WarX

• Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Commons maintenance announcements [+/−]

More translations are needed for:

• Commons:Project scope (Sept 2008)
• Commons:Fan art (April 2009)
• Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator#User interface texts (August 2009)
• Commons:File renaming (October 2009)
• Commons:Nudity

---

Backlogs:

as of 18 February 2010

• Old deletion requests are still opened.
• Many files moved to Commons requiring review.
• Too many unprocessed files without source.
• Many files are OTRS pending for too long.
• There are 124 requested merges.
• The Vandalismpatrol has over 1190238 unpatrolled anonymous edits.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:POL COA Trzaska.svg, which was nominated by Przykuta at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:POL COA Trzaska.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 21:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Mapy z podejrzeniem NPA

Odesłała mnie do Ciebie Pilecka w kwestii NPA map:

Czy mógłbyś zerknąć na wkład kartograficzny User:Bastet78. Osoba ta dodała swojego czasu sporo map (razem 15), twierdząc, że jest ich autorką (por. tutaj). Faktycznie są to dokładnie przerysowane mapy z Atlasu świata Służby Topograficznej Wojska Polskiego (Warszawa 1962) - na mapach zmieniono kolorystykę warstw hipsometrycznych (wysokościowych) oraz dokonano, zapewnie nieumyślnie, wielu błędów przy przepisywaniu nazw geograficznych. Moim zdaniem wkład autorski do tych map jest jednak zbyt mały (dokładne przerysowanie, podmiana kolorów, błędy, lecz brak jakichkolwiek zmian w zasadniczej treści) by można je uznać za jej pracę własną, a nie zwykłe przerysowanie "żywcem" mapy z atlasu. W kartografii dokładne przerysowanie czyjejś mapy traktowane jest za jej skopiowanie. I tu ma zasadniczy wpływ modyfikacja treści, a nie grafiki. Mapy można, choć i to jest dla wielu dyskusyjne, wykorzystywać jako materiały podkładowe, które się generalizuje, przeskalowuje, dodaje treści z innych materiałów itp. Nawet genaralizacja, zmiana skali itp. nie jest pracą własną, w rozumieniu kartografii, jeśli korzysta się wyłącznie z jednej mapy jako podkładu (analogicznie jeśli ktoś napisze publikację na podstawie wyłącznie jednego źródła to jest to zwykły plagiat, a nie praca własna). W przypadku tych map wykorzystano wyłącznie mapy z atlasu wojskowego nie dokonując jakichkolwiek, nawet drobnych, modyfikacji ich treści (nie licząc ewidentnych literówek w nazwach geograficznych) ograniczając się jedynie do przekopiowania mapy (zamiana utworu w postać cyfrową nie jest pracą twórczą) i zmiany kolorystyki (tu można dyskutować, czy jest to praca twórcza). Zakładając jednak, że tak powstała mapa jest pracą twórczą (bo zmieniono kolory), to i tak nie ma prawa być na Wikipedii, gdyż nowe "dzieło" zawiera w sobie również dzieło pierwotne chronione prawami (analogicznie jeżeli wezmie się czyjąś fotografię Zamku Królewskiego i dorysuję na niej kontury zamku na fioletowo, to pomimo, że powstaje coś nowego, to "autor" tej nowej pracy nie ma do niej pełni praw, gdyż wykorzystuje pracę wcześniejszą i takie zdjęcie nie mogło by być na Wikipedii zamieszczone). Aotearoa 10:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Philip Greenspun illustration project

