Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 October 2024
3 October 2024
Deletion requests on 2 October 2024

October 2

[edit]

File:The History and Role of Creative Commons Advancing Knowledge Sharing.png

[edit]

the file I uploaded was double Nafisathallah (talk) 03:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Front view of Mireuk Daebul statue at Bongeunsa temple with reflection on floor at night in Seoul.jpg

[edit]

Own photograph, regretfully per COM:FOP South Korea. Apparently built between 1986 and 1996. Maybe the whole Category:Mireuk Daebul, Bongeunsa should be deleted (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Category:Mireuk Daebul, Bongeunsa) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Unfortunate, but our hands are tied, and the non-commercial requirement in South Korea's FOP laws seems clear based on COM:FOP South Korea. I agree that the other images in the category will likely need to be deleted, as the statue isn't incidental in any of them.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:OHCHR logo.png

[edit]

I don't see how this file can exict considering Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Nations and OHCHR being created after 1987. Even if it can exist, it is not "own work" as it clearly originates from the UN-owned logo. Vanyka-slovanyka (talk) 04:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

High-res copyrighted content by AOMAF2024

[edit]

These three images uploaded by User:AOMAF2024 have a fabric Cut The Rope artwork. Also, The styles of Keep cases.jpg have high-res copyrighted covers and needs a alternative image of keep cases without copyrighted covers. Todonite (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh no AOMAF2024 (talk) 13:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vienna, United States - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 11:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Viking Longship Sculpture - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Invalid svg

[edit]

This is not a file, and it should be deleted because it has no use. Chealer (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Tempaltes are perfectly in scope ("not a file" is not a valid reason for deletion). Still, this tempalte is redundant and useless, so strong support for deletion. There are also Template:Invalid SVG (to be deleted too, no interwiki) trans and Template:InvalidSVG d:Q15715403 trans. Taylor 49 (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battling Bears Wildlife Sculpture, Cabela's, Dundee Michigan - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mural ("Art, Much More than Art") at art installation in Deep Ellum, a neighborhood composed largely of arts and entertainment venues near downtown in Old East Dallas, Texas LCCN2014632997.tif

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 12:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mineral Springs park.jpg

[edit]

Not a NRHP site Colette Eshleman (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:October 2024 Iranian strikes against Israel.jpg

[edit]

Not a work by Tasnim, photographed by Amir Cohen for Reuters [1] HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tasnim doesn't seem to be strict about copyright. I suggest not to approve uploading Pictures from this site Hanay (talk) 07:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hanay Tasnim is actually an invaluable source of freely-licensed files, but it must be used with extra cautious. Please read this for more information. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@HeminKurdistan This picture was not taken by them. So they are probably not that reliable. This image should be deleted because it violates copyright Hanay (talk) 14:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hanay I agree, that's exactly why I nominated this file for deletion. However, I disagree that Tasnim files should not be approved. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 4ipid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:License laundering. None of these files are works created by the sources mentioned. Iranian news agencies such as Tasnim, Mehr and Fars have a conventional way of publishing their own photographs (mentioning the photographer's name and using a watermark). While lack of these do not necessarily mean that the photos are not freely-licensed, lack any further indication that these works are owned by those sources and the fact that many of these photographs are found elsewhere on the internet or obviously seem like screenshots, means that we'd better delete them.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4ipid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

non-notable

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear@HeminKurdistan 4ipid (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello dear @HeminKurdistan Please explain why you nominated this photo File:Javid Nasiri.jpg for removal under the title of not remarkable?
This person is an Iranian pop singer and has pages on international platforms such as YouTube, Spotify, Apple Music, Instagram, isni, imdb, etc.
If you check his wikidata item and his platforms, you will realize that this person has an acceptable reputation. This photo was taken by me and I am very careful in the photos I upload.
Please review and remove this photo from the nomination. I am waiting for your reply. Thanks 4ipid (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@4ipid. Everyone can create accounts on social media. The Wikidata item has been deleted. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 4ipid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of being a work by SNN/Mehr (no photographer credit, no watermark), seems like a screenshot from the film

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 4ipid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of being a work by Mehr (no photographer credit, no watermark), seems like a screenshot from the film

