User talk:Tournasol7/Archive7

Copyright status: File:Rue Saint-Cyr in Saint-Cere.jpg

Copyright status: File:Rue Saint-Cyr in Saint-Cere.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rue Saint-Cyr in Saint-Cere.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Valley Track in Westland Tai Poutini National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Cornelia' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the Saint Martin Church in Mayrinhac-Lentour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope and could be useful (and apparently already in use). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahitahi River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Montignac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 13:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Municipal library in Cahors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 13:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South facade of the Wurzburg Residence 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hmmm very good, I really like this one --Podzemnik 13:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChristChurch Cathedral 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Hawea 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:15, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Paul Gleyrose 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:15, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of the town hall of Belves 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Amber Flush'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egg cartons with chicken eggs 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Harsh light, in this image IMO still acceptable. --Basotxerri 16:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the Recollects Church of Saint-Céré.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains in Fiordland National Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TSB Bank ATM Auckland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dira0101 07:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Fort in Belves 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 Rue Paul Reclus in Domme 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Beynac 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the Saint Spérie Church of Saint-Céré.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Tasman River NZ 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 Place d'Armes in Belves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Car and shadow are a little bit disturbing. --XRay 10:07, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Valzergues 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Valentre 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Montignac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hollyford River NZ 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:38, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main River in Wurzburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Modern Art'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel du Ravieux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry in Peyrusse-le-Roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.Better if you add some more categories. --Ermell 05:36, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miramar Peninsula 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Pont de Tresque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sky Tower Auckland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Fox River Westland 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28 Worcester Street in Christchurch 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality. --Fischer.H 17:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient synagogue in Peyrusse-le-Roc 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel Bontemps in Belves 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Larnagol 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter Abbey of Marcilhac-sur-Cele 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Marienberg in Wurzburg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandy Bay NZ 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Side of Lewis Tops and Libretto Range 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cours de Cicee in Belves 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenhaus in Wurzburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern exposure of the Saint Albinus church in Faverolles-sur-Cher.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used beautiful image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road sign at Lewis Pass NZ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Berbiguieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 7 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Swiecie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 Rue Corneboriol in Marcillac-Vallon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: There are CAs at the top. Please remove them. --XRay 07:29, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delosperma sutherlandii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northern exposure of the Sulpitius the Pious church in Buxeuil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Sambin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Albinus church in Faverolles-sur-Cher 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulpitius the Pious church in Buxeuil 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pontlevoy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loire River in Blois at sunrise 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Sambin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 09:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church of Cormeray 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of the Maison de l'acrobate in Blois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 05:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Totaranui Inlet 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clock on belfry in Belves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of the Penitents of Marcillac-Vallon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Valzergues 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Rue du Puits Chatel in Blois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front facade of the Town hall of Blois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandy Bay NZ 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Present church in Peyrusse-le-Roc 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Tekapo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Rue in Domme 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dionysius Church of Berbiguieres 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front facade of the Louis XII wing of the castle of Blois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:30, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