I don't really know the details but I thought you might be interested in this. Apparently someone donated money and you can win actual cash for you illustrations for Wikipedia: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Philip_Greenspun_illustration_project --Calibas 07:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

problem LUCPOLa

LUCPOLa i jego nieopanowany tzw. "patriotyzm lokalny", który przybrał postać kliniczną i ostatnio skończył się dwuletnim banem z plwiki - znasz. Ostatnio napotkałem na Commons jego autorstwa mapki konturowe (przeróbki standardowych konturów województw w Polsce), na których zaznaczono: lubuskie i dolnośląskie; opolskie, śląskie i małopolskie, oraz wszystkie pięć. Podpisy pod tymi mapkami były "województwa na których leży Śląsk" (oraz na których leży Dolny oraz Górny). Oczywista dziecinada, ale co gorsza mapki te zaczęły wykorzystywać inne wikipedie w haśle "Śląsk" opisując je jako granice terytorium Śląska. Powstaje w ten sposób merytorycznie fałszywe wrażenie, że do Śląska zalicza się nie tylko Katowice, Gliwice czy Opole i Wrocław, ale nawet Tarnów, Zakopane, Gorzów albo pomorski Międzyrzecz! Mało kto dokładnie czyta podpisy, nie każdy też - szczególnie poza Polską - umie odróżnić pojęcie "województwa na terenie których leży Śląsk" (w zamyśle autora - choćby skraweczkiem, jak w małopolskim i lubuskim) od pojęcia "województwa należące do Śląska".

LUCPOL ma swoje sny o potędze, ale to trzeba leczyć, a nie wciskać ludziom kit. Uznałem, że przeprowadzanie procedury likwidacji tych grafik przez deletion request będzie tylko biciem piany, bowiem trudno oczekiwać, by francuscy, angielscy, amerykańscy, hiszpańscy czy japońscy userzy mieli jakiekolwiek zielone pojęcie o co w tym wszystkim chodzi.

Zechciej, proszę, przeczytać jego wpis u mnie, moją odpowiedź i ewentualnie zabrać głos.

Julo 13:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Julo kłamie: nie było zaznaczone za mapkach województwo małopolskie jako część Śląska. A co do tekstu "mapki te zaczęły wykorzystywać inne wikipedie w haśle "Śląsk" opisując je jako granice terytorium Śląska" prosiłbym Julo o jakiś dowód że te grafiki są opisane jako granice!!! Śląska. Zdanie "Powstaje w ten sposób merytorycznie fałszywe wrażenie, że do Śląska zalicza się nie tylko Katowice, Gliwice czy Opole i Wrocław, ale nawet Tarnów, Zakopane, Gorzów albo pomorski Międzyrzecz" jest niedorzeczne. Dlacezgo Julo pisze ci takie niedorzeczne rzeczy? Julo znów pisze "LUCPOL ma swoje sny o potędze, ale to trzeba leczyć" - czy to nie jest atak osobisty? Ja nie mam takich snów i nie życzę sobie wypaczania i opinii Julo. Ja jego poglądów nie wypaczam ani nie wypominam. Czy to już kolejny atak personalny Julo za który nie dostanie on blokady? Co dziwne - czytasz to ty - admin i czyta to Szwedzki - admin i nic nikt nie zrobi? Na zakończenie napisał: "Uznałem, że przeprowadzanie procedury likwidacji tych grafik przez deletion request będzie tylko biciem piany" - nie panie Julo. Grafiki usunąłeś na swoje widzimisie ("bo tak sobie sądzisz") - bez żadnej dyskusji, bez powiadomienia autora grafik, bez żadnego głosowania, nawet bez usunięcia ich z artykułów na Wikipedii. Jak bardzo bym się starał pozytywnie na to patrzeć to widzę to jako wandalizm i nadużycie uprawnień. Nie obrażaj się że tak to nazwałem bo mam prawo tak to nazwać - patrz 5 argumentów w zdaniu powyżej. LUCPOL 14:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Requesting edit to Template:MMP-Katowice

I see you locked the page, I was trying to change the translation, as at current it is wrong. The correct translation would be "This picture was created thanks to the cooperation of Metal Mind Productions", could you change it please? Thanks. Chris Down ^(talk) 14:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Flago-mapa

