User talk:Tournasol7/Archive27

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Hilary church in Frejeville (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cuq Tarn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mazieres (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a little dust spot on the middle-left, but all in all good quality :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of St-Chely-d'Aubrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road D987 near Salgues 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vestiges of the castle in Muret-le-Chateau 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Senergues (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church in Quins (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Jonquieres Tarn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Cambounet (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Puylaurens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 11:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Montgey (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 18:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Magrin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 21:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Solsac (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water well and pump in Ferrieres-Bas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pechaudier (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Veilhes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 15:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Viviers-les-Lavaur (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvator church in Marzens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Bertre (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 15:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Senergues (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Espeyrac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footpath fingerpost in Limogne-en-Quercy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Garrigues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Lacroisille (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of the Nativity church in Cadix (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Aguts (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Montgey (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moulin de la Salette in Lautrec (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Templiers in Martiel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castle of Annecy 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Annecy 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflowers cultivated in Southern France 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 12:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Puylagarde 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments God quality --Llez 08:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Puylagarde (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Puylagarde (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment In the bottom left corner, there is an artist's signature. To whom does this refer? (Maybe Laurent Théotine Lachaize?) Accordingly, could you add artist information (and category) to your image maybe? --Martinus KE 08:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Garrevaques (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Palleville (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de l'Eglise in Puylaurens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 23:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Marroule 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Espeyrac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-des-Hauteurs chapel in Golinhac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Cuq (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Avits (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lescout (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Lempaut (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Lagardiolle (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Cambounet (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuw Leven in Oss (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuw Leven in Oss (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuw Leven in Oss (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuw Leven in Oss (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuw Leven in Oss (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Palleville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lautrec (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mazieres (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Jonquieres Tarn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Kozlov Rob castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign in Tolmin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Kamno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuw Leven in Oss (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lallint 01:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Oss (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking path in Tolmin (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Vodel from Kozlov Rob castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gregorciceva 8 in Kobarid (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gregorciceva ulica in Kobarid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Kobarid 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bertre (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Algans (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking path in Tolmin (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Kamno (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gregorciceva 20 in Kobarid (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Vodel from Kozlov Rob castle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca Valley in the fog and Mount Vodel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Kamno (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gregorciceva 20 in Kobarid (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the town hall of Kobarid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gregorciceva 8 in Kobarid (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Kobarid 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac d'Aurie (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Island 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Salvator church in Nova Gorica 03.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvator church in Nova Gorica 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Tuxyso 11:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Salvator church in Nova Gorica 04.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvator church in Nova Gorica 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church Tolmin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Agnan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvator church in Marzens (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Hilarius church in Pratviel (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Blan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Segolene church in Soual (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflowers cultivated in Southern France 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Cambounet (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cuq Tarn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Kamno (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of the Assumption church in Auvezines (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Blan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mazieres (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Remigius church in Lautrec (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Lagardiolle (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 place Pierre Bayle in Puylaurens (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road in Kobarid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boka river in Zaga (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains of the Julian Alps seen from Zaga 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Cezsoca (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Na Vrhu, Starijski Vrh & Baba (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign in Kobarid (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road D203 near Kobarid Slovenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church Tolmin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Too dark for me. Could you increase brightness? --Tuxyso 11:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)  Done. --Tournasol7 14:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC) Much better. Now there is some very fine noise, but on an acceptable level--Tuxyso 22:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Quentin church in Appelle (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Belcastel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Anianus church in St-Agnan 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Famberhorst 05:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mountains of the Julian Alps seen from Zaga 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca near Zaga 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boka river in Zaga (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Cezsoca (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Famberhorst 05:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9 rue Foulimou in Puylaurens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 12:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pratviel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Roquevidal (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Algans (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Lacroisille (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca Valley from Tonovcov Grad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velika korita Soce (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Soca (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirhovec & Veliki Vrh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Krn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Palleville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Kranj 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velika korita Soce (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Trenta (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirhovec, Veliki Vrh & Krasji Vrh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 18:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Jonquieres (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on!

