Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/04/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_001.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
11.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
mistake, was supposed to be a category Ronn (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Please do not use {{Delete}} for routine housekeeping. {{Speedy}} takes less human and computer resources. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
copyvio
This image composed with 5 photos but we can't see any information about these files! MehdiTalk 05:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
ok thanks.but i cant understand!u want to say that files dont have name or dont have source? Nejebad (talk) 07:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Was amended.
Please remove tags ...Nejebad (talk) 09:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 20:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
منبع نا مشخص Diyarenoon (talk) 22:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine KTo288 (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Statue dates from 1793, miracle if he hasn't been dead for at least 70 years.--KTo288 (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
I've kept this image and I've removed deletion tag. Sculpture created in 1793 --Butko (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please
precise reasons.Tomasz Leśniowski (talk) 18:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: 18 century building Anatoliy (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine
Converted by me to DR. Statue looks rather old. Who is the sculptor and when did he die? Túrelio (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Statue dates from 1793-see en:Market Square (Lviv).--KTo288 (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please
precise reasons.Tomasz Leśniowski (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: 18th century building Anatoliy (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine KTo288 (talk) 12:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: no buildings on the photo Anatoliy (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine KTo288 (talk) 12:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: There are no architectore on the photo. It is park. Anatoliy (talk) 19:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine
Converted by me to DR. I doubt that such a silhuette is copyrightable. Anyway, who is the original sculptor and when did he die? -- Túrelio (talk) 12:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Keep This is detail of Bernardine church and monastery. This monastery built in 1600-1736. --Butko (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: 18th century building Anatoliy (talk) 20:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've deleted this file as duplicate --Butko (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, ok. But I think it wasn't an actual duplicate, because the view angle was a bit different. And do you have a special ability to delete the files? --Kulmalukko (talk) 19:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted and redirected by Butko Anatoliy (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've deleted this file as duplicate --Butko (talk) 19:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted and redirected by Butko Anatoliy (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Reduntant image, it's similar to this one. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I've deleted this file as duplicate --Butko (talk) 19:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted and redirected by Butko Anatoliy (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 19:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 19:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 19:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Memorial built in 1982. Anatoliy (talk) 19:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 01:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nomination and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 01:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Art work 2011 year. Anatoliy (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Delete as per nomination and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nomination and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 01:19, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nomination and as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 00:08, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine
Converted by me to DR. Who is the sculptor and when did he/she die? -- Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Nikifor Krynicki did in 1968, memorial was built in 2006. --RasamJacek (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- O.k., thanks. Then the image seems indeed to violate the copyirght of the sculptor, per Commons:FOP#Ukraine. --Túrelio (talk) 14:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:FOP#Ukraine Sreejith K (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
It has faces of people who have not agreed for the photo to go on the internet. Gurdhad (talk) 11:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot of a television programme. Jespinos (talk) 23:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright-protected screenshot MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a screenshot taken of a video taken of the explosion, the uploader could not be the original owner of the video. The359 (talk) 23:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy delete. Screenshot MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
No proof that this image was released under CC-BY-SA that I can see... Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Logo. Not for commons SamuelFreli (talk) 03:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Logo. Not for commons SamuelFreli (talk) 03:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Logo. Not for commons SamuelFreli (talk) 03:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope COM:SCOPE SamuelFreli (talk) 03:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope COM:SCOPE, image have been used on blogspot [1] previously SamuelFreli (talk) 03:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The source given in file summary says that their works are copyrighted. Else too, it might be a copyright of the manufacturing company. We can certainly afford to get better and more reliably free alternatives. Rahul Bott (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Rahul Bott (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
unused logo, no educational value Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Appears to be from a seemingly non-notable (and insanely expensive.. $799) "Learn To Speak English" web site. Unused isn't a valid criteria for deletion, but not being realistically useful for educational purposes is... and for that reason I'd agree to delete. – JBarta (talk) 05:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Comment Unused wasn't meant to be a criteria, just information. :-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:14, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