Czesc. Widzialem, ze fajne flago-mapy robisz. Moglbys prosze zdradzic jak zrobic taka flago-mape? Duzo ich jeszcze brakuje i chcialbym jakies stworzyc. Dzieki. - Darwinek 12:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:ISL Arbogar COA.svg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:ISL Arbogar COA.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Lokal_Profil 18:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Also Image:ISL Talknafjardar COA.svg, Image:ISL Flateyrar COA.svg, Image:ISL Mosfellsbaejar COA.svg, Image:ISL Seltjarnarness COA.svg, Image:ISL Alftaness COA.svg, Image:ISL Bolungarvikur COA.svg, Image:ISL Dalvikurbyggdar COA.svg, Image:ISL Myrdalshrepps COA.svg, Image:ISL Reykjavik COA.svg, Image:ISL Fljotsdalsherads COA.svg. /Lokal_Profil 18:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Błędy w svg

Witaj, chciałem poprawić swoje dawne kulawe svg Czerwoną Dłoń Ulsteru, zwłaszcza że na en:wiki zgłoszono mi błąd w rysunku, ale nie otwiera mi się w ogóle wersja wektorowa, choć jako png wyświetla się poprawnie. Pewnie winne są moje błędy w pliku svg, może mógłbym poprawić, ale niestety lokalnie na kompie już tego rysunku nie mam. Czy jakoś można ściągnąć źródło svg tej graficzki? Może masz jakieś wiedźmińsko-admińskie narzędzia? Jeśli nie, to trudno, będę robił od początku, ale jeśli można, to będę wdzięczny za pomoc, może najlepiej źródło svg przesłać mi mailem? Pozdrawiam Steifer 10:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Adam Gierek.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam Gierek.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kam Solusar 18:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi! Thanks for creating Image:USA Hardin County, Tennessee.csv age pyramid.svg. It really improved the article about that county. Thanks, Leo Johannes 12:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Pomyłka

Witam. Proszę usuń tę grafikę, ponieważ przez pomyłkę załadowałem sobie plik PNG zamiast SVG. Obydwa miały takie same nazwy i nie zwróciłem uwagi. Z góry dziękuję. Bastianow (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Licencje herbów

Witaj, ostatnio Ipek wstawia szablony sugerujące usuniecie grafik herbów polskich hierarchów (m.in. tu), z uwagi na braki licencyjne. W opisach informuje, że są to herby żyjących polskich biskupów, i prawa autorskie do nich należą do polskiego kościoła katolickiego. Według reguł heraldyki, zazdrośnie i restrykcyjnie strzegącej praw właścicieli herbów, zawsze można było umieszczać wszelkie herby w herbarzach, rolach herbowych, a później różnych wydawnictwach encyklopedycznych. Dziś dochodzi do róznych absurdów, nie wiem co jest w tym przypadku, czy były jakieś skargi ze strony kościelnej, czy to nadgorliwość ipka czy faktycznie trzeba przestać robić herby osób żyjących? Pozdrawiam Steifer (talk) 08:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Administrative notice

Deutsch Dear WarX. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).

If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.

Thank you,
abf /talk to me/ 11:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Minor adjustment

Community logo

I'd like to have a vertical version of the globe of Image:Wikimedia Community Logo.svg. Can you upload that as Image:Wikimedia Community Logo (2).svg? Thanks.

De-Admined

Hi WarX. Because you have been inactive for a long period and you have not signed at this page in the last month you lost your adminship on Commons (->meta-request). If you want to be sysop again, please start a new RfA.
Thank you for your long and helpfull work on Commons! abf /talk to me/ 12:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:TU-144 taking off.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TU-144 taking off.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 22:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Georg Graf von Arco.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:Image:Georg Graf von Arco.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Melanom (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bulgaria_coa.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bulgaria_coa.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bulgaria_coa.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lokal_Profil 23:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

EN:File:Flaga_ostrowawlkp.jpg

Do you know the original location of en:File:Flaga_ostrowawlkp.jpg? I would like to upload the original to Commons, and delete the EN version. Thanks! ~ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 06:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Bronic