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Trenta (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prisojnik from Vrsic Pass (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prednje Robicje & Zadnje Robicje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mala Mojstrovka & Nad Sitam Glava (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Island 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Trenta (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Steindy 13:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mala Mojstrovka & Nad Sitam Glava (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prisojnik from Vrsic Pass (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter house in Celje (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gosposka 19 in Celje (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Billet house in Celje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muzejski trg 4 in Celje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josip Vosnjak Library in Slovenska Bistrica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murkova 2 & Town Tower in Ptuj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Ptuj (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krempljeva 2 in Ptuj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Kamno (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's blue CA at the top and at the right --Basile Morin 06:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)  Done. --Tournasol7 17:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Basile Morin 00:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former presbytery in Zalec (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenwarter house in Celje (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presernova 30 in Ptuj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Garrigues 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pechaudier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Salvator church in Nova Gorica 01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvator church in Nova Gorica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karawanks from Lake Bled (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Lower left edge is a little bit disturbing.) --XRay 05:29, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nad Sitam Glava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 13:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glavni trg 1 in Celje (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glavni trg 2 in Celje (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutna in Kamnik (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Kozlov Rob castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hulged 04:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river near Kamno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hulged 04:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prisojnik from Vrsic Pass (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Kranj 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Island 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Kamnik–Savinja Alps (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velika korita Soce (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Trenta (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca Valley in the fog 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutna in Kamnik (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Kranj 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bled Island 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glavni trg 9 in Celje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glavni trg in Celje (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Krn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps in the Municipality of Kobarid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karawanks from Lake Bled (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glavni trg 1 in Celje (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Salvator church in Nova Gorica 02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvator church in Nova Gorica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karawanks from Lake Bled (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutna in Kamnik (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca Valley in the fog 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Kamnik (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutna 17 in Kamnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former presbytery in Zalec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church Tolmin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Alps from Vrsic Pass (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutna in Kamnik (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikl house in Zalec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducal Court in Celje (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Our Lady of the Assumption church in Caminha 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Our Lady of the Assumption church in Caminha 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra Preradovica 14 in Varazdin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merchant Casino in Cakovec (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soca river in Kobarid (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presernova 10 in Celje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Celje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Draskovica 3 in Varazdin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trg slobode 12 in Varazdin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bakaceva in Varazdin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prassinsky-Sermage palace in Varazdin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augusta Senoe 2 in Varazdin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra Preradovica 14 in Varazdin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merchant Casino in Cakovec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trg Republike in Cakovec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulica kralja Tomislava in Cakovec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Josipa Jurja Strossmayera 1 in Cakovec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rakoczi utca 3 in Kormend (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szabadsag ter 3 in Kormend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Varaire 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of the Virgin Mary church in Bach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merchant Casino in Cakovec (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)  Support good quality --Matutinho 12:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reformed church in Kormend (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)  Support good quality -- Matutinho 12:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dienes Lajos utca in Kormend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)  Support good quality -- Matutinho 12:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Nissan-lez-Enserune (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Puimisson (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Roujan (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Fabian & Sabastian church in Fijaguet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rakoczi utca 3 in Kormend (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenkei utca 13 in Kormend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fo ter 16 in Szombathely.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fo ter 9 in Szombathely.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fo ter 12 in Szombathely (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fo ter 29 in Szombathely (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szechenyi 2 in Szombathely.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szechenyi 10 in Szombathely.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajnis utca in Koszeg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City well in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town Hall of Koszeg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurisics ter 1 in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurisics ter 3 in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sgraffito house in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurisics ter in Koszeg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity column in Koszeg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fo ter in Koszeg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fo ter 13-15 in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Margaret school in Koszeg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tablahaz utca 1 in Koszeg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your fotos

hello,

i used one of your fotos in one of my art-projects. you find it here:

deadline bis übermorgen - LmaA

Feel free to listen to my playlist. :)

Thank you for your very good foto.