A possible cpvio. In any case, simple text and therefore, out of scope. Rahul Bott (talk) 05:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Official press photo? As far as I see, it's not released under a free licence. --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 05:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Uploader has not identified photographer. The image has been scanned from a publication without photographer or publication being identified. The real photographer would have the original and would not have scan from a publication. Also, GNU refers to documents, not photo. Sardaka (talk) 07:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, photo's copyright notice is clearly invalid.--Grahamec (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation . HombreDHojalata.talk 08:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Español: Hola buenos días, :¿podrías decirme cuál es la razón por la que has incluído este mensaje en el archivo? Si ha habido un error en la manera en la que el fichero ha sido subido agradecería me lo hiciéses saber y me orientases de cómo corregirlo, pues la verdad todas los códigos que hay que meter relativos al "copyright" no acabo de entenderlos muy bien. Gracias por adelantado--1234fontan (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Español: Los derechos de autor de toda obra corresponden siempre al autor. Si, tal como has expresado en mi página de discusión, tú no lo eres, dificilmente puedes licenciarlas en Wikimedia Commons bajo CC-BY-SA o cualesquierea otra licencia. Y, por otra parte, no deberías haber especificado en la caja de datos que son "obra propia". Para que estas imágenes pasaran al dominio público deben pasar 70 años, según la legislación internacional, y 80 años, según la legislación española, desde el fallecimiento del autor, o desde su publicación en caso de autor desconocido. Tienes muchísima información sobre estes temas en diversas páginas de este proyecto. Por ejemplo en: Commons:Sobre las licencias.--. HombreDHojalata.talk 08:29, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation . HombreDHojalata.talk 08:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation . HombreDHojalata.talk 08:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation . HombreDHojalata.talk 08:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation . HombreDHojalata.talk 08:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
not in use, missing EXIF, small image showing a little girl, i.e. imho 'missing permission' p.e. by her parents, Roland 08:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Rapsar (talk) 10:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: no encyclopedic value High Contrast (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Promotional only content High Contrast (talk) 11:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Highly likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 11:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
An SVG file of this image was already uploaded. (see File:Tainanciry flag.svg) Akira123 (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
An SVG file of this image was already uploaded. (see File:Tainanciry flag.svg) Akira123 (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Anne Dwane is not notable enough imho. So: out of scope: unused file, private image. BrightRaven (talk) 11:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep It is listed at en:User:Russavia/Agenda for the image to be placed into en:Zinch. As the CEO of the company, whilst she may or may not be notable as an individual, the image could very well fall into scope of "Zinch". russavia (talk) 12:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Image is licensed on Flickr as CC-BY-NC, which is not permissible on Commons —Eustress talk 23:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- However, User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) reviewed the file as being available under CC-BY when the file was uploaded in 2013. As User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) is a bot, the user can not make a mistake in verifying the licence on Flickr. A file which has once been licensed under CC-BY remains licensed under CC-BY perpetually. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Chris Michel's photos were CC-BY at the time of upload. That's all that's needed. russavia (talk) 01:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
This is Chris Michel: I've changed the license back to CC-BY. Thanks
- Thanks Chris, you are truly a legend! russavia (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 13:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Likely a false license. Uploader claims it is his own work. Image is used here: http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/gubernatorial/adam-hollingsworth-gov-rick-scotts-new-right-hand-man/1244174 and here:http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2012-04-30/story/guest-columnist-boys-punishment-tv-brings-some-remote-control If this is his own work, then he is the subject and should be disclosing this Niteshift36 (talk) 14:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The uploader has used a misleading rationale: he is not the copyright holder of this image Richard BB (talk) 14:14, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
While the subject of this short bio, Jorge Goyeneche, may or may not be notable, there is no reason for us to host it as a PDF. It should be written as text in an appropriate WP. Out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
evident copyviol; photo of a printed material Bramfab (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The author is not specified, but the image was published using a GFDL-self licence. ALH (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
the extremely low resolution makes it likely to have been published before on another site. This users' talk page doesn't inspire confidence in its trustworthiness. Vera (talk) 17:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio
MehdiTalk 17:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
copyvio
Image with low resolation and without any EXIF Metadata MehdiTalk 18:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
clear copyright violation Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
copyvio
source of image is "najafabadnews.ir" but we have not any agreement from this website in OTRC system. MehdiTalk 18:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
copyvio
Image without any EXIf metadata and OTRS permission! MehdiTalk 18:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Korea (South) -mattbuck (Talk) 18:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Scope? Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This was just a hypothetical proposal. I have added a tag saying it is fictitious and removed it from Category:SVG flags of Turkmenistan and added it to Category:SVG flags - special or fictional and Category:Proposed flags. Please don't delete it. User:Raymond1922A