Witam. Znamierowski, Gajl i Jurzak są zgodni co to tego, że jelce winny być złote. Co za tym idzie, podbicie labrów też. Mogę prosić o poprawkę? Pozdrawiam Avalokitesvara (talk) 23:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brass instrument mouthpiece.

review

---

Scope changed from Trumpet mouthpiece to Brass instrument mouthpiece --Eusebius (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Support This image is much more detailed; although there are differences between trumpet and other brass mouthpieces, they all have come with the same principles. Pbroks13 (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Embouchure profil.jpg: 0
2. Trumpet mouthpiece scheme.svg: +1 
=>
File:Embouchure profil.jpg: Declined.
File:Trumpet mouthpiece scheme.svg: Promoted.

--Eusebius (talk) 12:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Translation please

Hi WarX, do you want to tell me, what the last two points at [1] (starting with Szybka ...) mean? Thanks in advance, --Flominator (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Szybka Kolej Miejska w Trójmieście Zdjęcia przystanków leżących w województwie i jakby ktoś miał jakieś historczne

Fast City Train in Trójmiasto (Gdynia, Gdańsk, Sopot). Photos of train-stops in voivodeship and some historical if anyone has.

Fast City Train is probably something similar like S-bahn in Germany (but 100% on ground).

--WarX (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Thx. --Flominator (talk) 07:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, WarX!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 04:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:POL dowódca obrony wybrzeża rank flag.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:POL dowódca dywizjonu okrętów rank flag.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:POL szef sztabu rank flag.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Thematic week logo proposal.svg was uncategorized on 30 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tigran_Vardikyan-szafa.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tigran_Vardikyan-szafa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tigran_Vardikyan-szafa.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Masur (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

• wiem ze jestes :) Ale nie trzeba byc operatorem OTRS zeby sfingowac zgode nie? ;) Nie na tym to polega. Ale w tym wypadku zgoda jest wiecej niz konieczna, ze wzgledu na to, ze on rysowaniem zarabia na zycie. Masur (talk) 09:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia_Polska_logo.svg

File:Wikimedia_Polska_logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bastique ^demandez 22:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File:USA Holmes County, Ohio age pyramid.svg

thumbnail problem

Hi! Your age pyramid is used in the german WP-article of Holmes County (Ohio). As you can see, the diagram doesn't work correctly as thumbnail...the age classification label dosn't minimize correctly. Is there a way for you to fix it? This would be nice!!! Greets, --Rosso Robot (talk) 12:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, ok i see! i hope it is ok for you, that i made a .png-version of your diagram...! i hate this horrible svg-renderers!!! thank you for your respond! --Rosso Robot (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

I noticed the same thing at File:USA Champaign County, Illinois age pyramid.svg. Age pyramids are a great way to show the data, and every county and city page should have one! However at about 250 px for the usable size, the current age groups are unreadable. Is there anyway to automate this? Thanks for any help. Smallbones (talk) 04:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Autorstwo i licencje

Witaj po przerwie. Przejrzyj te edycje i powiedz mi co o tym myślisz. Uważam, że to trochę nieuczciwe. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Dzięki za próbę pomocy, ale problem jest już rozwiązany. Nie wiem czy zainteresuje Cię ta sprawa ale tęsknię za czasami kiedy zaczynałem swoją działalność i kiedy graficy poważnie traktowali licencje i prawa autorskie. W tej sprawie byłeś dla mnie wzorem. Na bazie gallowskiej (i mojej) grafiki nowy użytkownik złożył z elementów moich grafik herb Tarnawa i przypisał sobie autorstwo tej pracy bez wzmianki o prawdziwych autorach. Kiedy zmieniłem ten opis oczywiści zrewertował go, co było przyczyną mojej prośby do Ciebie. Plik Tarnawa herb szlachecki poprawny.svg był dokładną kopią tego z tym, że po moim wpisie załadował go powtórnie pod nową nazwą. To taki drobny manewr, który miał ukryć moje edycje, więc to ja zgłosiłem go do usunięcia wstawiając szablon {{Dupe}}. W tym nowym pliku też zmieniłem opis ale znów zostałem zrewertowany. Zobacz historię edycji. Nie mogąc doczekać się Twojej odpowiedzi poprosiłem Masura o to samo i dość szybko sprawa się skończyła blokiem na tydzień dla nowego. Niestety nie był w stanie przyjąć do wiadomości, że obowiązują pewne zasady wynikające z licencji. Efektem tego będzie może to, że paru innych, którzy przypisują sobie autorstwo nie swoich prac zacznie poważnie traktować licencje. Dzięki za szczere chęci i pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

PS. Tuż nad Twoim wpisem w mojej dyskusji jest cała historia tej sprawy. Bastianow (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

No cóż, nie jest tak dobrze jak myślisz. Od roku jestem na intensywnym leczeniu no i choroba (rak) stawia mi sporo ograniczeń, ale jeszcze póki mogę, staram się coś robić, choć kompletnie zniechęcają mnie takie sytuacje jak ta. Dzięki za miłe słowa. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:USA_Winnebago_County,_Wisconsin_age_pyramid.svg

The 200px version of this graph has weird-sized text - any help would be much appreciated! MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of of Afghanistan, 1991-92.gif

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of of Afghanistan, 1991-92.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Flag of of Afghanistan, 1991-92.gif]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Antemister (talk) 10:24, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Steblik - skasowanie pliku WSJB.jpg

Zauważyłem usunięcie pliku, który załadowałem do artykułu o Władysławie Stebliku - WSJB.jpg. Usunięty skan kopii fotografii pochodzi z moich prywatnych zbiorów, przedstawia tak naprawdę mojego wuja, ilustrował artykuł o nim. Autor tej fotografii nie jest znany a fotografia pochodzi z lat 1935-1938 - niesygnowana żadnym logo. Zgodnie z prawem autorskim tzw. prawa autorskie wygasły. Bardzo rzadko edytuję w Wiki i proszę o info co zrobić, żeby przywrócić zdjęcie, oraz jakim rodzajem licencji go oznaczyć. JurekB (talk) 11:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_of_Afghanistan,_1991-92.gif

File:Flag_of_of_Afghanistan,_1991-92.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:SCO_Dundee,_Tay_Rail_Bridge.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SCO_Dundee,_Tay_Rail_Bridge.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

{{POL-flag}}

Czy mozna skasowac szablon {{POL-flag}}? Nie jest uzywany. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 14:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Przykutak.jpg

File:Przykutak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– Adrignola talk 15:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Authorfield

Hi WarX, Please use the Author-field for what it's intended for: The author's (nick)name. I fixed an example here. Thanks, –Krinkle^talk 13:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

File:POL Wieluń COA.svg

Witaj,

Czy mógłbyś poprawić herb Wielunia, bowiem powinien zawierać trzy blanki, a zawiera cztery? Porównaj dyskusję na Wikipedii oraz stronę miasta, jeśli masz wątpliwości.

Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Rozek19 (talk) 16:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

File:POL MiszczSVG order.svg

Unfortunately, you misspelled "through"... AnonMoos (talk) 08:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Herb miasta Rydułtowy

Zamieszczony przez Ciebie herb miasta Rydułtowy jest NIEPOPRAWNY. Nie jestem biegły w wikipedii, więc nie wiem, jak go podmienić na właściwy. Przesłałem Ci go na maila z wiki, ale chyba go nie odbierasz (albo skrzynka jest pełna). Proszę o kontakt z Urzędem Miasta Rydułtowy. Sprawa jest NIEZMIERNIE pilna, bo ludzie (nawet oficjalne instytucje) wykorzystują twój niewłaściwy herb i mamy z tym kłopot. Właściwy herb jest tu: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herb_Miasta_Rydu%C5%82towy.jpg Grabie mają w nim sześć szczebli - u Ciebie mają osiem

pozdrawiam Krzysztof Jędrośka Sekretarz Miasta Rydułtowy

File:Dali_Teatro-Museu_painting.jpg

File:Dali_Teatro-Museu_painting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File:POL Zakopane COA.svg

