VT98Fan

Kategorie:QI vu Lëtzebuerg

Salut VT98Fan, merci fir deng Fro. Ech gesinn elo den Notze vun där Kategorie an, wat virdrun net de Fall war. An Zukunft setzen ech déi dann och bei menge QI-Biller derbäi. beschte Gréiss, --Cayambe (talk) 19:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Ok, Merci fir d'Äntwert. Wann ech Zäit hunn, kann ech och hëllefen, deng fréier Biller an d'Kategorie ze setzen, dat ass jo schliisslech och am Sënn vun äisem Portal an der de:wiki. Nach e schéinen Owend, --VT98Fan (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

ok a merci fir d'Hëllef. Schéin datts du um Portal Lëtzebuerg op dëser Wiki matschaffs. --Cayambe (talk) 07:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Saint-Mathias Fingig

Bonsoir VT98Fan. -- Deux mots pour répondre à ta phrase finale sur la page VI. Non, tu n'as pas fait d'erreur dans ta description. Je suis le seul à en avoir fait une en voulant t'aider, mais je ne sais pas comment j'ai pu me tromper aussi grossièrement. Heureusement Archaedontosaurus (qui a dépassé récemment les 1000 VI !) veille et a rectifié. Bienvenue, donc, sur cette page où les règles sont différentes de la QI mais où il se passe toujours des choses intéressantes. Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Bonsoir. Ne te sucie pas, errare humanum est. Je fais des fautes chaque jour, crois-moi. Bien à toi, --VT98Fan (talk) 21:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Mathias Fingig 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Mathias Fingig (Luxembourg) - Exterior of the apse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Welcome VT98Fan ! Best in scope. (I slightly modified your scope. I hope it's OK.) --JLPC (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Welcome VT98Fan but little problem. From the caption of the image, the description must be in English too. This is a particular view of the church, I propose to limit the scope to: "exterior of the apse". This is not the facade. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't really know what happened... I'm very sorry VT98Fan and I think the best way to apologize is correcting my mistake :  Done. P.S. : Thanks a lot, Archeo ! --JLPC (talk) 21:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks a lot. --VT98Fan (talk) 10:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC) PS: J'ai corrigé quelques fautes dans la description française, dis-moi si je me suis trompé....
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

VIS promotion

This is one of the images forming part of the Valued image set: Église Saint-Remy, Clemency, Luxembourg on Wikimedia Commons. The image set has been assessed under the valued image set criteria and is considered the most valued set on Commons within the scope: Église Saint-Remy, Clemency, Luxembourg You can see its nomination at Commons:Valued image candidates/Église Saint-Remy Clemency.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schiessentümpel 11 08 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit unsharp, but OK for me --AleXXw 06:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Panoramabild

Hallo VT98Fan, ich war so frei und habe das hier: File:Chartreuse de la Verne 2013 01-02.jpg gebastelt. Vielleicht hast Du damit bei QI mehr Glück... Grüße -- KlausFoehl (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Dankeschön. Der Himmel sieht auf der rechten Seite momentan etwas dunkler aus, was einfach daran liegt, dass ich diese bereits nachbearbeitet habe. Auf dem Originalfoto war der Himmel stark überbelichtet. Leider war auch die Schärfe suboptimal, deshalb wurde auch kein QI draus. Mal schauen, ob ich den Himmel hier noch etwas verschönern kann... LG, --VT98Fan (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Danke, ich verstehe. Der überbelichtete und nachbearbeitete Himmel hat der automatischen Vignettekorrektur von Hugin Probleme bereitet, deswegen hatte ich das abgeschaltet. Was die Schärfe betrifft, habe ich links etwas nachgeschärft und ansonsten das Bild auf circa zwei Drittel geschrumpft. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 17:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de retenue Verne 2013 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 03:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de retenue Verne 2013 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 03:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BCEE Place de Metz Luxembourg 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolphe Bridge provisional 2013 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 11:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Verne 2013 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition. The photo has somehow abstract elements. --Tuxyso 13:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

La Caisse d'Epargne

Jebulon à raison il faut ajouter Exterior ou Facade au scope. Bonne Journée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Amaurornis isabellina 1898 changed.jpg