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michał-Janowczyk-bokser-1945.jpg

[edit]

Zdjęcie zostało wrzucone przeze mnie w sposób niepoprawny, bez wcześniejszej weryfikacji licencji. Nie jestem w stanie ustalić autora fotografii, stąd prośba o usunięcie fotografii z zasobów Mag.po (talk) 16:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Армянск, 2019 год, 36.jpg

[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this plaque was created in 2019. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO. Adamant1 (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Plaques referencing 2010 in Ukraine

[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and these plaques were all created in the 2010s. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 19:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Rector-hugo-lavados-3.jpg

[edit]

Se sospecha de violación a derechos de autor (copyvio). La imagen había sido publicada anteriormente en el sitio web de la Universidad San Sebastián [2]. No queda claro si la persona que subió el archivo es también el autor de la fotografía. Es posible que simplemente haya sacado la imagen de otro sitio y la haya subido utilizando una licencia inadecuada, en cuyo caso sería una violación al derecho de autor. SamuelInzunza (talk) 19:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quién es Pamela San Martín, la autora? 186.173.92.83 20:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pamela San Martín Jara? 186.173.92.83 20:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sculpture honoring bicyclists - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sculpture at Biosphere 2 - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sculpture at Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA), an art museum in Los Angeles, California LCCN2013632448.tif

[edit]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:18-110-0037 Пам'ятний знак на честь Михайла Обачного.jpg

[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this plaque was created in 1996. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 20:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At least IMO it looks like a drawing and I certainly couldn't find an original photograph that it might have been based on when I looked for one. If your going to claim it is a faithful representation of a photograph then it would be good if there was a source for the original. Otherwise it just seems like speculation. Although on your end of this he did die in 1903. Which would put him a year before the date for unpublished anonymous and pseudonymous works, and works made for hire in Commons:Hirtle chart. But then it's dependent on this being an unpublished anonymous and pseudonymous work created before 1904 to begin with. Which there's really no way to know without the original. It's just as likely someone created it after his death. But it doesn't look like a photograph regardless. Probably it doesn't really matter either though. No one is going to sue anyone over a 100 year old drawing. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is a photograph. Here is a colorized version which derives from same original. Given his age of death, the photograph is pretty clearly {{PD-old-assumed}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Thanks for finding the photograph. I'll have to add it as another version of the image when I have the time. I'm totally fine with it being keept now that you've provided the original. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Commemorative plaque to Taras Shevchenko in Zviahel

[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this plaque was created in 1992. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 20:21, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Располов ИЕ.jpg

[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this gravestone was created in 1975. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO. Adamant1 (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Monument to Lesya Ukrainka near museum of Lesya Ukrainka in Zviahel

[edit]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and this bust was created in 1971. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Speed cash Launch.jpg

[edit]

Photo of existing photo, missing original author, date, source, and permission. P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EF4DaltonMNtornadoJuly2020.png

[edit]

The image was uploaded from an NWS website.

I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source. They confirmed that they

  • own the copyright on the image
  • do not want to release it into the public domain

"This is definitely not Public Domain and I'm not planning to release it into the Public Domain at this time. [...] If there are any others that you suspect are my photos that may be being misused, please do not hesitate to reach out. "

I have forwarded the conversation to the VRT. (ticket:2024100210010288)

This is not a free image, so we can't host it here.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 21:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: it is clear that this isn’t public domain; and that said copyright holder does NOT want it to be so. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:2017 New Orleans tornado near Chef Menteur Highway.png

[edit]

This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.

Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.

This particular photo was unattributed at the source,[3] but because it is unlike the images usually taken by NWS staff in the course of their duties and looks more like a public submission, I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (New Orleans).

They confirmed that it is not an NWS image but contributed by a member of the public, whom they did not name:

"This image was shared to us by a member of the public, and they allowed us to use it for the web page. It's a still image from a video of the tornado they took from their home. "

I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024100210010484).

Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Payasos de circo.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo from 2015 shows probably a young mother and her children wearing clowns costumes and make-up. It is semi-professionally made with a large cardboard background. The purpose of this photo isn't fully clear: Does it show, "people wearing costumes at home for family entertainment"? The Spanish captions do not mention the names of the people shown. Thus, I guess, the photo fits well into Category:Clown costumes and do not see a reason for (speedy) deletion, just because it has now been cropped, translated and categorized. Please keep and remind Nv8200pa to request speedy deletion only in well explained exceptional circumstances. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 02:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of assumptions are being made about this image. The people in the image may not even be related or at their home or they were doing this for family entertainment. It was taken with a cell phone and is very blurry. I would not qualify it as semi-professional. We make all these guesses about the intent of images, which have no or inadequate descriptions, and then classify them as educational. My opinion still is this is a poor-quality personal image taken by a non-contributor. Nv8200p (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not very good quality but certainly could be categorized as "people wearing clown costumes and makeup." And it didn't warrant speedy deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Every image can be categorized. In my opinion, that does not make it educational. It's a low-quality image of a bunch of kids taken with a cell phone. It looked like a personal image, of course that is subjective. It is the only image the user contributed. It my opinion, the image met the criteria for F10 speedy deletion. Nv8200p (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there's a basis for discussion about it, it should not have been tagged for speedy deletion. I'm surprised you won't concede that point now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images from NWS La Crosse history page

[edit]

These files are all sourced to a page of a National Weather Service website.

Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We generally rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.

These images were all published without any attribution,[4] but because they are unlike the images usually taken by NWS staff in the course of their duties, I reached out the to NWS office that published them (La Crosse). They told me:

  • they do not know who took these photos and "don't have easy access to documentation of where/who the images are from"
  • other images on that page appear to be a mixture of NWS photos and some that "appear to be acquired from other parties/resources: Chamber of Commerce, Partner Groups, Internet Sources"

I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024100210010528).

Because we cannot verify that they are (or were ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If the NWS has lost track of their ownership and they are truly orphan images, they will enter the public domain 120 years after they were taken, probably somewhere around 2120.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

--Rlandmann (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Formation of the F5 Hudsonville, Michigan tornado 1956.png

[edit]

Well, this image isn't the F5 Hudsonville tornado, it's the F4 Saugatuck tornado, and it isn't forming, it's dissipating, but that's all beside the point!

The uploader sourced this image from a National Weather Service history page. The photo was taken by Jarvin Kleiman, a resident of the area at the time, and provided to an NWS researcher by a member of the local historical society. Mr Kleiman passed away in 2002.[5]

Correspondence with the NWS researcher confirms:

  • they have independent evidence confirming that Mr Kleiman took the photo from his home (meaning that it is not the work of the NWS or another US government agency)
  • they are not specifically aware of any prior publication of this photo.

I have forwarded this conversation to the VRT (ticket:2024100210010644)

He did think that it might have appeared in newspapers of the time. However, searches of local newspapers on newspapers.com and newspaperarchive.com failed to turn up this specific image. I focused on The Grand Rapids Press, the Holland (Evening) Sentinel and The Holland City News for the weeks following the event, plus the 10-, 20-, 25-, and 30-year anniversaries of the disaster.

The Grand Rapids Press did run another photo by Mr Kleiman, taken within moments of this one, and I have uploaded it with the correct description here: File:Dissipation of the F4 Saugatuck, Michigan tornado 1956.jpg. It is definitely free of copyright and can be used in place of this image if we delete it.

As a photo taken in the United States prior to 1989, its copyright status rests on whether, when, and in what context it was first published.

In this particular case, there is no known publication before 2006, when the NWS published a series of articles to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the disaster.[6]

There is no evidence that Mr Kleiman ever released this image into the public domain, and there is no way to ask him now.

Therefore, per COM:ONUS unless anyone can provide evidence that:

  • this particular image was published prior to 1989 without following copyright formalities (like the other one from this series was) OR
  • Mr Kleiman ever released this into the public domain or under a free license OR
  • his estate or heirs ever released this into the public domain or under a free license or would be willing to do so now

this image is presumably protected by copyright that will not expire until 2073, 70 years after Mr Kleiman's death, and we cannot host it on the Commons.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 00:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been fooled!  Delete because I'm pissed. LOL! XD ChessEric (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/10/02&oldid=955672111"