User talk:Fæ: Difference between revisions
ArchiverBot (talk | contribs) m Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 4 days) to User talk:Fæ/Archive 90 |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
{{Welcome|Fæ|}} |
|||
|archive = User talk:Fæ/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
|algo = old(4d) |
|||
|counter = 90 |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 18K |
|||
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
}}<!--{{/head}}--> |
|||
{{Not around|has left Wikimedia Commons|3=31 August 2021}} |
|||
== BM == |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:for older archives, see [[User talk:Fæ/2021]], [[User talk:Fæ/2020]], [[User talk:Fæ/2019]], et seq. |
|||
Hi, |
|||
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
|||
== [[:File:SPIB No. 2 Prime KD19 HT 123 (28650431950).jpg]] == |
|||
I saw you recently create [[Template:British-Museum-object]], then update the pre-existing [[Template:Information British Museum]]. As the two templates seem to have the same purpose, that the last one is older, more complete and much more used as for now, don't you think it would be a good idea to mix the 2? Regards, [[User:Bibi Saint-Pol|Bibi Saint-Pol]] <small>([[User talk:Bibi Saint-Pol|sprechen]])</small> 08:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, I was just working on harmonizing the two. In practice the two are slightly different. The information template is a heavyweight solution (similar to a full infobox) whilst the -object template is a short way of getting a formatted description with a link to the record. There is overlap and I'll consider adapting the short version to feed the larger template (perhaps by adding an option to drop some of the styling, such as the white-text header line). [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 08:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
{{#invoke:Autotranslate|autotranslate|1=File:SPIB No. 2 Prime KD19 HT 123 (28650431950).jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Abzeronow|Abzeronow]] ([[User talk:Abzeronow|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 00:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::After a bit more work the differences are clearer and I have add some detail on documentation in the templates. The information template mandates a large header line and as I have styled the smaller detail box to be able to supplement the standard Information box, this is a significant difference. In articles where a reasonable standard Information box exists, the full Museum Information box would be significant duplication, whilst the detail box would be a better choice. I think there is sufficient need for both forms to exist and though it may be possible to merge the two and provide the same functionality, this is probably icing on the cake rather than applying the [[w:KISS principle|KISS principle]] ;) [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 09:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::: |
|||
:::I'm not totally convinced since the description field of [[Template:British-Museum-object]] is redundant with the field in [[Template:Information]]. What is the point of having 2 description fields? |
|||
:::Anyway, I would suggest to harmonize the name of the fields: using "accession number" rather than "number" in [[Template:British-Museum-object]], and find a more comprehensive name for the "id" field ("online id"?). [[User:Bibi Saint-Pol|Bibi Saint-Pol]] <small>([[User talk:Bibi Saint-Pol|sprechen]])</small> 09:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
::::I'll add objectId (as that's what the BM site uses as a parameter name) but ''number'' is deliberately named to take the "most common" number as it could be accession number / registration number / Big number / Exhibition number, all of which are used in reference to objects in the BM and none of which are more correct as a reference as it depends on context. [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== FP Promotion == |
||
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg}} /[[User:FPCBot|FPCBot]] ([[User talk:FPCBot|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 05:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hi, |
|||
== [[:File:Southampton water treatment plant, 1969 annual operating summary (IA SOUTHAMPTONWATER00SNSN19765.ome).pdf]] == |
|||
I think there is a major copyvio in some of your contributions, since you copy the full description of objects done by the BM ([[:File:Achilles and Troilos vase.jpg]] and [[:File:Oedipus slaying the sphinx.jpg]] e.g., fields "Detailed description"). These texts are published by the BM and are very likely protected by copyright. [[User:Bibi Saint-Pol|Bibi Saint-Pol]] <small>([[User talk:Bibi Saint-Pol|sprechen]])</small> 01:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:I'll check it out, give me a day or two. If the website does not make the matter clear I can raise it for discussion and clarification at [[:en:WP:GLAM/BM]] where a number of British Museum staff contribute including the website manager (I'll add a link to it here). Speaking in an academic sense, collection record descriptive fields are unlikely to be an issue as the nature of any extract would be small compared to the total publication and the database has been published on-line for wide public access. If the BM prefers to protect this text then I can re-write but I would prefer to quote the curators accurately. [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 09:06, 17 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
{{#invoke:Autotranslate|autotranslate|1=File:Southampton water treatment plant, 1969 annual operating summary (IA SOUTHAMPTONWATER00SNSN19765.ome).pdf|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Jan.Kamenicek|Jan Kameníček]] ([[User talk:Jan.Kamenicek|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 11:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::I have emailed the British Museum for clarification on what is a reasonable text extract (linking to the above examples) and raised for discussion on [[:en:Wikipedia_talk:GLAM/BM#Quoting_descriptions_for_objects_from_the_on-line_collection_database_and_copyright]]. [[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 09:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== [[:File:Fence Art-Green Frog-01+ (300672744).jpg]] == |
|||
{{#invoke:Autotranslate|autotranslate|1=File:Fence Art-Green Frog-01+ (300672744).jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:A1Cafel|A1Cafel]] ([[User talk:A1Cafel|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 07:54, 11 November 2024
- for older archives, see User talk:Fæ/2021, User talk:Fæ/2020, User talk:Fæ/2019, et seq.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 |
File:SPIB No. 2 Prime KD19 HT 123 (28650431950).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 00:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Southampton water treatment plant, 1969 annual operating summary (IA SOUTHAMPTONWATER00SNSN19765.ome).pdf
[edit]File:Southampton water treatment plant, 1969 annual operating summary (IA SOUTHAMPTONWATER00SNSN19765.ome).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jan Kameníček (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Fence Art-Green Frog-01+ (300672744).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |