY-SA 2.0 in mind, as the person who marked it with that licence is perceived of as a serious editor on the site geograph.org.uk .
As I write in the image description, I found another image that only seem to be identical to the main object of the image composition.
I have requested a licence for the other image from National Portrait Gallery, and it is only this licence that is CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.
It is only this way that I sense a delicate interpretation of the licence by the person that marked his photograph with CC-BY-SA 2.0.
I would like to use this opportunity to learn more about this case and cases like this one. So if you can describe more in detail your reasoning for "copyright violation" it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you--Mysteriumen (talk) 16:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mysteriumen, is there any evidence that the original photo (the photo of Rosalind Franklin) is in public domain? If it is really the photo from the National Portrait Gallery, it means it was produced in 1946 (exactly 70 years before present) and also mentions the creators, so we much learn when they died (if they aren't still alive). --C messier (talk) 17:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please take care to copyright details, as there is no claim that this image is in public domain. --Mysteriumen (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mysteriumen, I can understand that maybe you were confused with what I said, but this is a derivative work of a photo on this panel. Which are the evidence that the original photo (of which we see in this file a COM:DW) is available with cc-by-sa 2.0? --C messier (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The evidence for the cc-by-sa 2.0 licence rest entirely on the Moderator Robin Stott on Geograph http://www.geograph.org.uk/profile/34609?expand=1 that state he is not merely a volunteer (http://www.geograph.org.uk/article/Get-Involved) but also a directors and trustee. I don't know much about this that project, but they have a general statement reading All photographic submissions are licensed by the original submitter under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike licence. And they seem to stand by this.--Mysteriumen (talk) 20:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative works are a minefield. --C messier (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai refais ce schéma en version SVG Sulli- (talk) 14:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the original with the OTRS ticket should remain here for copyright prove. -- Mdd (talk) 14:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by KDS4444 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.billboardradiochina.com/story/shao-nv-biao-ben-Girls-Sample-dan-qu-zh_cn and https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCswUqHtWTUzlqWO4qc1hBsg I am especially concerned/ confused, as the uploader has managed to include camera EXIF data with this upload. If this is indeed a copyright violation, then the uploader's other files should also probably be deleted and the account blocked. If the uploader actually is the copyright holder, he/ she needs to contact OTRS and get this user account authenticated before any more uploads take place. Wdwd (talk) 14:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: please send permission to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:NETCOPYVIO: No compatible license found on http://www.thefirearmblog.com/ but "© 2016 TheFirearmBlog.com".
Steve from the firearmblog is sometimes giving permission see here. Sanandros (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission for this file. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matthieu Bastien (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE. These uploads would be great on Facebook or Deviant Art but they're out of the Scope of Commons which is not for promotion. After the prior nomination I was made aware that there were more of these than I had nominated the last time.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and restore the previously deleted files. I fail to see why and how a drawing would be less in the scope than an other type of representation, for me File:Haka Polynésie.jpg and File:USMC-04235.jpg are equally in the scope. For files like File:La Recouvrance accostant au port de l'Abers Wrach.jpg there is no other files representing this general view of the harbour ; if deleted, it would be a shame and a loss for « providing knowledge » (per SCOPE wording). COM:SCOPE doesn't say anything about drawings and as far as I know, there is no Commons policy against drawing (which furthermore are quite common on Commons). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no lo he subido bien. Quisiera hacerlo bien. ya que no encuentro la manera correcta para rectificar Msaludt (talk) 18:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 19:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I drew this map. How can I prevent the deletion? --조승희2007416 (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should I mention the original source of the blank background map? --조승희2007416 (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I find out that the original source of this map is File:BlankMap-World6.svg and that map is public domain. --조승희2007416 (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: thanks for fixing the source information. --Jcb (talk) 21:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Villages News (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyrighted images. see here.

Wikicology (talk) 19:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - we have uploaded these files from our website and they are owned by our website. We are not sure how else to go about authorizing their use?

@Villages News: See Commons:OTRS on how to verify this. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lusilva1

[edit]

All images from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lusilva1 because they come from an anonymous Flickr account, have mostly been published before, and it's highly implausible that the owner of the account has the copyright (there is even a poster from the series "The Family" among the posts) --84.62.82.249 21:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source to support US gov license - 'no source' tag was removed without fixing the problem Jcb (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filename bears the USAF photo ID so if you don't know simply don't edit. --Denniss (talk) 06:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fix the source field or leave it alone please. Jcb (talk) 07:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: problem has been fixed in the meantime. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

under reza einolahi

[edit]

Out of project scope. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:آندر رضا عین اللهی.jpg too. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]