VIC for File:Bark of Atlas Cedar.jpg

Hello! I believe if File:Bark of Atlas Cedar.jpg was added to Category:Cedrus libani subsp. atlantica It would pass it's VIC nomination. I would do it myself but since it directly relates to the VIC perhaps it would be better if the author made the edit themselves. I'm confident once that is done everything would be fine. All the best, -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Sambin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulpitius the Pious church in Buxeuil 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicasius church of Bracieux 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saturnin church of Poulaines 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Rue du Puits Chatel in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Albinus church in Faverolles-sur-Cher 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 21:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulpitius the Pious church in Buxeuil 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 15:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place du Marche in Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice scene all around --Daniel Case 05:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rue des Papegaults and Petit Degres Saint-Louis in Blois.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rue des Papegaults and Petit Degres Saint-Louis in Blois.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 10:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenhaus in Wurzburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bark of Atlas Cedar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Geotagged, Useful and Used. It would have been nice is the category didn't have 158 files in it-haha. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose * Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
• Wow I'm embarassed. I was just looking if anything was better for the scope in the category or sub cats. Archaeodontosaurus is right that needs to be fixed.
•  Comment Looks good now. I don't think we will need a separate VI based on cultivated/wild type. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
• I think so --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern exposure of the orangery of the Castle of Cheverny.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 Place de la Halle SGdO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient synagogue in Peyrusse-le-Roc 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support null --Ermell 12:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Hawea 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de la Combe in Domme 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Marqueyssac 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Pont de Tresque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley near Manganui Ski Area in Egmont National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire station in Belves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! State Highway 94 near Homer Tunnel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at Place de l'Eglise in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Rue in Domme 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but colours are quiet soft. It might need a larger or contrast ans/or stronger colours --Michielverbeek 07:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Sai Beach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fox River in West Coast Region 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Beynac 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covered market of Peyrusse-le-Roc 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChristChurch Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Albinus church in Faverolles-sur-Cher 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church of Cormeray 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Sambin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall clock in the Chambord Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:09, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Rue du Puits Chatel in Blois 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church of Blois 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It looks like a perspective issue at the top, but I think it is real. --XRay 18:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church of Chisseaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:07, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cher river in Montrichard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Early in the morning. --XRay 18:35, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Monthou-sur-Bièvre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The door could be in the middle, on the left is more space. --XRay 18:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dye church of Saint-Dye-sur-Loire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The lights (not highlights, see tone curve) could be a little bit darker. --XRay 18:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of the Penitents of Marcillac-Vallon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Supanut Arunoprayote 08:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Pierre Chalaud in Uzerche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church of Chisseaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambord Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 05:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Bretonneau in Chenonceaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 05:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Eligius church of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vezere River in Uzerche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Blois 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caryatides in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support That looks better to me --Poco a poco 09:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opera Range 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Pont Turgot in Uzerche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turret of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church of Chisseaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church of Chenonceaux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chenonceaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Eligius church of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Louis-XII in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outbildings of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chissay-en-Touraine 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 05:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of Madame Dupin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicasius church of Bracieux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South-western exposure of the Caryatids in the park of the Castle of Chenonceau.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Caryatides are not green. They are better seen here Château de Chenonceau - 079.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment No more objection to the color. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support best in scope imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - Edited out typo: In English, "caryatid" has no "e" on the end. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Blois 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A beautiful composition (a possible FP), but unfortunately not really sharp so a weak  Support --Michielverbeek 06:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 06:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of Louis XV of France 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dormer windows of the Chambord Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bark of Atlas Cedar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Lavalliere in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Blois 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 07:42, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moat of the Chambord Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Tayac in Uzerche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cheverny 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saturnin church of Poulaines 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Genille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicasius church of Bracieux 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 28 July 2018 (UTC) Yes, very good (I'm not sure whether FP is possible or not), but the subject of this pair of windows is the Annunciation, so that should be mentioned in the file description and if there is a category of depictions of the Annunciation, it should be included. -- Ikan Kekek 01:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church of Meusnes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison, 48, 50 rue Denis-Papin (Blois).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicasius church of Bracieux 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saturnin church of Poulaines 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 38 rue Saint-Lubin in Blois 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:28, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte Eulalia church of Genille 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church of Meusnes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North-west exposure of the Chambord Castle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church of Montrichard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Room of five Queens in the Castle of Chenonceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chissay-en-Touraine 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cheverny 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:11, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Room of Gabrielle d'Estrees in the Castle of Chenonceau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Uzerche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western exposure of the Maison de l'Ave Maria in Montrichard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern exposure of the Maison du Prèche in Montrichard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Saint Anthony in Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Nouans-les-Fontaines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of Saint Anthony in Loches 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus church of Cour-Cheverny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dye church of Saint-Dye-sur-Loire 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Nouans-les-Fontaines 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow on the photo is regrettable. But the picture is good enough for me .--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Republique in Valencay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church of Ouchamps 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Couffy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a strange stop on the top left --Poco a poco 07:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)  Done, better? Tournasol7 08:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Poco a poco, can you check it, please? Tournasol7 14:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Beaulieu-les-Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some cw tilt --Poco a poco 07:48, 27 July 2018 (UTC)  Done, better? Tournasol7 11:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Poco a poco, can you check it, please? Tournasol7 14:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shore of the Lake Wakatipu in Queenstown 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:44, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osteospermum ecklonis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of the former hospice in Saint-Geniez d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Supanut Arunoprayote 15:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a bit too blue IMO, could be a bit warmer --Llez 15:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte Eulalia church of Genille 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think that it needs some tilt/perspective correction --Poco a poco 07:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC) I don't think so, see the notes. Tournasol7 08:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Poco a poco, can you check it, please? Tournasol7 14:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality, all the windows appear to be vertical --Trougnouf 23:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western exposure of the Saints Simon and Jude church in Więcbork.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:19, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Te Anau 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 10:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Serendipity' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 09:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Liebig Range from Blue Lakes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:22, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Ricard 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:22, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Peyrusse-le-Roc 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the castle of Marqueyssac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Nouans-les-Fontaines 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anthony church of Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Blois in Valencay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chenonceau 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte Eulalia church of Genille 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:23, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Sefton 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Strong support Really unspeakably beautiful composition and high-quality. I love how the three mountains come together. Just needs a bit more post-processing IMO. Ever considered to nom this for FP? --GerifalteDelSabana 14:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)  Comment The cloud behind the top-right of the peak is such a wet-blanket! --GerifalteDelSabana 15:06, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church in L’Union 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Valzergues 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Belves 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:39, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:40, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Blois 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice picture and annotation --Trougnouf 23:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Chenonceau 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal appartments in Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture on the staircase in the Castle of Valencay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ben Ohau Range 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Tea Clipper' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Beynac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior gallery in the Castle of Chenonceau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French garden of the Chambord Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape of Blois 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)  Support I somewhat wish that the boat wouldn't be there in the centre of the image. But it's a nice shot anyway. GC. --Basotxerri 08:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Cheverny 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Art Gallery in Christchurch 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ben Ohau Range 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa 'Tea Clipper' in Dunedin Botanic Garden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Beynac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eastern exposure of the Porte des Cordeliers in Loches.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 67 rue nationale in Montrichard 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in the Gallery of prints of the Castle of Valencay 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Quintefol in Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Castle of Montrésor 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Montpoupon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GrandCelinien 22:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Nouans-les-Fontaines 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The steps and the threshold should be horizontal --Ermell 07:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC) Hmm... but I think that it's horizontal here, Tournasol7 16:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)  Support The stairs are too uneven to judge. I think it´s o.k. --Ermell 19:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Church of Saint-Mayme 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of Saint-Mayme 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church of Villeloin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Nouans-les-Fontaines 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern facade of the Castle of Valencay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegiate Saint Ours of Loches 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Fallen Angel in the park of the Castle of Montresor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus church of Cour-Cheverny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicasius church of Bracieux 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of the duke of Berry at the Chambord Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church of Ouchamps 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northern facade of the town hall of Autoire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus church of Cour-Cheverny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicasius church of Bracieux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church of Ouchamps 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:11, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cosson River in Chambord 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone ball in the Museum of Montrichard Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of the Circles at the Castle of Valencay 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:37, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 22 Rue nationale in Montrichard 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church of Nouans-les-Fontaines 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunate cables, but good quality. --Uoaei1 07:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern facade of the Castle of Valencay 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tympanum in the collegiate Saint Ours of Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Two misidentified flower images