You forgot your name behind your vote. Kersti (talk) 08:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Ahhh, Schande über mich! Danke für den Hinweis. --VT98Fan (talk) 09:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fingig Forest 2013 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BCEE Place de Metz Luxembourg 2013 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Clair 2013 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. And beautiful! --Martin Falbisoner 20:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarze Ernz 2013 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Clair 2013 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État headquarters, 1 Place de Metz, Luxembourg (Exterior, view from the Adolphe Bridge).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État headquarters, Place de Metz, Luxembourg to Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État headquarters, 1 Place de Metz, Luxembourg --VT98Fan (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• Bonjour. Il conviendrait d'ajouter "exterior" au scope, ainsi qu'il est d'usage pour les bâtiments (dans l'hypothèse où nous aurions ultérieurement des photos de l'intérieur à évaluer). Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 21:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Merci, j'ai précisé le scoope, bien qu'il est interdit de prendre des photos de l'intérieur. Tout de même, on peut prendre des photos de l'autre côté du bâtiment. --VT98Fan (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État headquarters, 1 Place de Metz, Luxembourg to Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État headquarters, 1 Place de Metz, Luxembourg (Exterior, view from the Adolphe Bridge) --VT98Fan (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Al criteria met now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support agree. Thank you. On peut avoir un dessin ou une peinture de l'intérieur, ou on peut...violer l'interdiction de photographier l'intérieur !!! (Mais c'est pô bien !) --Jebulon (talk) 22:55, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. VT98Fan (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Headquarters and Musée de la banque of the Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État, 2 Place de Metz, Luxembourg (Exterior, view from the Adolphe Bridge).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Headquarters of General Omar N. Bradley during the liberation of Luxembourg, 1944/1945.
 Info The first meeting of the Haute autorité of the European Coal and Steel Community in took place in this building in 1952.

---

Scope changed from Headquarters and Musée de la banque of the Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État, 2 Place de Metz, Luxembourg to Headquarters and Musée de la banque of the Banque et caisse d'épargne de l'État, 2 Place de Metz, Luxembourg (Exterior, view from the Adolphe Bridge) --VT98Fan (talk) 06:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarze Ernz 2013 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but I suggest investing in a neutral density filter. --Mattbuck 18:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you. I've got a Hoya NDX8, but I forgot it at home... --VT98Fan 09:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Architectural plan of the former jesuit college Athénée de Luxembourg and the former jesuit church in Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

• Perhaps it's usefull to add des geolocation of the original place? --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done Good idea, thanks! --VT98Fan (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cadastral plan of the urban district of the former jesuit college Athénée de Luxembourg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful too ! --JLPC (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in the Rue Centrale, Fingig, Luxembourg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port Cros 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 19:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bormes les Mimosas 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel Rue Centrale Fingig 2013 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartreuse de la Verne 2013 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stock Car Alzingen Luxembourg 01 09 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stock Car Alzingen Luxembourg 01 09 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz D 6005 Clemency 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 23:40, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 415 Clemency 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Little CA in the foliage but ok for me --Christian Ferrer 10:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint Hubertus Itzig 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Reservoir of the Verne river.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Reservoir of the Verne river.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear VT98Fan, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear VT98Fan, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Bréck zu Stengefort

Salut, ech si sécher datt et op deenen zwee Biller ëm déiselwecht Bréck zu Stengefort geet. Um Bild ënnen erkennen ech d'Verbuetschëlter déi deemols am Agank vun der Bréck stongen, well dee Moment do d'Iwwerreschter vun der Bud vun Hinzert louchen. Hei d'Koordinaten, sou wéi ech se elo just vu Google Earth ofgelies hunn:
49/39/58,57N 5/45/30/23 E. Beschte Gréiss an e schéint Neit Joer, --Cayambe (talk) 14:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, ech hat am Oste bei de Minutten d'Zifferen an der falscher Reiefolleg ginn, hei déi 'richteg' Koordinaten:

49/39/58,57N 5/54/30/23 E.

Hoffentlech klappt et elo, --Cayambe (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thillebierg 2014 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thillebierg 2014 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 19:34, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thillebierg 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --P e z i 19:34, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thillebierg 2014 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Possible stitching error noted. Otherwise excellent. Mattbuck 21:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC) No, this is a chimney. --VT98Fan 05:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC) I see. Mattbuck 12:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/VT98Fan⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourglinster 2 rue d Imbringen 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourglinster 2 rue de Gonderange 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear VT98Fan,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Vieux Port 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 14:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Vieux Port 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Corbiere Jersey 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Sicona-Gebai zu Ollem

Salut,

net all neit Gebai steet ënner Copyright, nëmmen déi mat engem manifeste Projet d'architecte, also enger artistescher Ambitioun. Dëst ass éischter e riicht ewecht Gebai mat enger reng funktioneller Architektur (energetesch passiv, pousséiert thermesch Isolatioun, asw). Wanns du awer mengs, kanns du jo e Copyvio-Request maachen. --Cayambe (talk) 07:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Corbiere Jersey 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:46, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Corbière Lighthouse, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe du Roc Granville 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Vieux Port 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you reduce the brightness of whites on the two boats ? --JLPC 16:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)  Done Thx. --VT98Fan 19:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)  Support : better now. --JLPC 08:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Dräi Eechelen Luxembourg 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 18:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016

Bonjour VT98Fan,

En 2014, vous avez participé au concours photo Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. Nous organisons aussi ce concours de photo en 2016.

• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments en Belgique & Luxembourg
• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments (international, autres pays)

Nous organisons aussi 4 balades photo à Gand, Malines, Anvers et Liège. Visite : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/fr&setlang=fr

Soyez les bienvenus ! Romaine 15:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)