- Because it is a derivative of the current flag, it still belongs in the Turkmenistan category, but I'll withdraw my nomination. Fry1989 eh? 18:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of a probably temporarily shown artwork. Presumably copyrighted, no application of COM:FOP possible. A.Savin 21:08, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of Soviet sculpture (1960s or later), no COM:FOP in Russia, not scheduled for non-architectural artwork. A.Savin 21:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
local event, no useful description. no educational value Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
spam, not used, out of scope, etc. Aleator (talk) 23:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 00:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: available in higher res online. –moogsi (blah) 07:30, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
I want to reuse the file but with a different picture that isn't selfshot. Getitrightkaliah (talk) 02:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. –moogsi (blah) 07:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Per the same reason as File:Kugel-SotinskiBreg1.jpg was deleted. Eleassar (t/p) 06:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 07:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Work by the architect Ivan Vurnik (1884-1971).[2] Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 08:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Additionally, File:3.4.13 3 Radovljica 55 (8616666083).jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
An awarded work (1st prize) by Jurij Kobe.[3] Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 08:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Just because someone wins a public contest (javni razpis) this doesn't make it qualify as art. --141.70.5.108 21:33, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
It has won the first prize in a competition, which is not javni razpis, but natečaj.[4] There's a difference: natečaj translates as competition,[5] javni razpis translates as public tender.[6] It surely is a work of art if it has won an architectural competition. By the way, it would be appreciated if you log in when you comment.[7] --Eleassar (t/p) 06:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The painting was created in 1987, when the shrine was thoroughly renovated.[8] Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 08:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 16:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:37, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 16:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 16:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 16:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - this logo may be above COM:TOO INeverCry 17:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo –moogsi (blah) 07:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 17:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:47, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
We have this in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: small, low-quality raster image uploaded when alternatives are available. –moogsi (blah) 07:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution version of File:Grace Coolidge Official portrait.jpg. Kelly (talk) 21:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Image in use; all usage should be replaced before deletion. -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Unopposed Evrik (talk) 14:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: usage replaced with superior .jpg –moogsi (blah) 07:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Tony Tollet (1857-1953) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 90.44.66.209 21:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom –moogsi (blah) 08:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- NOTE: Per fr:Église Notre-Dame-du-Sacré-Cœur du Mas Rillier, the painting is undated, so the undeletion date should be 2049 (URAA) in case he painted it in the last year of his life. —holly {chat} 17:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Tony Tollet (1857-1953) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 90.44.66.209 21:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom –moogsi (blah) 08:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Tony Tollet (1857-1953) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 90.44.66.209 21:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom –moogsi (blah) 08:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Permission looks wrong Itu (talk) 23:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: incorrect PD rationale, original by Picasso –moogsi (blah) 08:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't want anymore share to this picture Piloterace (talk) 13:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept; photo of notable person with Wikipedia article, released under free license more than 3 years ago; no reason for deletion offered. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Definately microsoft copyright . This is not eligiable for copyright 188.104.122.1 20:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep "Microsoft" and "Copyright" do not always equal to "Non-free". The Microsoft part of this image does not pass through threshold of originality. It is mostly text (which is not copyright protected in U.S.) plus two simple symbols that are already in public domain. The background image, however, is a free image under Creative Commons license, Attribution Share-Alike, "Benh LIEU SONG". Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I definitely agree with Codename Lisa, the image has now a proper license. The background image is under a free license while the texts and the little icons don't pass the thresold of originality. --Lucas (msg) 05:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
not notability and copyright violation Reality006 (talk) 23:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 08:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
image used only in spam page deleted off enwiki (and also in page on ru.wiki, purely as a coincidental result of bad filenames) DS (talk) 14:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Unknown author, pictures from 1926 - no free licence.. D.W. (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional logo and pdf
INeverCry 16:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Delete Useless spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 16:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logos of non-notable company
INeverCry 17:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jas Devael (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:Juan Gabriel y Jas Devael.jpg
- File:Jas devael disco.jpg
- File:Jas devael con juan gabriel.jpg
- File:Jas Devael.jpg
INeverCry 17:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jenniepierce567 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images. One of them appears to be a screenshot from Google Street View.