• 
  your image #1
• 
  your image #2
• 
  Veronica persica
• 
  Veronica chamaedrys

Hi Tournasol7/Archive7, The leftmost two images above (your images #1 and #2) show Veronica chamaedrys, not Veronica persica. The most important difference between these species is that Veronica persica has got single flowers on long stalks arising from the axils of large, leaf-like bracts, whereas Veronica chamaedrys has got long racemes of flowers arising from the leaf axils. Each of the individual flowers has also got a bract, but this is very small and does not look like an ordinary leaf. I corrected the IDs of the two photographs, but they must be also renamed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amphora in the Museum of Montrichard Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French garden at the Castle of Valencay 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal of the collegiate Saint Ours of Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist of Montresor 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Tayac in Uzerche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a spot you should clone out and I believe that the sharpening is too high (or at least to visible) --Poco a poco 08:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC) I will correct it tommorow, Tournasol7 23:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 13:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church of Montrichard 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! French garden at the Castle of Valencay 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 06:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue in the collegiate Saint Ours of Loches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist of Montresor 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Saint-Aignan 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Saint Louis Cathedral of Blois 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really fine work, potential FPC nominee. -- Ikan Kekek 07:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North-west exposure of the Chambord Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue Guigne in Beaulieu-les-Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus collegiate church of Saint-Aignan 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist church of Chenonceaux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church of Cheverny 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Papegaults and Petit Degres Saint-Louis in Blois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of the Castle of Fougeres-sur-Bievre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:55, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue Bourgeoise in Beaulieu-les-Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 09:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Porte Grosset in Selles-sur-Cher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anianus collegiate church of Saint-Aignan 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC) Close to FP quality; might be worth a nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 23:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs some perspective correction, see right side --Poco a poco 07:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 12:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbey Church Saint Pierre and Saint Paul of Beaulieu-les-Loches 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some dust spots need removing. --Ermell 07:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 10:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remains of the Porte Poitevine in Loches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The persons should be cropped out and the fringes at the chimney eleminated. --Ermell 07:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 12:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wounded soldier in the park of the Castle of Montresor 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:09, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North-west exposure of the Chambord Castle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC) FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust of Louis Grand Dauphin at the Chambord Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Marques Castle of Chenonceau 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison des Templiers in Beaulieu-les-Loches 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal of the Hotel de la Prevote in Saint-Aignan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla in the park of the Castle of Selles-sur-Cher 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 August 2018 (UTC)