File:POL Zakopane COA.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Zdjęłem szablon copyvio i uzupełniłem informację o statusie prawnym grafiki; moim zdaniem stworzenie wiernej kopii w postaci grafiki wektorowej nie jest działalnością twórczą w rozumieniu ustawy o prawie autorskim, powinieneś więc zdjąć szablon swojej licencji z opisu tego pliku. Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Zgadzam się, że to ciężka praca, ale nie każda ciężka praca ma charakter twórczy; tym bardziej, że twoim celem nie była artystyczna ekspresja, tylko uzyskanie jak najwierniejszego odpowiednika :) To jest jednak tylko moja opinia, a wykładnię mógłby dać chyba tylko sąd, gdybyś kiedyś chciał się prawować jak ktoś weźmie sobie wersję wektorową i nie zamieści wymaganego licencją podpisu. Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Community Logo trademarked

Hi WarX, if you did not notice this, your artwork has been trademarked in the US, with an international trademark application pending. I only found out about this today due to the discussion at meta:Talk:Wikimedia Thematic Organizations#Is it correct that this is a community logo?. Did the WMF inform you that it was trademarking your artwork? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 11:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Community

Cześć WarX,
wspomniałem o problemie z rejestracją Twojego community logo jako znak towarowy WMF na liście dyskusyjnej Wikimedia-l — jeśli chciałbyś się wypowiedzieć, to zapraszam do dyskusji :)

Dyskusja toczy się na Meta; ja osobiście dowiedziałem się o rejestracji tego logo jako znaku towarowego 8 stycznia, ale nie pomyślałem, żeby Ciebie poinformować, myśląc że jako autor logo zostałeś poinformowany o tym bezpośrednio przez WMF. PS Tytuł wątku to oczywiście odniesienie do Twojej wiadomości na wikipl-l :) Pozdrawiam, odder (talk) 12:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Bot de-flagging notification

Hi WarX, I'm writing to you because your bot WarXboT (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a week from now (20 February 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Titi.mto (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

File:POL Słupca COA.svg

File:POL Słupca COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

85.221.210.175 12:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Kraków, Aleje Trzech Wieszczów 08.jpg

File:Kraków, Aleje Trzech Wieszczów 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Luxetowiec (talk) 21:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tharkun (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Coats_of_arms_of_cities_and_villages_of_Poland

Coats of arms of cities and villages of Poland has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

jdx ^Re: 18:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

coats of arms

Hello, I am interested in hiring an artist who knows heraldry. If you are interested, please contact me at [email protected].

File:Uruguay Pesos.jpg

File:Uruguay Pesos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Banfield - Amenazas aquí 00:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

File:In-Grid in Warsaw (01.09.07).jpg

File:In-Grid in Warsaw (01.09.07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamru (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

File:In-Grid in Warsaw.jpg

File:In-Grid in Warsaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamru (talk) 09:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

File:In-Grid in Warsaw (01.09.07).jpg

File:In-Grid in Warsaw (01.09.07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamru (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

File:In-Grid in Warsaw.jpg

File:In-Grid in Warsaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamru (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Yaddah

User talk:Yaddah has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page ⧼pageinfo-talkpage⧽, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

160.157.77.171 16:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear WarX,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Kraków, Aleje Trzech Wieszczów 25.jpg

File:Kraków, Aleje Trzech Wieszczów 25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Old members of Quidam.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Old members of Quidam.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Old members of Quidam.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Quidam 2005.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Quidam 2005.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Quidam 2005.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hello,

I am trying to create a SVG image of one particular version of the Polish Ostoja CoA, but I need some help with the sword (the rest I already prepared). Would you be so friendly to help me?

You can see the CoA and the sword here.

Thank you very much! Liglioto (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)