Jespinos (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 23:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by R.Michael Suresh (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - no educational value
INeverCry 16:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SEVEN Company (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos of non-notable company
INeverCry 18:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - low quality - no educational value
INeverCry 16:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: –moogsi (blah) 07:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Rangams13
[edit]- File:Subhjitms13.jpg
- File:Subhjit13.jpg
- File:SUBHRAJIT.jpg
- File:SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.jpg
- File:SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.jpg
Self-promotion by a blocked sockpuppeteer on enwiki. See en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onems13subh/Archive. Jafeluv (talk) 06:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Original is [9]. See also: en:File:Nyan cat 250px frame.PNG kahusi (會話) 03:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's true that the Nyan-Cat inspired me to make this picture. But is it a problem if others work is giving me ideas to create somthing? I worked several hours to create this in paint.net.
- --Lbenedix (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know surely how its handled here on commons, but wouldn't the "threshold of originality" of the original file to low for copyright? (Only the same idea, and only some (countable) pixels are the same.) (Same like as logos?) (Sry, horrible English this evening..) --#Reaper (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC) (PS: Nice job Lbenedix. :) )
- Keep --Tobias1984 (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete --kahusi (會話) 10:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep --#Reaper (talk) 17:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a clear derivative work. Given this lawsuit in relation to unauthorised use, COM:PRP is applying here russavia (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep This photo is a general overview of the Museum to the Patriotic War in Kiev, in which the statue is located. The statue would be de minimis in this instance. russavia (talk) 19:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I should point out that the photo is clearly framed to include the statue. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Right, but it is also part of the museum. It's not like File:Giant monument of Mother Motherland (8162384212).jpg where it takes up 1/3 of the frame. russavia (talk) 01:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The scuplture is not main object of the photo. Anatoliy (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 16:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
schlechte Qualität JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
schlechte Qualität JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 18:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
schlechte Qualität JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 16:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:59, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 16:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:59, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - plain text INeverCry 16:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 21:59, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 16:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I created this file, it has been replaced by a different better diagram on the caulobacter page and now this file is not being used on wikipedia any longer Adenosine (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:54, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
störende Rechtecke im Bild, allgemein schlecht JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 18:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Die Qualität ist sehr schlecht JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:44, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
unlinked link Petrus Adamus (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:32, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine, was built in 1938. Arkitector I. Langbart did in 1965 Anatoliy (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine KTo288 (talk) 11:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:39, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted Chelsea F.C. logo Tân (talk) 16:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine
Converted by me to DR. When and by whem was the pavillon built? When did the architect die? Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC) Kept per UnDR -- it was built in 1835. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Questionable license. This sketch is used in a news article http://www.news-press.com/article/20090729/SS23/907290395/Influential-local-Capt-Manuel-Gonzalez?nclick_check=1 same uploader has uploaded another image used by a newspaper and claimed it as his own work. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your inquiry. I uploaded the photo and I own it. It is a photo of my great great grandfather, who foundeded the City of Fort Myers, Florida in 1866. The photo was passed down to me and other descendants of Manuel A. Gonzalez. My third cousin provided a copy of the photo to the newspaper that published it with an article. Please let me know if I can provide any further information. Number9060862
Deleted -FASTILY 22:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
The source of this file is listed as the Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority. Their website claims that content is copyrighted (webpage from which the current revision of the map...JPG image...is linked from..." 2030 Master Plan Concept Development Map").