Best regards Hilmar — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:8108:9640:1ED4:C9DD:3FC2:44A1:8DF3 (talk) 15:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faunok fountain in Szombathely.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurisics ter in Koszeg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurisics ter 11 in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Margaret school in Koszeg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goos quality --Llez 06:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tablahaz utca 1 in Koszeg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajnis utca 12 in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajnis utca 10 in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajnis utca 6 in Koszeg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halloween 2021 in Leuven 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halloween 2021 in Leuven 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bled Island 05.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bled Island 05.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Rasbora kalochroma stamp.JPG

File:Rasbora kalochroma stamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 03:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith abbey church in Conques (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old houses by the Agout river in Castres (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellis perennis in Aveyron (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Solsac (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Adrian church in Livinhac-le-Haut 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Varaire 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Nissan-lez-Enserune (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Entraygues (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julian church in Roussy (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leontius church in Corneilhan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Solsac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-Mirabel 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julian church in Roussy (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vincent church in Cassagnes-Comtaux (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juniperus communis in Causse Comtal (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 12:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Gratus church in Memer (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Golinhac 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)  Support good quality --Matutinho 08:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church in Quins (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Salan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du 11 Mai 1944 in Cardaillac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lissac-et-Mouret (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter & Michael church in St-Urcize (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agout river in Castres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Camburat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Jamblusse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Solsac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Nissan-lez-Enserune (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saillac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thymus serpyllum in Cardaillac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. ---Imehling 17:18, 14 March 2022 (UTC)-

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis purpurea in Aveyron (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul church in Promilhanes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Panat (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Matutinho 19:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Puylagarde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Salan 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady basilica in Ceignac (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Cardaillac (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Amans church in Camboulazet (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Jamblusse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Matutinho 19:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC) code error repaired --Matutinho 19:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Rignac (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Amans church in Camboulazet (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Antoninus church in Combret 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria of Loreto church and Holy Name of Mary church in Rome.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria of Loreto church and Holy Name of Mary church in Rome (a).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferme de la Goudalie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church of Montredon 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leonard church in Escamps 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Ronde in Cardaillac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Manhac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-Mirabel 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 08:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 08:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Julian church in Roussy (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Matutinho 08:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau de Malrieu (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 13:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Information board about Boka Falls.jpg

And also:

• File:Information board at Tonovcov Gr.jpg
• File:Velika korita Soce (9).jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 00:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Conques (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary chapel in Corneilhan (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Entraygues (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman tower in Puissalicon (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Coursan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Camburat (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Genevieve church in Lissac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Camboulas (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viaur river in Camboulas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agout river in Castres (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du 11 Mai 1944 in Cardaillac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Nayrac in Castres 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leontius church in Corneilhan (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman tower in Puissalicon (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Camburat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferme de la Goudalie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 17:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-Mirabel 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Adrian church in Livinhac-le-Haut 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Ronde in Cardaillac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Alquier Bouffard in Castres 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Coursan (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Roujan (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Tour de ville in Entraygues 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman tower in Puissalicon (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)  Question Wouldn't that be a Romanesque tower, not an ancient Roman one? -- Ikan Kekek 01:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Marroule 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Varaire 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bach Lot (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Golinhac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bach Lot (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leonard church in Escamps 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Lunel (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter in chains church in Quins (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Solsac (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Jamblusse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Combret Nauviale 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Jean-le-Froid chapel 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Adrian church in Livinhac-le-Haut 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presbytery in Ceignac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Dionysius church in Cougousse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jean Jaures Museum in Castres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Camboulas (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Pity chapel in Montredon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-Mirabel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith abbey church in Conques (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Jamblusse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Saillac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Puylagarde 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Martiel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Senergues (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-des-Hauteurs chapel in Golinhac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Vaylats 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Camboulazet (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Entraygues (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Entraygues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agout river in Castres (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Golinhac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)