The link is no longer valid. However, the current revision of this map (Revised 6/25/07) is almost identical in style (although the style and content of the overlaying proposed roads has been significantly altered). It seems very likely that this map is a derivative work (uploader states "modified by self") of an earlier revision of the map I have linked to and, therefore, a derivative of a copyrighted work. AHeneen (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
nNo valid licence, uploader ≠ author. Description says reproduction and use forbidden Traumrune (talk) 20:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
comagglo (Communauté d'agglomération Argenetuil-Bezons) is not the author, but Jean-Michel Thirion (see exif). Other uploads of user may be wrongly attributed. Traumrune (talk) 20:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:59, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 22:59, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence for the PD-USGov tag. Dominic (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 23:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 16:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted per nom (Note: also questionable copyright for base artwork) -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 16:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 18:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valeriy indzhov (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
INeverCry 16:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 19:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- To me this is not a sculpture as well as not a work of art. This is just a polished stone. Not sure to what extend the luck of panorama applies to this image... Oleg (talk) 14:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I do not see any sculptor's work here, it is just a stone — NickK (talk) 23:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Per above: not sculptural work. Anatoliy (talk) 23:49, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
The stone features a symbol and a depiction of two swords; these surpass the threshold of originality. Eleassar (t/p) 20:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- The symbol and a depiction of two swords were removed. Thank you. Regards, Oleg (talk) 21:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Well, the symbol on the stone is the coat of arms of Ukraine, well in the public domain per {{PD-UA}}. The bottom one (sword and bulawa) are coming from symbol of Ukrainian cossack regiments who erected this stone (I could not find the high-quality with all details, the simplified version of chevron is here), such insignia is in public domain as well per {{PD-UA}}. Thus both images are in public domain per {{PD-UA}} — NickK (talk) 23:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- There are some differences between the coat of arms in this image and the one that you've linked too. The same goes for the chevron. These may be deemed derivative works per COM:COA#Copyright on the representation. The copyright on the text is also unclear: a translation is needed. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- I do not think that the derivative work of an image that is not subject of copyright by the law may be copyrighted. The version on this stone is exactly identical to the coat of arms without border, this version is very widely used in Ukraine. The lower image is the symbol of cossacks who erected this stone, I seriously doubt that this exact representation has an author at all — NickK (talk) 18:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have removed portions of the text to eliminate potential issues with the copyright of the text as well. Is it OK now? (The remaining text means: “On this place on 22 of January 2005 Viktor Yushchenko was selected to be a Hetman of Ukraine. Glory to Ukraine!”) Regards, Oleg (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- In my opinion, yes. Therefore only the older versions need to be deleted. --Eleassar (t/p) 17:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- There are some differences between the coat of arms in this image and the one that you've linked too. The same goes for the chevron. These may be deemed derivative works per COM:COA#Copyright on the representation. The copyright on the text is also unclear: a translation is needed. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept the original version. The revised versions are useless -- we don't want or need revised versions of the real world -- we want photographs of the world as it really is. For the reasons given above, the engraving on the stone is PD. The text is simple facts and too short for a literary copyright. The symbols are copies of PD works. And, please note that the original DR closure was for the wrong reason -- this is both a sculpture and a graphic work and would have a copyright as both if it were not simply a copy of existing material. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. In this city all built after 1945. Anatoliy (talk) 19:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Nonsense. Stop trolling. Anyway the picture shows manly water, rocks, and the DniproHES. So these stupid regulations can't be applied in this case. --C.G. (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Center of picture this bridge. Delete. --RasamJacek (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- You do not know much about copy-right issues. Find yourself another playground. --C.G. (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Just nonsense. DniproHES was built in 1927-32. Zaporizhzhya did exist before the WWII, there is no reason to say that "In this city all built after 1945" — NickK (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not recent. Built in 1930s Anatoliy (talk) 23:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 00:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I don't know if person shown has notability, but pretty good photo of microphone with pop filter and headphone setup. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept. A potentially-useful image even if it turns out that there is little educational value in the identity of the person shown. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm unsure if this is copyright-free, as it's a straight photograph of something created by (presumably) the UN, rather than a work created by Deror avi... It may, therefore, be copyrighted to the person who made the map. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is there Freedom of Panorma in the UN building? What does the UN Law says about it? Deror avi (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that Freedom of Panorama is the issue here - I'm concerned that it's reproducing a (potentially) copyrighted work of art (in this case, the display). Works of the United Nations are generally copyrighted, cf. Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Public_domain#Works_of_the_United_Nations. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 19:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 01:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm unsure if this is copyright-free, as it's a straight photograph of something created by (presumably) the UN, rather than a work created by Deror avi... It may, therefore, be copyrighted to the person who made the map. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is there Freedom of Panorma in the UN building? What does the UN Law says about it? Deror avi (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'll reply at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trusteeship 1945 PA210127.JPG, as the two cases are essentially identical. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 01:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
From a technical view, the whole video might be produced by VOA {{PD-USGov-VOA}}, but it seems that they have included material from external sources which might be copyrightable by others. The video shows, among other things, one of the Boston Maraton explosions (11s) and aftermath scenes. See also "(...) However, voanews.com content may also contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only. This material is not in the public domain and may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the copyright owner." = Terms of use (Copyright Statement). That might be the case here. Gunnex (talk) 07:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I thought that including of the videos is similar thing as citation in work of VOA, because no non-VOA videos are longer than 15 seconds and it's only part of the whole work similar as in some articles on Wikipedia is cited copyrighted material, but the whole article is under CC BY-SA. Is this disabled by copyright laws of the USA or the VOA statement has got priority? --Venca24 (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Citing a text is quite different to "cite" a video or even a photo (which can be also a crop of a video). As I understand you, you are presuming that all photos / videos / etc. can be (by some means) free licensed "cited" in Wikipedia, right? Well, obviously not (or we should close Commons) but maybe you are referring to Fair use which is not allowed in Commons. Btw, this deletion request was raised due to a fair use discussion at enwiki, where User:Masem stated that: (...) It is highly doubtful that VOA had their cameras there at that point to take the footage and we should assume it borrowed from CNN or the like.. Gunnex (talk) 06:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 01:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine Anatoliy (talk) 19:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have changed the "author" parameter of the file, so that now the correct person is credited. It seems, under Ukrainian copyright law ("Закон України Про авторське право і суміжні права") attribution is sufficient for displaying images of publicly available works. The question is very unclear though, as Wikipedia does not seem to fall nicely into the classifications given by the mentioned law.
- It is also arguable if the image is a "substantial reproduction" (as noted in the removal template) of the sculptural work.--An onlooker (talk) 14:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Images hosted on Commons must allow commercial reuse. This image cannot allow commercial reuse because it is not covered under FOP FASTILY 22:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In the scope of Category:Latte art russavia (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - per russavia (oh no, I'm supporting russavia, this means I'm part of the conspiracy! Delete on grounds of artist not being dead 70 years!) -mattbuck (Talk) 12:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment This could be analogous to Commons:Deletion requests/File:A chocolate tattoo in a girls hand.jpg which was kept. If we want to look at the issue of "latte art" being copyrightable, I would suggest that instead of a deletion here, we look at it as part of looking at the overall Category:Latte art category. russavia (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- It has been suggested that this falls under FOP rules, on the grounds that, for the entirety of the art's existence, it was on public display. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Per Russavia. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RasamJacek as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. All buildings in this part of Kiev was built after 1945. Anatoliy (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep yes, this are buildings, no more. There is no Art in the picture. --Ralf Roleček 08:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- In building safe architect right, too. --RasamJacek (talk) 09:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- But who is architector of that building? And when it was built? Without this information we does not know copyright status clearly.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- This is the main post office building which was build in 1956 by a group of architects: B. Prijmak, G. Sluckij, V. Ladnyj and others (In Russian: группа Б. Приймака, Г. Слуцкого, В. Ладного). In 1989 a portion of the building was restored after it has collapsed due to the water accumulation. Thank you. Oleg (talk) 15:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- But who is architector of that building? And when it was built? Without this information we does not know copyright status clearly.--Anatoliy (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- In building safe architect right, too. --RasamJacek (talk) 09:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Ukraine FASTILY 22:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
The copyrighted monument is too focus in the center and not de minimis. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:17-07-02-Maidan Nezalezhnosti RR74396.jpg for the information about this unfree public art from Ukraine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)